Novel Principles In
The Rife Microscope
And Rife's Great Secret
Ó
1998 T.E. Bearden
Substantially
updated Aug. 20, 2001
Foreword
In the 1930s and 1940s,
Royal Raymond Rife {1} made revolutionary discoveries in microscopy, including
development of novel microscopes that could see far beyond the
accustomed one-tenth wavelength limitation according to Rayleigh
theory. With his
microscope, he was able to "see" ultramicroscopic living
forms much smaller than anything considered in the observable state.
It would appear that his microscope was somehow capable of
peering directly into the virtual state itself, and finding living
forms at that level that were far beyond anything ever suspected by
conventional science, even to this day.
Obviously this work was
dramatically controversial. Rife
went on to develop treatment methods and devices based on the new
level of living organisms that his microscope revealed.
In short, he arrived at essentially a new theory of disease,
and did achieve success with his—to conventional scientists—completely
unprecedented devices and methods of treating and healing.
While we do not discuss his treatment methods in this paper, we
do discuss the methods of Prioré, whom we believe to have used
similar principles. So
these discussions may shed some light on Rife's therapeutic mechanisms
also.
Rife and others reported
his results in the proper scientific literature.
For his efforts, he was ostracized, essentially imprisoned in a
medical treatment facility, broken, and rejected by his peers.
His findings were harshly ridiculed and discredited.
Finally escaping from his enforced confinement, Rife lived out
his remaining years and died quietly and unknown.
In the present paper it
is not our purpose to address Rife's theory of disease or his
treatment devices and methods. It
is solely our purpose to propose a higher symmetry electrodynamics
functioning of his microscope, as one possible explanation of the
startling microscopy results he achieved.
We will reveal what we are convinced is Rife's great secret:
recursive virtual state magnification (amplification) by iterative
difference frequency serial summation of vacuum engines.
This is a substantial change from an earlier mechanism proposed
by the present author, which proved to be in error {1}.
We accent that this is
not a "standard electrodynamics" examination of the Rife
microscope; normal U(1) electrodynamics and transverse EM waves
contain no mechanisms that can explain the functioning of the
instrument. Accordingly,
since no such explanation is contained in the usual electrodynamics,
one must of necessity turn to those available electrodynamics models
that are of much higher symmetry than afforded by vector and tensor
algebra. To show the fit
to experiments, we must also address an enormous amount of the work
performed by Prioré and his colleagues.
Only in such EM models and their known fit to actual
experiments are the additional phenomena and principles available that
can possibly explain Rife's epochal results.
Also, because of the
importance of this unified field theory area, we include substantial
references and additional extended discussions in the endnotes for
further technical clarification.
Thirty figures are added to illustrate the material.
The
Rife Microscope
The Rife microscope {
[1]
} (Figure 1)
cannot be made to work by normal optical principles at the level
utilized by Rife. With
normal optics, about one-tenth wavelength is as fine an optical
resolution as one can get. Since
Rife went far beyond that, it should be obvious that he was using
optics and electrodynamics of a novel
kind, and of a type not yet in the conventional textbook.
We believe we are aware of the major principles used in Rife’s
microscope, or at least some of them, but prior to 1998 we shied away
from anything to do with the scope.
My major interests have been in extracting EM energy from the
vacuum and in developing a new kind of medical therapy utilizing
higher symmetry electrodynamics—and thus unified field theory—to
directly and slowly change cellular disease or disorder back to a
normal previous state. Obviously,
if one is to produce a microscope that "sees" optically
further into the realm of smallness than any other microscope can
conventionally do (even in theory), that microscope must be
functioning in a higher electrodynamics mode rather than in the
conventional one.
In this
paper, we will try to summarize some deep physics principles
underlying the Rife microscope, at least as we see them terms of a
higher symmetry EM model, and we cite some references for the bits and
pieces. A more detailed
explanation must wait for a future time and assistance from very
high-level theorists.
Introduction
A
good hint is this: Rife (Figure
2)
often painfully adjusted his microscope stages for up to 24
hours before he finally got the instrument "focused."
Immediately that shows it is not standard optical equipment.
Well-made standard optics—and Rife’s microscope was
beautifully made—can be adjusted far more easily than that (in
minutes!).
So
far as we are aware, no one ever looked at the Rife work except
through essentially rather orthodox electrodynamics and rather
orthodox optics eyes. Normal
optical theory permits resolution of about one tenth of the wavelength
of the light used, and a few microscopes in the last few years have
gone just a wee bit further. But none have gone anywhere to the degree of smallness that
Rife reported.
In
our view, the orthodox approach to explaining the operation of Rife's
microscope is doomed to fail from the beginning.
Even a very good scientist will fail with replication, if that
approach is exclusively taken. An
entire scientific team and substantial funding will not do any better,
unless something technically deeper is understood and tackled from the
outset. We give an
overview of our approach to tackling that problem.
To begin with, we must present some errors in electrodynamics
and an omission in general relativity, so that we can develop the
necessary background. The
discussion is not simple and will require considerable development.
Once the considerable background is developed, the application
to the Rife microscope will be straightforward.
Errors
in Electrodynamics and Adjustments to General Relativity
First, present
electrodynamics itself has serious flaws and shortcomings, and needs
substantial revision {[2]
}. As
foundations scientist Bunge points out {[3]}:
"...it
is not usually acknowledged that electrodynamics, both classical and
quantal, are in a sad state.”
Bunge
{[4]
} also said:
"...
the best modern physicist is the one who acknowledges that neither
classical nor quantum physics are cut and dried, both being full of
holes and in need of a vigorous overhauling not only to better cover
their own domains but also to join smoothly so as to produce a
coherent picture of the various levels of physical reality."
The flaws in
electrodynamics pass over into what has been constructed for optical
theory—both linear and nonlinear—which just assumes the
electrodynamics as a subset.
For our purpose, we need
to clarify what modern electrodynamics does and does not say about the
massless vacuum, and about the state and form of EM entities—such as
potentials, fields, and waves—created in it (in empty
space) by matter dynamics, or acting from it (from empty
space) onto matter and causing matter dynamics.
Maxwell and all his
peers believed firmly in the material ether, a thin material fluid
filling all space and every crevice.
To scientists at the time, not one single point in the universe
was devoid of this material etheric fluid—this thin matter.
The atom had not been discovered, the electron had not been
discovered, and electricity was also considered a thin material fluid.
Charge had no more meaning than “a piece of the electric
fluid,” much like a cubic centimeter of water.
Faraday {[5]
} believed that the EM influence in space consisted of material lines of force which
acted as taut strings under tension from some mysterious source.
He believed that EM disturbances were just the transverse wave
“perturbations” of these taut strings.
In his concept, Faraday omitted the string holder or other
agent producing the tensile forces upon the string (Figure
3).
He thus omitted Newton’s third law from his electrodynamics
concept. He also omitted
precisely half the energy, by omitting the equal-energy time-reversed
EM wave that accompanies the formation of every ordinary EM wave we
take account of. In a
receiving copper wire antenna, for example, not only do the electrons
interact with the incoming fields, but so do the protons in the nuclei—though
highly damped in amplitude by the proton's large mass with respect to
the mass of a disturbed Drude electron.
However, the two energetic interactions (of perturbed protons
and perturbed electrons) are of equal energy magnitude.
So in the conductor, equal energy is expended to move the
"lattice holes" (positrons) as is used to move the Drude
electrons, else field theory itself is falsified.
Except in semiconductors, electrical engineers mostly just
ignore the "disturbed lattice hole current" energy.
Maxwell deliberately
captured Faraday’s thinking, mathematically {[6]
}, and so just assumed
Faraday’s lines of force and the “plucked tight string”
transverse EM wave in the material ether {[7]
} as well as the unexplained tension .
The notion of the transverse EM wave in vacuum has essentially
no other theoretical justification than that Faraday-Maxwell
assumption and the observed "transverse waves" generated in
the receiving "electric fluid in the conductor" in and on
the Drude electrons. The transverse EM wave notion in vacuum was maintained only
by discarding its missing antiwave that is always formed
simultaneously in our transmitters and receivers (e.g., when we
perturb the Drude electrons in a transmitting wire antenna, we also
perturb the protons in the nuclei with the same energy.
The two disturbances—proton disturbance in the nucleus and
Drude electron disturbance in the Drude electron gas—perturb the
local surrounding vacuum/spacetime with equal energy, so in the vacuum
"virtual particle flux gas" the two perturbations are
energetically equal. The receiving wire receives both perturbation
waves from the vacuum; one perturbs the electrons and the other
perturbs the nuclei. Since
the second wave is unaccounted, the perturbation of the nuclei is just
considered a "mysterious force" that always appears. In a pumped phase conjugate mirror material, e.g., we
interact the waves prior to their reaching the nuclei, by multi-wave
mixing. Since the
"causative" but neglected second wave coming in from space
does not reach the nuclei, but are redirected to form the phase
conjugate replica wave produced by the pumping, the mirror does not
recoil and it does not exhibit Newtonian third law reaction.
However, since electrodynamics omits the EM causative wave that
generates Newton’s third law forces in the receiver, which in normal
detection always appear, then presently electrodynamic fields are
erroneously said to be devoid of Newton's third law reaction.
To the contrary, the effects of that hidden, neglected EM cause
of the Newtonian third law reaction do appear, either as recoil of the
physical receiving antenna or as the production of the time-reverse
phase conjugate replica wave in optical pumping.
But in standard electrodynamics, equal-and-opposite forces in
the receiving antenna are assumed to arise "mystically” or from
some hidden electrodynamic demon.
The electrodynamic cause of Newton's third law has been lost
since Maxwell wrote his theory.
Maxwell, however, was
careful to point out the ad hoc nature of assuming the stress in the
vacuum, and that no mechanism for it had been discovered, nor was such
a mechanism contained in his theory.
Specifically, Maxwell said {[8]
}:
“It must be carefully borne in mind that we have made only one step in
the theory of the action of the medium.
We have supposed it to be in a state of stress, but we have not
in any way accounted for this stress, or explained how it is
maintained. This step,
however, seems to me to be an important one, as it explains, by the
action of the consecutive parts of the medium, phenomena which were
formerly supposed to be explicable only by direct action at a
distance. … I have not been able to make the next step, namely, to
account by mechanical considerations for these stresses in the
dielectric. I therefore
leave the theory at this point, merely stating what are the other
parts of the phenomenon of induction in dielectrics.”
Indeed, we now know of
electrons and their spin. The
longitudinally-constrained, spinning Drude electrons in receiving
wires will gyroprecess laterally in the wire when an EM disturbance
from the vacuum interacts with them.
(Figure
4)
It is well-known that these Drude electrons are highly
restrained longitudinally down the wire; the longitudinal movement is
the "drift" velocity and may be nominally only a few inches
per hour. The lateral
precession of the longitudinally constrained, spinning Drude electrons
establishes that the incoming vacuum disturbance, before its
interaction with the gyroelectrons, is longitudinal. Else one must discard electron spin, electron gyroprecession,
and indeed the theory of gyroscopic precession itself. In our view, the EM wave in
vacuum is longitudinal, always has been, and always will be {[9]
}. It also does
not consist of EM force fields, contrary to present classical
theory. Instead, only the
potentiality {[10]} for the transverse force fields—should
the longitudinally perturbed vacuum EM entity be intercepted by a
spinning charged particle and interact with it—exists in mass-free
space, as pointed out by Feynman.
Quoting Feynman again {[11]
}:
.
"We may think of E(x,
y, z, t) and B(x, y, z, t)
as giving the forces that would be experienced at the time t by
a charge located at (x, y, z), with the condition that placing
the charge there did not disturb the positions or motion of all
the other charges responsible for the fields."
Rigorously the force
fields exist only in and of matter.
In matter-free space, there is no force at all in what we call
the "field as it exists in massfree space" {[12]
}. E.g.,
Jackson states it this way {[13]}:
"Most
classical electrodynamicists continue to adhere to the notion that the
EM force field exists as such in the vacuum, but do admit that
physically measurable quantities such as force somehow involve the
product of charge and field."
But again, Jackson also states {[14]
}:
"...the
thing that eventually gets measured is a force..."
"At the moment, the electric field can be defined as the
force per unit charge acting at a given point.
It is a vector function of position, denoted by E.
One must be careful in its definition, however.
It is not necessarily the force that one would observe by
placing one unit of charge on a pith ball and placing it in position.
The reason is that one unit of charge may be so large that its
presence alters appreciably the field configuration of the array.
Consequently one must use a limiting process whereby the ratio
of the force on the small test body to the charge on it is measured
for smaller and smaller amounts of charge.
Experimentally, this ratio and the direction of the force will
become constant as the amount of test charge is made smaller and
smaller. These limiting
values of magnitude and direction define the magnitude and direction
of the electric field E at the point in question.
In symbols we may write
F = qE
where F is the force, E the electric field, and q the charge.
In this equation it is assumed that the charge q is located at
a point, and the force and the electric field are evaluated at that
point."
As can be seen, much of the difficulty occurs because physicists
continue to erroneously utilize an equation
as if it were a definition.
An equation defines nothing at all; it merely states that all
the "things on the left"
of the equality sign and all the "things on the
right" have the same overall magnitudes.
It does not define any of the things on
the left or right, and so it tells us nothing at all about what
anything in it really is.
A definition requires an identity, not an equality. E.g., if we take as an identity the very equation advanced by
Jackson's explanation above, we then have a definition:
F º qE => E º
F/q
And now that identity clearly states that charged mass is a component
of the E-field. Similar
argument prevails for the B-field, etc.
The identity also shows
that E is not the magnitude of the force field at all, but is
its local intensity at any given point in the E field, in terms
of force per unit point static coulomb—a force formed in, on, and of
the charged mass of the coulomb.
The misstatement that E represents the magnitude of the
field is another great non sequitur.
No textbook gives the calculation of the magnitude of
the E-field, though all purport to.
Instead, they all give the calculation of the intensity
of the E-field at each point in it.
There is a great difference between the magnitude of an
automobile's mounted tire and its pressure per sq. inch on the
pavement. In all
fairness, some of the better texts do use the term "field
intensity", at least occasionally.
As defined, the EM
force fields are effects produced in, on, and of charged matter and only
in, on, and of charged matter. They
are not at all the same effects produced in matter-free space (in the
vacuum/spacetime). The EM
force field (in matter) is not the same as the "massfree"
E-field in massfree spacetime. Ultimately,
all that exists in spacetime are spacetime and changes to
spacetime.
We may accurately take
the mass-free, force-free EM field to be a pattern of spacetime
curvatures. The coupling
of this spacetime curvature set, or any part of it, with charged mass,
then constitutes an EM force field.
Again, the problem is the hoary old mechanics notion of having
a separate massless force acting upon a separate mass.
No such thing exists in all nature, and mechanics should have
been rather thoroughly overhauled long ago as a result of this
horrendous foundations of mechanics error that is centuries
old.
In
present classical electrodynamics—certainly the kind taught to
electrical engineers and used in the electrical engineering discipline—the
EM potential {[15]
}, field, and wave, as
they truly exist in space and in
the vacuum, are
rigorously not prescribed at all.
Instead, the effect of the "causal entity" as it
exists in vacuum prior to interaction with charged mass, is used a if
it were what exists in and on the charged mass as the effect of the
interaction. (See Figure
5, Figure 6,
and Figure 7).
This substitution of the effect for the cause is arguably the
greatest uncorrected error in classical electrodynamics today.
It is a hangover from the old days of the material ether, and
the refusal to change the Maxwell-Heaviside equations to eliminate
that material ether assumption, once the Michelson-Morley experiments
falsified it. This has
long been known to foundations physicists, and to most of the better
electrodynamicists as well. But
it still seems to be known to very few electrical engineers!
Many
attempts have been made to “modify” the standard classical
electrodynamics theory, but most have failed.
For some reason, most of these attempted modifications seem to
have accepted the present “matter-to-matter transform” approach (Figure
8) of present electrodynamics, failing to see that the two missing
transforms of matter-to-spacetime and spacetime-to-matter (Figure 9)
are in fact just general relativity itself {[16]
,
[17]
} The solution
for adding the missing two transforms into electrodynamics therefore
may lie in “infolding” general relativity directly within
electrodynamics, rather than placing the two on an equal footing.
That requires the analysis of the supersystem rather than the
system, a concept which will be discussed shortly. Figure
10
shows the utilization of the "vacuum engine" that results
from this "infolded GR" solution.
To
our knowledge, the Sachs unified field theory {[18]
a,b,c,d,e} is presently the only practical unified field
theory that can be directly engineered by higher symmetry
electrodynamics, such as the O(3) group symmetry EM model advanced by
Evans and Vigier and perfected by Evans {[19]
}. The
engineering power of Sachs' theory is remarkable {[20]
}, and the O(3) electrodynamics has been shown by Evans to
be an important subset of the unified electrodynamics in Sachs'
theory.
Let
us examine that statement a little deeper.
In classical
electrodynamics the sources of all EM potentials, fields, waves, and
their energies are assumed to be the charges—which are assumed to
somehow act as perpetual motion machines that continuously create
and pour out all that EM energy in the fields and potentials
associated with the charge as their "source".
This outpouring of 3-space energy comprising and establishing
the associated potentials and fields eventually fills all space with
energy. All the charges
and dipoles present in the universe since shortly after its formation
have done this for some 14 billion years.
Yet in classical EM—with
all the existing charges in the universe implicitly assumed to
continuously pour out energy into all of space, and most having done
so for billions of years—inexplicably space is then
considered to be an emptiness having no interactive energetic exchange
with the charge at all {[21]
}. That of
course is a non sequitur because it involves a total
contradiction of the conservation of energy law.
If there is no active energy in spacetime for the charged
particle to receive and then output in 3-space, then the energy
conservation is falsified by every charge and every dipole.
In particle physics the
inactive vacuum concept is known to be quite wrong, else the charge
creates energy from nothing. That
would violate the most sacrosanct law in physics: that energy
can neither be created nor destroyed.
So electrodynamics—both classical and quantum, neither of
which contains the solution to this source charge problem—is
in gross violation of conservation of energy laws, because it assumes
that the charge is solely the source of its associated fields and
potentials and their energy {
[22]
} and that it accordingly creates all that energy it has
poured out since the beginning of the universe.
Presently the electrical
engineer implicitly assumes total violation of the conservation of
energy law with every equation he writes, and is blissfully unaware of
it.
Particle physicists,
however, have done much better and published and incorporated their
results, although inexplicably the mainstream electrodynamicists have
not changed their own model accordingly.
Particle physicists have known and shown for more than 40 years
that (i) space is a seething inferno of EM energy {
[23]}, (ii) a charge continually undergoes a violent energy
exchange (see Figure 11)
with the vacuum EM flux. That
exchange is what a charged mass is doing, to make it a
"charged mass"), and (iii) the charge is a broken
symmetry in that violent energetic flux of the vacuum.
"Broken symmetry" means that the charge disrupts and
alters part of that virtual particle flux to observable EM energy flux
(see again Figures 5, 6.
and 7). The
charge continually absorbs virtual energy from the vacuum, radiates some
of that absorbed energy back to the vacuum in virtual form, but integrates
and radiates the remainder
in a flow of potentially observable energy—the energy flow
discovered by Poynting {[24]
} and Heaviside {[25]
} after Maxwell was already deceased.
So what does the source
charge really do? It
coheres, transduces, and gates
some of its virtual energy {[26]
} received from the vacuum, into an EM energy flow going
out in all directions in 3-space from that source charge. Contrary to
present electrodynamics, this energy flow is actually longitudinal and
bidirectional {[27]
,
[28]
,
[29]
,
[30]}, with energy going out in 3-space from the charge to every point in the universe,
and with energy coming from every point in the universe back
to the charge through the time domain.
But as reinterpreted {22
b}, Whittaker {[31]
} showed in 1903 that any such bidirectional EM flow of
energy—reinterpreted with the input energy to the charge coming from
the time-domain, and the output energy from the charge being emitted
into 3-space, comprises a scalar potential.
This also agrees with quantum field theory {[32]
}
See Figure 12.
As it really exists in space, a scalar potential is a harmonic
set of bidirectional EM energy flows, with the
"bidirectional" EM waves being outgoing EM waves in 3-space
caused by interaction with the source charge or dipole of incoming
time-polarized EM waves. There
is a set of outgoing EM longitudinal waves in 3-space, perfectly
correlated with a set of incoming time-polarized EM waves in the time
domain. Hence one
time-polarized EM "causal" wave couples with one outgoing
longitudinal EM wave in 3-space.
It is this scalar EM wave coupling (combining) with
longitudinal EM wave coupling, in a harmonic set of phase conjugate
pairs, that constitutes the scalar EM potential.
In short, all EM energy
in 3-space comes from the time domain.
After all, no observable
persists continuously in time. Any
observable is a frozen 3-space momentary snapshot of an ongoing
4-space interaction. It
is the result of a d/dt operation imposed upon LLLT spacetime, to
yield a momentary LLL by
d/dt(LLLT) => LLL
What we see as the
"motion of an object in 3-space" is actually the ensemble of
a continual serial
iteration of such "frozen 3-space snapshots" of each
observable part of the object, much as the iterative frames of a movie
film are seen as a continuously moving picture.
In Whittaker's
bidirectional energy flow associated with the source charge,
electrodynamicists—including Whittaker himself—assumed that a
point positive coulomb of charge is located at each and every point in
space. (Figure
5, Figure 6, and Figure
7). A tiny bit of the impinging EM energy flow “from” the
distant source charge {[33]
} is geometrically intercepted and diverted by the
observing/detecting point charge to streamline around it, creating a
“swirl around” of diverted energy flow.
As can be seen, only a tiny portion of the impinging and
passing EM energy stream in 3-space is diverged into the swirl.
This is rather like a small diverted whirlpool of water forming
around a stable rock in a flowing river.
In electrodynamics the amount of energy in that “diverged
whirlpool” is said to be the “collected” energy appearing upon
that point charge (upon that fixed rock).
That amount of energy swirled by the intercepting point coulomb
at a given point in space, is then erroneously said to be the magnitude
of the potential (the magnitude of the entire river).
It is no such thing. The
small fraction of the potential that is diverted from the
potential's flowing rivers of energy, is not that the magnitude of
that potential (the magnitude of the entire set of flowing rivers
themselves!) And
it is certainly not “identically” the river itself!
At best it is a measure of the intensity of the
potential (the local intensity of all those internal rivers of energy
flow) at that point occupied by the intercepting/diverting rock.
The
point is, as defined and used in
conventional electrodynamics, the potential occurs only after the
vacuum EM entity’s reaction with the intercepting mass, and is
defined only as the effect produced
upon that coulomb by the causative potential's interaction.
Literally, the potential (the cause) is erroneously defined as
the “excitation” or “excess energy” it locally produces as an effect
upon a unit point intercepting/collecting charge.
Ironically,
it appears that no electrodynamicist calculates the magnitude of the
actual potential as it exists in vacuum-spacetime, before its
interaction with charge {[34],
[35]
}. Its magnitude is enormous, since the potential may
extend over all space, and energy can be intercepted and collected by
a charge placed at any point therein, or from charges placed at every
point therein.
Certainly
no rigorous definition of the potential presently exists in physics;
the reader is challenged to check for himself or herself.
No legitimate definition can exist for the potential,
until the little matter is resolved of its present erroneous
definition only "in and on and deviated by" charged matter,
contradicted by the simultaneous assumption that it does exist in
mass-free space in undeviated form.
What is deviated from the potential, is not the potential
itself. A part of
something torn out of that something at one point in itself, is not
the whole. The local
effect cannot be substituted for the entire nonlocal cause—only
a small part of which interacts locally.
The EM force field is
similarly defined—only for charge mass interception, and only as an effect produced upon the intercepting charge.
(See again Figures 5, 6, and
7.) A flow of water across a rock (or the wind on a rock in the
desert) produces a “pileup” of fluid on the windward side, and a
lesser “pileup” on the downwind side.
The difference (called the “gradient”) in the energy
density collected across the standard charge (rock) produces a “difference
in pressure” on the rock—in other words, a force per interacting
rock. That effect
is erroneously taken to be the EM field itself, when rigorously it is
only the reaction cross section of the EM field.
Again, rigorously this EM field as
defined in electrodynamics only exists as the effect that occurs
upon an intercepting standard charge
or "rock" {[36]}.
Since the EM wave “in
space” is erroneously said to be made of varying EM fields, it too
is defined only as the effect upon the intercepting charged mass,
after the vacuum EM wave entity—whatever it is—has interacted with
the charge and changed the charge translationally and energetically.
Specifically, the present “EM wave in vacuum” in the
literature is not at all what is presented and taught in undergraduate
texts, and even the standard illustration of "oscillating E-field
and B-field vectors" lateral to the line of motion of the wave is
horribly wrong. E.g.,
Dr. Robert Romer, former editor of American Journal of
Physics, has taken that error to task as follows {
[37]
}:
"…that dreadful diagram purporting to show the electric and
magnetic fields of a plane wave, as a function of position (and/or
time?) that besmirch the pages of almost every introductory book. …it
is a horrible diagram. 'Misleading'
would be too kind a word; 'wrong' is more accurate."
"…perhaps then, for historical interest, [we should]
find out how that diagram came to contaminate our literature in the
first place."
The EM field and wave as commonly regarded are transfer
functions from the source charged masses that “perturbed the vacuum
medium and created an unknown kind of disturbance therein”, onto the
receiving charged masses that intercept the incoming “unknown vacuum
wave entity that was created” and interact with it, being translated and perturbed as a result.
This “detected”
translation of the receiving charged masses (usually the interacting
Drude electrons in a wire) is what our instruments detect. Indeed, the
Drude electrons are highly constrained from moving longitudinally down
the wire, usually moving at only a few inches per hour.
They are much freer to move laterally, however, and can easily
do so.
Reacting with the
incoming longitudinal EM wave perturbation of local spacetime, the
spin of the electron produces gyroscopic precession laterally in the
wire since the electron is terribly restrained in moving
longitudinally down the wire. Since
our instruments detect these transverse electron precession waves,
that has been totally confused (since Faraday's "plucked taut
string" notion of the EM wave and Maxwell's arbitrary adoption of
it) as representing the incoming wave in vacuum.
It does not represent the vacuum EM wave at all; the incoming
wave is in fact a longitudinal EM wave in 3-space, associated with a
precisely correlated longitudinal EM wave in the time-domain.
So we have answered
Professor Romer's implied question.
That horrible diagram came from the assumption by early
electrodynamicists, before discovery of the electron or atom or
nucleus, that the "transverse electric fluid waves" in the
receiving wires represented actual "intercepted" fluid
perturbations arriving in the material ether medium.
In summary: Using
a transmitter-receiver analysis, the so-called “EM wave in vacuum”
as presently defined,
actually represents that “detected and measured electron precession
wave” in and of the reacting Drude electron gas in the distant
receiving wire antenna. The
so-called EM force field wave in vacuum has been erroneously defined
as observable matter wiggles, not vacuum virtual energy wiggles and
not as spacetime-curvature changes and wiggles.
So even the present notion of the EM transverse wave in space
is wrong, and it has been corrupted as a pure matter-to-matter
transform from the beginning {
[38]
}.
Somewhat less technical
explanations are given by Lindsay and Margenau {
[39]
}, and a rigorous statement and discussion that EM force
fields exist only in charged matter is given by Aharonov and Bohm {
[40]
}. Feynman of
course said it bluntly: Only
the potential for the field exists in the vacuum, should one place a
unit point charge there to allow the force field to be developed (on,
of, and containing the source charge itself).
Let us summarize this
terrible EM foundations flaw: As classical electrodynamics presently
is modeled, Maxwell and his modern followers only include equations
which are mass-to-mass transformations (Figure 8).
Specifically missing {
[41]
} are two other transforms: (i) the mass-to-vacuum
(mass-to-spacetime) transformation (which obviously is general
relativistic in nature), and (ii) the vacuum-to-mass
(spacetime-to-mass) transformation (again, obviously general
relativistic in nature). (See
again Figure 9).
When these two missing transforms are added back into
electrodynamics, one has suddenly extended EM theory into a new
domain. One has also infolded
general relativity (GR) inside the present EM matter-to-matter
transforms, and also included the vacuum interaction including broken
symmetry in that exchange, but in an electromagnetically engineerable manner. In short, one has a practical, engineerable unified field
theory.
Highly
creative inventors such as Rife and Prioré intuitively developed
apparatuses that unwittingly utilized this presently undeveloped and
extended union of EM, particle physics vacuum theory, and GR.
The intuition of the theorists in interpreting those
revolutionary experiments and their results has very seriously lagged.
The
Supersystem Concept
To understand how extraordinary systems such as Rife's
microscope works, one must understand the concept of the supersystem.
(See Figure 13).
The supersystem consists of three components, which are (1) the
physical system and its dynamics, (2) the local active vacuum and its
dynamics, and (3) the local curvatures of spacetime and their
dynamics. All three
components of the supersystem interact with one another, in nature. The second and third components of the system constitute the
active environment in which the system is embedded, and with which it
interacts.
Unfortunately, in
standard classical electrodynamics either the system's environment is
assumed to be inert, or the system is assumed to be in equilibrium in
its interaction with that environment.
This represents a totally arbitrary assumption that the system
cannot receive and utilize any excess energy from its known active
environment. Hence the active vacuum's interaction with the system can be
and is ignored by classical electromagnetics, as are the local
curvatures of spacetime and their interactions with the system.
Extraordinary EM systems
invariably involve the supersystem dynamics, and not just the system
dynamics. In nature,
no system analysis is complete until the supersystem interactions and
their effects have been determined and analyzed.
The Rife microscope is
indeed an extraordinary system using non-negligible interactions
between the system and the other two components of its supersystem.
Hence in our discussions, we will be examining interactions in
that regime, and not just the standard electrodynamics analysis.
In these discussions, we will be holding in mind not just the
mass-to-mass transforms of standard electrodynamics, but two other
transforms: (1) the mass-to-vacuum/spacetime transform, and (2) the
vacuum/spacetime to matter transform (previously shown in Figure
9).
The reason that Rife's
work has not been understood is that researchers have been unaware of
the necessity for supersystem analysis.
Almost all analyses of Rife's work have been merely standard
classical EM analysis and thus quite insufficient.
There are other examples of the standard electrodynamics model
completely failing to show higher symmetry phenomenology in an
inventor's work, so that his work is not understood even today.
An example is provided by Tesla's patented circuits, as
rigorously demonstrated by Barrett {
[42]
}. Barrett
went on to improve the new functions discovered in Tesla's patents,
and obtained two additional patents related to signals and signal
processing {
[43]
}.
Vacuum-Structurings
as “Engines”: Key Part of the Missing Transforms
The missing
mass-to-vacuum/spacetime transformation produces a massless
structuring of the vacuum medium.
That is a vacuum
engine or “multiplex of specific spacetime curvatures.”
(See Figure 14,
Figure 15,
Figure 16,
Figure 17),
and Figure 18.
Preparing the vacuum engine is accomplished by charged matter
dynamics of the source charges producing the necessary potentials,
fields and waves. The
charges are embedded in continual energetic exchange with the
vacuum/spacetime, and moving the charges affects that exchange; it
perturbs the local vacuum flux and curves the local spacetime
accordingly.
The transform represents
producing this vacuum engine by the vacuum-perturbing action of source
charge dynamics upon the vacuum, and by not
assuming a mystical intercepting point-charge at each point in space {
[44]
}. In the
vacuum/spacetime, only vacuum/spacetime
entities and changes to them exist.
In pure water, only water and changes to that water exist!
So a precise dynamic
structuring of the energetic vacuum (and spacetime geometry) is what
charges produce when they “perturb” the vacuum medium {
[45]
}, by the presence or dynamics of their fields,
longitudinal and time-polarized EM waves, or both.
This "perturbed vacuum dynamics" separate from the
source charges themselves comprises an engine that consists of altered
longitudinal EM wave dynamics inside the internal Whittaker structure
{
[46]
} of the scalar potential of the ambient vacuum.
That is the same as also producing internested levels of
spacetime curvatures in a template
or specific pattern {
[47]
}.
In turn, this vacuum
engine region of local curvatures and structurings in
spacetime will interact upon any mass placed therein.
That action is the missing electrodynamic
vacuum-to-mass transform.
The missing
electrodynamic vacuum-to-mass transformation produces direct changes
and alterations in the “receiving” mass, at all levels, by the
action of such a vacuum engine. As
each action occurs locally in the localized receiving mass, it
produces the "local effect" as the result of that “local
action.” The primary
causative chain (i.e., the set of “dominoes” affecting each other
serially), started back at the distant source charges.
One can say that we therefore have mass-to-mass action
at a distance, via the matter-to-vacuum and vacuum-to-mass
intermediary transforms and the spatial and temporal propagation of
the vacuum engines in the middle of the two {
[48]
}. We will
shortly discuss the Whittaker structuring of the potential as a
fundamental process for producing vacuum engines.
General relativists
mostly concentrate upon the warping and curving of spacetime (i.e.,
producing a vacuum engine) by the very weak gravitational force—which
is only some 10-42
times as strong for electrons as the electric force between them.
Consequently, relativists must look to huge assemblages of
mass, such as in stars and other astronomical objects, for sufficient
gravitationally-induced spacetime curvature to produce easily
observable results. For
that reason, general relativity has resisted laboratory development as
an engineerable applied science.
By using the far stronger EM force as the agent of spacetime
curvature, and including the infolded electrodynamics inside the
potential, field, and wave, general relativity then becomes
engineerable and usable. But
one is engineering the supersystem, not just the system.
The
Infolded Electrodynamics Inside Potentials, Fields, and Waves
As previously stated, in 1903 E. T. Whittaker, a well-known
mathematical physicist, showed that a scalar potential can be
mathematically decomposed into a set of peculiar EM wavepairs in a
harmonic set. (Again see Figure
12) These “hidden
waves” are longitudinal EM waves, arranged in conjugate pairs {
[49]
} with the pairs also arranged in a harmonic set. In each wavepair, there is an ordinary (forward-time)
longitudinal EM wave (outgoing in 3-space from the
interacting/observing charge), coupled to its phase conjugate replica
(time-reversed twin).
And here lies a magic
secret. Prior to
interacting with a charge, the phase conjugate wave in each wavepair
is in the complex domain, which means that in Minkowski space it is
incoming along the fourth axis, ict, where the only variable is
t. Hence this wave
prior to interaction with charge does not even exist in 3-space.
Instead, it exists as a longitudinal EM wave incoming in time,
so that it is a time-like flow of EM energy. (See Figure
19).
After interaction with a charge, the charge absorbs the
incoming time-polarized EM wave, transduces that time-energy to
3-spatial energy, and re-emits the energy as longitudinal EM waves in
3-space in all directions. "In
all directions" means that for every outgoing longitudinal EM
wave emitted in one direction in 3-space, another wave just like it
also emitted in the other direction in 3-space.
So the paired "bidirectional" EM longitudinal EM
waves in 3-space, as interpreted by Whittaker, do exist as the effect
waves caused by the incoming causal time-like longitudinal EM waves
(scalar EM waves). The pairing of the causal time-polarized EM incoming wave
with an outgoing effect longitudinal EM wave was not interpreted by
Whittaker, but does agree with more modern quantum field theory
interpretations of photon polarizations and their observability or non
observability, by Mandl and Shaw {22b}.
We have corrected this
"effect substituted for the cause" wave to reinterpret
Whittaker's 1903 decomposition of the scalar potential, into combined
biwaves where one of the biwaves is incoming in the time domain, and
the other is outgoing in 3-space.
That re-interpretation then allowed a solution {22a} to the
problem of the source charge and its associated fields and potentials,
together with their energy. Every source charge and source dipole continuously emits EM
energy in 3-space, without any 3-spatial EM energy input.
The input is there, but in the time-domain.
This problem—resolved by the present author in 2000—has
been called the most difficult problem in quantum and classical
electromagnetics {30
}.
Because of observed
parity reversal accompanying the time-reversal operation, in his
forward-time, the observer “sees”—after interacting the incoming
wave with charge—the effect of the incoming time-reversed or
phase conjugate wave (entering from the time domain) as a 3-space
longitudinal EM wave leaving in the opposite spatial direction.
So the basic 4-space phase conjugate longitudinal wavepair
would appear to us in forward time as a “regular” time-forward
longitudinal EM wavepair in 3-space, with the two waves going outward
in opposite directions. But
each is accompanied by a time-polarized EM wave, else it would not be
observable.
Further, there is a harmonic series of such bidirectional
longitudinal wavepairs comprising the scalar potential.
So the staid old electrostatic potential (i) is not a
"scalar entity" at all {
[50]
}, (ii) is a bundle of longitudinal wavepairs, (iii)
is an entity with a remarkable internal hidden multiwave
structures and dynamics, (iv) is a composite of very special
waves whose transverse amplitude (i.e., whose spatial energy density,
which is a function of transverse amplitude squared) does not change,
but whose transported time structure changes, and (v) therefore is a
special kind of wave that is velocity modulated about some central
velocity, and is not limited to the speed of light c.
Indeed, in classical electrodynamics in the Coulomb gauge, the
scalar potential is already recognized as having infinite velocity,
merely appearing in space instantly at every point it occupies {
[51]
}.
We also state without elaboration that the active vacuum is identically a very huge scalar potential, as indeed is “spacetime
geometry”. So a
unifying principle is:
vacuum
º
spacetime º
potential º
energy {
[52]
}
Further, as a potential, the “ambient” vacuum
decomposes into an incredibly rich, internal Whittaker wave structure.
So then also must spacetime and energy similarly
decompose. That
decomposition structure is even richer when higher symmetry O(3) EM is
used instead of the lower symmetry U(1) EM employed by Whittaker.
A
revolution in electrodynamics has recently begun, and central to that
revolution is the strong appearance of longitudinal EM waves as
essentially the basis for the emerging new electrodynamics.
Work by Evans {
[53]
}, Barrett {
[54]
}, Ziolkowski {
[55]
}, Evans {
[56]
}, Rodrigues {57}, and others is fundamental in this
respect. One part of this
emerging new electrodynamics is advanced under the label of undistorted
progressive waves (UPWs). A
good summary of UPW theory is given by Rodrigues and Lu{
[57]
}. Even so, to
date this body of work still largely ignores the internal Whittaker
dynamics {
[58]
} inside an EM wave. The
body of work—particularly the higher symmetry O(3) electrodynamics
pioneered by Evans {56} inherently possesses the capability to model
such structuring, since much of it utilizes a higher topology algebra
such as quaternions {
[59]
} or even Clifford algebra {
[60]
} In those
higher algebras, many electrodynamic things can be done outside the
operations permitted by present vector and tensor electrodynamics.
Superpotentials
and Superpotential Theory
Whittaker’s 1904 paper {
[61]
} showed that all the “normal” electrodynamics was
based on, and created by, the interference of scalar potential functions
(i.e., by the interference of those multiwave longitudinal wavepairs
and their dynamics {
[62]
} constituting the interfering scalar potentials.) He showed that any EM field or wave whatsoever can be
replaced by two scalar potential functions—in fact, is comprised
of those two scalar
potential functions and is created
by them. Scalar
potential interferometry already creates all the “normal” EM in
the textbooks anyway, and a proof has been given by Evans et al. {
[63]
}.
The 1904 paper by Whittaker initiated a somewhat obscure branch
of electrodynamics referred to as superpotential
theory {
[64]
}. Whittaker’s
work was further extended and augmented by later scientists such as
Righi {
[65]
}, Debye {
[66]
}, Bromwich {
[67]
}, Nisbet {
[68]
}, McCrea {
[69]
}, etc. But
even with the extended superpotential theory, without the addition of
Whittaker 1903 and the substructuring "internal LW
electrodynamics" one cannot understand the mechanism for what
Rife was actually doing.
Rife
was not using normal potentials and normal E and H
fields—which as we discussed, only apply to observable material
entities anyhow and thus could not be used to “see” far below the
quantum threshold of least detectable material disturbance.
His entire protocol was to get beyond those “material
interception of EM energy” limitations.
Unwittingly, Rife was using vacuum
engines—involving structuring of the active vacuum as well as
pure general relativity (GR) and pure structurings of spacetime
geometry itself. He was
electromagnetically using that part of GR that the GR physicists have
mostly only tried to produce by use of the weak gravitational force.
In GR, the ST geometry
itself is active, dynamic, energetic, and structuring!
In higher symmetry electrodynamics, the ST geometry itself
is powerfully active, dynamic, energetic, and structuring! It is not at all just a "passive spacetime" as
classical electrodynamics assumes {
[70]
}.
Biological
Systems Use the Infolded Whittaker-Type Electrodynamics
The
problem in the Rife microscope is to be able to observe very subtle ST
curvatures and patterns, in an optical manner.
These subtle or virtual "disturbances" of local spacetime are far finer
and smaller than the one-tenth wavelength optical resolution generally
the limit for optical microscopes using conventional optical EM
notions and “material” potentials, fields, and waves.
In short, Rife’s
twofold problem was to (i) function with vacuum engines (internal
structuring of the potentials) so he could penetrate to any degree of
smallness, and (ii) output, in the observable state, exact visible
summations and analogues of the individual structures detected in the
virtual (nonobservable) state {
[71]
}.
To make the subtle
vacuum engines observable on the bench, the ST curvatures and their
internested patterning must be accomplished by making and assembling
local curvatures of ST, via making longitudinal EM wavepairs in
structural pattern assemblies. Spacetime
is in fact just a powerful scalar potential, or can be modeled as
such, and as such Whittaker 1903 and 1904 rigorously applies, along
with extensions from higher symmetry electrodynamics.
By realizing that ST is identically potential, one has altered
one's thinking from the standard GR theory into a correlated EM-GR
theory. One has also
extended GR: Not only is there a “topology” of things that can be
externally done to a base
spacetime, but there is also a hidden, vast EM topology within any overall base spacetime.
So we now have “topologies within topologies.” This is in fact what the Russians have long called the information
content of the field.
However, all living
systems already use this "infolded" bidirectional,
longitudinal wavepair EM in their ongoing living functions {
[72]
}. Just as
they used frequency modulation, EM signals, EM oscillations, etc.
before we even had an electrodynamics or a physics, living systems do
use the infolded EM (and vacuum engines) in all their living
functions, and particularly in their cellular regeneration and restoration (R&R) system {
[73]
}, as contrasted to their immune
system. The immune system
cells are the fighters and the debris scavengers/cleaners.
They go after the hostile invaders, fight them, and usually win—littering
the battlefield with the debris.
Then the immune system scavenger cells clean up the residue.
But many of the body’s cells will have been damaged in the
fight. The immune system itself cannot heal or restore a single
damaged cell, even its own! It is not a healer!
It is a searcher, a marker, a killer, and a residue-cleaner.
It contains " the troops and the combat engineer," so
to speak, but not the hospitals and the doctors.
All healing/restoration of living cells is done by the R&R
system, not by the immune system.
A high-level overview of the immune system is given in Figure 20.
No vaccine, drug, herb, vitamin, or mineral heals
the body, although certainly they can enhance or aid the body's
healing process. Each
does carry its individual resident vacuum engine, and when absorbed by
the cell, this added vacuum engine contributes to the resident vacuum
engine in the cell by summing with it.
To restore the damaged cells back to normal (i.e., to heal),
the R&R system uses a novel kind of extended electrodynamics with
infolded vacuum engines, and it uses a novel kind of optical phase
conjugate pumping, in the time domain rather than just 3-space.
The magic “unified field theory” so long sought by
scientists, has long been utilized by the regeneration and restoration
system of the body in its minute-to-minute and day-to-day healing and
restoring actions.
The magic "universal healing mechanism" so long
evading the discovery of medical scientists is none other than the
exact cellular regenerative mechanism universally used by every living
organism. For the first
time, we are explaining the higher symmetry electromagnetic nature of
this mechanism.
Robert Becker's epochal work {
[74]
} (Figure 21,
Figure 22)
strongly probed the electromagnetic control system directing the body’s
cellular regeneration and repair (R&R) system.
However, he did not have available the infolded Whittaker
electrodynamics. He
could only utilize the grossly inadequate standard electrodynamics. Modern nonlinear phase conjugate optics had not yet been born
when Becker did most of his seminal work.
Since standard EM does not incorporate infolded
GR, vacuum engines, or optical pumping in the time domain, Becker
could not formulate the full technical mechanism of the R&R system
—which uses the supersystem, not just the system.
But Becker did strongly point out the importance of the R&R
system, both theoretically and experimentally.
He found that it operated electrically, with the scalar
potentials being key. He
modeled the R&R system as closely as can be done with classical
U(1) electromagnetics (Figure 22).
He
proved that cells can be dedifferentiated (reversed back to an
earlier, more primitive state) and redifferentiated
(time-forwarded into a more complex state) by weak DC potentials and
laughably weak (picoamperes) of current.
He was twice nominated for a Nobel prize for his epochal work.
His method of electromagnetic healing of otherwise intractable
bone fractures (Figure
21) is utilized today in many hospitals.
In his microscope, Rife
was in pursuit of optically "seeing" the infolded
electrodynamics functioning of the living cells in the most minute
detail—i.e., he wished to see the actual vacuum engines and their
functions. Using the infolded EM, one can still "see" the
cells and all their parts, but one can also go far beyond the
one-tenth wavelength optical discrimination limitation and see into
the virtual state dynamics. In
theory, because the infolded EM is recursive
as a function of wavelength, one can go to any limit in smallness
desired—or at least to whatever limit is determined by the available
technology's development at the time {
[75]
}.
Vlail Kaznacheyev's
novel electromagnetic induction of cellular death, disease, and damage,
at a distance, is instructive in this respect {
[76]
}. (Figure
23)
Indeed, the Russians mastered, extended, and weaponized the
Kaznacheyev mechanisms as disease-inducing weaponry, and slyly used it
at low level on personnel in the U.S. Embassy in Moscow (Figure
24).
This was done to stimulate high level officials in the U.S.
government and U.S. scientific community to see if the U.S. knew of
this "infolded electrodynamics and vacuum engine" technology
{
[77]
}. The Russians were using GR, but by infolded EM means—so
they were using a unified field theory involving higher group symmetry
electrodynamics. The
puzzled U.S. employed only standard U(1) symmetry electrodynamic
analysis {
[78]
}, so it totally missed the entire physics of what was
occurring to cause the health changes and diseases.
In GR, one is very
interested in Wheeler's principle which states (slightly paraphrased):
Mass
(trapped energy) acts upon ST geometry to curve it, and curved ST acts
upon mass to produce forces upon it and move it.
This
statement after Wheeler is the very essence of general relativity.
It simply states that there is a mass-to-spacetime
dynamic transform, and also a spacetime-to-mass
dynamic transform, as we diagrammatically showed in Figure 9.
Understanding
Vacuum Engines and Their Action
Wheeler’s
general relativity principle includes the missing two transforms of
electro-dynamics. We are
extending Wheeler’s principle to the corollary form:
All
levels of the structures of mass (trapped energy structures) and all
levels of the structures of time (the time aspects of photon
structures) act upon ST geometry to structure it in both 3-spatial
energy density structuring and in time domain structuring.
Producing this multilevel spatial and temporal structuring of
spacetime is called “forming a vacuum engine.”
Both 3-spatial energy density structuring of spacetime at all
levels and time structuring of spacetime at all levels, act upon mass
at all levels, to produce internested templates of forces and
translations and stresses.
In short, energy patterns and time patterns in 3-space act
upon spacetime to produce patterned curvatures of ST geometry (vacuum
engines). And conversely,
patterned curvatures of spacetime geometry (vacuum engines) act upon
mass to produce corresponding patterns of forces at all levels in the
mass—down to and including upon the quarks and gluons in the
nucleons in the atomic nuclei. We
note with pleasure that the Sachs unified field theory does apply from
the gluons to the entire universe, as has been shown by Sachs himself
{18b}.
Muscle
and Skeleton Analogy of Interaction of Vacuum Engine and Mass
We call attention again
to our analogy (Figures 15, 16,
17, and 18) of the interaction of a vacuum engine and
mass, provided by the interaction of arm muscles and the skeletal arm
bones to which they are attached.
The arm muscles attach to the arm's skeletal bones, and those
bones are articulated and free to dynamically move.
To the bones, the muscles are mysterious agents (analogous to
vacuum engines) exerting forces upon them, and causing them to move or
hold. To the muscles, the
bones are positioned resisting masses for them to work upon and change
their positions, and the bones exert Newtonian reaction forces back
upon the muscles as the muscles apply forces to the bones. So the vacuum engines (muscles) create forces upon the
resisting masses (bones) to move them, and the masses act back upon
the causative vacuum engines to create antiforces in resistance.
Using
this analogy, when we create a set of vacuum engines, we create a set
of “mysterious muscles” that act directly upon any and all “masses”
(bones) that are exposed to them.
The bones then change and move until the bidirectional
interaction forces are balanced (equal and opposite).
This symmetry between the two missing transforms is shown in Figure
9.
The
Multilevel Structuring of Time is Important
We also add the extension that dynamic structuring in the time
stream also occurs from trapped time domain “time component”
structuring and distribution effects, as well as dynamic structuring
of the spatial energy density of the ST geometry (the vacuum).
We are speaking relativistically
of the interaction of mass and spacetime at any and all levels of a
mass, down to and including the molecules, the atoms, the atomic
nuclei, the nucleons, and even the quarks comprising the nucleons
(comprising the protons and neutrons).
One must first clearly have this vision in mind: The dynamics
of everything ongoing in that mass, down to the most minute particle
dynamics and in the most minute detail (and far into the virtual state
beyond the one-tenth wavelength limitation of light resolution)
consists of the structurings of this "mass-ST curvature"
mutual interaction.
So
we know from general relativity that collections of energy (such as
mass) act directly upon spacetime, its structuring, and its dynamics
at any and all levels, down to the tiniest.
We know that the variations in local spacetime geometry
(including in both energy and time), down to any and all levels and
sizes, down to the tiniest conceivable lengths, act directly upon any
and all exposed mass at that level, no matter how tiny.
There
is no “quantum” limitation nor is there any “wavelength of light”
limitation to this GR process. Total
continuity applies.
Some
Characteristics of Vacuum Engines
The great advantage of a
vacuum engine is that the "action" it produces upon an
exposed mass, arises directly from within each point in the local
spacetime in which the mass is embedded.
One does not have to "start outside" and move through
space and the intervening mass toward the "inside".
Every point within an object occupies every point in time, a
priori. From a single
time-point, the vacuum engine's 3-space action enters everywhere
within the object, all-at-once, and the 3-space effects proceed
outward from each interior point. (See again Figure
19). Therefore even a weak vacuum engine induced by EM forces
can do with ridiculous ease what the most powerful particle
accelerators on Earth cannot do.
The engine is already everywhere "inside" an object
or particle, and working from every point in it, toward an outward
direction. On the other
hand, a particle accelerator is trying to build tremendous velocity of
its particles so that they can "smash" their way in there,
by brute force. To get
ever deeper, the particle accelerator must be made ever larger, so
that a "bigger hammer" is available.
Also, the vacuum engine does not smash or damage any of the
matter in the object, in any fashion not desired.
The particle accelerator, on the other hand, is a great
disruptor and may well destroy or serious change the very object it
"probes".
Further, contrary to the
accelerator's "one shot for one giant amount of energy
input", a vacuum engine—once formed—continually exists in
that locally altered spacetime and is contained in it and is sustained
by it. Hence that locally
altered spacetime—after we pay to alter it once—will continuously
expend energy in the form of the action of that vacuum energy,
forever, upon any mass emplaced in that local spacetime.
The universe itself is furnishing the energy to do the work,
via the instantaneous connection in the time domain.
That "multiply
connected space" entry everywhere within an object
simultaneously, is quite different from "spatial propagation of
energy" through singly-connected space from outside an object to
the object, striking the outside of a mass and being absorbed,
producing a gross translation force upon the mass.
In the “energy propagation through space” case, severe
energy interaction may occur with only the absorbing part of a
macroscopic mass, while the remainder of the mass is little affected
or not at all. To wit,
one does not get the resulting electronuclear
alterations of the nucleus (materialization, dematerialization,
transmutation, etc.) by absorbed propagated “normal” EM radiation. However, with weak EM-induced vacuum engines one can do
things inside the nucleus such as easily flip quarks inside the
nucleons, so that transmutations at very weak spatial energy levels
are readily obtained. This
in fact turned out to be the major secret of the low-energy nuclear
transmutations occurring in some 600 cold fusion experiments worldwide
{
