Engines and Templates:
Correcting Effects Confused as Causes
from personal correspondence
Though deliberately informal, this is a
very difficult paper, both to write and to read.
We are struggling to explain and correct one of the great,
pervasive flaws in physics foundations, which is the confusion
of cause and effect, both in mechanics and particularly in
reader is likely to find the going very rough; indeed, one will need
to continually reflect very deeply on the "operational
observation situation applying or not applying to what is being
discussed at this moment".
I apologize for the density of the
subject matter and that in a single sentence it is necessary to switch
between two opposite operational situations.
The "implicitly assumed" operational situation has
been largely hidden and misunderstood for more than a century, and is
still vastly confused in the extant physics literature.
We attempt to point out how these assumptions (often quite
unconsciously) were included by the older pioneering physicists.
Some foundations quotations are added to show the problem and
that it has not been solved.
So we advise
patience if the reader is truly interested in this important
foundations issue and a possible resolution.
We urge the reader to heed Einstein's excellent advice, which
he stated so beautifully as:
scientist makes use of a whole arsenal of concepts which he imbibed
practically with his mother's milk; and seldom if ever is he aware of
the eternally problematic character of his concepts.
He uses this conceptual material, or, speaking more exactly,
these conceptual tools of thought, as something obviously, immutably
given; something having an objective value of truth which is hardly
even, and in any case not seriously, to be doubted.
...in the interests of science it is necessary over and over
again to engage in the critique of these fundamental concepts, in
order that we may not unconsciously be ruled by them." [Albert Einstein,
"Foreword," in Max Jammer, Concepts of Space: The History
of Theories of Space in Physics, Harvard University Press,
Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1969, p. viii.]
Margenau, in their noted Foundations of Physics, make the same
made without realizing that they are being made] …are what Poincaré
has called "unconscious" or "natural" hypotheses—a
type which one hardly ever challenges, for it seems too unlikely that
we could make progress without them.
Nevertheless it should be the endeavor of the physicist always
to drag them out into the light of day, so that it may be perfectly
clear what we are actually doing."
have indeed struggled with the "confusion of cause and
effect" but usually under different terminology—often speaking
of "dual" use or of a "duality" theory.
E.g., Sen states it as particle and field (but note that field
is usually intended to imply cause,
and particle is usually intended to imply effect).
seems to be a strange characteristic of the human mind that it is
forced to describe the physical properties of matter either as fields
or particles. The whole
history of physics appears as a struggle to either clarify or escape
from this either or dichotomy."
theory [is] dualistic if it supposes that the source of the field,
i.e., the particles with their characteristic masses and charge, etc.,
form a separate entity apart from the field which they generate."
[D. K. Sen, Fields and/or Particles, Academic Press, London and
New York, 1968, p. viii.].
recognizing the duality of a theory, however, physicists often have
not clearly recognized that they confuse effect as cause in their use
of the field concept itself.
So they have not resolved the issue, even with the
"duality" principle which was just an agreement to quit
fighting and use either the particle view or the wave view, as one
wished, if it worked. It
did not address or solve the confusion of wave and particle, and of
cause and effect.
concept itself is perhaps the most primary example of dual use of
a concept for two precisely contradictory things.
The concept of a force—which
is an effect and never a cause, but is used nearly universally as a
cause—is also a fundamental part of the confusion.
Force is an observable, and all observables are effects of the
observation process a priori. The d/dt
operation of the observation process was also not properly taken into
Insofar as questioning the "dual
field concept" is concerned, the problem certainly has been long
debated, but not resolved. As
we mentioned, there is fundamental duality involved even in the notion
of force itself. E.g.,
dealing with force the tacit assumption is always made that the force
is equal to zero unless some physical body is present… One of the
most important characteristics of force is that it has a material
origin, and this is not just a definition. …
If you insist upon a precise definition of force, you will never get
it!" [Richard P.
Feynman, Robert B. Leighton, and Matthew Sands, Lectures on Physics,
Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, Vol. 1, 1964, p. 12-2.]
Wheeler also pointed out that the force field assumed in classical EM
theory only existed where charged mass was interacting.
Hence it could not exist in empty space where no observable
charged mass exists. They
did not include mass as a component of force, but stopped short of it.
They attempted to correct electrodynamics by advancing an EM
model based on absorber theory. However,
the fields used in their theory still maintained their unacceptable
dichotomy, so the theory—though quite valiant—did not succeed.
places Feynman specifically pointed out that the field as conceived
could not and did not exist in mass-free space, but only the potential
for the field existed there, should there be some charged mass there
to interact with. E.g.,
in Feynman, Leighton, and Sands, ibid.,
p. 1-3, Feynman states:
may think of E(x, y, z, t)
and B(x, y, z, t) as giving
the forces that would be experienced at the time t by a charge
located at (x, y, z), with the condition that placing the
charge there did not disturb the positions or motion of all the
other charges responsible for the fields."
This is actually
a realization that the field is an effect (after interaction) rather
than the cause (what exists before the interaction occurs). It clearly reveals the dichotomy of using the word
"field" as both the entity existing in spacetime before the
interaction and thus the cause, and as the entity (the "effect
field" existing after the interaction of that "causal
field" with charged mass. That
is very much like saying the field—an effect—is also its
own cause. Also
note that Feynman still uses the charges as the "cause" of
the fields. Yet since charged mass is an observable, it is an effect.
Here again we meet the fact that an "effect" is
considered to be a cause. This
problem of the "association of the field with its source"
has long been recognized as a formidable problem.
Again quoting Sen ibid.,
connection between the field and its source has always been and still
is the most difficult problem in classical and quantum
this long-vexing problem in our "Giant
Negentropy of the Common Dipole" paper, which is carried on
this website. It is
solved by reinterpreting and extending Whittaker's
1903 decomposition of the scalar potential (as between the ends of
a dipole) and by treating the charge with its clustered virtual
charges of opposite sign as a set of composite dipoles.
electrodynamicists have taken a pragmatic approach to the
"duality of the field concept" and simply
"bypassed" that tough problem.
One can be very sympathetic to this view!
After all, eventually one must use the electrodynamics model to
do practical things and get practical results, i.e., effects.
As an example, one of the finest electrodynamics books for two
decades is J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 2nd
edition, Wiley, New York, 1975. Jackson
avoids confronting the field dichotomy in this fashion:
thing that eventually gets measured is a force..."
"At the moment, the electric field can be defined as the
force per unit charge acting at a given point. [p.
classical electrodynamicists continue to adhere to the notion that the
EM force field exists as such in the vacuum, but do admit that
physically measurable quantities such as force somehow involve the
product of charge and field."
statements recognize that the "field as it exists in charge-free
spacetime" is not a force field, but does not reconcile that
position with the definition of the (e.g., electric) field itself as
reader to begin, an excellent treatise on physics foundations is
Robert Bruce Lindsay and Henry Margenau, Foundations of Physics,
Dover, New York, 1963, previously quoted.
Lindsay and Margenau point out the difficulties in the
causality concept itself, and on p. 18-19 they state:
proper definition of the term cause has been a controversial
subject among philosophers for a long time…" …All that the
laws state is a relation among symbols which represent well-defined
operations in the laboratory, and no notion of precedence or
antecedence, or dynamic enforcement, is involved in them.
… [Difficulties with assumed certainty] …should by no means
be interpreted as denying the importance of a principle of
causality in physics. …It
is in itself a hypothesis concerning the behavior of physical
As this small
cross-section of the foundations literature shows, the best physicists
themselves have great difficulty in clearly separating cause and
effect, specifically as they involve more terms. In the same sentence,
one often finds the same entity stated in the front as a cause, yet in
the back as an effect! We
merely have wished to show the extreme difficulty of properly sorting
out and clarifying one's own use of the terms "cause" and
"effect", as well as one's unconscious use of cause and
effect richly intermingled and erroneously exchanged in one's own
daily conversation and writing. In
Einstein's words, we imbibed
this confusion with our mother's milk!
paper is certainly not intended to be the "definitive
statement" on the matter! Instead,
it is intended to merely point the way to a deeper consideration of
the field, and to its present erratic and erroneous usage in a
dualistic manner, and to how to solve the problem.
We use a
simple "discriminating" notion:
We use "observation" as a process occurring in
ongoing spacetime, involving a cause acting on (interacting with) a
previously observed effect, generating a change (effect) in that
previously observed effect. Whenever
one says the word "effect," one assumes (usually
unconsciously) a continual iteration of observation.
In short, we assume the continual iterative production of
effects, each rigorously static and frozen, much like the frames of a
movie film. The
"progress of change" is added by perception, by our mind's
normal operation which is innate.
On the other hand, we point out the assumption,
in that notion of continual iterative observations, of
"time-forward" motion through time.
In a time-reversed situation, the exact opposite happens, and
we may think of the observation interaction as reversed in direction
in the iteration of the d/dt operator.
In short, we go back along the movie film, so to speak, rather
than forward. Thus perceptually we would "see" (not observe!) the
steady production of what had previously been the causal set, but
backwards, from what had previously been the effects set (but
backwards). We may regard
this as the production of reversed time-forward "causes"
from reversed time-forward "effects".
Only the reversed time-forward "effects" constitute
observables; the stream of "produced causes" is not
that stream can be calculated, and in fact does appear in that manner
in general relativity.
One must be
very careful when thinking "cause and effect" in reversed
time. It is not that the
"cause becomes the effect and the effect becomes the cause,"
because cause and effect have been named (standardized) in forward
time. So what we actually
perceive but cannot observe is the causal interaction running
backwards. So we perceive
the usual ordering of effect and cause reversed—but observation only
sees that reversed ordering of effects. Since the symmetry inherent in
Newton's third law implies both time
forward to produce the action observed,
and time-reversed to produce
the equal reaction observed,
it would seem that at the most fundamental level there always exists a
two-way symmetry between the ordering of effects, and thus the
so-called independence of physics to the direction of time (i.e., the
principal equations operate "backwards" as well as
general relativity does capture this very kind of symmetry between the
ordering of the continually observed effects, since a change in the
curvature of spacetime in turn produces a change in the mass-energy
with which it interacts, and the change in the mass-energy
correspondingly produces a change in the curvature of spacetime.
We have also constructed our approach largely consistent with
O(3) electrodynamics, which is an important subset of Sachs' unified
field theory. Hence time
(and spacetime) do play primary roles in the approach.
encourage bright young doctoral candidates and post-docs to consider
giving the entire "duality of fundamental concepts which use
effect as cause" problem a very rigorous and extended treatment.
Such is sorely needed in physics, because frankly the confusion
of cause and effect has been a wholesale epidemic for nearly four
centuries. But sadly it
is still little noticed or emphasized, even today.
attempting in this informal paper to "point the way" to
possibly how this long-vexing confusion can be resolved.
As the reader will appreciate as he or she goes through this
paper, the problem is complex. It
will require enormous effort and time to ever get physics (and
scientists in general) scrubbed of this ubiquitous problem we have all
inherited since our birth.
reflection is related to the template
and engine concepts, and it
is related to other years of reflection.
The present stream of thoughts was stimulated by
nanotechnology's more mechanical use of the concept of template.
and extended from a response to a scientist working in nanotechnology,
we discuss the concepts of template
(ordered form of multiple deterministic spacetime curvatures and their
impressed dynamics) and engine
(the actual curvature set itself and its ongoing dynamics). This is an extension to the more mechanical template concept
presently applied in nanotechnology and in forthcoming nanobots.
In the discussion we explain how longitudinal EM wave
technology is at the very heart of the new template and engine
concepts, in unified field theory in general and in the O(3)
electrodynamics approach in particular.
We discuss Becker's work and Prioré's work as having
unwittingly applied early engine technology and demonstrated its
effectiveness. We explain
how the template of a cellular disease or disorder can be utilized to
generate a specific anti-engine to reverse the condition and move the
cell back to a previous healthy condition.
In short, we advance a universal cure mechanism for all
cellular diseases and disorders, at least in theory, once the
technology sufficiently develops.
We also point
out the urgent need to develop engine technology to treat and cure
mass casualties from the coming terrorist attacks on our population
centers. Without such
treatment at all for most of the casualties—will of necessity be
used and millions of Americans will be deliberately left to die
without any real treatment given or even attempted.
The flavor of the original
communication to a nanotechnology specialist is maintained, but
changes have been made to add headings for clarity, further explain
the major points, correct some typographical errors, etc.
Selected pertinent references have also been added at the end. As time permits, we will furnish color illustrations for some
of the main points, and these will be added to this article.
found your nice work on nanotechnology, and I want to express my
appreciation for your efforts on this important subject, making the
information widely available. I
was also struck by your insight and use of the template
concept, and wish to comment on where the "templating"
concept and the associated "engine" concept lead.
First, if we
can control the electrodynamics at very tiny positions, we obviously
can control the mechanical forces (or most of them), much of the
chemistry, etc. But we
also can control much more than that, if we examine higher symmetry
electrodynamics rather than the standard U(1) model.
The U(1) EM model is seriously limited, even flawed in many
Our work with
the Alpha Foundation's Institute for Advanced Study (AIAS) has for
some time been laboring on a more effective, dramatically extended
electrodynamics known as O(3) gauge symmetry electrodynamics, or just
O(3) for short. This
electrodynamics has been spearheaded by Dr. Myron Evans, who has over
600 papers in the refereed literature, and is the editor of several
prestigious scientific volume series.
Electrodynamics Engineers General Relativity
remarkable thing has happened to O(3) electrodynamics, and it bears
directly upon the notion of templating
that is being used for molecular templating in nanotechnology, but is
just more advanced. O(3)
has been shown by Dr. Evans et
al. to be an important subset of Dr. Mendel Sachs' unified field
theory, which covers everything from the smallest state (e.g., gluons)
to the entire universe in a comprehensive and unitary manner.
The union of Evans' O(3) electrodynamics and Sach's extended
general relativity unified field theory offers for the first time a
breathtaking vision of being able to directly engineer
spacetime curvatures in exact patterns and sets—the ultimate
templating—by novel electrodynamic means.
relativity there is a two-way interaction between spacetime curvature
and mass energy, including the dynamics.
As Wheeler states it, mass-energy
works on spacetime to curve it, and curvature of spacetime works on
mass-energy to change it. This
is true at any level, including in the interior of the nucleons of the
similar vision in more primitive form was the early inspiration for
modern science. E.g.,
Francis Bacon stated it this way:
end of our foundation is the knowledge of causes, and the secret
motion of things, and the enlarging of the bounds of the Human Empire,
to the effecting of all things possible."
[Francis Bacon, 1561-1626.]
commented about unified field theory as follows:
would of course be a great step forward if we succeeded in combining
the gravitational field and the electromagnetic field into a single
structure. Only so could
the era in theoretical physics inaugurated by Faraday and Clerk
Maxwell be brought to a satisfactory close."
appears to now be in our grasp, using the Sachs' unified field theory
and the O(3) electrodynamics as a special subset of Sachs' theory
which makes it engineerable by electromagnetic means.
is testable—more on that later, in discussing Becker's work and the
Prioré work. It appears
that one can directly produce exact templates of spacetime curvatures
and their dynamics. Once
the technology develops, these spacetime curvatures can be produced to
act in ensemble on mass and its dynamics in any fashion—at any
level, rising from local spacetime within the mass itself.
I have previously been referring to a specific set of spacetime
curvatures and their dynamics as an engine. I refer to the precise dynamic form for the engine as a template.
The simplest engine is the spacetime curvature causing a single
force, and its simple form is the simplest template.
as you have foreseen at a mechanical level in nanotechnology, for
every cellular condition there is a template (exact form, to include
the dynamics). There is
not only a template of the "effects" (conditions of the
cell, continuous observation assumed), but there is also an ongoing
specific resident engine
involved in dynamic interaction with each cell and every tiniest part
of it, right down to the nucleons inside the atomic nuclei.
What Western science has missed is that not only is there a
mechanical template and dynamics for the functioning mass system itself as
continually observed at all levels, but there is also a precisely
correlated engine and template of dynamic
spacetime curvatures that are the unobserved causes in
the local spacetime in which the mass system (continual observation
assumed!) is embedded. This spacetime energy and the 3-spatial mass-energy are in
constant interaction with each other.
Notion of Space
Space in its most general sense
refers to our characteristic of perceiving things apart.
What we call "geometry" is very useful in physics for
the study of space and apartness.
Geometry is primarily the mathematical set of constructs
(axioms, theorems, mathematical functions, etc.) we use to arrange the
relationships (characterize the "apartness") of our
perceived separated things. As
Lindsay and Margenau point out in their Foundations of Physics,,
p. 71, there are in fact an infinite number of geometries!
There is even a valid geometry in which a straight line may be
perpendicular to itself, as shown by Poincaré in his Foundations
of Science, Science Press, New York, 1913, p. 63.
We point out
that when observation has occurred, the observed entity is already in
the "separation" or "separated" state.
It is therefore 3-spatial by the very definition of space.
But that single observation is a frozen 3-space snapshot.
It itself does not change, and never happens again; it is
already in the past when it has occurred.
This casts strong question upon the notion of an observable
(such as a mass) propagating through space, and changing its position
in apartness (in space). When
it was observed, it has an absolutely fixed position in space.
Hence to observe it in a different position is a different
observation. That is the
importance of realizing that an observable does not persist a priori,
physically, but that an iterative series of observations of the causal
interactions continuing to occurring with that single thing in that
single observation, gives a series of observations which has four
cases: (1) there is no distinguishable "change"
between one observation and another or in any separate observation of
the various features (parts) of the greater observable.
Hence that observable is "perceived to persist in the same
form" in the mind's perceptual iterative recall from memory.
(2) there is a distinguishable change in the object's features,
but not in its spatial position.
Hence, e.g., we might see a flower withering in its vase, in
the same position, but "aging".
We perceive in our recall comparisons that it changes in place.
(3) We distinguish in our iterative recall no change in the
internal features of the object, but we see its spatial position
changing in the iterative stream of perceptual recall comparisons.
So we perceive motion; e.g., a pitched ball moving through the
air. (4) In our perceptual recall and comparison stream, we see
its spatial position changing and also its internal features changing.
Therefore we see, e.g., an aircraft struck by a missile lose
its wind, falter, start to fall, catch fire and flame up, then
"file" in our experiential memories a huge catalog of such
observations and perceptual recall and comparison chains.
Hence we are able to "anticipate" a crouching tiger's
leap, by recall from our catalog.
On the other
hand, we also find a need for using our geometries to model changes
detected in iterative observations.
Hence we must introduce another mode of abstract thinking of
our sensory impressions: we must have a way of ordering
our observations. Actually
the conscious mind is a serial process but very rapid.
So we have temporary registers (short term memory) and
intermediate registers (medium term memory) and also very long or
permanent registers (long term memory).
Just as any modern computer, the conscious mind is adept at
recalling and comparing the contents of these registers.
This ability and functioning is unconscious, inborn, and
innate. It is totally automatic and usually we do not even have to be
aware of doing such rapid processes.
When we take
into account these iterative
processing functions of the conscious mind, the ordering becomes
an extraordinary capability of the human mind and perception.
Notion of Time in Physics
Time is a term we use in physics to
express the results and operations of a characteristic mode of
abstract thinking which orders the results of our sensory impressions.
It utilizes the memory, recall, and comparison functions we
mentioned. Because of the
ubiquitous photon interaction with each and every part of the
universe, all parts of it are continually interacted "as if
observed" and then again and again causally.
So "change" is the incessant characteristic of the
universe and all parts of it.
time is the consideration of "everything at once"—all
sensory processes and all the "apartness" spatial orderings—at
any "moment" (that all-at-onceness).
But because of the physical changes in all these
photon-interacted "things apart", then "everything at
once" is seen to change because the various parts are changing
(remember, we are in extraordinary rapid recall and comparison
operations mentally, and can "switch" from all to one to any
group of compared perceptions instantly.
So we can think of the universe as totally separate things, as
totally separate changing things, as an instantly "entire
one-thing", as a totally changing instant "one-thing",
etc. without effort. The
sense of "all things as one-thing changing" gives us the
sense of physical time passing at a rate, for everything.
The sense of "a single thing changing" because of the
iterative comparisons of its previous observations, gives us the sense
of "that thing changing in time".
This is how we see "an observed thing persisting",
even though no observation persists.
We are integrating the continual iterative observations by
recall and comparison from memory.
changes (such as the earth orbiting the sun, in a "year"),
in the ensemble of total changes, give us the sense of "the
regular flow of time", time intervals such as a year, etc.
In short, it enables clocks and the "measurement" of
time by comparison with some "standard time interval" (time
required for some standard process to make one or a certain number of
Time is not
"observable", even in principle, because it is a sense of
ordering achieved by the human mind, as a synthesis of description of
two very important characteristics of our sensory impressions: (1) the
sense of "integrating everything into a one-thing", and (2)
observing the differences in the recall comparisons of previous
observations with the present observation.
There is also
the question of whether the "flow of time" is continuous or
discrete. Here we point
out that it is both (we violate Aristotelian logic, but that is okay;
Aristotelian logic is incomplete.
See my extension and completion of it elsewhere
on this website). The
model we advance is a model containing a host of "discrete"
changes along a time line, but with all sorts of other "discrete
changes" simultaneously bridging the "gap" across any
two discrete changes in a single line.
Even so, we
have not really defined
time, and neither has anyone else.
It may be that we have to remain satisfied with the fact that
the concept of time rises from our attempts to understand processes
which our own mind does innately, automatically, and unconsciously.
We are born to do it
that way! To deal with
the time concept, we have had to use the process itself, whatever it
may really be. After all, all our words are ultimately drawn from primitive
observation, and with the "time" concept we are attempting
to define the unobservable as if observed.
That cannot be done in Aristotelian logic, but can be done in
5-law logic where opposites can be identical (as perceived, because of
the extra mental recall and comparison functions and the mind's
ability to change these functions instantly and "during the
process" of comparison. So
we have had to define the thing in terms of itself.
This difficulty with time is the essence of the philosophers'
great frustration, when they were unable to resolve their fundamental
problems (nature of time, nature of being, nature of change, nature of
mind, etc.). Their term
"thing-in-itself" was actually a desperate term used to
imply, "Oh, twiddle! You
know, the thing as whatever it really is anyway!"
With that said, we must leave the notion of time without having
really "defined" it.
highly recommend the reading of Morris Kline, Mathematics: The Loss
of Certainty, for all those readers so enamored of mathematics
that they believe it captures "truth" and "absolute
truth". It doesn't. That
has been proven somewhat obscurely by the mathematicians themselves.
We also urge the reader to read something such as Thomas J.
Jech, The Axiom of Choice, American Elsevier, New York, 1973. The axiom of choice is an
advanced mathematical theorem that is further used in the proofs of
many other advanced mathematical theorems.
A great deal of advanced mathematics thus depends upon the
axiom of choice. Yet its
employment demonstrates that "absurd" results must be
expected. E.g., p. 3-6
contains the proof that it is possible to cut a ball into a finite
number of pieces and rearrange them to get two balls of the same size
as the original one.
So we will
just accept the results of our reflection upon time, and accept that
we have not been able to completely define it but only characterize
the type of perceptual mind operations involved, and proceed.
in a General-Relativity-Based Unified Field Theory
The beauty of
working in a general relativity-like format is that we can work in the
time domain [for energy
and curvature, electromagnetically since we are in O(3)] as
well as in the 3-space
domain. So not only can
we work on mass-as-it-is, but mass-as-it-moves or has moved in the
time stream. The entire
notion of external force acting upon a separate mass is quite
incorrect; a priori mass is
a component of force by its definition: Force F
There is also
a hidden assumption in the notion of an "observable
is, "observable persisting" is a non sequitur.
What is unconsciously assumed in the statement that "an
observable persists" is that the observation process is being
continually and consecutively applied to give a stream of d/dt outputs
(effects). If we
"observe no changes", then we perceive in our minds (by
recall and comparison at very great speed, automatically and innately)
the same observable (effect) with no change in our mental comparison.
An observable is a frozen snapshot as produced, and that frozen
snapshot does not and cannot exist at the next moment!
Instead, another snapshot exists at the next moment—again,
like the individual frames in a movie film.
In short, we
never observe even the present, but only "the most recent
past". The observation process is finished when we have an
"observation", and that was the output of that process
(which is usually referred to as the "collapse of the wave
function" in quantum mechanics.
No wave "exists" as such unless it exists in 4-space.
But the d/dt operation of observation is in fact the
destruction of the time-domain momentarily.
That destroys the time-aspect of the wave, leaving a frozen
snapshot (an observable). As
we have stated elsewhere, the ubiquitous absorption of photons—both
of quantum and subquantum size—by a mass is what adds a
"time" dimension to the frozen 3-space entity mass.
The photon is comprised of a "piece of energy welded to a
piece of time, with no seam in the middle".
In short, the photon is comprised of
Upon absorption by a mass, the increment of energy DE,
divided by c2, gives a tiny bit of extra mass Dm that
is added to the mass m, to give (m+Dm)Dt.
Note that we did not and cannot just ignore that Dt
component of the photon in photon absorption.
Indeed, photon absorption changes the mass into masstime, which
is as different from mass as impulse (Ft) is different from force (F).
At the next instant, the excited (m+Dm)Dt
masstime emits a photon (DE)(Dt),
converting that little Dm
back into (DE).
So the reaction for photon absorption is:
(DE)(Dt) + m
This is an
"integrating with respect to time" process. Note that "mass" (an observable) has been
integrated into "masstime" (unobservable).
for photon emission—which is from masstime, never
from mass, is:
(m+Dm)Dt ® m + (DE)(Dt)
This is a
"differentiating with respect to time" process.
Note that "masstime" (a nonobservable) has been
differentiated into mass (an observable).
fundamental process is what Einstein called an "event" in
his theory of relativity.
Note that for
a quantum change, an interval (Dt)
exists between consecutive iterations of observation (productions of
observed mass from the unobserved masstime).
In short, the masstime stated occupies a specific interval of
time. But during that
interval, there are incredible numbers of smaller (subquantal or
"virtual") photon interactions that occur, and in each of
these "infolded" or "internal" virtual streams of
interaction (within that single macroscopic time interval), each of
the infolded little (Dt)
intervals has other even smaller infolded photon interactions within
The point is,
there is an incredible internal dynamic structuring of the ongoing
causal interaction and observation processes.
Hence the "quantum level" mass (effect) is in fact
comprised of a myriad of ongoing interactions!
These in fact constitute "engines" and their specific
formats and dynamics comprises the "template".
Any template has an internal structure of finer potentials.
thus is irrevocably linked with the virtual state, very precisely, via
the "nested engine" concept.
This means that, electromagnetically, by engineering this
internal structure (which also represent sets of dynamic spacetime
curvatures), we can engineer and change the resident engine of a mass
(continual observation assumed!). We can "get at" the ability to do this by using
Evans' O(3) electrodynamics, which is a subset of Sachs' unified field
(continual observation assumed!) is of course highly compressed
spatial energy, compressed by the factor c2. By the
"engines with infolded engines" concept, we actually are
defining energy itself. We will attempt a new definition of energy, which of course
must still be further examined by foundations scientists for any
unperceived flaws: Energy at any local region of spacetime is the complete set of
differences in the engine-set of that region from the engine-set of
average or ambient spacetime.
Energy is thus a special form of "spacetime
excitation" or "spacetime charge".
It is also a difference engine.
It is also an "engine potential", so to speak.
Note, however, that the excitation and charge (the differences)
are not just in the 3-space domain, but also in the time domain as
can be time-reversed in one form—e.g., in the well-known
time-reversal of uncompressed EM transverse wave energy—then it can
be time reversed in another form; i.e., in mass-energy (compressed)
form. We can do that with
a variation and extension of nonlinear optical pumping, but
we must pump in the time domain rather than in the 3-spatial
domain as is normally done.
In short, we
propose time-pumping as the process for making a precise antiengine,
exactly corresponding to a resident engine, but time-reversed and
example, suppose we have a nonlinear mass that acts as a phase
conjugate mirror (PCM) (as
continually observed!). If
one pumps the mass in 3-space with normal EM waves, one can create an
exact phase conjugate replica wave—including one that is amplified—that
travels back in spacetime precisely over the 3-space trajectory
previously taken by the stimulating "input" or
"signal" wave itself. Since
one does not observe the time element but only 3-space, one observes a
3-space EM wave traveling backwards in 3-space precisely over the
previous 3-space path we observed the stimulating wave to have taken.
We can think
of pumping as a sort of triode action.
As continually observed, if we input a 3-spatial energy wave
oscillation as the engine
stimulus, we have inputted its 3-spatial template
which is actually a 2-dimensional wavefront and its dynamics.
By pumping the PCM in 3-space with other 3-spatial energy wave
oscillations, we produce a time-reversed 3-space replica wave with parity
reversed. Hence we get
the poorly named "distortion correction theorem", which
states that the 3-space phase conjugate replica wave will
progressively appear point by point back over the spatial path
previously taken by the 3-space input signal wave.
Again, as continually
observed. We must
never forget that each and every 3-space "snapshot" exists
only at that exact moment in time.
The next instant, things are back to unobserved 4-space things.
Observed mass-at-an-instant, e.g., returns to nonobserved
In short, by
spatial template input and spatial energy pumping for a 3-space wave,
we time-reverse and amplify the 3-spatial input wave and its energy.
So we time-reverse a 2-dimensional object—the EM wavefront—and its
though not yet in nonlinear optics, if we input a 4-space template and
4-space energy, we will produce 4-space phase conjugate reversal. In
that case, we time-reverse a 3-dimensional object: the pumped mass
(the PCM) itself. Note
particularly that, for EM energy to be 4-spatial, it must exist at
least in the time domain, and it exists in nonobservable form.
Otherwise, it is normal 3-space energy as existing in some
observation being applied.
Pumping and Time-Reversal of Mass
consider the 4-template of spacetime curvatures (the engine,
when its energetics as well as its form are considered) that is
resident in the pumped nonlinear "mass".
Elsewhere we have advanced the exact mechanism by which a mass
propagates through time, and thus even "persists" or seems
to, as we continually and
repeatedly observe it. In
that mechanism, the mass continually changes (in each part of it) from
mass to masstime to mass to masstime, and so on, due to the incessant
photon interactions at all levels, including the virtual photons of
the vacuum itself.
When we pump
in spacetime (4-space), we must consider pumping the "persisting
mass" and every element of it down to the smallest level, during
the "masstime" state of every differential element of the
"persisting mass". More
simply, we may just say we are now pumping the PCM as a
"masstime" PCM, and we are pumping in 4-space rather than
3-space. In this
extended form of pumping, we produce a precise anti-template in
rather than just in mass-energy.
The result of that pumping is an amplified anti-engine
that precisely returns that pumped 3-space mass—continual
observation now assumed!—back over its previous time-like
trajectory, changing its 3-space physical form (its mass) in the
So we may
time-reverse the pumped living cell itself, in situ, and in the
process we will time-reverse all its parts even down to the tiniest.
Mathematically, time is multiply connected; each and every
tiniest part of that cell exists in each and every single moment of
time simultaneously. Thus,
pumping in the time domain pumps the entire cellular mass-energy and
time-energy and all the dynamics of both forms of energy (time and
the Time-Pumped Mass from Returning to Its Past Condition
we can readily deviate the time-reversing mass off its "past time
trajectory" to any desired new physical state, by simply
inputting an additional "delta antiengine" that will move
the mass away from its past time path to the desired off-trajectory
physical state. This
gives a special kind of reality to "probability" and
"possibility", where they now mean "potentiality".
The point is, by adding additional engines as additional
"input" signals to the time-pumped mass, we can rigorously
control what the pumped mass becomes (changes into).
We can thus move it forward in time (redifferentiation) or
backwards in time (dedifferentiation), or off-trajectory in either
direction so as to reach "possible" states in potentiality
Engines and the New "Signal Wave" Input
nonlinear optics (NLO) there is no consideration of the structuring
and dynamics of the time element (time-stream) associated with the
visualized "flow of a mass through time".
This restricts NLO to a subset, since every element of the
mass-energy is in continuous interaction with its own local dynamic
spacetime curvature sets, and that may include time-pumping as well as
3-space pumping. The overall coordination of the local effects is generated by the overall coordination of the local causes.
its masstime state also, every "mass" has a resident dynamic
4-space energy (energy in space and energy in time) with a dynamic
template, and there is an ongoing continuous two-way interaction
between the "mass-energy" on the one hand and the
"spacetime curvatures and their dynamics" on the other hand.
involves structures and dynamics both in the time domain and in
3-space. Indeed, it is
not possible to "curve 3-space" alone, without
simultaneously "curving the dynamics of that space's
"persistence in time".
In short, one affects and alters the dynamics of both space and
time whenever one alters the dynamics of either of them. For a mass (momentary observed state!), one alters the
dynamics of the mass-energy and its associated time-energy,
immediately thereafter when the observed mass has returned to its
unobserved masstime state.
Dedifferentiation and Redifferentiation
simply pumping the cell in the time-domain results in what is known
roughly as dedifferentiation
of the cell—return of the cell back to a more primitive form;
actually, back to an earlier physical state or condition.
example, Becker's bone-fracture healing experiments clearly showed
such initial dedifferentiation of red blood cells caused by having a
simple electrical potential across the fracture site.
Becker rigorously showed that, in the local fracture region
where "bone" was the cellular normal, so long as the
resulting cellular change state (first, dedifferentiation) differed
from the bone, the action of the potential continued to time-reverse
whatever "delta" existed between the exact condition of the
changing cells and the cells in the area.
The red blood
cells first dedifferentiated
by shucking their hemoglobin and growing a cellular nucleus. They then redifferentiated
into the type of cells that make cartilage (which is
"approaching" the bone state but not there yet.
Then these new cells redifferentiated
further into the type of cells that make bone, and were then deposited
as bone cells to heal the fracture. We point out that
redifferentiation is actually "time-forwarding" the physical
state of the cellular mass-energy and its dynamics.
When the delta reverses, the time-direction of the anti-engine
clear understanding of it, that bone-healing procedure is used in many
hospitals today to heal otherwise intractable bone fractures. In short, experimentally
it has been proven to work.
comment that the entire foregoing topical discussion is as
continually observed. The
actual causes (the engines) were not observed, since they are in fact
Cellular Regenerative System Pumps Damaged Cells in the Time Domain
studied the cellular regenerative system of the body,
The regenerative system is an electromagnetic system, but one
of novel and advanced electrodynamic kind..
Unfortunately, Becker only had available to him the standard
U(1) electrodynamics, which does not include curved spacetime and
engines. Also, at the
time (1960s) he performed his seminal experiments, modern nonlinear
phase conjugate optics itself had not yet been born—it did not start
in this country until visiting Russian scientists briefed Lawrence
Livermore National Laboratory in 1972 about the "strange wave
that emerges and restores order".
Even then, it really was not well underway in the U.S. until
1978-1980. Hence Becker
was unable to complete the modeling of the regenerative system.
with U(1) electrodynamics thoroughly confusing the effect wave as the
causal wave, Becker was unable to advance the complete EM unified
field engine mechanism that directly produced the cellular changes
necessary to reverse cellular damage, regrow missing cells, and change
cells from one form to another. He
did capture the biochemical aspects and cellular change aspects very
nicely. He captured the
accompanying EM aspects perhaps as completely as they can be expressed
in ordinary U(1) electrodynamics, which cannot deal with time-reversal
of mass-energy, or with spacetime curvature engines and templates.
Becker's work was epochal, however, and he was nominated multiple
times for a Nobel Prize.
Was Suppressed for His Achievements and Courage
his noble efforts and also because he had the courage to speak out
against the biological hazards of non-ionizing weak EM radiation,
Becker was rather ruthlessly suppressed.
His funding and grants were withdrawn and not renewed.
Eventually he was forced to retire early.
Very powerful scientific forces were arrayed against him and
against others also speaking out.
work, there is an old dictum: To search for the culprit, follow the
money trail and look for the motive.
The continuous weak EM hash that is radiated from power lines
ubiquitously was the center of the issue courageously raised by Becker
and others such as Marino, including their testifying as EM bioeffects
experts in court cases. Whereupon institutes were set up and funded rather handsomely
by the electrical power industry to "investigate the biological
effects of weak EM radiation".
Needless to say, the scientists employed by these institutions
largely found that the effects were negligible.
This provided a large body of scientific papers and scientists
testifying that the entire EM bioeffects scare was a no-brainer.
And so it has largely remained to this day, in the
"official" scientific view.
Even an editorial in the journal Nature has raised a
question of the scientific open-mindedness of institutes funded by an
industry being investigated or held in question.
that we understand templates and engines, let us explain the Becker
work and the mechanism utilized by the cellular regenerative system to
restore damaged cells back to normal.
Immune System Heals Nothing
system, so necessary to fight off pathogens etc., actually heals (restores) nothing at all, not even its own damaged cells.
Of course the immune system is absolutely vital; it is like a
great army that defends us against continuous and unending assaults on
all fronts. We could not live without it, and those unfortunate
persons having suppressed immune systems are forced to live in
environmental isolation, special suits, etc.
Otherwise, invading pathogens would quickly kill them.
immune system battles against hostile invaders and wins, it usually
litters the battlefield in the body with dead cells and residue, and
there are many living but damaged (and even diseased) cells remaining.
The immune system's large cells "clean up the dead
residue", and then the immune system's work is finished.
The array of
damaged cells in the body in that area are restored (within its
limitations) by the cellular
regenerative system, not by the immune system.
Since it must cause cellular restoration, its key functions
must operate in the causal
domain, not the effects
domain. Those causal
functions must also be highly and specifically organized and
correlated to the specific effects in (state of) the individual
damaged cells and all tiniest parts of them.
So how does the regenerative system prepare such marvelously
tailored, specific causal engines to restore a damaged cell back to
health? For that we shall have to re-examine the scalar potential.
Unsuspected Dynamics of the "Scalar" EM Potential
innocent-appearing little "scalar electrostatic potential"
is a real tiger in disguise. In
1903, E. T. Whittaker—one of the leading mathematical physicists of
his day—showed that in normal U(1) electrodynamics the scalar
potential decomposes into a harmonic set of bidirectional EM wave of
special kind. This
harmonic set is actually a set of longitudinal EM waves, in perfect "bidirectional" phase
conjugate wavepairs. That
is the way that Whittaker (and everyone since) interpreted it—as if continually and repeatedly observed.
Wave Versus Causal Wave
We now meet
face-to-face a primary flaw in the conventional interpretation of
electrodynamics. That is
the ubiquitous use of the EM effect
wave in 3-space—produced after
the "causal EM wave-in-spacetime" is interacting with
charged 3-spatial mass and has had a d/dt operation imposed upon it—as
if it were also the causal
EM wave actually existing in (persisting
in) 4-space prior to interaction, and thus prior to imposition of
d/dt. In short, the causal EM wave is an LLLT entity existing not
only in space but also in time, while the effects wave is an LLL
entity that is observed only by repeatedly imposing d/dt(LLLT) = LLL 3-space intersection snapshots at successive "frozen
moments" in time.
EM wave does not even exist or persist in
time, a priori. It "appears" to do so to the observer by the
observer's continual rapid reiteration of the observation d/dt
process. Actually a
series of 3-space snapshots—with memory recall—is how the observed
entity is "assumed to persist".
The snapshots themselves are not the "existent"
entity in the form that it does persist!
They are the continual perturbations and cuttings of
persists except when it doesn't.
It is persisting when unobserved, and is not persisting in the
form as repeatedly observed.
Without belaboring, we point out that the problem of being and
persistence are unsolved problems in philosophy as well as physics.
Centuries of philosophers struggled with the problem of being
and failed to solve it, because all of them continued to confuse the
"observed" instant which does not persist in such form at
all, with the unobserved persisting entity.
The forms of the observed entity and the "same"
persisting entity are dramatically different.
The existing entity may be said to be "the observable
entity multiplied by time". This is readily seen geometrically; the observable entity is
3-spatial (LLL) and instantly a frozen partial snapshot.
The nonobserved, persisting entity is 4-spatial (LLLT) and a
The thing the
philosophers (and the physicists) have struggled with is that any
entity exists (persist) not only in a series of frozen instants
"as observed" and as "not persisting", but also as
an ongoing process which is not and cannot be observed a
priori. Elsewhere we
have shown that Aristotelian logic is incomplete and destroys itself
like a snake swallowing its own tail.
We advanced the completion, which is a 4-law logic with an
application rule which itself is a 5th law of logic.
Hence the problems the philosophers and physicists have
struggled with remain unresolved largely because of the use of an
incomplete logic. Such
fundamental foundations issues cannot be resolved in Aristotelian
logic, which does not model such solutions.
The issues can be resolved in 4-law logic.
(i.e., after we "detect-as-observed" an effects wave from
the ongoing interaction of a causal wave with a previously observed
3-space charged mass), Whittaker's interpretation of the decomposition
does apply in those iterative "frozen momentary snapshots"
only. That is the effects
decomposition (the effect EM
waveset) that would be detected—by
continually interacting the actual causal decomposition waves in spacetime with charged mass. But such a pure effects
interpretation has omitted and altered something very vital indeed:
The actual form in which those waves exist prior to complete
interaction and observation is 4-spatial, not 3-spatial.
However, to have an "interaction" at all, that will
produce an effect, we must introduce not only the 4-space causal
interactant(s) but also a previously observed 3-spatial entity
steadily being "observed".
Reflect on that for a moment!
We cannot have a cause and effect action, unless we have a
causal set interacting with a previous effect (a previously observed
observable) to produce a change in that prior observable—i.e., to
produce a new effect.
"new snapshot" series (observations) taken of the persisting
interacting causal entity (the cause) and an ongoing series of
iteratively snapped sequences of the "interacting"
observable (initial effect) will iteratively reveal the changes
occurring in the "initial observable".
That is the "output effect" of the interaction
(observation) process. Note
the multiple use of observation infolded within observation (a
comparative process a priori) interacting with an ongoing unobserved
cause, to produce a steady series of effects which are
"changes" when compared to the initial observable.
comparative recall process of the observer, if iterative comparisons
between the continually outputted "changes" are zero, then
the initial observable is "seen or accepted" as
"continuing to persist".
But this very notion of "the observable continuing to
persist" involves this rather complex interaction process
ongoing, as well as the observer's continual recall from memory and
comparison. In our paper
extending and completing Aristotelian logic, we pointed out that
identity itself is a determination made by comparison of one
observable with a recalled previous observable.
This process of the observer is continuous and automatic; it is
the way that the operation of perception itself is designed and
the Effect Wave Came to Be Confused as the Causal Wave
electrodynamics, the founders (Faraday, Maxwell, Heaviside, etc.) all
conceived a material (as
continually observed!) ether. In
short, there was not a single point in all the universe—so they
thought—where mass was absent.
Hence the "EM field in space" was a very real and
material thing to them, and "massless" field was not even in
their minds. Indeed,
Maxwell modeled his electrodynamics as a purely material fluid flow
and dynamics theory, originally using a very mechanical model of the
"ether" replete with gears and wheels.
that this "material ether as if continually observed"
concept already completely substituted spatial effects for all
spatiotemporal causes. This
seemed natural; in confusing force as cause, "natural
philosophy" (as physics was known early on) had already
hopelessly confused effect with cause in mechanics, therefore in fluid
dynamics. And it was
material fluid dynamics that Maxwell utilized and adapted as the model
to capture his electromagnetic theory.
One cannot fault Maxwell; almost all scientists had already
confused cause and effect long before Maxwell was born.
same EM formative period (Maxwell in the 1860s and 1870s, and then in
the 1880s after Maxwell was deceased), special relativity had not yet
been born—it would be two more decades before it appeared.
The notion of "spacetime" did not exist as we
conceive it today, and neither did the notion that the flow of time
changed its pace. Indeed,
the very notion of the "flow of EM energy through 3-space"
appeared in electrodynamics (and in physics) only in the 1880s,
several years after Maxwell's death in 1879, and introduced by
Poynting and Heaviside independently.
Prior to that, the notion of energy propagating through space
did not even exist in physics. E.g.,
from an editorial, "The Transfer of Energy," The
Electrician, Vol. 27, Jul. 10, 1891, we quote as follows:
idea that energy is located at all, and that, when it changes its
position, it must move along a definite path, is quite a new one. The law of the conservation of energy implies that energy
cannot disappear from one place without appearing in equal quantity
somewhere else; but, although this fact has long been accepted, it is
only within the last few years that the idea of transference of energy
has been developed, or that anyone has attempted to trace out the
actual path along which energy flows when it moves from place to
place. The idea of an
energy current is of more recent date than the electro-magnetic
theory, and is not to be found explicitly stated anywhere in Maxwell's
work. We believe that the
first time it was applied to electrical theory was in the pages of The
Electrician, by Mr. Oliver Heaviside, to whom so much of the extension
of Maxwell's theory is due. The
idea was also independently developed and brought to the notice of the
Royal Society in a Paper by Prof. Poynting."
Also, in that
formative period, instead of conceiving a variable space and time, time and time flow were thought by those pioneering
scientists to be absolutely immutable.
clear notion of the observation process existed, and in fact such was
not made possible until after the advent of quantum mechanics, much
So in all the
early EM founders' minds, the incoming EM wave in
"spacetime", prior to its interaction with charges in the
detector or receiving circuit, had already interacted with mass, and
was continually interacting with mass, and was in fact a "wave of
very thin mass". It
was—so they believed—entirely a material wave in a material
medium. So Maxwellian electrodynamics is rigorously and completely a
"material medium with material waves" model.
Specifically it is a material fluid dynamics model.
But as a quaternion algebra model, it is still a better EM
model that the U(1) electrodynamics model we use today!
Barrett points out the diminishing of Maxwell's theory very
A field [for the potentials] was banished from playing the central
role in Maxwell's theory and relegated to being a mathematical (but
not physical) auxiliary. This
banishment took place during the interpretation of Maxwell's theory...
by Heaviside... and Hertz. The
'Maxwell theory' and 'Maxwell's equations' we know today are really
the interpretation of Heaviside... Heaviside took the 20 equations of
Maxwell and reduced them to the four now known as "Maxwell's
[Barrett, Terence W., "Electromagnetic Phenomena Not
Explained by Maxwell's Equations," A. Lakhtakia, ed., Essays
on the Formal Aspects of Electromagnetics Theory, World Scientific
Publishing, River Edge, NJ, 1993, p. 11 and generally pp. 6-86.]
particularly antagonistic to potentials, and believed firmly that only
the force fields (continual
observation unconsciously assumed!) were the causes of EM
phenomena. In short, he
completely confused cause and effect in electrodynamics, from the
getgo. He was a
brilliant, lone scientist, self-educated, and thus passionately
convinced of what he worked out.
Nahin, a biographer of Heaviside, states:
an 1893 letter to Oliver Lodge, Heaviside said of his own work that it
represented the 'real and true "Maxwell" as Maxwell would
have done it if he had not been humbugged by his vector and scalar
Paul, Oliver Heaviside: Sage in Solitude, IEEE Press, New York,
1988., p. 134, n. 37.].
Heaviside did not even understand the potentials, and it is
questionable even today how well they are understood by modern
Heaviside's own words:
a function called the vector potential of the current and another
potential, the electrostatic, [work] together not altogether in the
most harmoniously intelligible manner—in plain English, muddling one
another. It is, I
believe, a fact which has been recognized that not even Maxwell
himself quite understood how they operated.”
[Oliver Heaviside, Electromagnetic Theory, Vol. I, p.
One must also
realize that, in all the world in the 1880s, there were perhaps some
three dozen electrodynamicists. So
the mindset and actions of only a few could and did set the course of
history for all of electromagnetics for more than a century.
also despised quaternions, and reasoned that "the poor
electricians"—the term for electrical engineers in those days—would
never be able to understand such a complicated mathematics.
He also believed that adding a vector component and a scalar
component in a single quaternion component was against the very laws
of nature. That is why
his subset theory was in vectors; he ruthlessly rooted out that scalar
component of the quaternion, converting it to a vector.
Heaviside's theory was far more easily understood and applied.
The "poor electricians" were struggling to build
transformers, put in telegraph lines and systems, etc.
Heaviside published a series of practical engineering-type
papers dealing with such subjects, which were of great assistance to
the struggling young electricians.
Consequently vector electromagnetics spread relatively rapidly,
in its own limited way.
Then in a
short "debate" in a few journals, never involving more than
a few scientists and with the important action occurring in a single
journal, Nature, the vectorists simply threw out the quaternion and
the quaternionists, and vectors (and then tensors) became the accepted
had also regauged the vector equations to make them even simple and
symmetrical, and much easier to solve with closed solutions rather
than numerical methods. This final subset (which is the subset taught to electrical
engineers and most scientists to this day) also had one other
unfortunate consequence that was to lead to massive pollution and
great damage to the modern biosphere: Lorentz's symmetrical regauging
unwittingly discarded all those Maxwell-Heaviside EM systems that were
open systems far from equilibrium in their active environment (such as
the modern active vacuum). In
short, it arbitrarily discarded all electrical power systems which
freely received and used excess energy from the active vacuum, to power themselves
and their loads simultaneously, or to output more energy than was
input to them by the operator.
We know today
that a "material fluid model" of electromagnetic fields
is wrong in its very foundations, and particularly with respect
to how the "field" in spacetime prior to interaction is
modeled. Eerily, those
"material ether fluid" equations have never been changed in
classical electrodynamics to the present day, even though outstanding
physicists—such as Nobelist Feynman and the great John Wheeler—have
emphatically pointed out that the "field" as conceived and
modeled by the Maxwellians does not and cannot exist
as such in massfree space (where "space" refers to
massfree spacetime. The
use of "space" for "spacetime" is a little non
sequitur widely used and accepted in physics.).
More rigorously, such an observable
does not and cannot persist as such, since it is actually only
a single frozen "snapshot" in 3-space, after the observation
process has been applied. It
does not and cannot persist even in perception, unless the observation
process is continually iterated.
No effect and no 3-space entity persists without continual
repetition of the causal interaction in the observation process.
Even then, rigorously it "persists" only in
"persistent and ongoing observation".
Without observation, it does not exist at all.
ubiquitous in physics is the confusion of cause and effect, and the
relation of causality to continual iterative observation, that even
those physicists noticing the non sequitur in the "force field in
vacuum" modeling were unable to completely correct the error.
The reason is straightforward: The problem is endemic
throughout most of physics, not just in one area.
It is endemic in statics and dynamics as well as in
electrostatics and electrodynamics.
Its correction calls for essentially a massive redo of much of
physics from beginning to end, and it will require a decade of
sustained effort to root out the present metastasized "cause and
effect confusion" cancer that has spread throughout the complete
body of physics.
barrier to even recognizing the magnitude of this problem is that
almost all the language developed and used to describe these physical
phenomena, principles, etc. itself is highly convoluted with this
confusion of cause and effect. The
greatest barrier is the habitual phraseology and embedded confusion we
have all "imbibed with our mother's milk", so to speak, as
Einstein put it.
a Subset of Maxwell's Theory Was Selected and Retained
in 1879 of stomach cancer, about the time that Heaviside began
re-interpreting Maxwell's 20 quaternion
equations in 20 unknowns, into a highly simplified subset of some four
vector equations as written today.
This modified "Maxwell-Heaviside subset" is what is
taught in university today as "Maxwell's equations".
Not a single
one of those equations ever appeared in any paper or book by James
Clerk Maxwell! They are
Heaviside's equations, and also the same as or similar to work by
Hertz and by Gibbs. The Heaviside equations are only a limited subset of Maxwell's electrodynamics and Maxwell's theory.
Quaternion algebra has higher topology than even tensors, much
less vectors. So one can
do a great many things in Maxwell's quaternion electrodynamics (or
better yet, in Clifford algebra electrodynamics) than are taught in
university in tensor electrodynamics or vector electrodynamics.
Barrett says it nicely:
only with differential calculus there is no awareness that field
dynamics is held hostage by the topological restrictions determining
the algebraic logic. This
view raises a question of importance to those seeking a unification of
all forces. Perhaps
unification of other forces with electromagnetism needs to be with a
higher order symmetry form of electromagnetism than the U(1)
form." [Barrett and Grimes, Eds., ibid., p. ix-x.].
the "Field" Concept
Now let us
see what the notion of the "material ether universal medium"
did to the field concept. It meant that the incoming "fields" in the wave
oscillations were absolutely material wave oscillations of a matter
medium. Faraday used his
lines of force as actual physical taut strings in that physical
material "ether" medium (with
continual observation implicitly assumed).
Hence to Faraday, disturbances in the ether before reaching the
detector or antenna were "pluckings" of those taut strings.
That is where
the notion of the transverse EM wave in vacuum (actually in a material
ether filled with taut strings) came from.
As he directly states in his 1873 book, Maxwell deliberately
captured Faraday's concepts in his (Maxwell's) mathematical theory.
this was "as continually observed" by assumption. The entire modeling apparatus thus substituted the effect
wave for the causal wave.
Limited Physics Knowledge At the Time
At the time
(1860s to early 1880s) that electrodynamics was developed, the electron, atom, nucleus, etc. had not been discovered.
"Electricity" was envisioned as a thin material fluid
flowing in the wire, much like water flowing in a pipe.
For an incoming perturbation in spacetime reaching the wire,
the "shaking of the electric fluid" in the wire was thought
to be just an "interception" of the "shaking of the
electric fluid" that was incoming.
"Charge" meant only "a piece of electric
fluid". There was no
knowledge that the wire had positive charges in the nuclei as well as
negative charges in a Drude electron gas.
At that time, in their minds there did not exist the concepts
of electron, nucleus, nucleons, positively charged nucleus, atoms,
know that the Drude electrons in the conductor move very, very slowly
down the wire (e.g., along a receiving antenna) at a drift velocity
(nominal case, a few inches per hour).
The actual disturbance (signal) races down the wire at light
speed (perfect conductor) or near-light speed (good but real
conductor). The Drude
electrons, having spin but restrained from longitudinal translation to
any great degree, interact with the streaming signal and its energy
flow. The Drude electrons
act as gyros and thus precess laterally in the conductor since they
are very restrained longitudinally.
Thus with our
instruments we actually measure electron
precession waves and their lateral translation in the detecting
wire medium. These
detected waves are unconsciously thought of as
continually observed. We
do not measure the "signal as it exists prior to
interaction", but only the "signal comprised of the
material-waves (electron precession waves) after the interaction, with
continual interaction and continual observation assumed".
In short, we measure the 3-spatial effects
wave in matter, assuming it persists (continual observation process!)
and then erroneously still assume—as the old guys did—that the
same "effects wave" is identical to the causal
wave that existed (and did persist a
priori) in massless spacetime (prior to interaction) where there
are no observable Drude electrons with precession.
old founders considered the detection of "transverse
vibrations" in the conductor as positive proof that the incoming
"material fluid vibrations" that had been intercepted were
also transverse waves and therefore "taut string"
vibrations, just as Faraday and Maxwell had assumed.
To them, transverse electric fluid oscillations came in, and
those transverse electric fluid oscillations were detected as the
perturbed motions of the electric fluid in the conductor.
easily be falsified today, if one considers not only the perturbation
of the electrons in a conductor, but also the simultaneous
perturbation—with equal energy—of the positively charged atomic
since no such "opposite-sign, equal energy, highly damped,
antiphased vibrations in the same wire" were known in those days
or detected then, electrodynamics has never been changed to correct
its erroneous model of "transverse" waves in the vacuum.
The actual EM
waves in 4-space are quite unique.
A priori they contain not only a 3-space EM energy component
but also a precisely correlated EM time-energy component.
They would best be represented as a pseudo-longitudinal EM
3-space wave, multiplied by time so as to constitute a 4-space wave of
pure spacetime curvature oscillations.
electrodynamics still erroneously omits Newton's third law reaction,
even though the reaction effect has an electrodynamics cause.
Expressing electrodynamics as part of a unified field theory—as
in O(3) electrodynamics—brings in the general relativity aspects and
therefore the mutual interaction between spacetime curvature and EM
energy (both 3-space EM energy and EM time-energy).
Decomposition Shows the Primacy of Longitudinal EM Waves
Whittaker's 1903 decomposition of the scalar potential—and his
interpretation of it—reveals the importance and primacy of
longitudinal EM waves as "effect" waves after
since the modern vacuum is proven to be highly energetic and thus has
high energy density, its energy density constitutes a scalar
potential. Hence the
Whittaker decomposition can be directly applied to the vacuum itself,
but first the decomposition must be re-interpreted as a causal
decomposition rather than an effects decomposition.
rigorous, we must not use the commonly accepted "effects"
3-space waves after mass interaction, which to date everyone has
previously utilized to interpret the Whittaker decomposition.
We thus have the problem of re-examining and re-interpreting
Whittaker's effect waves interpretation of his decomposition of the detected
potential into the causal
domain, which means we must work "backwards" across and with
the observation process itself. We
must decipher which of Whittaker waves are effects waves after
interaction with charged mass, and which are (or should be represented
as) causal waves prior to interaction with charged mass.
Quiescent Vacuum as Spacetime and as a Scalar Potential
imposition of vacuum energy fluctuations—from dynamic local
nonlinear wave interactions engendered by very large numbers of
passing waves from far emitters—the "quiescent vacuum"
would be a very nice scalar potential, but one of extreme energy
density. The dynamics of
all source charges everywhere, however, produces myriads of waves, and
their wave-to-wave nonlinear interactions and changes are occurring at
any instant through any finite vacuum volume element.
entire dynamic charged universe participates in producing the local,
very large but very fast, EM fluctuations or "zero point energy
fluctuations" of the vacuum.
This is in accord with Puthoff's "cosmological feedback
principle" which shows a causal feedback, but one where the
causal information is unavailable.
Hence statistics is still required for calculation.
for Hidden Order and Its Implications
Sachs-Evans theory, one does not have to assume random
statistics! We would say
the situation is chaotic,
because our knowledge of each particular change may be either
nonexistent or highly limited. These
changes and their causes for which we have no information are
therefore "hidden variables".
They constitute a hidden causal order inherent in that apparent
statistical disorder of the seething zero point vacuum energy
we can legitimately take the view that there is an underlying order
inside what appears to us to be "random" (no ordering
information at all is available) changes.
course deals directly with the great problem of quantum mechanics: Its
assumption of random change
eliminates the entire observable integrated universe, because
integration of randomness just yields more randomness, not the
observed macro order at all. So QM scientists know (and many will even admit) that there
has to be hidden order and thus chaos, or else quantum mechanics is
wrong. This is the
recognized "problem of the missing chaos" in quantum
mechanics. However, QM
scientists still have not changed their statistics to an "already
chaotic" statistics, except in case of something like the Bohm
hidden variable theory. Bohm's
theory does yield all the correct answers as well as the Bohr
interpretation does. However, in theory the Bohm hidden variable
theory would appear to be causally
engineerable, whereas Bohr's theory is not.
Engineering the hidden longitudinal EM waves comprising the
interior of every normal EM wave, field, and potential is the way to
causally engineer Bohm's theory.
deeply enough to consider the observer's knowledge or lack of
knowledge of the hidden causes themselves, a causal model does indeed
correctly model the vacuum, its fluctuations, and its exchanges.
This means that, given the proper approach, we can model most
situations of vacuum energy exchange with EM circuits and systems in
terms of purely causal electrodynamics.
But we will have to deal with the fundamental "hidden
variables": the infolded longitudinal EM waves and their
dynamics. This includes
the always present, associated,
perfectly-correlated EM longitudinal waves in the time domain.
When one electromagnetically structures 3-space
EM energy, one first electromagnetically structures EM time-energy
as a precise causal template.
In short, all
3-spatial EM energy comes from the time-domain. Or put another way, all 3-space EM energy is the effect
(output) of an interaction of unobservable causal time-domain EM
energy with observable (i.e., "as continually observed")
Since all EM
energy comes from the time domain, then if we engineer the time domain
itself, we can in theory produce
and direct EM energy wherever and however we wish—including,
e.g., inside the nucleons of the nucleus, to "flip" quarks
and accomplish isomer transmutation.
Since every part of an object is multiply connected in each
time moment and interval, by using the time domain we completely
overcome the notions of "outside" and "inside" and
"propagation of energy through 3-space".
Whittaker's work, by reinterpreting the longitudinal 3-space
phase conjugate waves (continual
observation assumed!) into unobserved longitudinal 4-space waves as necessary (before they were observed), we
immediately see the overwhelming importance of various kinds of
longitudinal EM waves.
Indeed, we can electromagnetically decompose all spacetime
curvature "engines" and "templates" into sets of
longitudinal causal EM waves
and their impressed dynamics.
Here a higher
symmetry electrodynamics such as O(3)—and one which is also a subset
of a proper unified field theory, which O(3) electrodynamics is—is
electrodynamics fits the modeling requirements nicely.
Indeed, in O(3) electrodynamics the Whittaker decomposition
itself is expanded and very much enriched to include not only
potentials and waves and fields with "regular" linear
internal structures, but also potentials and waves and fields with
"nonlinear" deterministic internal structures.
In short, the
O(3) electrodynamics allows the direct modeling of engines and
templates carried infolded inside "normal" linear-appearing
EM fields, waves, and potentials due to the infolded exact pattern of
curvatures of spacetime and their dynamics.
It is all simply those infolded longitudinal EM waves—both in
3-space and in the time domain—and their imposed dynamics.
background potential of the vacuum does indeed decompose into quite
regular longitudinal EM Whittaker phase conjugate wavepairs, prior to
the imposition of the additional dynamics and interactions due to
interior longitudinal EM waves from all sources in the universe.
Let us examine a single EM longitudinal wavepair in the
composition of the quiescent vacuum potential.
strong attention to this: The
3-space form of a wave, expressed as a function of time (i.e., giving
the value of the effect wave at any point in time where time has been
stripped away and zeroed) is not a 4-space causal wave, but merely an
iterated set of frozen 3-space snapshots, much like the static frames
of a motion picture film. F(t), where F is a 3-space entity, is not a 4-space entity.
It does capture the effects changes that are observed to progressively occur in the
observed 3-space F as iterative observation continues.
Is a d/dt Operator
4-space wave is detected (i.e., interacts with charged mass which
provides a d/dt operation), the detection or "observation"
interaction strips away time and leaves an instantaneous 3-space
frozen snapshot of the 3-space intersection of what was an ongoing
4-space interaction. As
is well-known, all observation is spatial and yields a 3-spatial
result. Time is not observable, even in theory, according to QM itself.
the material ether, the Maxwellians inappropriately applied that d/dt
observation operator to the incoming nonmaterial wave in spacetime
before it interacted with the detecting charged matter!
That is a non sequitur today, and one of primary magnitude.
It in fact substitutes the "effect" wave as the
"cause" wave, even though the two do not even have the same
physics (and especially electrodynamics) has wrangled over this
so-called "duality" of field theory and the field concept
for a few decades now. But
electrodynamicists have not corrected the EM model foundations
themselves, but have settled on just using the word
"duality" as a smooth "spin control" term.
Therefore they have continued to maintain and propagate a
monumental foundations error in the classical EM model.
Electrodynamics Corrects the Duality Error
Sachs-Evans theory deals with that non sequitur and corrects it, since
the field is conceived in 4-space as a spacetime curvature from the
beginning. So the true spacetime causal field—which is a curvature of
spacetime—is used in O(3), whereas in U(1) electrodynamics there is
still an erroneous assumption that the vibrating spatial EM energy
moves through a flat
spacetime! As is
well-known in GR, any change of the local spatial energy density of
spacetime is a curvature of spacetime a
priori. Since the EM wave in space is conceived in U(1) as an
oscillating wave of spatial energy density, then a
priori it must be a propagating wave of local spacetime curvature.
Hence the EM wave always moves in a curved spacetime; indeed,
locally in a continuously
varying curvature of spacetime—in contradiction to U(1)
As Evans has
pointed out, U(1) electrodynamics is therefore an idealized model that
is approached but never met in the real world and in real EM
phenomena, such as in the highly nonlinear human body.
In the new unified approach, the propagating EM wave is treated
as the propagating set of spacetime curvatures that it really is.
Thus the true 4-spatial "EM causal wave" is used in
cellular regenerative system uses nature's
actual electrodynamics, including the causal waves in spacetime
prior to interaction with mass. The
regenerative system uses the associated
single Whittaker bidirectional longitudinal EM phase conjugate
wavepair in "3-space".
Oops! If it's
modeled in 3-space, the assumption has already been made that it has
interacted with charged mass and therefore has been
"observed" or detected.
In short, we have already assumed two effects waves.
That is a non sequitur. Causality
itself requires that for every effect there must be a cause, and there
must be an interaction in the middle.
Since the theory assumes a source (cause) for any potential,
the potential as we have conceived it in the past is the result of a
causal interaction and therefore must involve a cause and an effect.
Hence we cannot have two
effects waves, but we must have a causal
wave and an effects wave together. Else
we have not specified the ongoing observation interaction as to input
So we have to
examine the situation more closely.
We have to separate the effects
part of the Whittaker decomposition, since the effects waves are as continually observed 3-space EM energy emitted from the
"dipole" (any potential and any element of a potential is a
[We point out
that "emitted from the dipole" merely means that a 3-space
effects component is detectable in any quadrant included in what we
call "the effect of the energy emission".
Even so, there is a unobserved but accompanying time-energy
causal component at each and every point in that "emitted
domain" where we measure the 3-space energy.]
In the common
language (keep in mind what is observed continually and what is
unobserved!), we know we can
observe!!! 3-space EM energy continuously flowing from
any source charge or source dipole, by actual experiment.
[More rigorously, we have 3-space energy observed/observable at
every point in 3-space—continual
observation assumed!—in the "emission 3-space
domain".] Again in
the common language, to salvage the conservation of energy law, we
have to have the same amount of EM energy flowing into
the dipolarity, else we have assumed that the source charge and source
dipole create their continuous outpouring of EM energy out of nothing at
all. If true, that would
destroys the entire energy conservation concept, and also would treat
every source charge and dipole in the universe as a perpetual
Maxwellian electrodynamics model and its derivatives have and do
indeed implicitly assumed the universe to be filled with these
perpetuum mobiles called "source charges" and "source
dipoles". Again, as
connection between the field and its source has always been and still
is the most difficult problem in classical and quantum
If we are
working in a 4-space frame (spacetime), there
is no requirement that energy and energy flow be conserved in 3-space!
Indeed, there can be no such thing as
energy "flow" in 3-space per se.
There is only the "as continually observed" energy
changes in 3-space if we are or could be continually observing and
examining the effects output of our observation process. The very
term, "energy flow through 3-space" is a non-sequitur if we
rigorously examine it. We
do see that "flow" in our minds by continual recall from our
memory and comparison, just as we see the frames of a motion picture
on the screen as having motion in out mental perception. Any engineer or physicist, however, will agree that there is
no actual motion ongoing in the scenes iteratively appearing on that
screen. Each projected
frame is absolutely static. The
"motion" is created in our minds as a power analysis and
perceptual interaction that is automatic.
"conservation of energy flow in 3-space," there is a
rigorous requirement that energy be conserved in 4-space.
"real wave" halfset of the Whittaker decomposition is
identifiable as a "continually observed, effect" waveset
sequence pouring out of the charge or dipole, because all 3-space EM
waves are such "effects" waves after interaction has
occurred. The 3-field is
even defined after
interaction, as force per unit charge (charged mass having unit
charge) resulting from (after applying d/dt to) the interaction, and
as the specific pattern of energy deviated
from the causal
Let us use
the simplest model of the dipolarity of a potential (any "scalar
potential" is just a difference between two other differing
scalar potentials, hence a dipolarity).
For visualization, let us employ a real source dipole
(continually observed!) , where we separate a positive and a negative
charge (both continually observed!) by a finite distance.
Let us now examine that scalar potential between the ends of
We now relax
our incessant use of the term "as continually observed"
pointer, and assume that the reader can sort this process out and
remain aware of it. When
in doubt, one must immediately stop and ascertain what is observed and
continually observed (the effects) , and what is not observed (the
decomposition of that "dipole's scalar potential" assumes
that the real or "effect" waves are
the emitted waves in 3-space, after the incoming causal 4-space
wave and the charges in the dipole have interacted.
By applying conservation of energy, this means that the
remaining phase conjugate waves—prior
to their interaction with the charges of the dipole—thus must be
in 4-space and not 3-space, and they must be bringing in exactly as
much energy as the "real" EM longitudinal waves are
radiating away. In short,
we must examine these phase conjugate waves in spacetime, prior to
their interaction with the dipole charges, and they must constitute
the "causal" waveset. In
spacetime before interaction with charge, the phase conjugate waves
halfset is in the imaginary plane, which is part of the -ict
modeling of the time axis (i.e., the fourth axis in 4-space).
Hence these longitudinal EM phase conjugate waves in that
halfset are incoming causal EM waves in the time-domain.
One can easily see that the only variable in -ict is the "t".
Let us bring
in some additional information from other parts of physics. In particle physics, the dipole is known to be a broken
3-symmetry in the vacuum energy exchange with the dipole charges.
This means that the flow of energy to and from the dipole is
not conserved in 3-space,
but it must be conserved in 4-space.
We can measure the actual radiation of EM "real 3-space
energy" from a dipole in all directions, and we can clearly show
experimentally that there is no concomitant input of EM 3-spatial energy into the dipole.
That is why the dipole has a "broken 3-symmetry" with
respect to EM energy flow.
considerations, it rigorously follows that all the energy input to the
dipole charges, and coming in from 4-space, must be incoming from the time
domain, since we experimentally know there is no 3-spatial EM
energy input at all. That is why the input energy to the source dipole is not
measurable; the d/dt operator of the observation process destroys any
ability to detect or measure it, and there was no 3-space component to
electrodynamics, there is no great mystery involved in time-like
longitudinal EM waves! My
AIAS colleagues have already rigorously shown such "time-domain
EM energy flows" as primary, in a series of rigorous O(3)
electrodynamics papers published in leading physics journals and
carried on a DoE website. Some
convenient references are cited at the end of this paper.
Results of Reinterpreting Whittaker Decomposition
Now we have a
more rigorous reinterpretation of the Whittaker decomposition waves.
Prior to interaction with the charges, the incoming phase
conjugate halves of the
Whittaker wavepairs are carrying EM energy in the time domain, in
time-like longitudinal EM waves.
Such time-like EM waves and currents are clearly demonstrated
in AIAS published papers.
strangely, every dipolar element of every dipolarity (potential)
represents a continuous input of EM energy from the time-domain, being
absorbed by the dipole charges in the complex plane, and then being
reradiated by the dipole charges in 3-space.
If we conceive that all EM energy comes from source charges
(which are special dipoles) or ordinary source dipoles, then all
3-spatial EM energy first comes to these source charges from the time
domain. The incoming
time-domain EM energy interacts with the source charges and dipoles
which absorb the time-like EM energy and transduce it into 3-spatial
real EM energy output. We
previously explained the simplest
part of that in our Giant Negentropy paper that is on this
website. We also
explained how the charges perform that transduction of time-like EM
energy into 3-spatial EM energy.
After a small summary, we will also add the gist of a much more
advanced portion we did not tackle in our Giant Negentropy paper.
More Primary 4-Symmetry in EM Energy Flow
In the Giant
Negentropy paper, we advanced our discovery of a great new symmetry—a
more primary EM energy flow symmetry between 4th dimension EM energy
inflow and 3-space energy outflow (continual
observation assumed!), generated automatically by the broken
3-symmetry of a simple dipole—and of a simple charge as a special
kind of dipole. Once
established, this more primary energy flow continues indefinitely and
freely, so long as the
dipolarity remains intact. So
in conventional engineering terms, we also uncovered the "magic
secret" of extracting unlimited EM energy from the seething
vacuum, and for converting "time-energy" into 3-spatial
discovery is totally consistent with the findings of particle physics
that the dipole is a broken 3-symmetry in the vacuum energy flux.
Note particularly that this broken symmetry involves an
unobservable cause interacting with observable charge (continuous
observation assumed!) and then the observed changes in that observable
charge's energy condition (i.e., it is pouring out 3-space energy (continual
observation assumed!). Rigorously
this broken 3-symmetry means that some of the absorbed virtual state
(disintegrated) EM energy is integrated by the spin of the charge, and
is reradiated as real, observable EM energy (continual
observation assumed!). With
the Whittaker U(1) approach, we find that the process symmetry for
energy conservation uses input longitudinal EM waves in the time
domain and output longitudinal EM waves in the 3-space domain.
Further, the two domains are perfectly organized
macroscopically and causally, with perfect correlation between EM
time-energy inflow and 3-space EM energy outflow.
reinterpreted Whittaker decomposition reveals a startling and an
unexpected process for "giant and continuing negentropy"
associated with any common dipole (and any charge as a special kind of
dipole). My paper,
"Giant Negentropy from the Common Dipole" on the DoE
website, http://www.ott.doe.gov/electromagnetic/papersbooks.html, and
on this website www.cheniere.org,
conceptually explains all this to
first order, adhering as closely as possible to the "ordinary
view" while reinterpreting the "two 3-space (effects)
waves" conventional assumption.
negentropy paper is also published in Journal of New Energy,
5(1), Summer 2000, p. 11-23.
that paper, we solved the long-vexing problem of the source charge and
its associated EM fields and potentials and the enormous amount of
energy that may be in those fields.
Unrecognized by most readers of the paper, we also began the
clarification (and partially corrected) the incorrect use of the effects
EM field as the causal EM
Quantum and Classical EM Models Grossly Violate Energy Conservation
On the other
hand, the present electrodynamics models—both quantum and classical—still
implicitly assume that every charge freely creates energy out of
nothing, pouring it out continuously to make those fields and
potentials. It allows that continuous outpouring of EM energy in 3-space,
but without modeling the input energy.
That of course is the grossest possible violation of the
conservation of energy law. Energy cannot be created or destroyed, but only changed in form.
There is no restriction on changing the form of the energy from
EM time-energy to 3-spatial EM energy.
was that electrodynamicists could not solve the problem in 3-space energy flow, because it is a 4-spatial energy flow problem
and indeed 3-space energy
flow is resounding and permissibly violated by every source charge and
every source dipole. That
is what broken
to Time-Domain Pumping
Now we are
equipped to understand how a cell can be pumped in the time-domain.
The cellular regenerative system uses longitudinal EM wavepairs
comprising their scalar potential.
Hence the associated sets of causal
time-like EM longitudinal EM waves are indeed pumping the cells in the
time-domain. This is why
Becker's "simple" scalar potential across the intractable
fracture zone could produce such revolutionary and astounding cellular
mass-energy time-reversal effects, and "fast-forwarding"
effects as well.
Nonlinear Phase Conjugate Optics
considering pumping in the time domain, we change nonlinear phase
conjugate optics accordingly. Instead
of the input "effects" 3-space signal wave, we use the
resident 4-space EM spacetime curvatures and their dynamics (the
resident engine and its template) as corresponding to the "signal
or input wave" in ordinary phase conjugate electrodynamics.
The input is a time-forward engine
complete with its template and dynamics.
The output is therefore a precise time-reversed
engine with an appropriate template and dynamics. Note that we are now directly engineering general relativity,
and we seldom if ever experience a flat spacetime.
Instead, we are always
working in and with and on a curved spacetime.
Approach Extends the Template Approach in Nanotechnology
provides a vista of extending nanotechnology and some of its concepts
into this unified field area. Note
that in quantum field theory, the longitudinal EM wave and the
time-polarized EM wave (at least the photons so polarized!) already
exist in the theory, but heretofore no one knew how to
"make" a time-polarized EM wave. Now we know that the incoming wave halves of the common
scalar potential already contains time-polarized EM longitudinal waves
as causal waves, and 3-space
longitudinal EM waves as effects
waves (continual observation assumed!).
of the "Lone" 3-space Longitudinal EM Wave
So the scalar
potential is actually a vast set of ultrawideband causal time-domain pump waves and an associated set of effects
longitudinal EM 3-space waves (continual
observation assumed for the latter!).
When any charge interacts with the scalar potential, it absorbs
the causal time-domain pump
waves and—in conventional unclear language—emits the effects
3-space EM longitudinal waves. The
absorbing charges are therefore pumped in the time domain because that
is the kind of pumping energy they absorb.
In a living
body, if we pump any nonlinear cellular masses with longitudinal
causal EM waves—such as can be emitted from an appropriate plasma—the
plasma also has simultaneously produced accompanying time-like
longitudinal EM causal waves in the time-domain.
So unknown to us, we are actually inputting the time-domain
pump waves as well. Hence
we are actually pumping the
irradiated mass in the time-domain.
The longitudinal EM 3-space effects wave is always
accompanied by a correlated time-domain EM longitudinal wave—something
previously unknown in physics.
One cannot even have a "wave" unless there is an
active time aspect of it. If
there is a 3-space component of an EM wave, there must be an
accompanying time component of it as well, a priori.
with Longitudinal EM Waves Accomplishes Time-Domain Pumping
interaction with what we erroneously think are only longitudinal
3-space EM waves (as if continually observed and not causal), the
pumped cells themselves experience the time-pumping from the
associated incoming time-polarized EM longitudinal waves they absorb,
thereby producing amplified
antiengines in perfect one-to-one correlation to the cells' input resident
engines. The stronger
antiengines overpower the weaker resident engines, thus moving the
cells slowly back to a previous physical state.
Every smallest part of the cell is so time-domain pumped and so
Components of the Resident Engine and of the Generated Amplified
the resident engine into two parts: (1) the "normal"
resident engine component, which would represent a healthy, normally
functioning condition if the injured cell were normal, and
time-domain pumping of the cell with these two "inputs", we
see that the overall time-reversed engine or antiengine that is
created (and amplified) will also contain two components:
time-pumping effect is to time-reverse the diseased or damaged cell
back to its previous "normal" healthy condition.
This is how all biological healing in the living body is
accomplished by the cellular regenerative system itself.
This is the
long-sought solution to the biological and biophysical problem of
Jeremy P. Brockes, "Amphibian limb regeneration: Rebuilding a
complex structure," Science, 276(5309), Apr. 4, 1997, p.
remains a challenge, however, to understand precisely how the
combination of tissue repair mechanisms with reactivation of embryonic
programs can generate growth, pattern formation, and morphogenesis in
an adult animal.
We believe we
have now given the solution to that remaining challenge.
Prioré Procedure and Its Active Mechanism
possibility that some hitherto unrecognized feature of the radiation
from a rotating plasma may be responsible for the Prioré effects
should not be dismissed out of hand..."
intuition was "right on", in the vernacular.
The Prioré team used longitudinal EM wave pumping of the whole
body by longitudinal EM effect waves from a large plasma tube, without
any knowledge of the actual physical mechanism involved.
The team consisted of eminent French Scientists who worked with
Prioré in the 60s and early 70s.
They achieved startling and revolutionary cures of terminal
tumors, infectious diseases, atheriosclerosis, and suppressed immune
systems in laboratory animals and in some humans clandestinely
For the work,
Prioré invented a progressive series of large plasma tube treatment
devices for use in the experiments.
Essentially he mixed ordinary (transverse modeled) EM waves in
a giant plasma tube surrounded by a giant coil.
The longitudinal EM effects waves produced by the plasma tube—and
their accompanying causal time-like longitudinal EM waves—then were
recaptured inside a rippling magnetic field, by simply winding a large
coil around the plasma tube and placing the current upon the coil to
produce the rippling magnetic field "carrier".
modified the "inner longitudinal EM waves" of the emitted
"Prioré ray" that in fact comprise all normal EM fields,
potentials, and waves—and also modified their accompanying time-like
causal longitudinal EM waves.
Infolded EM Longitudinal Waves Inside Ordinary EM Entities
showed in 1904 that any EM field, potential, or wave can be decomposed
into two scalar potential functions (scalar potentials and their
impressed dynamics). That initiated what today is known as superpotential
in 1903 Whittaker had
already shown that each of those base scalar potentials decomposes
into the bidirectional EM longitudinal phase conjugate wavepairs, as
we discussed and reinterpreted above.
So all EM
fields and potentials and waves are just sets of what
will be after interaction/observation pure effects longitudinal EM
waves (with hidden, unobservable, accompanying causal time-like
longitudinal EM waves) with impressed dynamics.
In the West, this is a totally neglected, far more fundamental
electrodynamics than the "gross bulk electrodynamics" we
utilize. In Russia, the
KGB calls the interior longitudinal EM wave electrodynamics the information
content of the field. The
KGB has highly weaponized
this infolded LW electrodynamics for several decades, and for several
succeeding generations of weapons.
As an aside,
we point out that the mind and its operations are time-like. Hence the engineering of time-like longitudinal causal EM
waves allows the direct engineering of mind at all levels, including
short term and long term memory, perception, consciousness, the
unconscious mind (a massively parallel processor and totally
conscious, just multiply so), etc.
The overall extended electrodynamics/unified field theory is
It has three branches, depending upon what is targeted.
Against inert mass, normal EM fields and waves and potentials,
etc. that branch is called the same name: energetics.
Against the living physical body, cells, biopotentials,
biochemical functions, etc. that second branch of energetics is called bioenergetics. Against
the mind and mind operations, that third branch of energetics is
We will not further discuss psychoenergetics in this paper, but
will give an example of Russian bioenergetics testing.
of Russian Weaponization
example, the so-called Russian microwave radiation of personnel in the
U.S. Embassy in Moscow created deliberately induced health changes and
diseases in U.S. personnel for four decades.
All personnel health changes and diseases occurred only in
areas that were field-free, hence in areas where the potentials were
constant and stable.
that the interactions of the infolded electrodynamics structuring (the
engines) in the stable
potentials were the culprit. Had the EM radiation not
been involved, then some health changes would have occurred in areas
of the Embassy where fields were present, and some where they were
absent, on a random basis.
Prioré team unwittingly showed and the Russian microwave radiation of
the U.S. Embassy cleverly concealed, the infolded longitudinal wave
electrodynamics is engineerable. Not only can it be made to heal, as in Prioré's application,
but it can also be made to sicken and kill, as in the KGB testing
against U.S. personnel in the U.S. Embassy in Moscow.
Indeed, over the years three U.S. Ambassadors were sickened by
the microwave radiation and eventually died.
Subspace of Infolded EM Inside Conventional EM Entities
vacuum potential as identically spacetime, we thus have a sort of
"subspace" interior of spacetime—somewhat similar to, but
vastly extending, the present concept of dimensions wrapped around a
point, as in the Kaluza-Klein theory.
The "interior" of EM fields, waves, and potentials—considered
in 4-space—is actually a special kind of electrodynamics, using
paired sets of longitudinal EM waves (in both the time domain and what
will be in 3-space after interaction) and their dynamics. Note that
these internal LWs are identically spacetime curvatures and their
dynamics, in organized sets or "templates". So "ordinary" EM waves and fields and potentials
can and do carry such engines and templates.
Further, potentials superpose and "spread through one
internal structures (engines) diffuse one into the other, or
"mix" in that case. Emissions
from a biological body (as fields and potentials and waves) thus carry
thorough internal engines which represent the exact interior
conditions and dynamics of the emitting body in all aspects.
A future medical diagnosis technology will apply developed
longitudinal EM wave technology to directly analyze all major aspects
of health interest, for a living body.
Biophysical Mechanism Utilized Empirically in Homeopathy
We mention in
passing that homeopathy has long dealt with the fact that these
interior engines and their templates diffuse from the potentials and
fields in a dissolved substance, out into the potentials and fields
and waves in the liquid. The
hydrogen bonding actions particularly provide a special kind of
continuous energy density, hence constitute a special potential or
"H" potential. Immediately
one sees that the interior structure (engine) of the H-potential is
structured by diffusion of the engines of the dissolved compound.
One can dilute the solution, then by shaking violently the
diffusion of engine structures will be spread throughout the entire
H-potential of the new solution.
When by extreme dilution methods the actual physical compound
is no longer physically present, the engine structures of that
compound dissolute can still remain in the
in Reverse for Healing
or changes in spacetime are just changes in and to those internal
longitudinal waves (both causal and effect) and their dynamics, inside
normal electrodynamic causal
entities. Control and
engineer the interior electrodynamics (the infolded longitudinal EM
waves and their dynamics) of the causal EM waves, fields, and
potentials, and one does in fact utilize a novel but highly engineerable
unified field theory capable of controlling and changing matter in
any fashion. One is free
to directly engineer matter as one wishes, from the gluons and quarks
in the atomic nuclei, to the molecules, to the physics and the
chemistry, and to the DNA and operations of the living cell and living
Causes Arise and Act from the Local Spacetime In Which the Target is
that the use of engines does not require or involve the
"transmission of overt EM energy through space" at all.
One does not have to have the energetic engines
energetics of the engines and their interactions arises from
within the object, from
everywhere in it at once, and acting
on everything within it at once.
This is not the conventional "acting from outside
in", but totally unconventional "acting from inside
papers we have previously proposed how this "inside-to-out"
action is used to generate specific mechanisms for new low energy
nuclear reactions involved in "cold fusion" experiments.
The approach explains the production of deuterium, the
production of alpha particles, the production of tritium, etc. as well
as the production of the excess heat.
It also explains the years of anomalous instrument effects in
electrolyte experiments in U.S. Navy research facilities at China
Example: Russian Microwave Radiation of U.S. Embassy Personnel in
"outside-in" Faraday EM shielding useful against spatially
propagating overt EM energy has no effect at all on
"inside-out" propagation, as was shown in the Moscow Embassy
radiation incidents after aluminum screens were erected on the
Embassy. The EM 3-space
microwave field penetration (as continually observed is assumed!)
through the screens and into the Embassy was reduced some 90% by the
screens. The field-free
potentials were unaffected, and they contained all the internal active
engines, to embed in local spacetime and "act from inside
out". So the health changes and disease inductions continued.
Two beams were used in the microwave transmissions, meaning
that scalar interferometry (longitudinal EM wave interferometry of the
infolded energetics) was utilized as well. This allowed the additional
ability to produce ordinary EM radiation emerging in the exposed
bodies in the field-free areas, in whatever patterns were desired.
was to stimulate high-level attention of the U.S. Government,
intelligence community, and scientific community to see if they were
aware of what was actually being done.
By U.S. actions at the Embassy site, whether or not the U.S.
understood the engines and antiengines area could be determined with
very high confidence.
some years the U.S. showed conclusively that it had no understanding
of what was being done, how the diseases and health changes were being
introduced, or the mechanism being used.
We point out
that the Embassies in Russia of other nations were also subjected to
similar radiations and effects, for the same purpose.
Prioré Mechanism: Amplified Damage-Specific
active Prioré mechanism can finally be understood as specifically
generated and 100% correlated amplified antiengines introduced
throughout the body down to the deepest levels, including the genes
and chromosomes and even the atomic nuclei.
The Prioré team demonstrated revolutionary cures of terminal
tumors in laboratory animals, and cures of infectious diseases such as
reversed ("cleaned out") clogged arteries, thus reversing
also restored suppressed immune systems.
thousand experiments were conducted on laboratory animals, and quite a
few clandestine experiments successfully cured tumors and cancers in
human patients. The
results of the animal experiments are published in the standard French
scientific literature in leading French journals.
Is the Logical "Next Great Extension" to Mechanical
So the same
template concepts being utilized and developed in nanotechnology today
do extend much further that just mechanically into the molecular
region. They also extend
into the unified field theory region.
If not only mechanics and U(1) are employed, but a higher
symmetry electrodynamics such as O(3) is employed, nanotechnolgy will
dramatically extend into a vast new and direct healing technology,
where the actual mechanism utilized by the cellular regenerative
system can be highly amplified and used.
Example: Complete and Ready Cure of AIDS Would Be Possible
application to diseases such as AIDS is immediately apparent.
E.g., given the development of the engine and template
technology in unified field theory, electrodynamics (higher symmetry)
could be used to directly
time-reverse all cells of the body—including all the immune cells—back
to a previous healthy state, as
soon as the patient tests positive for AIDS.
There would be no need to wait for the symptoms and ravages of
the disease to appear.
Also, even a
patient in the advanced stages of the disease, and with concomitant
opportunistic infections, could be quickly and rather inexpensively
treated and cured. Note
that the DNA of the cells is also time-reversed back to an earlier
stage, so the problem of the remaining small residual infected cells
with altered genetics that escape drugs, etc.—and progressively
adapt and become more resistant—would be totally bypassed.
of the Aged Is Practicable
rejuvenation of the aged also appears to be directly engineerable by
such fundamental methods. Just
time-pump the entire body and all its cells and tissues, to gradually
time-reverse all the cells of the body.
Normal cells just get a little younger and more vigorous.
Aged or damaged cells return to normal again as they also get
But as one
might suspect, there are very powerful financial interests that do not
wish such a thing done at all. As
an example, a great deal of money is made today by treating the
disabilities of the aged, to alleviate symptoms and not achieve cures
at all. Change that lucrative formula, and some very great financial
empires—who spend $300 million or so to develop and FDA-certify a
single new drug!—are at serious risk.
and Extending Prioré's Process
There is also
a method of highly simplifying and speeding the Prioré radiation
results, discovered in Germany but not theoretically understood by the
discoverers. We will have
more on that later, in perhaps another paper.
In my 1998 presentation to the DoD and other government
agencies, I did propose an adaptation of that methodology as something
for which the treatment devices could be made very small (suitcase
sized) and highly portable and adaptable—and relatively inexpensive
once sunk development costs were spent. The view is to develop and mass produce this type of
relatively inexpensive and effective mass treatment apparatuses, which
could be flooded down through all emergency facilities and
organizations (hospitals, fire stations, police stations, National
Guard, etc.) and used to treat and save mass casualties in the
forthcoming terrorist use of biological weapons and other weapons of
mass destruction upon the population centers of the United States and
other Western powers.
and Informal Proposal Sent to DoD and Other Government Agencies
website, http://www.cheniere.org, there is a briefing
of more than 80 colored slides I submitted to the U.S. Department
of Defense and many other U.S. agencies in 1998, urging a crash
development program for this method of engines and templates.
The plan was to use the special "shortcut" and
simplified method, in very small, portable equipment, for use in
treating the mass casualties we expect in future terrorist attacks on
our population centers with weapons of mass destruction.
in their clandestine biowar laboratories, the Russians modified the
smallpox pathogen among other things, so that everyone's vaccination
is ineffective against it. Further,
there is little smallpox vaccine left these days, even against the
former smallpox strain. The
U.S. just discovered that its remaining smallpox vaccine cache is in
fact contaminated and not fit to be used on humans anyway.
We also know
that, after the collapse of the Russian economy, the Russian
scientists in those bioweapons labs quietly left Russia and were
employed by other nations, many quite hostile to our own nation and to
the West in general.
implications are obvious. The
coming weapons of mass destruction strikes on our large population
centers are known to be planned, and this threat has been officially
recognized as the greatest strategic threat against the U.S. today.
Quite frankly the U.S. is still woefully unprepared to handle
such strikes, as far as effectively treating and saving the stricken
casualties is concerned.
Major Present Defensive Response Is Triage
preparations for "defense" against these known-to-be-coming
mass strikes are still
very much inadequate and will massively fail to do the job.
Instead, we will see triage
on a massive scale.
Triage is "the sorting of and
allocation of treatment to patients and especially battle and disaster
victims according to a system of priorities designed to maximize the
number of survivors." [Webster's
Medical Dictionary, 1986.] This
is a very blandly worded definition of something blood-curdling: It
means "drag to the side all those who will probably die anyway or
already have the symptoms advancing, don't treat them, and just let
them die so we can try to save a few of the others."
is, modern war has moved from over
there amongst the soldiers to over
here amongst the civilians—men and women and children and
babies, the aged and the infirm, the sick and the well.
Strategic terrorist strikes on the United States will occur not
confined to some distant battlefield, but right in our cities—particularly
in and on our great population centers, which will be struck and
a study performed by the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment
before its dissolution, a single small "Piper Cub" type
aircraft with two terrorists (one to fly and one to spray), employing
a common agricultural sprayer, and spraying 100 kilograms of anthrax
spores while flying around leisurely over Washington D.C. on a calm
night, will generate (conservatively) from 1 to 3 million casualties.
The attack will also horribly contaminate the entire area with
anthrax. The terrorists
will be long departed prior to the emergence of the symptoms in the
population a few days later.
terrorists use a cocktail mix of other pathogens as well, such as
smallpox, an absolutely horrifying scenario of mass casualties will
ensue on a scale never before heard of in America.
uninitiated, in such mass casualties (say, 3 to 10 million sick and
dying of smallpox, anthrax, and a cocktail of other diseases, with
certainty of spreading by carriers), the present stockage of medical
supplies is but a spit in the ocean as to what is really required.
Consequently, the precious little stores of antibiotics,
vaccines, etc. that are available will be reserved for use on patients
deemed to have a reasonably good chance of surviving if treated.
Those already ill and most desperately needing treatment, but
deemed not to have a good survival chance, will simply be moved aside,
perhaps made comfortable if possible, and deliberately
allowed to die without treatment.
public still does not realize that (1) most of its mothers, fathers,
children, etc. will already be in desperate circumstances once the
symptoms from the attack—actually made several days earlier—start
emerging en masse, (2) for many or most of the stricken, there is then
very little chance of saving them even if treated with available
conventional means, (3) the conventional means are so scarce and there
are so few treatment teams available that only a pitifully few persons
can be treated prior to exhaustion of the supplies and death of the
afflicted, and (4) the standard and approved practice for such dire
circumstances is already determined:
It will mostly be to simply
move their loved ones aside and do little or nothing for them, while
they painfully die horrible and agonizing deaths.
If the mass
news media had its head on straight, and would clearly explain what is
going to happen to the American public on the course presently set, I
believe there would be a mass swell of protest that would force the
government to (1) develop more massive, portable treatment capability,
(2) flood that capability down through all the civilian facilities and
resources as well as in the military units, and (3) in a national
crash program, seek out at utmost speed and test any
and innovative new technology that could possibly save that huge
percentage of all those coming mass casualties that as of now will
assuredly perish. Their perishing is
already reluctantly recognized and planned, because of the extremely
limited capabilities to treat or save them!
take a rocket scientist to see that we need a lot more treatment
capability, and we also need a much more effective treatment
capability than anything in the inventory, being worked on, or even
known to the conventional establishment.
Getting a new and effective treatment capability can only be
met by going outside the "conventional" thinking on the
problem. Indeed, it can
only be met by miniaturizing the type of treatment methodology
indicated by the revolutionary results of the Prioré team.
To the present, the Government agencies have not even one
scientist contact me, and discuss the potential great saving of life
and how valid the proposed technology development is or is not.
At NIH, e.g.,
I never got out of their "policy" (read: spin
control) section. Not
a single scientist from NIH bothered to call me and discuss the
potential development, how solid the science was or was not, etc.
In short, not a soul took
it seriously. Not a soul
apparently bothered to read any of the French literature references
reporting the Prioré team's revolutionary results.
In short, not a soul was interested in solving the problem, if
it calls for going out of the "drug 'em, vaccinate 'em, hit them
with antibiotics accepted approach.
Oh yes, drag them off to die by applying triage is acceptable.
But saving them is unacceptable if it is not done by
"approved" pharmaceutical methods.
In short, it
was business as usual. Oh
yes, they have apparently developed harsh sprays that kill the
anthrax, on the ground where it lies and also in your body if you
breath in the spray. Well,
that is a way to go about decontaminating a city, and it may be quite
necessary. It's very
harsh, and it will kill some of the sprayed populace, but it will also
save lots more people than it kills.
It appears appear they've also been practicing quite a bit so
as to get the aerial spraying patterns correct.
science and treatment that are actually in hand at present, such harsh
methods are extremely regrettable but militarily understandable. In combat, one sometimes has to send a division to its death,
so to speak, in order to save the rest of the Corps. With war now to be fought right in the civilian populace,
these harsh and formerly purely military decisions made on distant
battlefields now have to be made right in our cities with civilian
lives. One can appreciate
the agony of a decision, say, to spray Washington, D.C. with
anti-anthrax spray after an anthrax attack, knowing that in doing so
the spray itself will kill some 10,000 to 20,000 persons.
Yet if the spray is not
used, perhaps three million more lives will be lost than if it is
used. One sees the point.
Such harsh decisions are now necessary and they will have to be
made for the civilian populace. Triage is just one more of those harsh decisions.
In a 3 million casualty
example, triage may well require that two and a half million American
citizens be deliberately moved aside and allowed to die.
heartbreaking point is that
there is a better way, if the ponderous government agencies will seize
upon it, fund it, and get it developed at all speed with a new
Manhattan Project. And if the leading influential scientists in our scientific
community will examine the Priore team results, shackle the dogmatists
who froth at the mouth at anything new, and spend some of that
taxpayers' billions showered on them in a all-out effort to save those
taxpayers' lives in return. In
view of the seriousness and validity of the threat and those kinds of
predicted results, anything less from our scientific community must be
called into question as approaching scientific treason against the
entire populace of the United States.
Serious Is the Threat, Really?
To see just
how extreme the threat can easily be, we call attention to an
excellent article: Laurie Garrett, "The Nightmare of
Bioterrorism," Foreign Affairs, 80(1), Jan./Feb. 2001, p.
76-89.] We quote from p.
a terrorist to disperse the smallpox virus, for example, populations
that were once universally vaccinated would now be horribly
vulnerable. Today the
U.S. government stows only about 15.4 million doses of the smallpox
vaccine—enough for less than seven percent of the American
population. The World
Health Organization (WHO) keeps another 500,000 doses in the
Netherlands, and other national stockpiles total about 60 million more
doses of varying quality and potency.
If the smallpox virus were released today, the majority of the
world's population would be defenseless, and given the virus' 30
percent kill rate, nearly two billion people would die."
Well, our stored vaccine will still
save us or most of us, right? Wrong. Quoting again
from Garrett, ibid., p. 77:
1999…scientists discovered that the U.S. samples of the smallpox
vaccine had severely deteriorated. Originally made in the 1970s by the
Wyeth pharmaceutical company, the samples were stored at the Centers
for Disease control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta in the form of
freeze-dried crystals parceled out in 100-dose quantities inside
vacuum-sealed glass tubes.
The tubes were further sealed with rubber stoppers secured by
metal clamps. To their
dismay, CDC investigators discovered condensation in many of the glass
tubes, indicating that the rubber stoppers had decayed and vacuum
pressure had been lost. Such
vaccine supplies can no longer be considered safe for human use."
shocked reader may exclaim. Can't
we get some vaccine that is stored by the other nations of the world,
etc.? And won't that save
is, no, we can't get it, and even if we did, it would not do any good
either. Again quoting
Garrett, ibid., p. 77:
the rest of the world's vaccine reserves have not undergone similar
scrutiny, experts do not have much confidence in those either. Furthermore, the world's supplies of bifurcated needles—uniquely
designed for scratch-administering the smallpox vaccine on human skin—have
been depleted, and companies are no longer interested in manufacturing
such specialized devices."
can see the point. One
can be assured that some terrorists do have smallpox agent, and some
even have the modified smallpox agent developed some years ago by the
Russians. Hence Garrett's estimate of nearly two billion people dying
if just smallpox alone is unleashed, nearly one third of the
population of the earth will eventually die.
This is just
one example threat of the many we face.
It is safe to say that, if weapons of mass destruction such as
biological warfare are unleashed on a substantial scale, over half the
population on Earth will die in the holocaust.
Any nation specifically targeted by multiple strikes may lose
over half its own population in those strikes.
That includes the United States as at the top of the
Need for Action
So as one can
see, we need all the technology using templates
and engines that we can get.
Nanobots in the emerging nanotechnology—though mechanical—are
a first good move in that direction. By all means, their development—and
concentration into treatments for these coming mass casualties—should
be redoubled. The
Prioré-type approach of engineering "spacetime nanobots"
and engines directly as
longitudinal EM systems in spacetime itself, is the logical extension
of the nanotechnology templating approach.
Both are needed as rapidly as they can humanly
be developed. We
need a new Manhattan Project, for the WMD threat today is far more
severe that was the approaching nuclear threat in the early 1940s.
There the threat was not yet developed and stockpiled. Now it
is both developed and stockpiled—including clandestinely cached
right here in the United States itself.
want to thank you for posting the nanotechnology information, and to
inform you of where the concept of template
really leads. It may be
that nanotechnology, as it develops, will start to focus on the
energetics of the matter, and eventually include the spacetime
curvature engine reactions that can be engineered by novel higher
One can only
hope and pray that this ponderous motion of the U.S. scientific
community will finally cut through the dogma and really look deeply
into the problem and the potential solution.
Millions of American lives are hanging in the balance, while
the scientific community seems to be engaged almost in "business
as usual. Never mind
innovative but odd new approaches, regardless of their potential
payoffs." That's a
little nicer "scientific suppression by ignoring" than was
used in France in the mid-70s to destroy the Prioré project. But it is suppression notwithstanding.
One is ever
mindful of how Max Planck wryly characterized the habitual response of
the scientific community to real innovation:
important scientific innovation rarely makes its way by gradually
winning over and converting its opponents: it rarely happens that Saul
becomes Paul. What does
happen is that its opponents gradually die out, and that the growing
generation is familiarized with the ideas from the beginning." [Max Planck,
in G. Holton, Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought, Harvard
University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1973.]
vacuum energy, Arthur C. Clarke characterized it best for all
be surprised if the world again witnesses the four stages of response
to any new and revolutionary development: 1. It's crazy! 2. It may be
possible -- so what? 3. I
said it was a good idea all along.
4. I thought of it first." Arthur
C. Clarke, in "Space Drive: A Fantasy That Could Become
Reality" NSS ... AD ASTRA, Nov/Dec 1994, p. 38.
We can only
hope that the scientific community will eventually respond with
greater alacrity and depth. It
has already been 40 years since the Prioré team began demonstrating
unprecedented and miraculous cures with the proposed technology, even
though in primitive form. It
has been nearly 30 years since the Prioré program was ruthless
suppressed by the new French leftist government that came into power,
and by the full weight of the orthodox French scientific
indeed large funds given for medical research by private wealthy
patrons. As an example,
Bill and Mrs. Gates have repeatedly donated large sums of money to
worthy causes, particularly to save lives.
Recently their foundation set up $100 million to develop a
vaccine for AIDS, which continues to take an enormous toll world wide,
and is decimating some poor nations. But the AIDS virus is unstable and changes strains often.
Any vaccine developed and used will likely be effective for
only a limited time, because the HIV virus will start rapidly adapting
to a resistant strain as soon as the vaccinations begin.
A $100 million effort in developing the "small unit"
approach to the Priore mechanism in a highly portable treatment
device, which treats in about one minute, could produce the unit
recommended in the color briefing to DoD that is carried on this
website. Not only could
that $100 million get a very good treatment and cure (and an
inexpensive one) for AIDS, but in the process it would also produce a
treatment and curative method and device that could save some 70% or
so of those coming millions of helpless American casualties.
mistake, the coming terrorist attacks are not a joke, and neither is
triage. Until the
scientific community wakes from its lethargy and moves vigorously on
this type of unprecedented medical treatment and potential, the dark
shadow of triage hangs heavily over every home in America, and in fact
over every home in the developed nations of the world, as well as many
of the impoverished nations. As of this moment, if one's city is struck here in America,
of necessity there is a very good chance one's own government will
simply let one die, along with a preponderance of one's loved ones and
Americans are going to die, just as surely as the sun will rise
tomorrow. And that
is something with which both the governmental community and the
scientific community will agree.
wishes, and thanks again for all your efforts.
Colonel, U.S. Army (Retired)
Probleme Prioré," Rapport de la Commission de l'Académie des
Sciences à Monsieur le Ministre d'Etat chargé de la Recherche et de
la Technologie, 1982, p. 1-22.
Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, Part
I, Senate Hearing 104-422, Hearings Before the Permanent Subcommittee
on Investigations of the Committee on Governmental Affairs, U.S.
Senate, Oct. 31 and Nov. 1, 1995.
Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Proliferation of Weapons
of Mass Destruction: Assessing the Risks, Government Printing
Office, Washington, D.C., 1993. A
major study on WMD and the risks to the U.S., including to the U.S.
of AIDS virus resistant to powerful drugs are spreading," AP
Release, The Huntsville Times, July 1, 1998, p. A-10. Now
people are beginning to catch HIV viruses that also are resistant to
protease inhibitors, which have revolutionized care of the disease in
the past two years. Report by Dr. Frederick Hecht published in July
1998 in New England Journal of Medicine.
Report released July 1, 1998 at the 12th International AIDS
Conference in Geneva.
Viruses Said Lethal." AP
Times, Oct. 31, 1986, p. B-10. Researchers infected mice
simultaneously with two mild herpes viruses and created a lethal
disease virus within the animals, the first proof that such a process
can occur in mammals. Report to be published in [that day's] journal Science.
and D. Bohm, “Significance of Electromagnetic Potentials in the
Quantum Theory,” Physical Review, Second Series, 115(3),
1959, p. 485-491; — “Further considerations on electromagnetic
potentials in the quantum theory,” Physical Review, 123(4),
Aug. 15, 1961, p. 1511-1524.
J. R., “Nothing’s plenty: The vacuum in modern quantum field
theory,” Contemporary Physics, 26(4), 1985, p. 333-391.
"A New Blueprint for Water's Architecture," Science,
Vol. 256, Jun. 26, 1992, p. 1764.
P. K; Bearden, T. E; Ciubotariu, C; Coffey, W. T.; Crowell, L. B;
Evans, G. J; Evans, M. W; Flower, R; Jeffers, S; Labounsky, A;
Lehnert, B; Meszaros, M; Molnar, P. R; Vigier, J. P; Roy, S.
of the Lehnert field equations from gauge theory in vacuum: Space
charge and current," Foundations Of Physics Letters,
13(2), APR 2000, p.179-184; — "Classical electrodynamics
without the Lorentz condition: Extracting energy from the
vacuum," Physica Scripta 61(5), May 2000, p.513-517; —
"Operator Derivation of the Gauge Invariant Proca and Lehnert
Equation: Elimination of the Lorentz Condition," Foundations
of Physics, 39(7), 2000, p. 1123; — "Effect of Vacuum
Energy on the Atomic Spectra," Foundations of Physics Letters,
13(3), June 2000, p. 289-296; — "On the Representation of the
Maxwell-Heaviside Equations in Terms of the Barut Field
Four-Vector," Optik 111(6), 2000, p. 246-248; —
"The New Maxwell Electrodynamic Equations: New Tools for New
Collection of 60 papers from the Alpha Foundation's Institute for
Advanced Study. Published
as a Special Issue of the Journal of New Energy, 4(3), Winter
1999. 335 p.
Terence W. (1996) "Active Signalling Systems," U.S. Patent No.
5,486,833, Jan. 23, 1996.
Filed Apr. 2, 1993.
W.; and D. M Grimes. [Eds.] Advanced
Electromagnetism: Foundations, Theory, & Applications.
World Scientific, (Singapore, New Jersey, London, and Hong
Kong), Suite 1B, 1060 Main Street, River Edge, New Jersey, 07661,
B., A Biologically
Active Combination of Modulated Magnetic and Microwave Fields: The
Priore Machine, Office
of Naval Research, London, Report R-5-78, Aug. 16, 1978; —
"Staging the Perils of Nonionizing Waves," European
Scientific Notes, ESN 32-3-85-88, 1978; — "Microwave
Magic," Office of Naval Research London Conference report, ONRL
E. "Extracting and
Using Electromagnetic Energy from the Active Vacuum," in M. W.
Evans (ed.), Contemporary Optics and Electrodynamics, Wiley,
2001, 3 vols. (in press), comprising a Special Topic issue as vol.
114, I. Prigogine and S.
A. Rice (series eds.), Advances
in Chemical Physics, Wiley, ongoing; — "Dark Matter or Dark
Energy?", Journal of New Energy, 4(4), Spring 2000, p.
4-11; — "Mind Control and EM Wave Polarization Transductions,
Part I", Explore, 9(2), 1999, p. 59; Part II, Explore,
9(3), 1999, p. 61; Part III, Explore, 9(4,5), 1999, p. 100-108;
— Energetics: Extensions to Physics and Advanced Technology for
Medical and Military Applications, CTEC Proprietary, Mar. 21,
1998, 200+ page inclosure to CTEC Letter to Gen. (Ret.) Walter Busby,
Deputy Secretary of Defense for Counterproliferation and Chemical and
Biological Defense, March 21, 1998; — "EM Corrections Enabling
a Practical Unified Field Theory with Emphasis on Time-Charging
Interactions of Longitudinal EM Waves," Explore, 8(6),
1998, p. 7-16; — "Vacuum Engines and Prioré's Methodology: The
True Science of Energy-Medicine, Parts I and II," Explore!,
6(1), 1995, p. 66-76; 6(2), 1995, p. 50-62; — "Vacuum Engines
and Prioré's Methodology: The True Science of Energy-Medicine, Parts
I and II," Explore!, 6(1), 1995, p. 66-76; 6(2), 1995, p.
O., "The neural semiconduction control system and its interaction
with applied electrical current and magnetic fields," Proceedings
of the XI International Congress of Radiology, Vol. 105, 1966, p.
1753-1759, Excerpta Medica Foundation; Amsterdam; — "The direct
current field: A primitive control and communication system related to
growth processes," Proceedings of the. XVI International.
Congress of Zoology,
Washington, D.C., Vol. 3, 1963, p. 179-183; — "A technique for
producing regenerative healing in humans," Frontier
Perspectives, 1(2), Fall/Winter 1990, p. 1-2; — and Charles H.
Bachman and Howard Friedman, The direct current system:
A link between the environment and the organism," New
York State Journal of Medicine, Vol. 62, April 15, 1962, p.
1169-1176; — and D. G. Murray, “A method for producing cellular
dedifferentiation by means of very small electrical currents,” Trans.
N.Y. Acad. Sci., Vol. 29, 1967, p. 606-615; — and Joseph A.
Spadaro, "Electrical stimulation of partial limb regeneration in
mammals," Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine,
Second Series, 48(4), May 1972, p. 627-64.
J.; B. Ducot, and A. Spira, Letter
to the Editor, "Memory of water revisited," in Nature,
Vol. 370, Aug. 4, 1994, p. 322. Letters from Benveniste et
al. on confirmation of his water memory phenomena by independent
laboratories and reported failure by Hirst et
Richard K., "The New Threat of mass Destruction," Foreign
Affairs, 77(1), Jan./Feb. 1998,p. 26-41
Christopher Bird, "The Case of Antoine Prioré and His
Therapeutic Machine: A Scandal in the Politics of Science," Explore!,
5(5-6), 1994, p. 97-110.
J., "A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of
'Hidden' Variables, I and II." Physical Review, 85(2),
Jan. 15, 1952, p. 166-179 (Part I); 180-193 (Part II).
F., "Clifford Algebra: What is It?"
IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society Newsletter, Aug.
1987, p. 18-23.
Bork, A. M.,
"Vectors versus quaternions — the letters in Nature," American Journal of Physics, Vol. 34, Mar.
1966, p. 202-211.
Spencer, Laws of Form, Julian Press, New York, 1972.
Jed. Z., From Maxwell to Microphysics, University of Chicago
Press, Chicago and London, 1985.
Foundations of Physics, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1967.
and D.D.L. Chung. (1999)
"Apparent negative electrical resistance in carbon fiber
composites," Composites, Part B, Vol. 30, 1999, p.
Crowe, M. J.,
A History of Vector Analysis: The Evolution of the Idea of a
Vectorial System, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame,
C. W.; Editor, The New Physics, Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, New York, 1989.
James D. Jr., "Quaternion quantum theory: New physics or number
mysticism?", American Journal of Physics, 42(3), Mar.
1974, p. 220-223.
V., "The Quantum Chaos Problem," Sov. Phys. Usp.,
Vol. 31, No. 7, 1988, p. 597-622.
and G. Nimtz, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 48, 1993, p. 632;
— “Photonic Tunneling
Experiments,” Physical Review Vol. B47, 1993, p. 9605-9609.
Evans, M. W.,
"O(3) Electrodynamics," a review of some 250 pages in M.W.
Evans (ed.), Contemporary Optics and Electrodynamics, Wiley,
2001, 3 vols. (in press), comprising a Special Topic issue as vol.
114, Prigogine and S. A. Rice (series eds.), Advances in Chemical Physics, Wiley, ongoing; —O(3)
Electrodynamics, Vol. V of The Enigmatic Photon, Kluwer,
Dordrecht, 1999; — and L. B. Crowell, Classical and Quantum
Electrodynamics and the B(3) Field, World Scientific, Singapore,
2000 (in press).
Richard P., The Character of Physical Law, MIT Press,
Cambridge, 1965; — "Space-Time Approach to QED," Physical
Review, 76(6), 15 Sept 1949, p. 769-789; — Quantum
Electrodynamics, Other TBD, 1961, 1963.
Robert A., [Ed.], Optical
Phase Conjugation, Academic Press, NY, 1983.
I. and A. G. Nikitin, Symmetries
of Maxwell’s Equations,
D. Reidel, 1987.
Laurie, The Coming Plague: Newly Emerging Diseases in a World Out
of Balance, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, 1994; —
"The Nightmare of Bioterrorism," Foreign Affairs,
80(1), Jan./Feb. 2001, p. 76-89; — Betrayal of Trust: The
Collapse of Global Health, Hyperion, New York, 2000.
Jean-Michel, Dossier Prioré: A New Pasteur Affair, De Noel,
Paris, 1984 [in French]. A
complete exposé of the Prioré affair.
"How Anthrax Kills," Letters, Science, Vol.
280, Jun. 12, 1998, p. 1671-1673.
F., Propagation of Nonsinusoidal Electromagnetic Waves.
Academic Press, New York, 1986.
Oliver, Electromagnetic Theory, 3 vols., Benn, London,
1893-1912. Second reprint
Robert, "Shocks for Snakebites," Outdoor Life, June
1987, p. 55-57; 110-111.
Hunt, B. J., The
Maxwellians, Cornell University Press, 1991.
T. Eguchi and
K. Nishijima, Broken Symmetry: Selected Papers of Y. Nambu,
World Scientific, River Edge, NJ, 1995.
T. Eguchi and
K. Nishijima, Broken Symmetry: Selected Papers of Y. Nambu,
World Scientific, River Edge, NJ, 1995.
Jammer, Max, Concepts
of Space: The History of Theories of Space in Physics., 2nd
Edition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1969; —
Concepts of Force. Harvard
University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1957; — , “Entropy,”
in Dictionary of the History of Ideas, vol. 2, edited by P.
Wiener, Scribner’s, New York, 1973.
Vlail and L. P. Mikhailova, Ultraweak Radiation in Intercellular
Interactions, [in Russian], Novosibirsk, 1981.
Morris, Mathematics: The Loss of Certainty, Oxford University
Press, New York, 1980.
Lee, T. D., Particle
Physics and Introduction to Field Theory, Harwood, New York, 1981.
Robert Bruce and Henry Margenau, Foundations of Physics, Dover,
Andrew A., Powerline Electromagnetic Fields and Human Health,
available at http://www.ortho.lsumc.edu/Faculty/Marino/Marino.html.
James Clerk, “A dynamical theory of the electromagnetic field,” Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society, Vol. 155, 1865, p. 71, 459; —
A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, Oxford University
Press, Oxford, 1873.
H. and Benjamin F. Bush, “Radiation measurements at China Lake: Real
or Artifacts?”, Proc. ICCF-7(International Conference on Cold
Fusion—7, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Apr. 1998, p. 101.
K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation, W.H. Freeman, San
Tadahiko, Nuclear Transmutation: The Reality of Cold Fusion,
Infinite Energy Press, Concord, NH, 1997.
Nahin, Paul, Oliver
Heaviside: Sage in Solitude, IEEE Press, New York, 1987; — “Oliver
Heaviside,” Scientific American, 262(6), June 1990, p. 124.
Niven, W. D.,
Editor, The Scientific Papers of James Clerk Maxwell, Dover,
New York, 1952, Vol. 1, p. 526-604.
and I. Iovitzu Popescu, “The Quantum Effects of Electromagnetic
Fluxes,” Reviews of Modern Physics, 57(2), Apr. 1985, p.
Lochlainn, The Dawning of Gauge Theory, Princeton University
Podolny, R., Something
Called Nothing: Physical Vacuum: What Is It?, Mir Publishers,
H., “On the transfer of energy in the electromagnetic field,” Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Vol. 175, Part II,
1885, p. 343-361.
de la Trypanosomiase Expérimentale Aiguë et Chronique par L’action
Combinée de Champs Magnétiques et D’Ondes Electromagnétiques
doctoral thesis, which the University of Bordeaux was compelled to
reject due to the ruthless suppression of the Prioré project. Also
see Antoine Prioré, "Apparatus for producing radiations
penetrating living cells," U.S. Patent No. 3,368,155, Feb. 6,
1968; — "Method of producing radiations for penetrating living
cells," U.S. Patent No. 3,280,816, Oct. 25, 1966.
Eric, Effets des Ondes Electromagnètiques et des Champs
Magnètiques sur le Cancer et la Trypanosomiase Experimentale [Effects
of Electromagnetic Waves and Magnetic Fields on Cancer and
Experimental Trypanosomias], Doctoral thesis, University of
Bordeaux No. 83, March 16, 1984. Although Prioré's own thesis was
suppressed in 1973, Pautrizel nevertheless finally succeeded in
getting this doctoral thesis by Perisse approved on the work, at the
University of Bordeaux, after eleven more years had passed.
Considering the viciousness of the suppression, this was a major
M., “Do the French Have a Cure for Cancer?”
Esquire, July 1975, p. 110-111, 142-149.
C. and Harold E. Puthoff, “Extracting Energy and Heat from the
Vacuum,” Physical Review E, 48(2), Aug. 1993, p.
1562-1565; — “Source of Vacuum Electromagnetic Zero-Point Energy,”
Physical Review A, 40(9), Nov. 1, 1989, p. 4857-4862.
Reali, G. C.,
“Reflection from dielectric materials,” American Journal of
Physics, 50(12), Dec. 1982, p. 1133-1136.
A. Jr. and J. Vaz Jr., “Subluminal and Superluminal Solutions in
Vacuum of the Maxwell Equations and the Massless Dirac Equation,” Advances
in Applied Clifford Algebras, Vol. 7(S), 1997, p. 457-466.
H., Quantum Field Theory, Second Edition, Cambridge University
of Science: Festschrift for Mendel Sachs, Michael Ram
(Ed.), World Scientific, Singapore, 1999).
Mendel, General Relativity and Matter, Reidel, 1982; — Quantum
Mechanics from General Relativity, Reidel, 1986; —
"Relativistic Implications in Electromagnetic Field Theory,"
in T. W. Barrett and D. M. Grimes, eds., Advanced Electromagnetism,
World Scientific, 1995, p. 541-559.
P., And Yet It Moves: Strange Systems and Subtle Questions in
Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993.
E. T., “On the Partial Differential Equations of Mathematical
Physics,” Mathematische Annalen, Vol. 57, 1903, p. 333-355; —
“On an Expression of the Electromagnetic Field Due to Electrons by
Means of Two Scalar Potential Functions,” Proc. Lond. Math. Soc.,
Series 2, Vol. 1, 1904, p. 367-372.
The paper was published in 1904 and orally delivered in 1903.