ANNOTATED GLOSSARY
T. E. Bearden 1997, slightly
updated Dec. 2000
Latest editing and additions: 12th April, 2003
Foreword
This is an informal glossary originally prepared in 1997 for Gary
Hawkins to use on his web site, and informal definitions and discussions were
rather quickly jotted down in 1997. We
have been able to do a little updating now in Dec. 2000. Careful crafting and polishing for greater
rigor would require much more time than I am able to spare, but perhaps the glossary
can be helpful anyway.
We put in the gist of it, as we see it, and usually an annotation
or commentary to explain it. We tried to put in sufficient explanations and a
few references, so that the reader can see for himself or herself that physics,
mathematics, and even logic itself are not quite as cut and dried as is often
presented!
The only thing we absolutely insist on, that differs from the
normal physics and engineering approach, is that any true definition must be an
identity statement a priori. In this
view, since no equation is an identity, then no equation is a definition;
regardless of those "equations" universally advanced in physics as
"definitions." All an equation states is that the magnitude of the somethings on the right
is equal to the magnitude of the
somethings on the left. It does not at all define
any of the somethings on either right or left!
I've completed as much as I have time for now, and made some additions
and corrections to the 1997 version. As
time permits, we will try to add some more in the future . I hope these hasty
comments are helpful, and any errors in them are my own and not due to Gary
Hawkins or to Tony Craddock!
Tom Bearden, Dec. 2000
MATH AND SINGLE CHARACTER
ABBREVIATIONS
f The
electrostatic scalar potential, in units of joule per collecting coulomb.
Ñ The
mathematical operator 'del'.
Ñf The gradient
of the function f , mathematically.
In EM theory, use of the del operator produces an electric
field E given by E = - Ñf . An
electrical field is also generated by the time rate of change of the magnetic
vector potential A, where it is
given by E = - dA/dt.
Note that we have used that fact to assist us in producing the
motionless electromagnetic generator (MEG), with COP = 16 as of this writing.
fq Joules of
energy collected by a charge of q coulombs in an electrostatic scalar potential
having a
reaction cross section of f.
Since the collected energy is also usually the energy that
can then be dissipated as work, this expression often yields the work performed
in the circuit by the energy the surface charges collected from that part of
the S-flow in contact with the
conductors and components.
df /dt Time rate of change of the scalar
potential.
Also one form of displacement current.
dE/dt Time rate of change of the E-field.
Also one form of displacement current.
dp/dt Time rate of change of momentum, which
is a force F acting upon the system.
A force is defined as a time rate of change of momentum, or
F = dp/dt.
dP/dt Time rate of change of polarization.
Polarization displacement current.
dq/dt Time rate of change of charge,
otherwise known as "current".
Represents the normal current flow i of charges in a
conductor, i.e., i = dq/dt.
dq/dt-Isolated Load Loop A special current loop containing the
load,
...where i = dq/dt in that "load loop" is
isolated from the current i = dq/dt in the source loop containing the power
source, and the two loops are also field-coupling isolated. A transformer, e.g., does isolate the actual
current in the secondary from the current in the primary, but the field
coupling from primary to secondary and from secondary back to primary result in
the enforcement of COP = 1.0 as the maximum performance possible (in a perfect,
lossless standard transformer). In a
real standard transformer with some losses, COP<1.0.
The notion is that, even though current cannot pass from
the source loop to the load loop and there is no direct field coupling, energy
density flow S = E´H can pass. This is in
fact the definition of what we call bridging,
if in addition to current isolation the rigid back-field coupling is broken
between energy dissipation (power) in the source loop and energy dissipation
(power) in the load loop. In that fashion, overunity operation of the load can
readily be achieved.
E Electric Field.
Defined in older classical electromagnetics (CEM) as a force field, by E º
F/q. However, this only defines the entity after an interaction with
mass. In short, it defines the E-field
as an effect existing only in matter.
In the early days of electrodynamics, Maxwell and the other
"founding fathers" assumed a material ether filling all space. Hence any field in space was indeed such an
"effect" field existing in mass.
Maxwell died in 1879 of stomach cancer. In the 1880s, the Michelson-Morley experiments falsified the luminiferous
(material) ether as a material medium.
Hence the accepted use of the E
= F/q type of "effect"
electrical field as the electric field in space was also destroyed, but the
equations were never changed to eliminate this error in the foundations of
CEM. Instead, electrodynamicists more
or less announced one day that, "Since there is no (material) ether, we
are not using one!"
There is some rationalization mathematically for such an
approach, if the limiting process is used for the interaction of the
"causal field" in vacuum with the charged mass q, as q is allowed to
approach zero. However, from a
foundations view, it is still the interaction of the field in space with
charged mass that is being described in the limit, and therefore it is still
the "effect" entity rather than the "cause" entity.
This serious foundations problem is still unresolved in much of CEM theory and modeling to this day. The standard by which other EM texts are measured is J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 2nd edition, Wiley, New York, 1975. In several places, Jackson opts for this avoidance of the use of the " effect" field for the "cause" field: quoting p. 28: "...the thing that eventually gets measured is a force..." "At the moment, the electric field can be defined as the force per unit charge acting at a given point. It is a vector function of position, denoted by E." Quoting p. 249: "Most classical electrodynamicists continue to adhere to the notion that the EM force field exists as such in the vacuum, but do admit that physically measurable quantities such as force somehow involve the product of charge and field."
The problem is further increased by use of this flawed definition of E-field to "define" the electrostatic scalar potential (Jackson, p. 34) by the equation E = -Ñf. First, no equation is a definition; it merely equates the magnitude of the entities on the left of the = sign to the magnitude of the entities on the right of the = sign. It has nothing at all to say about the definition or nature of any of the entities, but is merely a comparison of relative magnitudes. Any definition, a priori, must be expressed by an identity sign. In all of classical electrodynamics, there is no available proper definition of (x) in the identity E º (x). Indeed, there is no such identity available for force F. To quote Feynman: "…in dealing with force the tacit assumption is always made that the force is equal to zero unless some physical body is present… One of the most important characteristics of force is that it has a material origin, and this is not just a definition. … If you insist upon a precise definition of force, you will never get it!" Richard P. Feynman, Robert B. Leighton, and Matthew Sands, Lectures on Physics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, Vol. 1, 1964, p. 12-2.
In the Sachs unified field theory, O(3) electrodynamics as
spearheaded by Evans is an important subset.
Hence in that approach there is a solution to the problem of defining
force and field. The EM fields (E, B,
etc.) when in spacetime, are in fact curvatures of spacetime identically. When these ST curvatures interact with a
charged mass, the effects of the interactions are the well-known force-fields
in matter, which Maxwell started with in the 1860s. So in this way, the definition problem can be rigorously
resolved.
jf The Slepian
vector, representing the time rate of energy density dissipation in the current
loop
containing the jf.
This does not at all represent the energy flow in space and
along the outside of the circuit, which may be very, very much greater, on the
order of 1013 times as great.
It does match the Poynting energy flow component that enters the
circuit.
Mq or mq The mass of a charge q.
Instead of just using "q" and assuming it to be
unitary, we must include the fact that charge is a system of two coupled
components: (i) the mass mq of the charge q, and (ii) the virtual
photon flux exchange (i.e., fq) of the charge q
with the surrounding active vacuum. In particle physics it is already
well-known that there is no symmetry of a mass system anyway, unless the
vacuum's exchange with the mass is included. So the expression mqfq captures the vacuum-mass exchange. By continuing to assume
that charge is unitary, physics inadvertently holds to the hoary old notion of
the luminiferous ether (thin material ether) that permeates all of space.
Maxwell and other electrical physicists of his time believed in a material
ether, and Maxwell embedded that notion in EM theory. Inexplicably it has not
been rooted out of the equations to this day, even though the notion of the
material ether (not the ether per se!) was destroyed by the Michelson-Morley
experiment over 100 years ago. Foundations physicists continue to point out
such terrible defects in physics—and continue to be ignored. We quote Mario
Bunge, "A mathematical theory of the dimensions and units of physical
quantities," in Problems in the
Foundations of Physics, edited by Mario Bunge, Springer-Verlag, Berlin and
New York, 1971, p. 7: "The question 'What are dimensions?' is seen to be
ill conceived, for there are two concepts of dimension, namely those of
dimension function and dimension value. The correct question is: 'What are []
and d?' " {Note: [] is dimension function, and d is dimension value.} Bunge is clearly discriminating between the
function associated with the dimension, and the magnitude associated with it
Quoting Bunge, ibid.,
p. 8: "The concept of a unit is one of those scientific notions that has
remained obscure for want of a theory and excess of a coarse philosophy. Indeed
we know how to manipulate units but we do not seem to know what kind of
mathematical object they are. As a consequence units are sometimes confused
with dimensions, at other times with standards, and they are often introduced
in relation to measurement rather than to concept formulation."
And quoting Mario Bunge, Foundations of Physics, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1967, p. 176: "Different
theories of CED [Classical Electrodynamics] are called for, both for charged
particles that can to a first approximation be regarded as electromagnetically
structureless (e.g., the electron and the m -meson) and for extended
systems with a charge distribution and spin (e.g., the proton). If fairly
satisfactory classical theories were available they could guide the
construction of the corresponding quantum theories. But no such theories are in
sight partly because it is not usually acknowledged that electrodynamics, both
classical and quantal, are in a sad state."
Again, Bunge, ibid.,
p. 182: "...the best modern physicist is the one who acknowledges that
neither classical nor quantum physics are cut and dried, both being full of
holes and in need of a vigorous overhauling not only to better cover their own
domains but also to join smoothly so as to produce a coherent picture of the
various levels of physical reality."
c The speed of light in ambient vacuum.
To discuss the speed of light, we point out that the vacuum
is highly energetic, as has been shown in modern physics. Since the vacuum has an energy density, it
can be modeled as a "potential" and particularly as a scalar EM
potential for EM purposes. Contrary to
convention, we recognize that the local energy density of the ambient vacuum
potential can vary, including seasonally within and close to the solar system,
etc. The average energy density of the
vacuum in space far from charged masses such as stars and planets may be
assumed as a "standard vacuum potential", and if this potential is
equated with the notion of "flat spacetime", then an increase in this
vacuum potential is an increase in the local energy density of spacetime, and
hence represents a curvature of the standard flat spacetime.
In fact the interplanetary radar probes' "ranges"
do show precisely such variation in the speed of light, with weekly and monthly
and seasonal variations, etc. In order to comply with the nearly universal
assumption in physics with respect to the constancy of c, the scientific staffs
averaged the readings over the entire month. This zeroed out the variations,
upheld the notion that space is a fixed type of thing, and that the speed of
light in it is also a rigidly fixed constant.
It does not agree with the actual measured speed of light from day to day.
The Russians have known and openly printed for about a
century that the speed of light in a hard vacuum in deep space, far removed
from solar and planetary masses, is a little slower than the speed of light in
a hard vacuum near the Earth or any other large charged mass. The huge
collection of charged particles in the earth have tiny separations, so that
looking at the Earth as a collection of tiny dipoles, one sees a collection of
enormous 4-symmetry energy flows from the time domain to the 3-space domain
(and vice versa for the time-reversed portions). The increased intensity of
this 4-symmetry energy flux in the vicinity of a massive planet or sun changes the
local energy density of the vacuum itself, increasing it in that vicinity.
Without elaboration, we will also point out that the Earth
and its dynamics structures the local spacetime and the spacetime out to some
distance. So do all other planets, stars,
etc. By whatever manner we model the
cosmos as having been created or initiated, the dynamics and structuring of all
the phenomena occurring in the universe is further impressed in the infolded electrodynamics inside the
vacuum potential.
The "laws of nature" in one sense represent the
most general results of the reactions of this internally structured
"common standard spacetime" or "standard vacuum potential"
with the various physical systems, devices, and measuring instruments utilized
in our experiments, etc. If one
deterministically alters the structuring
of the local spacetime, one can have a system which will function there
in a certain marvelous manner, but will not function that way elsewhere. Some decades ago, I participated in
experiments by Golden which over a period of some five years did condition
(dimension) the local vacuum potential.
The result was an engine which consistently exhibited COP = 1.67 at that
location, but when moved several hundred miles exhibited COP<1.0. Frank and
I were made aware of this "vacuum conditioning" effect by Prof.
William Tiller, who had himself conducted experiments exhibiting just such an
effect over several years.
EM waves in vacuum are actually longitudinal (sound-type) waves, but we do not belabor the point
since everything out there in the normal literature uses the transverse EM wave
model for the EM wave in space. Also,
the transverse wave is indeed what is detected in the interacting electron gas
in our measurement instruments—whose Drude electrons are restrained to simple
drift velocity longitudinally down the conductor, but are spinning and are free
to precess like gyros. So our
instruments detect the Drude electron precessions at right angles to the incoming
disturbing longitudinal force field, which means that they do indeed measure a
transverse wave. However, these are
actually the electron precession waves in the detector, and not the actual EM waves in space. See my paper, "Giant Negentropy from
the Common Dipole", Journal of New
Energy, 5(1), Summer 2000, p. 11-23 for a discussion of how all EM energy
comes from the time domain, via the broken 3-symmetry of the source charge or
source dipole, and is emitted in 3-space in all directions as longitudinal EM
waves. This is based on rigorous demonstration
by E.T. Whittaker, "On the Partial Differential Equations of Mathematical
Physics," Math. Ann., Vol. 57,
1903, p. 333-355 that the scalar potential is a harmonic set of phase conjugate
longitudinal EM wave pairs. We merely
applied the Whittaker decomposition to the scalar potential of a source dipole
or of a source charge, and the rigorous
proof that EM waves in space are longitudinal directly emerges.
Just as sound speeds up, say, in steel as a denser medium
than air, the EM "sound waves" in the ambient vacuum potential speed
up when that vacuum potential's flux density is increased. Consequently light
does move a little faster in a hard vacuum on Earth than it does in deep space,
because the vacuum itself has higher energy density near the earth than in deep
space. The comings and goings and orbitings of planets and the solar mass, etc.
do affect the local energy density of the vacuum between the planets, and hence
the speed of light through that interplanetary space.
So the interplanetary radar does show the periodic
variations of the local energy density of vacuum that are induced by these
factors. For a critical paper on this, see Bryan G. Wallace, "The Unified
Quantum Electrodynamic Ether," Foundations
of Physics, 3(3), Sept. 1973, p. 381-388. His discussion of the
interplanetary radar measurements of Venus, which did not fit relativity, are
particularly interesting, with respect to his finding that the data were simply
"averaged" to eliminate the variations and hence the diurnal, lunar,
and synodic periodic components actually measured in the variations of the
speed of light. See particularly Bryan G. Wallace, "The great speed of
light in space cover-up." Scientific
Ethics, 1(1), Feb. 1985. p. 2-3; — "Radar Testing of the Relative
Velocity of Light in Space," Spectrosc.
Lett. Vol. 2, 1969. p. 361.
Rigorously, the field is "defined" in
electrodynamics as the effect of an interaction of the force-free entity
(4-spatial!) existing prior to the interaction, with a 3-dimensional static
charge. This means that the field as
originally defined is an effect and
not a cause. To then use it as the cause is a grave non
sequitur.
This confusion of cause and effect is widespread in
physics. It was probably initiated by the hoary old assumption several hundred
years ago that a separate force acts upon a separate mass, which is false. In fact mass is a component of force, since
F º d/dt(mv) = m(dv/dt + v(dm/dt). As can
be seen, in both expanded terms there exists a mass term. To skirt the issue, electrodynamicists have
simply found a neat statement that "in massfree space the field continues
to exist, but the force is zero."
We point out that m = 0 makes the momentum vanish, and so F vanishes, and in the definition of E = F/q also vanishes because the numerator F becomes zero. Therefore that E-field vanishes.
Feynman and Wheeler pointed out that the field as it is defined does not and cannot
exist in massless space. Only the
"potential" for the field exists there, in case some charged mass is
brought in to interact with that entity that does exist there. That is accurate, since spacetime is totally
a potential and any "change" in spacetime is a change in that
potential a priori. In the Sachs-Evans unified field theory,
this problem is resolved because the fundamental field is defined as a
spacetime curvature (change in spacetime, hence change in the ST potential)
rather than E = F/q.
In empty space there are always myriads upon myriads of
interfering fields and potentials, from charges all over the universe, via
Puthoff's cosmological feedback principle [see
H. E. Puthoff, "Source of Vacuum Electromagnetic Zero-point Energy," Physical Review A, 40(9), Nov. 1, 1989,
p. 4857-4862.] Thus any EM wave traveling through space is always involved in
enormously active interferometry. This alone results in violent momentary
variations in the speed of that wave, even from 0.01 c to 100.00 c. For a paper
showing this kind of "galloping" travel of an EM wave, see William G.
Harter, John Evans, Roberto Vega, and Sanford Wilson, "Galloping waves and
their relativistic properties," American
Journal of Physics, 53(7), July 1985, p. 671-679. While the average speed
of the wave is c(g ), where g is the local energy density of
the vacuum, the instantaneous speeds of the wave vary violently from instant to
instant.
In special relativity, "velocity" merely is a
rotation angle of the moving frame from the fixed laboratory observer's
frame. The speed "c" merely
represents a full right-angle turn away, toward the time-dimension (since other
than the 3 spatial dimensions that is the only other dimension available to
turn toward). In higher dimensional
space, there are many other "higher" dimensions toward which further
rotation can be accomplished. Hence
rotating in n-space is not limited to a single orthogonal turn, and therefore
velocities are not limited to speed c.
However, each orthogonal rotation also subtracts one spatial dimension
of the rotated object from the observer's 3-space. One rotation would be speed
c, two departing rotations would be speed c2, three would give c3,
etc. At three orthorotations, to the
lab observer the rotated object is now purely an internal structure inside his
time dimension, very similar to a mental object (mind is time-like, not
spacelike). The nature of mind and its
operations has a rather unexpected connection with matter, when one considers
such orthorotations in hyperspace.
The point is, the speed c
is not an "iron dictum" of nature, nor is it an "unchangeable
constant"! Nature herself
routinely violates that notion. As an
example, de Broglie waves from any mass always move at v>c, and easily as
v>>c. EM "surface"
waves—so-called transverse oscillations or upheavals and depressions in the
magnitude (energy density; actually the reaction
cross section) of the local ambient vacuum potential), move at a discretized average speed c(g ).
The longitudinal component, if freed from the transverse component, can move
much faster because it is a sort of "tunneling" movement. In actual
quantum tunneling experiments, e.g., music (Mozart's 40th symphony) has been
transmitted through quantum mechanical tunneling between two separated points
at speed v>4c. Fogal is likely to eventually place a superluminal
communication system on the commercial market.
We discuss superluminal communication elsewhere in this glossary.
C Capacitance.
Essentially, the charge per unit potential.
For an isolated conductor, C = Q/V and C is expressed in
farads. A farad is one coulomb per
volt.
A lower case c represents the speed of light in ambient
vacuum.
E The electric field.
Essentially, E =F/q, but that is not really a definition.
Conventionally, the units of electric field are considered
to be force per unit electric charge; i.e., force per coulomb. Note that the E-field even in this "classical definition" does not
actually exist at a point unless there is a unit point charge (a point coulomb
of charged mass) located at the point.
Hence contrary to classical electrodynamics, communications theory, and
whatnot, no electric force field (and no magnetic force field either) exists in
the vacuum, at least of the kind prescribed by Maxwell's equations and by the
Heaviside-Hertz reduction of Maxwell's equations. Since Maxwell assumed it,
these equations and models all still erroneously assume a material ether
filling the vacuum, in which case there would
be matter and charges, and there would then
be force-fields in the vacuum. We refer
the interested reader to discussions by Feynman and by Wheeler. Quoting: "One of the most important characteristics of force is that it has a
material origin, and this is not just a definition. Y If you insist upon a precise
definition of force, you will never get it!
" [Richard P. Feynman, Robert B. Leighton, and Matthew Sands, Lectures
on Physics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, Vol. 1, 1964, p. 12-2.]
Even worse, note that E
= F/q defines not the magnitude of
the field in space, but has to do with the divergence of energy from the field
around a unit point static charge there in space, as well as the pattern of the
diverged energy density. Actually, what
is used as "the electric field" itself is the reaction cross section of the field, for a unit point static
coulomb of charge. That is at best a
function of the "field density" or "field intensity" of the
actual electrical field in spacetime, and the direction and pattern of change
of that field density due to the intercepting and diverting charge.
The field problem is resolved in the forefronts of
electrodynamics by making the field a topological function. It is resolved in the Sachs-Evans O(3)
electrodynamics (as a subset of Sachs' unified field theory) by making the
field a function of the curvature of spacetime.
See also the discussion under c, above.
H Magnetic field strength.
B The B-field (loosely), or magnetic flux density (more
properly).
Conventionally, this is thought to be defined, analogously
to E, by the force it exerts. The
force exerted on a point charge moving in the magnetic field B is at right angles to the velocity
vector of the charge and also at right angles to B. Actually, the H-field
was originally named the magnetic field
and the B-field was named the magnetic induction (and is still
sometimes called that.) This is an annoyance because it is B which involves the force, and hence B should be named the
magnetic field. Other writers have noted this discrepancy, and Sommerfeld
called H the magnetic
excitation—which correctly describes its role—rather than calling it the
magnetic field. As the reader can see, lots of things in electrical physics are
still very untidy! There are also different ways to approach
the EM modeling problem. In
Kaluza-Klein unified field theory, all electromagnetics is modeled in the 5th
dimension, which is wrapped around each and every point in our normal
3-dimensional space.
For practical use, a far better approach is the O(3) symmetry
electrodynamics spearheaded by Myron Evans, which is also an important subset
of Mendel Sachs' unified field theory.
In the Sachs-Evans unified theory, electromagnetics has become general
relativity and general relativity has become electromagnetics. Further, very powerful general relativity
can now be directly engineered with this O(3) electrodynamics, as it further
develops. We refer the reader to
"The New Maxwell Electrodynamic Equations: New Tools for New
Technologies. A Collection of 60 Papers
from the Alpha Foundation's Institute for Advanced Study," Special Issue
of Journal of New Energy, 4(3),
Winter 1999, 335 p. Also, particularly
see Contemporary Optics and
Electrodynamics, edited by Myron W. Evans, a special topical issue of I. Prigogine and S. A. Rice (series
editors), Advances in Chemical Physics,
Wiley, 2001 (in publication). Evans
gives a very long and detailed presentation, "O(3) Electrodynamics",
in that publication, and also gives the paper "The Link Between the Sachs
and O(3) Theories of Electrodynamics".
Q A quantity of electrical charge. Note that this statement does not define charge q itself.
We have tentatively proposed to redefine charge q as q º mqfq. The term fq captures the vacuum's violent virtual energy interaction
with the mass mq of the charge, which is presently missing in
classical EM theory and is an exceeding great flaw of omission. Further, fq may be decomposed into a harmonic series of phase
conjugate wavepairs, as shown by Whittaker, 1903, ibid. [In O(3)
electrodynamics, the internal structuring is dramatically extended, so that one
can get at the "inner electrodynamics" necessary to explain such
things as homeopathy, chi, ki, prana, etc.
To those scientists pooh-poohing such things as
acupuncture, we point out that acupuncture in a dramatic case can allow a
person without anesthetic to undergo a major operation with chest cavity
opened, while the patient remains alert, conscious, and talking. President Nixon's physician on Nixon's trip
to China witnessed such an actual operation, as well as other things. Nothing in our vaunted Western medical
science can equal that, nor can any of our medical schools, nor can our
National Academy of Science or our National Science Foundation. In short, acupuncture alone demonstrates how
woefully inadequate our medical science actually is.
Also, acupuncture works on animals as well, so it does not
involve hypnosis or deep suggestion. In
science, we must believe the repeatable experiment, not our dogma at the
moment. Yet the entire U.S. medical
research community has no higher symmetry EM investigation of how acupuncture
works, or of the infolded electrodynamics shown by Whittaker's decomposition of
the scalar potential in 1903. Hence our
scientists totally miss the vast electrodynamics of the internal structuring of potential and charge with vacuum engines
(spacetime curvature engines). As a
result, the entire U.S. scientific and intelligence communities were totally
unable to comprehend nearly five decades of Russian induction of health changes
and diseases in personnel in the U.S. Embassy in Moscow, using weak EM
radiation. Internal structuring of the
activity producing what is called "charge"—including its internal
structuring and engines—can be modeled and in theory directly engineered in the
new Sachs-Evans approach.]
As shown in my paper, "Giant Negentropy from the
Common Dipole," Journal of New
Energy, 5(1), Summer 2000, p. 11-23, the broken 3-symmetry energy
flow of any charge and any dipole allows a more fundamental 4-symmetry energy
flow solution for the century-old problem of
explaining the actual source of the EM energy that pours out of the source
charge in all directions in 3-space.
The 4-symmetry in EM energy flow explains its nature as longitudinal EM
waves, with the charge's absorbed energy being received from the time domain (complex plane), transduced into
3-space, and emitted in 3-space. The source of all EM energy at any point in
3-space is the time domain!
It has been known for decades in particle physics that
there exists no equilibrium in mass systems, unless the interaction of the
vacuum with the masses is included. It
has also been known that every charge and every dipole is a broken 3-symmetry
in the fierce vacuum energy exchange with the charge or dipole. Yet the vacuum interaction—and specifically
the source charge's and the source dipole's broken symmetry in it—are not even
included in classical EM as yet. That
this known total glitch in modern EM theory has not been previously corrected,
when the particle physicists of every university physics department of note
already know it is necessary, is inexplicable!
Here we must regretfully point out finger at our orthodox scientific
establishment, and particularly at our National Science Foundation and our National Academy of Science. These institutions are not even working on,
nor are they aware of, nor do they even care about, the most fundamental
science problems of our time. Bigger
accelerators, yes. Windmills, yes. EM energy from the vacuum and electrical
power systems which use it without destroying the source dipole, no. The greatest of all electrodynamics—the
infolded longitudinal EM wave dynamics inside all EM fields, potentials, and
waves—no. The correction of the dozens
of major flaws and non sequiturs in classical electromagnetics, no. The understanding of the longitudinal EM
wave interferometer weapons and quantum potential weapons already arrayed against
us, no. The development of EM healing
based on the Priore approach, which would totally revolutionize medical therapy
and handle attacks on our cities by weapons of mass destruction, no.
We have a scientific mindset problem of epochal
magnitude. And that costs the U.S.
taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars spent on the "status quo"
or "business as usual" scientific endeavors that are far inferior to
what can be done.
S Entropy. A quantity
which measures the extent to which the energy of a system is available
to do work.
Since in one sense energy is a function of ordering, then
fundamentally, entropy refers to
increasing disorder, which means increasing disruption of the ordering in our
collected energy. Unfortunately,
entropy is one of those concepts in physics for which there are several
differing major views. We avoid all
discussion of "information" etc., and prefer to deal only with the
energy and time aspects. For our work
in energy from the vacuum, we take the very simple view that an entropic process is like a
positive resistor: As forward observer time passes, the entropic process
continually disorders or "loses"—from further controlled conversion
of energy form—the collected energy in the system. We regard a negentropic
process as like a negative resistor: as forward observer time passes,
the negentropic process receives energy
in a form unusable to us, transforms, it, and outputs it in a form that is
usable. Quoting Ilya Prigogine,
Irreversibility as a symmetry-breaking process," Nature, Vol. 246,
1973, p. 70: "Entropy Ycannot in general be expressed in terms of observables such
as temperature and density. This is
only possible in the neighbourhood of equilibriumY It is only then that both entropy and entropy production acquire
a macroscopic meaning."
So basically, the notion of entropy will apply when we have a system in equilibrium or very near equilibrium. For open systems in substantial disequilibrium, the entropy cannot even be computed, and the classical equilibrium thermodynamics with its infamous second law does not apply. On the other hand, the loading of disequilibrium (negentropic) EM systems is a very nonlinear affair. Some direct indications of this were in the Russian work in the 1930s which produced overunity and self-powering EM generators, in several physics institute. [E.g., see L. I. Mandelstam and N. D. Papaleksi., "On the parametric excitation of electric oscillations," Zhurnal Teknicheskoy Fiziki, 4(1), 1934, p. 5-29. English translation, Feb. 1968, Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, Livermore, CA, performed for NASA]. The U.S. researcher G. Obolensky also has done appreciable important experimental investigation of the nonlinear load effects for negentropic systems.
S Poynting energy density flow. Not the overall or total energy flow by any means, but
just that component of it
that is intercepted, diverged,
collected, and used, where S is
given
by S = E´H.
The energy flow theory is rather thoroughly fouled, and has
been since the 1880s when the flow of energy through space was proposed by both
Heaviside and Poynting, independently and essentially simultaneously.
Since both E and
H are defined not as fields per se,
but as the reaction cross section of the fields with a unit charge, the S does
not refer to "energy flow" per se, but to the intercepted component
of the overall energy flow.
Poynting only considered the energy flow component around a
circuit that strikes the circuit's
surface charges and gets diverged into the conductors to power the
electrons. Heaviside, on the other
hand, also considered the startlingly enormous additional EM energy flow
filling all space around the circuit's conductors, generally parallel to the
conductors but missing them.
This huge Heaviside component is still there around every
electrical circuit, but almost entirely ignored and unaccounted. It misses the circuit, passes on off into
space, and is lost in most circuits.
Yet it is trillions of times larger in magnitude than the very tiny
Poynting component which actually gets intercepted, "caught" and used
by the circuit to power its loads and losses.
Since no one could explain where on earth such an enormous
nondiverged Heaviside component pouring out of the power source terminals could
possibly come from, Lorentz—reasoning that, since the nondiverged energy flow
did not do anything, it was "physically insignificant" (Lorentz'
term)—then just integrated the energy flow vector around a little closed
surface assumed around every volume element of interest. This efficiently discards the Heaviside
nondiverged component from all
accountability, leaving only the Poynting energy flow component vector
accounted. Of course the Poynting
energy flow will agree with the energy measured in the circuit, since we
actually measure energy dissipation, and the energy that dissipates from the
circuit must have first entered it.
Electrodynamicists today just continue to use Lorentz's integration of
the energy flow vector around an assumed closed surface surrounding any volume
element of interest. Thus, sadly our
electrical power system engineers unwittingly waste trillions of times more EM
energy actually produced from the vacuum by the source dipoles in their
generators, than what the feeble powerline is able to intercept and utilize.
We have nominated the vast unaccounted Heaviside energy
flow accompanying every field and charge interaction as the source of the extra
gravity known to be present in the arms of the spiral galaxies and holding them
together. See my paper, "Dark
Matter or Dark Energy?", Journal
of New Energy, 4(4), Spring 2000, p. 4-11.
Informally we have also nominated this dark Heaviside energy which fills
all space, as associated with the "quintessence" energy that is
responsible for the recently discovered antigravitational acceleration of the
universe. In this view the giant
negentropy process associated with charge (see my "Giant Negentropy of the
Common Dipole" paper, ibid.) is
ongoing in all the stars, galaxies, planets, nebulae, and other astronomical
entities. The ordinary energy we
measure in all these processes is gravitational; hence for symmetry and energy
conservation, the primary longitudinal EM wave energy from the time domain that
furnishes the energy to all these spatially energetic processes represents an
increasing curvature of spacetime in the time domain as we travel outward from
any origin point. This is an
antigravitational force, in this concept, which is cumulative as a function of
radial distance from the origin point.
Hence we see the distant parts of the universe as accelerating the
expansion of the universe. At present
this is of course an hypothesis, and must be further validated by laboratory
experiment and further theoretical work in a unified field theory
electrodynamics such as the Sachs-Evans O(3) symmetry electrodynamics.
S-flow is actually comprised of an organized, structured
flow of virtual photons or antiphotons and itself is not observable. Its
interaction with charged particles (electrical charges and magnetic poles),
however, is observable by the amount of energy
collected upon (diverged around) the charge or pole (formation of a
local potential), and formation of a translation force upon the charge or pole.
Again, the "E"
and the "H" in the
expression "E´H" are not really the "electrical field" and
"magnetic field" in space, but only their reaction cross sections at each point in space, should a little unit point static coulomb
be placed at that point to divert some of the E-field flow around it, or a little unit point static magnetic
charge be placed at that point to divert some of the H-field flow around it. So
even the Poynting energy flow S = E´H has been interpreted in terms of its reaction cross
sections.
It is worth noting that electrodynamicists today are still politely debating EM energy flow and the energy flow vector. As an example, a polite "debate" of this subject has been ongoing for over 30 years in American Journal of Physics alone. A particularly significant statement of the problem is given by Jones: "It is possible to introduce the Poynting vector S, defined by S = E´H, and regard it as the intensity of energy flow at a point. This procedure is open to criticism since we could add to S any vector whose divergence is zero without affecting [the basic integration procedure's result]." [D.S. Jones, The Theory of Electromagnetism, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1964, p. 52.] In short, here Jones is stating that an enormous nondiverged energy flow may accompany the Poynting flow component, and it will not be accounted for by S = E´H. After presenting the various elements required to solve the energy flow problem, Jones bows out with the statement: ""It does not seem likely that an expression satisfying all these conditions will be simple… …fortunately, we are rarely concerned with the energy flow at a point. In most applications we need the rate at which energy is crossing a closed surface." [Jones, ibid., p. 53.] Panofsky and Phillips warn against over-attachment to the Poynting vector: "Paradoxical results may be obtained if one tries to identify the Poynting vector with the energy flow per unit area at any point." [Wolfgang K. H. Panofsky and Melba Phillips, Classical Electricity and Magnetism, Second Edition, Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, CA, 1962, third printing 1969, p. 180.
We point out, however, that for gravitational effects of
energy flows in space, one must account the total energy flow per unit area at and surrounding any point, and
therefore one must restore the unaccounted enormous Heaviside nondiverged EM
energy flow component as well as the accounted tiny little Poynting diverged
energy flow component.
Dt An increment
(little piece of) time.
In special relativity, time can be considered a piece of
spatial length compressed by the factor c, so that L = ct, where L is in
meters, t is in seconds, and c is the speed of light. Time can also be considered as spatial EM energy compressed by
the factor c2. To comprehend
time and time rate of flow, one must first realize that a priori no observable
exists or persists in time. The
observable is a 3-spatial snapshot made at one instant in time, so that
"time stopped" momentarily.
The observable is thus a frozen snapshot of the 3-spatial intersection
of an ongoing 4-space interaction. At
the very next instant, that snapshot no longer exists. Hence for a mass (or any other observable)
to "propagate in time", there must be a process whereby Dt is continually added to the observable (such as to mass
m, converting it to masstime mt for a short duration) and then subtracted
again, leaving behind another frozen 3-space snapshot of the
"observable" that has seemingly now endured for that little Dt period, with respect to the observer. As we explain in several papers, the sum
total of the photon interactions with a mass m may be taken as the generator
that produces (1) the flow of the mass m through time, by changing from m to mt
to m to mt… continually, and (2) a substructuring of internal "time-flow
components". In short, any
time-flow ascertained in the macroworld or the microworld by the observer, has
an enormously rich internal dynamics and structuring. Again, in higher symmetry electrodynamics such as O(3), the
internal structuring of the photon, EM field, EM wave, and EM potential can be
modeled and eventually even directly engineered.
DE An increment
(little piece of) energy.
The photon is considered to be (unit-wise) composed of (DE)(Dt).
However, in our view (as we explain in energy, energy collection, and energy
dissipation) energy does not occur in "little fixed chunks" at all. One
only has "little chunks" of energy when one is collecting energy in an ongoing process. In electromagnetics,
the "collection" of energy is actually the ongoing collecting of energy from an energy flow deviating around
an intercepting charge. It is a dynamic, ongoing process whereby a collector
such as a charged particle intercepts and interacts with (undergoes virtual
photon flux exchange with) an impinging energy density flow S= E´H. In an equilibrium
(static) condition, the deviated flow remains very like a persistent,
unchanging whirlpool in a river, and so is said to have a "static
magnitude". If that Poynting flow is removed, then there is no excess
collecting going on and the "magnitude of the deviated energy flow"
is zero. EM energy
collection/collecting is always like a rock in a high wind. As long as the wind
is blowing on the rock, air is deviated to flow around the rock. The rock has a force field on and of it, and
wishes to move. It also has "excess collected energy", and a gradient
in this "excess collected energy" determined by the wind flow
direction. When the wind ceases to blow, the rock goes back to being just a
rock, and forgets it had all that excess wind energy collecting and any desire
to move.
TERMS AND
PHRASES
ABEL, NIELS HENRIK (1802-1829)
Norwegian mathematician who in 1824 proved that the general
equation of fifth degree cannot be solved algebraically. He also left an important paper on
transcendental functions which was published posthumously.
ABELIAN GROUP
A group obeying the commutative law of algebra for every
pair of elements a and b under an operation , so that a*b = b*a. As an
example, the set of integers is an infinite abelian group under the multiplication
operation.
ACTION AT A DISTANCE
An action (effect) occurring in a local system, for which
no separate local 3-space cause exists, but for which a causal correlation
exists between a distant cause and the local effect.
To the local 3-space observer, the effect is baffling. In
electromagnetics, action at a distance can be considered a higher topology
phenomena, occurring through hyperspace or through subspace, or through
"multiply connected spacetime." Particularly note that "time"
is multiply connected; i.e., every spatial point in 3-space (in the entire
universe) exists at the same moment in time, which means that electrodynamic
action through the time domain can be used to eliminate the spatial distance
between any two 3-space points. Action
at a distance is absolutely required by quantum mechanics, and experiments
establish its truth. Such action was implicitly included in Maxwell's
quaternion theory, but was unknowingly discarded by Heaviside, Hertz, and Gibbs
when they formulated a much more restricted vector interpretation of Maxwell's
theory, after Maxwell's death. Bohm's
hidden variable interpretation of quantum mechanics uses the quantum potential,
which is a multiply-connected entity producing instantaneous action at a
distance. In ordinary electrodynamics,
the common scalar potential in the Coulomb gauge has instantaneous velocity,
and it appears everywhere in space, wherever it will occupy, all at once in that gauge.
Time is also a set of energy flows in the time domain
(complex plane) rather than in 3-space.
Time is also multiply connected, since a priori every 3-space point in
the universe exists at and in a single moment of time. Since time is dynamic and structured with
special energy flows, it seems possible to use this feature to establish energy
flow during one specific moment to a desired subset of 3-space points,
regardless of where in the universe those points are located. Hence the development of
"time-energy" technology allows action at a distance via manipulating
the multiple connectivity of time and its internal structure (internal
time-like energy flows).
AD HOC MODEL
A model used and fitted for a specific purpose or area.
Tentative formulation, not intended toward general
application and not yet firm because there is still not a comprehensive, tested
demonstration of the "fit" of the model to the complex
phenomenology. Nonetheless, an ad hoc
model can be quite useful in a given area, so long as it sufficiently fits the
experimental data in that area and makes sufficiently accurate predictions in
the area.
ADVANCED FIELD
An electromagnetic field that is a solution of the
classical Maxwell equations, which is positioned on the future light-cone of
spacetime.
We believe much of the problem with the "advanced
solution" is a problem of interpretation.
We would urge the re-interpretation not in terms of
"time-travel" where the wave continues in observer forward time while
the rest of the universe is assumed to retrogress to a previous state, but in
terms of time-reversal of that wave only.
In that case, the rest of the universe stays sane and continues to move
in observer forward time, and the wave itself just moves in forward time in a
path-reversed manner, back along a previous "stimulus wave" (the
retarded wave that moved forward in time normally).
ADVANCED POTENTIAL
An electromagnetic potential that is a solution of the
classical Maxwell equations, which is positioned on the future light-cone of
spacetime.
Presently this potential has not yet been given a physical interpretation. See remarks above.
ADVANCED WAVE
An electromagnetic wave that is a solution of the classical
Maxwell equations, and which is positioned on the future light-cone of
spacetime.
See remarks above.
AFFINE CONNECTION
In mathematics: "A connection on a manifold, whose
form is unchanged under affine changes of parameter along curves, e.g., when
the original parameter t of a curve g (t) is replaced by t =
as + b." Dictionary of Science and
Technology, Academic Press, Christopher Morris (Ed.), 1992.
Ugh! We'll let the mathematicians take it from there.
AFFINE TRANSFORMATION
"Transformation on a linear space to itself which can
be expressed as the sum of a linear transformation and a fixed vector.
The affine transformations form a group. In the plane, the
group is six-dimensional, consisting of translations, rotations, stretchings
and shrinkings, reflections, simple elongations and compressions, and simple
shear transformations, as well as compositions of these."
Dictionary of
Science and Technology, 1992, ibid.
AHARONOV, YAKIR
Renowned Israeli quantum physicist and former student of
David Bohm.
Co-discoverer of the Aharonov-Bohm
effect: Even when the electromagnetic force fields reduce to zero in a
charged particle system, the potentials may still exist and interfere to cause
real physical effects. Together with Bohm, Aharonov authored a fundamental
paper in 1959 which pointed out the primary importance of the potentials rather than the force fields.
Indeed, the force fields are only made in
and of the charged particle system itself, by interference there of
potentials, and do not exist as such in the vacuum. The forcefields are thus not
primary electromagnetic causes at all, but are secondary effects due to the interference of potentials in a
particular charged particle system. [See Aharonov-Bohm
Effect] In his three volumes of physics, Feynman pointed out that the
forcefields do not exist as such in
the vacuum, and that only the potential
for the forcefields exists in vacuum. The primary causative agents for
electromagnetics are thus the potentials. This has been proven both
theoretically and experimentally in quantum mechanics, but still does not
appear in present classical electromagnetic theory taught in universities—which
terribly confuses cause waves and effect waves in wave-charge interactions.
AHARONOV-BOHM EFFECT
Phenomenon theoretically pointed out in 1959 by Yakir
Aharonov and David Bohm whereby interfering electromagnetic potentials can
produce effects on charged particle systems, even at a distance and in the
absence of the electromagnetic force fields.
See Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, "Significance of
Electromagnetic Potentials in the Quantum Theory," Physical Review,
Second Series, 115(3), 1959, p. 485-491.
For an overview and extensive bibliography, see S. Olariu and I. Iovitzu
Popescu, "The Quantum Effects of Electromagnetic Fluxes," Reviews
of Modern Physics, 57(2), Apr. 1985, p. 339-436.
Chambers experimentally demonstrated the Aharonov-Bohm
effect one year later. When
E- and B-fields are zero in a region, their potentials still may exist and
thus be stable and persistent. Being gradient-free, a force-free potential is
not changing; no bleed-in or bleed-off of its magnitude or of its internal structure is occurring. Interference of the
potentials produces real electromagnetic effects (energy) in the interference
zone, even at a great distance, without transmission of "field energy"
per se through the intervening 3-space. [Rigorously, the potential's EM energy
can be considered to be hyperspatially
transmitted, or subspatially
transmitted (tunneled) via the Whittaker internal EM biwave mechanism. See
discussions under action at a distance.]
In 1897-8 Stoney showed (in Philosophical Magazine) by physical reasoning that all the
disturbances of the ether arising from sources of certain kinds can be resolved
into trains of plane waves. This was extended and the general and special equations
written by E.T. Whittaker in 1903 in Mathematische
Annalen. In 1904 (delivered orally in 1903) Whittaker's second paper
dealing with the subject was published in the Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, and showed that
scalar EM potential interferometry is in fact what generates the classical EM
force fields.
The two Whittaker papers may be interpreted to show a
startling arrangement in a potential or EM wave. (1) any EM field or wave in a
particular 3-space is due to two interfering scalar potential functions in that
space. So we may replace any EM field
or wave with two scalar potential functions, a priori. (2) But each of the scalar potentials onto
which the functions are applied, is decomposable into the Whittaker 1903
longitudinal EM wavepairs, where the output waves are in 3-space and the input
waves are time-like and come from the complex plane. This provides a hidden "infolded LW electrodynamics"
inside, and composing, all EM fields and waves. Further, the decomposition is recursive, so each of the first
tier infolded EM waves can be decomposed again into a second tier of biwaves,
etc. Thus the most primary
electrodynamics of all is the nested infolded longitudinal EM wave structuring
of all present EM waves, potentials, and fields. The internal LW waves also form rigorous curvature of ST patterns
(templates) and thus engines. By
engineering the structure and dynamics of the internal EM, one can engineer
mass—including the atomic nuclei, quarks, and gluons—as one wishes, once the
technology is sufficiently developed.
In the West, this entire area has been ignored, but it has been highly
weaponized by the KGB in Russia.
AIAS
Alpha Foundation's Institute for Advanced Study.
Unusual "think tank" comprised of fellows and
fellow emeriti in various places in the world, who cooperate in advanced
electromagnetics studies via E-mail.
Led by Dr. Myron W. Evans, a theorist of note, the institute has been
forging ahead with the production of O(3) symmetry electrodynamics,
particularly as an important subset of Mendel Sachs' unified field theory. Dozens of AIAS group-authored papers have
been published in various leading journals such as Foundations of Physics,
Physica Scripta etc. More than 90 AIAS
papers are carried on a restricted Department of Energy website for reference
by DoE scientists. The work is
particularly significant in working out how EM energy flows in both the
3-spatial and time domains, and how EM energy can be and is extracted from the
active vacuum. More than a dozen
of the later AIAS papers are carried on
a DoE public website,
http://www.ott.doe.gov/electromagnetic/papersbooks.html. Also, about two dozen AIAS papers have
either been approved for publication in journals, or are in the review
process. The present author is a Fellow
Emeritus of the AIAS, and is kindly tolerated as a conceptualist by these
advanced theoreticians.
AIDS
Acquired
Immunological Deficiency Syndrome.
A
condition of acquired immunological deficiency associated with infection of the
cells of the immune systems with the retrovirus HTLV-III. It is usually recognized by testing positive
to HIV infection, and eventually by physical deterioration and by development
of one or more life-threatening opportunistic infections such as pneumonia, or
of Kaposi's sarcoma.
AIKIDO
A
Japanese martial art whose modern form is a synthesis of many schools of
jujitsu and the zen art of meditation in motion.
It
is the way (DO) of entering and turning (AI) the opponents vital energy
(KI). The present author is a retired
sandan (third degree black belt) in Yoseikan aikido. He is retired because of debilitating injuries suffered in other
fields and accidents, and as a busted-up old dog of 70 has no business bouncing
hard off the mats with all those vigorous young fellows. His extra 50 pounds also no longer enhance
his athletic ability. We did write a
book, privately held but never published, on Aikido and dealing with the
principles of unarmed combat.
Interestingly, we simply went into the deep unconscious in meditation
(and perhaps a little beyond, depending on one's viewpoint) to uncover the
unsuspected principles. To list them,
we went through the alphabet four times.
Many of these principles have never appeared in any text on martial arts
or military combat. The task was placed
on me by my sensei and required seven years to complete. Perhaps one of these days we will formally
publish the book.
ALGEBRAS
The various types of mathematics in which the theoretical
models for physics and other sciences are embedded.
Some important algebras utilized in physics are the vector
algebra, tensor algebra, quaternion algebra, Grassman algebra, Pauli algebra,
Clifford algebra, etc. There are many
others. The complexity of the symmetry
and of the topology varies significantly between these algebras. Thus, an electrodynamics model in a lower
topology algebra such as vectors or tensors will not reveal or permit nearly so
great a set of electrodynamic functions and operations as will electrodynamics
embedded in a higher topology algebra such as quaternion algebra or Clifford
algebra.
As an example, it has been shown by Barrett that the
operation of many of Nikola Tesla's patented circuits cannot be understood if
analyzed in vector or tensor electrodynamics.
The circuits will reveal totally new functions when analyzed in
quaternion electrodynamics. That paper
is T. W. Barrett, "Tesla's Nonlinear Oscillator-Shuttle-Circuit
(OSC) Theory," Annales de la
Fondation Louis de Broglie, 16(1), 1991, p. 23-41
ALLOPATHIC MEDICINE
A
medical system which combats disease by using remedies which produce effects
different from those produced by the disease treated.
Reliance
is primarily upon drugs, pain relievers, and treatment of symptoms as well as
use of agents to "kill" the microbial organisms regarded as the cause
of the diseases. Surgery is used as a
major adjunct. From time to time, other
practices formerly frowned upon or even legally prosecuted are recognized as
effective and legitimate, and are then brought in under the aegis of organized
allopathic medicine. Physical therapy
is such a formally prosecuted modality that was eventually adopted; hypnosis is
another. The problems with organized
allopathy is that (1) it tends to be monopolistic, (2) it uses the state's
power to enforce its credo, (3) it controls both the bulk of the medical
scientific literature and the flow of research funds from both government and
private sources, (4) it does not adequately police its doctors and technicians,
(5) it does not sufficiently accent preventative medicine or "whole human
being" treatment, and (6) it engages in conspiracies to destroy competing
systems of medicine (as in the case of chiropractic). (7) On the other hand, it has made remarkable advances in
preventing killer diseases by vaccination, treating them by antibiotics, and in
eradicating or controlling many of the former great killer diseases such as
smallpox, diphtheria, and bubonic plague.
It has been far less successful in treating and reversing debilitation,
cancer, arteriosclerosis, etc. Just
now, most of its major weapons against the former dread diseases are beginning
to fail. The disease organisms are
rapidly changing into new, more virulent forms that are resistant or even
immune to the present "successful" treatments. Even in orthodox medical publications, it is
now beginning to be recognizing that allopathic medicine is starting to fail,
and that we are again entering a period of great, uncontrollable killer
pandemics.
ALLOPATHY
Another
name for allopathic medicine and allopathic medical therapy.
AMBIENT VACUUM
The average active vacuum, in space, removed from large
collections of charge and mass.
AMBIENT VACUUM POTENTIAL
The average standard vacuum
(spacetime) considered as a potential having structure and dynamics on a myriad
levels.
Anything that is composed of virtual
particle flux is a potential. Another way of looking at the vacuum is to
realize that, having an energy density, then a priori it is a potential or may be modeled as such.
Hence the ambient vacuum can be decomposed
via the Whittaker method into an internal set of infolded EM longitudinal waves
of very special nature. Further, our
work on the broken 3-symmetry energy flow involved in any potential or
dipolarity shows the more fundamental 4-symmetry energy flow between the time
domain and 3-space. This 4-symmetry
energy flow is also highly structured and dynamic.
Whittaker's work shows that,
contrary to present assumptions in quantum physics, a particular potential has
its virtual particle flux formed into a beautiful bidirectional wave structure.
The apparent disorder at any local point in the local vacuum potential is due
to the constant arrival of myriads of potentials, from charged particles all
over the universe. The violent interference and re-interference of these
potentials results in the creation of violently changing virtual photons—or in
terms of waves, violently changing EM waves and fields. In other words, the
statistical disorder of the vacuum is actually composed of continually and rapidly changing perfect order. [Here
we have confronted 3-law Aristotelian logic with its missing 4th law, because at the limit opposites are identical!] The continual violent
interferometry results in the zero-point EM fluctuations of vacuum. Each EM
fluctuation is completely deterministic, as shown in Puthoff's cosmological
feedback mechanism. However, the macroscopic observer has no knowledge of the
cause or of the arrival, and of the myriads of interferences that produced the
final EM field fluctuation. Hence although the zero-point fluctuations of
vacuum are completely deterministic one-by-one, the observer has no information on their causality. Hence
to the observer these fluctuations are completely statistical and seemingly without local order. However, because of
their hidden determinism, these fluctuations are chaotic rather than
random—contrary to the Gibbs' thermodynamics statistics assumed and adopted by
quantum mechanics. That statistics should be changed to an "already
chaotic" statistics containing hidden Whittaker order. This would appear
to be the real solution to the recognized major QM problem of the missing
chaos.
Since their changes and appearances
are completely in one-to-one correspondence to all distant features of the
macroscopically ordered universe, then their integration yields macroscopic
order. Further, as can be seen, Mach's principle—so near and dear to the heart
of Einstein—arises directly from the foregoing discussion. In such fashion,
integration of statistical (but chaotic, and with hidden order) quantum changes
results in the familiar, ordered macroscopic world. This removes the great
error in QM: that heretofore it has failed to predict the ordered macroscopic
universe we observe and inhabit.
ANALOGUE
Part that is analogous
(representative or modeled).
At root, an analogue of something is
a second something that functions in similar fashion to the first something.
ANAEROBE
An
organism that lives, is active, and occurs in the absence of free oxygen. Particularly applicable to one-celled organisms
that do so.
ANAEROBE, FACULTATIVE
An
organism that can live either as an aerobe or as an anaerobe. Particularly applicable to one-celled
organisms possessing that capability.
ANAEROBE, OBLIGATORY
An
organism that is restricted to being anaerobic; i.e., it cannot utilize oxygen
from the atmosphere.
ANAEROBIC
Characteristic
of an organism of living, active, or occurring in the absence of free oxygen.
ANGULAR MOMENTUM
The
momentum or "leverage" of the momentum of a moving body, with respect
to an axis or reference point.
Angular
momentum as the same units as action; that is, it is energy multiplied by time,
or momentum multiplied by length. In
terms of particles, it is also known as spin.
ANOMALOUS EM JAMMING MECHANISM
In
a dense signal environment, an unusual mechanism whereby EM energy from the
skin of an aerial vehicle is directed laser-like into the internal circuitry.
The density of the signals impinging upon the skin are such that the probability of multiple photon interaction increases. Also, on a nonlinearity in/on the skin, the multiplex of signals creates a scalar EM potential. Decomposition of this potential into Whittaker waves provides hidden "pump" waves upon the nonlinearity, which therefore acts as a pumped phase conjugate mirror (PPCM). EM fields and signals from the internal operating circuits in the vehicle provide "signal waves" to the internal skin and to the nonlinearity PPCMs on the skin. Amplified phase conjugate replica (PCR) waves are generated by the PPCMs, where in each PCR wave the energy may be the total of the external signal density pump waves upon the initiating PPCM. The result is that the skin becomes a "collector" of energy from all the impinging external signals, and focuses much of this collected external energy into laser-like beams inside the vehicle which penetrate directly back to the circuit element that originated the particular signal field/wave to the inner skin. The result is spurious jamming throughout the vehicle, directly in its operating circuits, in a manner not described in normal ECM theory. Also, the same effect occurs in a human body when exposed to such a dense signal environment (threshold about 200,000 signals per square meter per second, and particularly active above 500,000 signals per square meter per second. I.e., in such an EM "smog" environment, the anomalous jamming mechanism is able to progressively conduct the energy impinging upon the skin deep into the body and throughout it, including into the bone marrow. This effect is not described at all in the standard dosimetry literature and experimental approaches for examining the effects of EM fields and radiations upon biological systems. By rigorous frequency band control of radiations and communications, most equipment can be operated in an appreciably dense environment such as appears on the modern environment, because the equipment is essentially "narrow band." The human, however, is a very wide-band receiver, and in such dense environments—even at very weak signal levels—the human system will eventually undergo cumulative damage. This is one of the major mechanisms involved in long term deleterious biological effects of EM radiation environments, but this effect on living systems has not been investigated in the laboratory by present EM bioeffects researchers.
In
the U.S. air attack on Libya in 1986, the anomalous jamming mechanism
interfered with the aircraft, controls, and missiles because frequency
discipline was not rigorously enforced.
In the Gulf War, rigid frequency discipline was enforced, with the
result that the electronic systems operated normally. However, the troops exposed to that environment (which varied
from place to place) were affected by the mechanism, which added a bit to the
previous cumulative damage to their immune systems, etc.
ANTIBODY
A
body substance produced in response to a specific antigen (protein or
carbohydrate or other substance, such as a toxin or enzyme, capable of
stimulating an immune response).
The
antibody counteracts the effects of the antigen, by neutralizing toxins,
agglutinating bacteria or cells, precipitating soluble antigens, etc.
ANTI-ELECTRON
The
time-reversed electron, or positron. Under
time reversal, electric charge reverses in sign.
Paul A.M. Dirac, in his "A Theory of Electrons and Protons," Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A126, 1930, p. 360 introduced the negative energy electron sea (now called the "Dirac sea") with negative energy electron holes treated as the positive electron. He attempted to identify these holes with protons, but that was later refuted. The positron, discovered about a year after Dirac's paper, was later connected with this anti-electron.
Note
that Dirac himself was not adamant that all
negative energy state holes in the Dirac sea were filled with electrons, but
just that almost all of them
were. Modern researchers have tended to
extend this to state that all the
holes are filled, normally. That is
sufficient in forward time situations.
But it does not necessarily hold in a time-reversed situation, in a
time-reversed zone, or in a tempic back emf.
ANTIGRAVITY
An
effect whereby normal masses repulse
one another rather than attract one
another
Antigravity
may also be considered as time-reversed
gravitation. It may also be
considered as gravitation between two
negative masses.
ANTIMATTER
Matter
consisting of atoms which are composed of antielectrons (positrons),
antiprotons, antineutrons.
Also loosely refers to the antiparticle corresponding to a particle—the antiparticle may be regarded as the particle traveling backward in time, or "phase conjugated", or "time-reversed.
ANTIPARTICLE
A counterpart to an ordinary fundamental particle, having identical mass lifetime and spin, but with charge and magnetic moment reversed in algebraic sign.
Note that when the charge is reversed, parity and time are also reversed. Thus, properly, the antiparticle is the phase conjugation of the particle, or just conjugate particle for short. In effect an antiparticle is the particle traveling backward in observer time rather than forward in observer time.
ANTIPHASED
180 degrees out of phase
(contrary-wise in timing).
ANTIPHOTON
A time-reversed photon.
Presently, the photon is considered
its own antiparticle, so that photon and antiphoton are one and the same. In the
new approach, that is not quite true. First, one considers that a photon—as is
well known—has the units of angular momentum. Thus it is made of "energy
multiplied by time." We consider that the time-forward photon (i.e. a
normal photon), is made of (+DE)(+Dt). Usually physicists have largely neglected the fact that
a photon carries an increment of time
as well as an increment of energy! In our approach the antiphoton, being a time-reversed entity, must be composed
differently. We have tentatively considered the antiphoton to be comprised of (DE)(- Dt). It will probably initially
be necessary to take into account the fact that Minkowski geometry treats the T
dimension as imaginary rather than simple arithmetic. We haven't had the
lengthy time to work all of that out; perhaps one of the better theoreticians
or one of the sharp young graduate students will do that and save us the
trouble.
At any rate, the requirement is
that—in a coupled photon-antiphoton pair (a graviton)—the energies of photon
and antiphoton must add spatially, while electromagnetically
the translation forces (actually translation impulses) of photon and antiphoton
must cancel or thwart each other. One insists on a strong interpretation of the
distortion correction theorem in phase conjugate optics. In other words, we
consider the "wave" as composed of photons, while the
"antiwave" (phase conjugate replica) emitted by a phase conjugate
mirror is composed of antiphotons. And we consider that the distortion
correction theorem must apply to the wave's photons, so that the antiphotons
are precisely superposing (coupling) and then decoupling as the wave and
antiwave pass through each other in perfect spatial superposition. We feel that
this "totally in phase spatially but totally antiphased temporally"
concept is important. It is well-known,
e.g., that in certain cases protons—the very building blocks of matter
itself—can pass right through other protons, as shown in certain colliding beam
experiments if their relative spins are properly arranged.
ANTISIGNAL
The phase conjugate of a signal. The time reversal of that signal or its
twin. The phase conjugate replica
signal/wave emitted by a phase conjugate mirror material in response to an
incident signal/wave.
ANTI-STOKES EMISSION
Radiation emitted from an
intensely scattering medium that is of greater intensity than the input
radiation.
In other words, the medium gives off
more energy than we have to put into it. This has been known since the 1930s
and proven experimentally, but no really complete explanation has been
forthcoming. The conventional
explanation is that some of the kinetic energy of the medium is furnished to
cause additional emission. In that
case, anti-Stokes emission would lower the kinetic energy of the emitting
medium. Note that this is not
necessarily true at all in Letokhov's negative absorption (excess emission) of
the medium, where in that case the excess energy in the emissions is said to
come directly from energy absorbed from the active vacuum.
ANTI-STOKES RADIATION
The radiation coming from an
anti-Stokes emission process from an intensely scattering medium, where more
energy flux is emitted than is input by the experimenter-operator.
In the past, there has just been
"arm-waving" that the excess energy must come from the internal
energy of the molecules. There seems to be no explanation at all of where the
excess energy of the molecules must continue to come from! Tacit silence on
this "apparent" violation of energy conservation is held. But see Letokhov's negative absorption of the medium discussions in the literature.
We quote from H. C. Dake and Jack
DeMent. (1941) Fluorescent Light and Its
Applications, Chemical Publishing Company, Inc., Brooklyn, New York, 1941.
p. 51-52: "When a phosphor or other
luminescent substance emits light, it gives in most cases an emission according
to Stokes' Law. This law states that the wavelength of the fluorescent
(emitted) light is always greater than the wavelength of the exciting
radiation. It was first observed in 1852 in the memoir "On the Change of
Refrangibility of Light," by Sir G. G. Stokes. In terms of energy the
relationship states that e em < e ab. While Stokes' Law holds for the
majority of cases, it does not hold in certain instances. In some cases the
wave length is the same for both the absorbed and the emitted radiation. That
is, the efficiency appears to be perfect or unity. This is known as resonance
radiation. In other cases Stokes' Law does not hold where the energy emitted is
greater than the energy absorbed. This is known as Anti-Stokes emission. In
1935 Prileshajewa showed that there is an energy difference as much as 1.1 v
between the exciting light and the fluorescence of aniline vapor. This added
energy is attributed to additions from the internal energy of the molecule."
There is no real problem of
identifying the source of the excess energy, once one realizes that (i) every
dipole is a broken symmetry in the vacuum exchange with the end charges of the
dipole, and thus extracts virtual energy from the vacuum, integrates and orders
it, and outputs it as EM energy density flow.
One then adds multiretroreflection and multiple passes of the EM energy
flow, so that charges that intercept and collect energy from the reciprocating
flow can multiply connect from the same energy flow (on a given pass, only a
tiny, tiny fraction—nominally about 10-13—of the energy
flow is intercepted and interacted with by the collecting particle). Thus
multiple collections from the same EM energy flow can be accomplished, if the
flow is iteratively rerouted (as by retroreflection or phase conjugate
reflection) back across the collecting charges again and again.
In this fashion additional energy is
collected in the collected volume, which increases the local collected energy
density in that volume. In turn this increases the local potential of that
volume. In turn that increases the
energy flow from that potential acting as a dipole, because it increases the
dipole strength and consequently the magnitude of the dipole's broken symmetry
in its vacuum flux exchange.
The inefficiency of the process
increases nonlinearly with increasing local potential, and faster than the
buildup of local energy density occurs from multipass multicollection. When the
inefficiency curve reaches the increasing broken symmetry energy extraction
curve, then a point of equilibrium is reached. At that equilibrium point, the
rate of energy diffusing out of the multipass region and escaping from the
periphery of the system is equal to the rate of extraction of energy from the
vacuum and flowing it out into as Poynting S-flow
into the multicollection region and collecting it.
So we have described an open
thermodynamic system, where there are two inputs of energy flow: (i) that by
the operator-experimenter, and (ii) that from the vacuum via the dipolar broken
symmetries. At equilibrium condition the total input energy rate is equal to
the total energy escaping rate, and the conservation of energy law is
rigorously upheld. However, this is an open thermodynamic system far from equilibrium,
and so rigorously the nonlinear thermodynamics of such systems applies, rather
than the normal equilibrium thermodynamics. As is well-known, the coefficient
of performance for such open systems in disequilibrium, may permissibly be
overunity, even greatly overunity.
Properly utilized, the overunity
anti-Stokes or Letokhov emission can be made very large—such as COP »1200 in Patterson's
adaptation. The process and its overunity certification already exist in the
hard science literature, being known and experimentally demonstrated for at
least three decades.
ANTIWAVE
The time-reversal (phase
conjugation) of a reference wave.
A phase conjugate replica wave is a
time-reversed replica of its referent wave. Hence it is the antiwave of the
referent wave.
A-POTENTIAL
Vector magnetic potential.
The A-potential is a real entity more primary than the
magnetic field B, and not a
mathematical convenience as was originally thought—as detailed in the second
volume of Feynman's three volumes of physics. Indeed, it may be separated from
the magnetic field, as reported by Feynman, and used for instrumentation
effects in the manner patented by Gelinas. When separated from magnetic field,
it is often referred to as the "curl-free vector potential," since the
B-field is modeled as being created
from the A-field by curling it. In
other words, B is defined as the
curl of the magnetic vector potential, if we use B º Ñ´A. Hence
"separating" magnetic field from A-potential
simply is a sort of "parallel branching" of the energy density flow
of the A-potential. It is like branching the voltage on a feeder
line conductor in an electric circuit into two parallel conductors. The feeder potential splits into two, so
that each branch has the same potential.
Actually the vast energy flow in the feeder line only has a small
component which strikes the surface charges, diverting the energy into the
conductor and potentializing the Drude electrons. In branching into two conductors, the giant flow branches also,
but is so great that the surface charges in each of the two branches still
intercept essentially the same amount of energy, diverging it into the
conductor. Hence each conductor
exhibits the same potential as the feeder conductor
The same thing happens when one "splits" or
branches the A-potential in similar
fashion. The diverted and separated B-field branch will exhibit "equal
energy density" flow (i.e., in the form of magnetic flux density flow) and
yet the original A-potential path
through space will still have the same previous energy flow density magnitude,
just without curl (without magnetic field).
Any good toroid or very long solenoid already performs such
separation, and hence energy density flow doubling. If properly used—as in the motionless electromagnetic generator
(MEG)—this effect can be used to provide a generator with COP>1.0. At this writing, the present MEG exhibits
COP = 16, and is a patent-pending system.
The well-known Aharonov-Bohm effect, e.g., also uses this
separation of the curl of the
A-potential, leaving an uncurled A-potential whose changes will and do
interact with electrons.
The curl-free vector potential is particularly interesting because
(1) it is a unique and independent field of nature, (2) its curl produces a
magnetic field, (3) its time derivative produces an electric field, (4) its
magnitude does not fall off inversely as the distance squared, but only
inversely as the distance, and its time derivative dA/dt = B E. Hence, as in the MEG,
one can extract energy both from the curl-free A-potential and the curled
A-potential (magnetic field B), increasing the available energy
collected in the circuit to greater than what the operator input to it. This is simply a physical process of
regauging, wherein electrodynamicists already routinely assume (and apply) the
fact that the potential energy of any EM system can be freely changed at will,
by regauging. In the real world, of
course, we may have to pay a little switching energy, but we are free to
regauge (by this "splitting the potential into equal parallel paths, and
by other methods), at will and at any time and place. The MEG just takes advantage of one major method for free regauging,
in order to violate the Lorentz symmetry condition (violate symmetry in the
system's energy exchange with its active vacuum environment). It thereby is legitimately permitted to
exhibit COP>1.0 and output more energy than one inputs, because the regauging
transforms it into an open dissipative system far from thermodynamic
equilibrium in its active environmental energy exchange.
ARISTOTELIAN LOGIC
The conventional three laws of logic, unconsciously fitted to the physical reality created by the single photon interaction. The three laws are: (1) a thing is identical to itself, (2) a thing is not identical to something else, and (3) either one has a given thing or something that is not that thing. Mathematically these are written as (1) A A, (2) A Ã, and (3) A Ã. Aristotelian logic applies only to single observation at a time (monocular observation, a single observer). When multiple simultaneous observation (multiocular observation, multiple observers) are considered, the three laws may be violated. In that case a fourth law, A Ã is added. This law may be seen to be the exact negation of all the first three. An application rule (which may itself be called a fifth law) is also added, and states that either the first three laws are explicit and the fourth is implicit, or the first three are implicit and the fourth is explicit. Further, the fourth law is the law of the paradox: Something that is found to be true in nature, but violates one or more of Aristotle's three laws, is known as a logical paradox. In the higher logic, it simply violates the case where the three Aristotelian laws are explicit and the fourth law is implicit. Instead, the three Aristotelian laws are now implicit and the fourth law has become explicit. All boundaries exhibit this effect.
It is highly recommended that the
interested reader familiarize himself or herself with Morris Kline, Mathematics: The Loss of Certainty, Oxford
University Press, New York, 1980. Kline
deals directly with the fact that mathematics is not a body of unshakable
truths about the physical world, and mathematical reasoning is not exact and
fallible.
ARISTOTLE
A great Greek philosopher who
lived from 384-322 B.C.
Aristotle is famous for his three
laws of logic: (1) a thing is identical to itself, (2) a thing is not identical
to something else, and (3) either one has the thing considered or one has
something else.
Heraclitus pointed out that
Aristotle's laws prohibited any change, and yet changes were ubiquitous. In short, for a thing to change, it had to
change into something else, so Heraclitus pointed out. So how could a thing be both itself and
something else simultaneously? How could it be not itself while being
itself? The problem has not been solved
by the logicians and philosophers to this day, because it has no solution in
Aristotelian 3-law logic. So
Heraclitus, believe it or not, concluded that all change was an illusion.
ATHERIOSCLEROSIS
Basically, clogging of the arteries, which may be due to deposits onto the artery walls or by thickening and growth of the artery walls themselves, or a combination. It is a chronic (slowly progressing) disease where the artery walls become progressively thickened and hardened and the artery becomes less elastic.
It
has been found that the common cytomegalovirus (one of the herpes viruses)
plays a key role in the development of the disease. Initial deposits irritate and injure the arterial walls, and the
herpes 6 virus infects the site, partially nullifying the control of excess
grown of the arterial muscle tissue.
This deposit and concomitant stimulation of some excess muscle growth
occurs repeated, so that the muscle tissue grows abnormally over an extended
period of time. For this reason, when
an operation is performed to forcibly reduce the deposits inside the artery,
the resulting injuries to the arterial wall tissues leads to the herpes 6
infection and stimulation of excess muscle growth. It has been found, e.g., that after angioplasty the process is
often engendered, so that within a year or two the artery is narrowed again,
but this time by abnormal growth of smooth muscle tissue. The Prioré team demonstrated positive and
total remission of arteriosclerosis in laboratory animals by means of
nonionizing EM irradiation to produce an amplified "antiengine",
which "time reversed" or dedifferentiated the stricken cells and the
stricken areas back to a previous state.
ARTIFICIAL POTENTIAL
A scalar potential which is
composed of, or partially contains, an artificially assembled bidirectional
wave set.
See E. T. Whittaker, "On the
Partial Differential Equations of Mathematical Physics," Mathematische Annalen, Vol. 57, 1903,
p. 333-355 for proof that a "scalar potential" is actually a harmonic
set of hidden bidirectional EM phase
conjugate longitudinal wavepairs. Each wavepair consists of a wave and its
antiwave (true time-reversed replica wave).
If the external observer could see
the detected (effect) waves in a
hidden wavepair, he would see the "wave" going in one direction and
the antiwave passing precisely through it in the other direction. However, prior to detection, the phase
conjugate wave exists entirely in the complex plane and hence in the time domain
(in -ict). So the interpretation of
Whittaker's 1903 paper, in terms of cause and effect waves, is that the phase
conjugate half set is incoming from the time domain to each and every point in
the dipolarity or potential, and the "real 3-space half set" is being
radiated in every direction in 3-space from that point. See my paper, "Giant
Negentropy….".
In addition to Whittaker's sum set
of biwaves, Ziolkowski added the product set in the mid-1980s. E.g., see
Richard W. Ziolkowski, "Exact solutions of the wave equation with complex
source locations," Journal of
Mathematical Physics, 26(4), April 1985, p. 861-863; Rod Donnelly and
Richard Ziolkowski, "A method for constructing solutions of homogeneous
partial differential equations: localized waves," Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A., Vol. 437, 1992, p.
673-692. Particularly see I.M. Besieris, A.M. Shaarawi, and R. W. Ziolkowski,
"A bidirectional travelling plane wave representation of exact solutions
of the scalar wave equation," Journal
of Mathematical Physics, 30(6), 1989, p. 1254-1269.
However, these deal only with the
effects waves after detection.
Another way of defining an
artificial potential is: A potential
formed by or containing a subset formed by, deliberately summing nonzero force
field vectors to a zero vector resultant. [Note that electrodynamicists
routinely discard vector systems that sum to a zero resultant; not realizing
that in doing so, they are discarding vacuum engines and a vastly extended
electrogravitational dynamics!] The vector zero system of infolded nonzero
vectors has a deterministic, internal stress pattern that is macroscopic. The
type of potential made by the zero summation depends upon the type of force
vectors summed. For example, summing electric field vectors to zero produces an
electrostatic scalar potential; summing magnetic field vectors to zero produces
a magnetostatic scalar potential of vacuum.
All potentials represents local
warps or curvatures in vacuum/spacetime, and all artificial potentials contain
internal, deterministic templates of nested internal spacetime curvatures.
Curvature of spacetime interacts directly upon mass and physical systems
embedded in it. Thus these deterministic, internested local spacetime
curvatures of the artificial potential represent vacuum engines, or spacetime
engines, and the artificial potential is said to be a dimensioned or activated
potential. Any system exposed to and placed in such a vacuum spacetime engine,
will have these hidden vacuum flux asymmetries interacting upon each and every
part of it, down to and including the nuclei, the nucleons, and the quarks in
the nucleons.
ASYMMETRICAL REGAUGING
Change of either the scalar
potential f or the vector potential A,
but not both, so that a single excess force and a single change of system
energy occurs in the system.
This violates the assumed Lorentz
condition, and thus excess energy can enter the system, and an excess
"free" force appears which can (if the system is adroitly designed)
then translate to perform work upon the system to increase its (e.g. kinetic)
energy, exhausting the excess regauging energy in the process and restoring
symmetry.
In conventional EM theory, Maxwell's
equations in potential formulation are in terms of two potentials, f (the
scalar potential) and A (the vector
potential). When Heaviside retranslated Maxwell's quaternion set of 20
equations in 20 unknowns, he transformed it (in potential form) into two
equations where main variables f and A
are not separated. Electrodynamicists, who until recently considered the
potentials as not even real, but just mathematical figments and conveniences,
then simply arbitrarily changed both f and A
just precisely so that the extra
force appearing in the system by the change of f was countered by an equal and
opposite extra force also appearing in the system by the change of A. This type of symmetrical (no net force) regauging is known as the Lorentz condition.
Each asymmetrical (produces a nonzero excess net force) potential change
(each half of the two asymmetrical regaugings that comprise the symmetrical
regauging) also altered the overall energy of the system. However, in the
symmetrical regauging that total energy change is "bottled up" as
increased stress in the system, because no net translation force is available
to be translated and use the energy change to produce excess "free
work."
The Lorentz condition assumes that
the designer will not allow the
equilibrium of the system to be broken! In that case, of course, ordinary
equilibrium thermodynamics applies, and the system cannot produce COP>1.0.
Prior to this Lorentz condition assumption and its absolutely arbitrary
regauging, Maxwell's equations do include asymmetrical regauging and therefore
open EM systems far from thermodynamic equilibrium; precisely those which
violate the Lorentz condition (symmetric regauging) assumption. In short, the unregauged equations do
include COP>1.0 electrodynamic circuits and systems.
Unknowingly the electrodynamicists arbitrarily discarded the entire
Maxwellian class of overunity EM engines and circuits—which class incorporates
making a change in one potential(s) such that the Lorentz condition does not
hold.
ASYMMETRY
Lack
of symmetry, or "broken symmetry" in a general sense.
ASYMMETRY OF THE DIPOLE
Any dipole or dipolarity is a
broken 3-symmetry in its fierce exchange of EM energy with the active
vacuum. This means that it continuously
receives and absorbs copious virtual energy from the seething vacuum flux, and
that not all this absorbed energy is reradiated back to the vacuum in virtual
form. Instead, some of it is integrated
into observable form and re-radiated in all directions as usable, real 3-space
EM energy.
This is standard, well-known
particle physics, although it appears to be totally missing from classical
electrodynamics and it is not considered at all by electrical power system
designers and analysts!
Every electric charge is a broken
symmetry in the virtual particle flux exchange between the quantum mechanical
(energetic) vacuum and the mass of that electric charge. The dipole is two
different such asymmetries. As is well-known in particle physics (not in
classical EM theory!) each such broken symmetry must "gate" out some
of the vacuum energy. In short, the charge asymmetry "extracts" some
vacuum energy from its normal "energetic exchange" with the vacuum
flux, and puts it out in some form we call "observable" (capable of
being measured; specifically, of being intercepted by electric charges so as to
produce a force field across the charge and translate it).
Well, an electrical charge produces
a flow of energy density which we may represent conventionally as S = E´H (when collected and measured
on assumed unit point charges), which we—a little bit mistakenly— call
"observable." [Actually, until the energy flow interacts with that
assumed unit point charge, it is an organized flow of virtual entities] After interaction it is real observable EM
energy in 3-space. The spinning electron has its own magnetic moment and its
own E-field. Since (in one form) also
E = - Ñf , an extracted and formed S = E´H is output by the
charge asymmetry. This output energy flow also produces the assumed f evidenced by the charge interaction, since f as used represents the reaction cross section of the
potential. Note that all these entities
S, E, H, and f are defined in
electrodynamics only as their own interaction cross section with a unit point
charge containing mass.
In classical electrodynamics (formed
long before the notion of charged particles, atoms, and EM energy flow!) it is
just recognized that "charge is the source of a potential." Actually
charge gates the energy flow from the vacuum flux, receiving the energy from
the time domain by its asymmetry, transduces the energy into 3-space energy,
and outputs it as real EM energy pouring out in 3-space in all directions. That energy-flow contains and carries the
energy that will interact with charge to form the E-field, the H-field
(spin field), and f.
Also, in particle physics and gauge
theory it is well-known that no mass
system can be in equilibrium anyway, unless the vacuum-to-mass interaction is
incorporated! After CEM was formed, much later the atom was discovered and
the electron was discovered. Much later then, particle physics and quantum
mechanics came along. CEM theory has never been altered to include the
necessary vacuum interaction, although it has been known for decades that CEM
is totally in error in this respect.
Here one poses a question to the
sharp young graduate students: Why does every university continue to teach a
seriously flawed classical electrodynamics which does not include the
vacuum/mass interaction, when the physics department at the same university
knows full well that it must or no EM system can be in equilibrium? Why is not
such a fundamental and universal
issue strongly raised and intensively discussed by our large, tax-exempt
scientific organizations at their annual symposia? Why do not the National
Science Foundation and the National Academy of Science demand that serious work
be done at all speed, to correct such known scientific deficiencies in the
classical EM theory? What happened to
science as the search for physical truth, and replaced it with "status
quo" models or—in some cases—even dogma?
It is an inexplicable mystery to me, and one to which I do not know the
answer.
AUTOIMMUNE DISORDER
A
disease or disorder relating to or caused by the antibodies or T-cells that
attack foreign molecules, cells, or tissues of their host organism.
A
flagrant autoimmune disease example is AIDS, Acquired Immunological Deficiency
Syndrome. The AIDS virus successfully
hides from the antibodies, so that they cannot perform their proper function,
and it infects the T-cells and negates their function. However, there are other examples other than
AIDS: e.g., rheumatism and osteoarthritis.
BACK EMF
The counter-electromotive force,
usually between the end charges of the source dipole for an EM circuit.
When the electrons in the circuit
are forced against the emf—as when the charges from the ground reference of the
circuit are forced back up through the emf of the source dipole—then work is
done upon the source dipole to scatter the charges and destroy the dipole. Removing the dipole removes its receipt of
vacuum energy via its broken 3-symmetry, transduction of that energy, and
output of it along the circuit and in space around the circuit as the energy
flow that powers the circuit (with part missing the circuit and being just
wasted).
Since this removes the power from
the circuit, then additional energy must be input to the source to perform work
on the internal charges and restore that source dipole again.
There are actually two emfs in a
circuit, not one. There is a 3-space
emf and also an entirely unrecognized tempic emf. In either case, under proper circumstances there can be a
back-emf or either one or both. See
discussion under electromotive force,
back. See also tempic back emf (to be added).
BALL LIGHTNING
Rare form of lightning where an incandescent, slow-moving globe forms. The globe often moves erratically, explodes, and may set fire to objects it touches.
Ball
lightning may be due to scalar electromagnetic interferometry which can produce
a controlled pattern of electromagnetic energy at a distance, or it may be due
to the formation of a special localized spacetime curvature engine.
BARE ELECTRON
The
true electron without its partial shielding of virtual positrons that are
attracted around it.
BARRETT, TERENCE W.
Noted modern electrodynamicist
and consultant who works in SU(2)´SU(2) gauge symmetry extended electrodynamics, and was also
one of the pioneers of ultrawideband radar.
BECKER, ROBERT O.
Medical doctor, medical research
scientist, and Nobel Nominee, noted for
his early-on efforts—particularly in the 1960s through the 1980s, in the
effects of EM fields on biological systems, studies of evoked or partially
evoked limb regeneration in certain species, electrical stimulation of bone
fractures to stimulate healing and reveal the mechanism involved, and the
cellular regeneration system of the body as opposed to the immune system.
Becker particularly recognized that
the cellular regenerative system was a special electrical system having unique
functions. He even succeeded in
diagramming this system as far as it is revealed by ordinary U(1)
electrodynamics. Becker demonstrated
partial limb regeneration in salamanders, etc. and in some other species, with
electrical stimulation. In his
EM-stimulated bone fracture healing, Becker showed a startling result: First the red blood cells entering the
fracture area shucked their hemoglobin and grew a nucleus, thus
"dedifferentiating" (biological term) or "time-reversing"
(physics term) back to an earlier state.
Then this modified cell redifferentiated (biological term) or
"fast-forwarded in time" (physics term) into the type of cell that
makes cartilage. Then this newly
modified cell further redifferentiated into the type of cell that makes bone,
and was deposited in the fracture site.
The continuing deposits of these cells from the ongoing process evoked
in red blood cells healed the fracture with new bone growth. Whereupon the action stopped.
Becker also was one of the first
qualified scientists who testified in court on the deleterious effects of power
line radiation. He thereby incurred the
enmity of very powerful interests, so that his research funds were pulled and
eventually he was forced to retire at an early age.
He was nominated for the Nobel Prize
multiple times, and his epochal work did finally focus at least some attention
of the medical research community on the regenerative system as opposed to the
immune system which heals nothing.
Becker's profound work was of tremendous
influence on me as I struggled to decipher the active mechanism in his
experiments, the Prioré team's experiments in France, the Russian microwave
radiation of U.S. Embassy personnel in Moscow, Kaznacheyev's experiments
demonstrating transmission of cellular disease and disorder electromagnetically
into target cells environmentally isolated except for contact by light from the
sender cells having such disease or disorder, and the body's own regenerative
system. After some 14 years struggle
with the problem, I finally did break the mechanism(s) involved in all those
things. But it was only possible
because of the magnificent work by Becker and Prioré, the reported work by
Kaznacheyev, and gradual exposure to higher symmetry electrodynamics. The work was crude at first, but eventually
progressed (by 1998, e.g.) to include the port-hole concept, transduction of EM
wave polarization types, the engine and engine template concepts, and unified
field theory. Since then it has become
clear that the proper electrodynamics to model such things is the higher
symmetry O(3) electrodynamics pioneered by Evans, and now revealed to be an
important subset of Sachs' unified field theory.
Becker is therefore one of my heroes
whose magnificent work and long perseverance against strong scientific
suppression I greatly admire. Most of
Becker's detractors were or are in fact employed in positions either directly
or indirectly funded by the electrical power industry. I believe that, had Becker had access to
O(3) electrodynamics and Sachs' theory, he would have personally impelled the
entire medical field to a marvelous and extraordinarily advanced EM medical
therapy.
See Robert O. Becker and Andrew A. Marino, Electromagnetism and Life, State University of New York Press, Albany, 1982; Nice summary of EM bioeffects (orthodox) ; also on http://www.ortho.lsumc.edu/Faculty/Marino/EL/ELPub.html.
See also R. O. Becker, "The neural semiconduction control system and its interaction with applied electrical current and magnetic fields," Proceedings of the XI International Congress of Radiology, Vol. 105, 1966, p. 1753-1759, Excerpta Medica Foundation; Amsterdam; — "The direct current field: A primitive control and communication system related to growth processes," Proceed. XVI Internat. Congr. Zoology, Washington, D.C., Vol. 3, 1963, p. 179-183; — “The control system governing bone growth in response to mechanical stress,” J. Ark. Med. Soc., Vol. 62, 1966, p. 404; — "A technique for producing regenerative healing in humans," Frontier Perspectives, 1(2), Fall/Winter 1990, p. 1-2; — with Charles H. Bachman and Howard Friedman, The direct current system: A link between the environment and the organism," New York State Journal of Medicine, Vol. 62, April 15, 1962, p. 1169-1176; — and D. G. Murray, “A method for producing cellular dedifferentiation by means of very small electrical currents,” Trans. N.Y. Acad. Sci., Vol. 29, 1967, p. 606-615; — and Joseph A. Spadaro, "Electrical stimulation of partial limb regeneration in mammals," Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, Second Series, 48(4), May 1972, p. 627-64; — and Carlton F. Hazlewood, Abraham R. Liboff, and Jan Walleczek, Electromagnetic Applications In Medicine," NIH-OAM Electromagnetics Panel Report, Jan. 15, 1993.
See particularly Robert O. Becker, "The significance of bioelectric potentials." Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics, Vol. 1, 1974, p. 187-199. This is probably the paper by Becker that provides a really good overview of the control system. A block diagram of the proposed system is given by Becker on p. 191.
Becker
also has authored several popular-oriented books filled with excellent
information. These include Robert O.
Becker, M.D. and Gary Selden, The Body
Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life, William Morrow and
Co., New York, 1985; and Robert O. Becker, Cross
Currents: The Perils of Electropollution; The Promise of Electromedicine,
Jeremy P. Tarcher, Los Angeles, 1990.
BEDINI, JOHN
Noted audio engineer, overunity
energy researcher, and inventor of the renowned Bedini amplifiers well-known to
audiophiles, the BASE process for holographic sound, and a process for cleaning
the harshness from digital audio disks.
Bedini has invented a variety of
COP>1.0 processes, motors, generators, etc.
Particularly he has developed a process whereby, in a battery-powered
circuit, he adroitly back-pulses the battery in a recharging direction while
the battery is powering the load, causing a pile-up of electrons on the surface
of the battery plates that is a sharply increased scalar potential opposing the
onrushing very massive lead ions in the battery in discharging mode. The result is that the potential's electron
pile-up increases dramatically due to the ions' far greater inertia than that
of the electrons. The result is a high
potential (perhaps 40 volts) upon the surface of the battery,
overpotentializing both the incoming lead ions between the plates and the
electrons in the external circuit in powering mode. In this phase, energy flows from the vacuum onto both the ions
and the external circuit electrons, adding significant energy to the powering
of the external circuit for the same ion current inside the battery.
As the ions slow and stop, Bedini's
back-pulse trailing edge causes a very sharp cutoff, thus invoking Lenz's law
and resulting in the surface potential on the plates increasing to well over
100 volts. This further
overpotentializes the external circuit electrons in powering mode, dissipating
much more energy in the external circuit to power the loads. As the ions finally stop and reverse, their
relatively sluggish re-acceleration in charging mode and their
overpotentialization still results in excess energy being delivered to the
external circuit. Then as the
overpotentialized ions accelerate in charging mode, the external circuit is
still in powering mode until the drain-off of the severe electron pile-up on
the surface of the battery plates.
This is one of several modes of
operation used by Bedini in his overunity battery powered circuits, which keep
their batteries recharged while powering their loads.
By separating the other closed
current loop between external electron currents and the ion currents between
the battery plates, and then dephasing these currents, Bedini breaks the usual
dissipation symmetry enforced in a closed loop circuit where all charge
carriers have the same m/q ratio. In
Bedini's circuits, the m/q charge ratios dramatically differ between the ion current
section between the plates and the electron currents between the outside of the
plates and through the external circuit.
Also, by providing a much greater potential between the two circuit halves, The potential extends in both
directions—internally back over the ions, and externally in the circuit over
the external Drude electrons powering the circuit loads and losses. He provides a true negative resistor on the
surface of the plates, which extracts energy from the vacuum (via its broken
3-symmetry as a dipolarity) from the time domain, transduces it into real EM
energy, and overpotentializes (regauges) the potential energy of both the
internal ion currents and the external electron currents.
The Bedini process is therefore a
legitimate COP>1.0 system, and in his self-powering embodiments the system
will run indefinitely without external energy input by the operator, use of
fuel, etc. He has converted the system
to an open system far from thermodynamic equilibrium in its violent energy
exchange with the active vacuum, and thus the system is permitted to exhibit
both COP>1.0 and self-powering as well.
For an expanded explanation of the
Bedini negative resistor process in batteries, see T. E. Bearden,
"Bedini's Method for Forming Negative Resistors in Batteries," Journal of New Energy, 5(1), Summer
2000, p. 24-38.
BEING
Pure
essence, existence.
Again,
something which in actuality resists Aristotelian definition unless preliminary
assumptions are made. Generally used in
one of two senses: (1) persistence, as in "he is (he continually
exists)," or (2) identity, as in "he is the man ('he' and 'the man'
are the same thing)."
BIDIRECTIONAL EM WAVES
EM waves running antiparallel to
each other through a given point or region of space.
Suppose we run a normal EM wave into
a phase conjugating mirror (PCM) with a gain of 1. By ordinary phase conjugate
optics, the mirror then emits a backwards-traveling phase conjugate replica
wave (PCR wave). According to the so-called "distortion correction
theorem," that backwards traveling wave will travel backwards (as seen by
the external observer) back over the exact route taken by the previous wave,
and it will reappear in space precisely superposed spatially with the previous
waves. If we examine the impulse (density) fields (i.e., Edt), then the
forward-time wave contains Edt while the backward time wave contains E(-dt), which is just -Edt. So electromagnetically—as far as producing a net translation force on
a charge—the E-fields seem to cancel, although they are still there and their
energy is still there. Instead of translation, the two produce stress.
One thus (simple case) will have a
strange kind of standing wave wherein the local energy density of the vacuum
varies (e.g., sinusoidally) as a function of distance, but a charged particle
placed in it will not be translated! Rigorously, that is a gravitational standing wave. Since change in local energy density
is also a curvature of spacetime, that is also a standing sinusoidal wave of
the local curvature of spacetime. This is where electromagnetics and
gravitation actually meet, and where electromagnetics can be utilized to
produce gravitational waves. (Much more complex waves can be produced; this is
just the simplest example).
BIDIRECTIONAL FIELD FLOWS
E-fields (and B-fields) being
propagated in a pair of opposite waves traveling "through" each other
in opposite directions,
...where the two may be "locked
together" as a wave and its antiwave; i.e., as a "Whittaker biwave
pair". Note that Whittaker
bidirectional EM wavepairs are not to be confused with the pairing of the wave
and reflection wave on a transmission line.
BIDIRECTIONAL GATING
Gating (of energy flow, e.g.) in
both directions simultaneously.
BIDIRECTIONAL TRAVELING PLANE WAVE
A wave and its antiwave, where each
wave is moving in an opposite direction (standard assumption in phase conjugate
physics).
In short, to the external observer
the waves seem to be "moving through" each other; one from left to
right, and the other from right to left; or one radially outward and the other
radially inward. All scalar potentials were shown by Stoney and Whittaker to be
comprised of a harmonic series of such "bidirectional traveling wave
pairs." However, the
interpretation of the phase conjugate waves was after detection, so that the
detected "effect" wave existed in 3-space. Prior to detection, the phase conjugate half-set of the Whittaker
decomposition of the scalar potential is convergent from and in the time domain
(complex plane).
BIOELECTROMAGNETICS (BEM)
Presently, the scientific study of interactions between living organisms and electromagnetic fields, forces, energies, currents, and charges. The range of interactions studied ranges from atomic and molecular, through intracellular, to the whole organism.
Electromagnetic fields studied in BEM include those of endogenous origin (from within the organism) and exogenous origin (from outside the organism). Sources of exogenous fields include: the earth and sun, electrical equipment (power lines, radio transmitters, etc.), clinical treatment devices (e.g., TENS), and other organisms. The electromagnetic fields of greatest interest in BEM are generally classified as nonionizing (i.e., lacking sufficient energy to directly dislodge electrons from molecules or atoms.) BEM is a scientific discipline emerging on the boundaries between physics and biology. As in other sciences, progress in BEM is made by testing falsifiable hypotheses against valid measured data obtained in repeatable experiments.
Our
new viewpoint seeks to dramatically enlarge the scope of this definition, to
include not only the presently-recognized external (outfolded)
electromagnetics, but also the internal (infolded, inside the scalar EM
potential) electromagnetics, and also to utilize a unified field theory where
EM is GR and vice versa.
BIOENERGETICS
That branch of Russian (KGB)
energetics which is targeted against the living body, its cells and tissues,
and its EM fields and potentials (biofields and biopotentials).
BIOGENESIS
Generation of living organisms
from other living organisms; also, the theory or philosophy that living
organisms develop only from other living organisms.
BIOLOGICAL WARFARE
Warfare against living humans,
livestock, crops, etc. using pathogenic micro-organisms or biocides to create diseases and death, or
using dimensioned electromagnetic potentials, fields, and waves to kindle
cellular damage, disease, and death in the same targeted populations.
BIOLOGICAL WARFARE, ELECTROMAGNETIC
The use of dimensioned
electromagnetic potentials, fields, and waves to induce cellular damage,
disease, and death in targeted living populations.
The decades of Russian microwave
radiation of personnel in the former U.S. Embassy in Moscow is an example,
where only field-free potentials were dimensioned with the disease or
health-change patterns (the engines).
This science was developed in Russia as an outgrowth of the thousands of
Kaznacheyev experiments demonstrating that any cellular disease and damage
pattern could be induced from diseased
or damaged cells into environmentally isolated cell cultures, purely by
specialized EM radiation from the damaged or "transmitting" cells
into the targeted cells.
The Chinese also used such
dimensioned radiation to induce cancer in almost all GRU operatives stationed
in China at the time of the major disagreement between China and Russia. In his book, Stanislov Lunev
and Ira Winkler, Through the Eyes of the Enemy: Russia's Highest Ranking
Military Defector Reveals Why Russia Is More Dangerous Than Ever, Regnery,
Washington, D.C., 1998, p. 160, Lunev reveals it this way:"…I was not the only person who was stationed in Beijing to come
down with cancer… Almost all of the GRU officers stationed in China with me
have been diagnosed with cancer. People
assigned to the embassy had told me that they were picking up high levels of
radiation from the apartment building around the embassy compound. Whether it was a form of high-tech
monitoring or a conscious effort to harm our health, it seems to have been
successful. So much so that in 1992 the
GRU was asked to investigate the high rate of cancer among embassy
officials. The findings, however, have
never been made public; in part, no doubt, because of the rapprochement between
Russia and China." In short,
the Chinese did exactly to the Russian GRU what the Russians were doing to the
Americans.
BIOPHOTON
A
quantum of angular momentum, each
containing "a piece of energy welded to a piece of time, with no seam in
the middle," emitted by biomolecules in living organisms. The difference between a biophoton and a
normal photon is that the "infolded EM structuring" (ST curvature
engine sets) carried by the biophoton carries the dynamics and templates of the
living cell or tissue or body emitting the radiation.
As presently known, biophoton emission is associated with processes such as mitosis (cell division) and with mechanisms such as soliton vibrations of DNA and other alpha-helix proteins [Popp et. al., 1984; Popp et. al., 1992]. An organism's biophoton field may represent a highly-structured innate organizing field capable of encoding or transmitting information over macroscopic distances.
Kaznacheyev, e.g., showed that almost any cellular disease or damage condition can be induced from the diseased control cells to separated and environmentally isolated target cells initially normal, if (1) the visible spectrum of radiation is blocked from the targeted cells, and (2) the two groups of cells are optically connected below and above the optical spectrum, in the infrared and in the ultraviolet.
The
new viewpoint seeks to dramatically extend the scope of this definition. Considering the wave aspects of the photon
frequency, the infolded oscillating EM energy in the photon may be decomposed
into two oscillating potentials [Whittaker, 1904]. In each of these potentials, there exists a magnificent infolded
structure [Whittaker, 1903] of internal bidirectional EM wave pairs, to include
the sum set [Whittaker] and the product set [Ziolkowski]. Thus the photon carries internal information,
which is also referred to as the "information content of the
field." Since the product set
represents modulations, the basic infolded structure has signal
characteristics. Mind, thought, and
long term memory exist inside the personal quantum potential, which may further
be regarded as consisting of coupling and uncoupling photon/antiphoton
pairs—i.e., hidden gravitons. In the
new viewpoint, the biophoton is the carrier of biogravitons, and also
biograviton lattices. This information
forms vacuum engines which can cumulate over a period of time to breach the
quantum threshold and outfold, producing real change in cells, as shown by the
Kaznacheyev cytopathogenic mirror effect experiments.
BIOQUANTUM POTENTIAL
A quantum potential connected to and of a living body, where the inner EM structuring and dynamics of the quantum potential are in correspondence with the inner EM structuring of the normal EM fields, potentials, and waves in the body, and also are in correspondence with the time-polarized EM structuring and dynamics of the mind and its operations.
The
biopotential provides the volition and intent exhibited by the biological body,
breaching the quantum threshold and producing direct psychokinetic change (by
the mind-body coupling mechanism) that is the "input signal" to the
servomechanisms of the body,. from the smallest to the largest. In this biopotential, the
Stoney-Whittaker-Ziolkowski decomposition provides the information structure
and vacuum engines that are the mind, thought, long term memory, etc. A living biological system may be defined as
a physical system of otherwise inert matter (the body) and of mind, coupled to
each other through a bioquantum potential.
BLOCKING
In the charge-barrier
semiconductor functioning, stopping or partially stopping the flow of current
in a circuit, or between two points, without stopping the Poynting S-flow.
In ordinary usage, "stopping
the progress of."
BOHM, DAVID
World renowned physicist and
originator of the hidden variable theory interpretation of quantum
mechanics. See David J. Bohm, "A Suggested Interpretation of the
Quantum Theory in Terms of 'Hidden' Variables, I and II." Physical
Review, 85(2), Jan. 15, 1952, p. 166-179 (Part I); 180-193 (Part II).
Together with his student Aharonov,
he co-authored a fundamental paper on the Aharonov-Bohm effect wherein
interfering electromagnetic potentials can produce effects on charged particle
systems, even at a distance and in the absence of the electromagnetic force
fields.
BOHM'S HIDDEN VARIABLE THEORY (HVT)
A major interpretation of quantum
mechanics, formulated by David Bohm and published in Physical Review in 1952.
See David J. Bohm, "A Suggested
Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of 'Hidden' Variables, I and
II," Physical Review, 85(2),
Jan. 15, 1952, p. 166-179 (Part I); 180-193 (Part II). Bohm's theory makes all
the correct predictions and also eliminates many problems in quantum mechanics,
such as the "measurement problem" and the—now alarming—problem of the
missing chaos (i.e., the missing "hidden order.").
Ironically, the prevailing
Copenhagen interpretation of the QM theory predicts that the organized
macroscopic world does not exist, while Bohm's theory predicts it. [Question to
the sharp young graduate student: How can one defend a scientific model which
predicts that he himself does not exist? If one keeps one's sense of humor, it
would seem that this has to be the greatest scientific faux pas of all time!] It may be that one unconscious reason that
most physicists still oppose HVT is that it
implies that physical reality can in fact be deterministically engineered.
Most physicists would seem to fervently wish physical reality to stay
"solid as a brick," with fixed "laws of nature," which can
be leisurely discovered and then utilized comfortably, predictably, and sanely.
The advent of HVT (which is just a matter of time; for decades the Russians
have highly weaponized the HVT area!) dramatically alters our perception of
"fixed physical reality" into that of an "engineerable,
changeable" physical reality! I tentatively believe that the terrible
psychological implications of such a potential development is something that
most scientists do not wish to cope with—we simply do not have the Gestalt for
it. On the other hand, the Russian national psychology is such that they do
have the Gestalt for it. The Russian energetics—which I have long referred to
loosely as scalar electromagnetics—basically utilizes the infolded ordering
inside the potential to create "direct patterns of vacuum flux", hence
vacuum engines. And it also utilizes
the quantum potential, including internally structuring the QP, to enable
instantaneous action-at-a-distance in multiple simultaneous locations and
nodes, with stupendous and automatic energy amplification.
By deterministically
"patterning" the internal structuring of the scalar potential, one
can directly form such vacuum engines. Whittaker showed in 1904 that any EM
field pattern whatsoever can be expressed as two scalar potentials, rather than
the common f and A representation.
This means that any EM wave is simply the "interference" (between the
hidden biwave structures) of two scalar potentials, even at a distance. By
properly structuring an EM signal (i.e., structuring the two potentials into
which it can be decomposed), the resulting EM signal—appearing normal on the
surface—nonetheless now transports special vacuum engines deliberately designed
to perform some particular internal task in mass systems, electronic systems,
or humans when it strikes a target at a distance. I refer to this
"internal structuring" of the Stoney/Whittaker/Ziolkowski internal
biwaves and their products, as dimensioning
of the potential(s), and hence of the EM carrier wave. The Russians call it the
information content of the field; but
our own scientists tend to erroneously interpret that phrase as ordinary
spectral analysis. In other words, they erroneously continue to regard EM vacuum engines as if they were ordinary
EM signals.
BOHREN
EXPERIMENT
Revealing experiment by Bohren,
replicated by Paul and Fischer, which shows that a given charge when in
particle resonance absorbs more energy from a field or potential then the same
charge does in "static" position.
By conventional outlook, this
provides a guaranteed COP>1.0 process.
Bohren demonstrated absorbing 18 times more energy with the charge in
particle resonance than with the static charge. This is a direct experiment proving the Heaviside dark energy
component of EM energy flow, whether in field form or in potential form.
See Craig F. Bohren, "How can a particle absorb more
than the light incident on it"?", American Journal of Physics, 51(4), Apr. 1983, p. 323-327. See independent confirmation of Bohren's
work by H. Paul and R. Fischer, ibid.,
p. 327. Other pertinent references are
V. S. Letokhov, "Laser Maxwell's Demon," Contemporary Physics, 36(4), 1995, p. 235-243; — "Generation
of Light by a scattering medium with negative resonance absorption," Soviet Physics JETP, 26(4), Apr. 1968,
p. 835-839; — "Double Gamma and optical resonance," Physics Letters A, Vol. 43, 1973, p.
179-180; — "Stimulated emission of an ensemble of scattering particles
with negative absorption," ZhETF
Plasma, 5(8), Apr. 15, 1967, p. 262-265.
Also see R. Pappalardo and A. Lempicki, "Brillouin and Rayleigh Scattering
in Aprotic Laser Solutions Containing Neodymium," Journal of Applied Physics, Apr. 1992, p. 1699-1708
BRIDGE
A component or process which
passes EM energy between two isolated circuits, but does not pass dq/dt between
them, and which breaks the normal rigidly field-locked power dissipations in
the two circuits.
Space itself would appear to be one
such bridge.
BRIDGING FUNCTION
The function of passing EM energy
flow between two isolated circuits, but not passing dq/dt between them, while
simultaneously breaking any normal rigidly field-locked power dissipations in
the two circuits.
BROKEN SYMMETRY
The fundamental meaning is a
condition in which two parts of some configuration or shape on opposite sides
of some divisor or condition or boundary, are not similar but differ.
In vacuum energy physics, we are
very interested in the fact that any charge and any dipole represents a broken
symmetry in its fierce energy exchange with the vacuum. This implies that something virtual has
become observable; i.e., part of the virtual EM energy absorbed from the vacuum
by the charge or by the dipole is changed into observable form and re-emitted
as real, observable EM energy.
Any observable implies a broken
symmetry. Non-observables imply
symmetry, and vice versa. Each symmetry
also can be represented by a conservation rule or law. Physicists have uncovered many kinds of
symmetry in physics; and in the 1950s they also discovered broken symmetry.
BROMWICH, THOMAS JOHN l'ANSON
Brilliant
English mathematician, 1875-1929, who made significant contributions to the
mathematics of electromagnetism—particularly to superpotential theory—before
his passion for overwork led to development of a mental disorder and eventual
suicide.
Bromwich originated a method for solving the source-free
Maxwell equations in 1899, publishing it in 1919. This approach formed the basis for his seminal paper on
scattering of plane EM waves by spheres.
He did excellent original work on infinite series and made contributions
to quadratic and bilinear forms. He
also placed Heaviside's operator calculus on a rigorous basis by treating the
operators as contour integrals.
Unfortunately Bromwich worked so intensively, in such painstaking
detail, and at such length that his physical health was affected. He developed a mental disorder and
eventually ended his own life in suicide.
For a summary of Bromwich's life and achievements, see G.
H. Hardy, "Thomas John Bromwich," J. London Math. Soc. 5 (1930), 209-220; — "Obituary of
Thomas John Bromwich," Proc. Roy.
Soc. London A 129 (1930), i -
x. For an exposition of Bromwich's
equations-solving work, see J. D. Zund and J. M. Wilkes, "Bromwich's
method for solving the source-free Maxwell equations," Tensor (NS) 55 (2) (1994), 192-196.
BROWN, G. SPENCER
Noted author and creator of the laws of form, a new form of logic that dramatically extends Aristotelian logic.
Essentially
Brown added complex numbers to logic, rather than just staying with simple
2-dimensional plane figures for postulate derivation. Electrical circuits— designed by Brown's logic—do function and do
work. When computer software is
designed by Brown's logic, it is then possible to mathematically prove whether
or not the end result possesses any defects (bugs). In the future software—particularly the larger systems—may well
be designed by Brown's logic. G.
Spencer Brown, Laws of Form, Julian
Press, New York, 1972. With a dramatic advance in logic itself, Brown has
succeeded in formulating a true calculus of form. Note: There is now a second edition of the book.
BULK GRADIENT CHANGE
Simply a change in the amplitude
of the entire potential,
… (i.e., to every internal biwave
pair comprising it) at some point or in some region of space, as compared to
changing the amplitude of only one or a few of the internal biwave pairs of the
potential, without changing all the rest.
BYPASS RESISTOR
In electrical theory, a resistor
to pass current by (in parallel to) some other component.
If other effects such as use of the
overpotential, pumped phase conjugate reflection, quantum wells, quantum
tunneling, and charge blocking are added, the function of the bypass resistor
becomes extremely complicated.
CANCER
Conventional
definition: A malignant tumor of potentially unlimited growth that expands
locally by invasion and systemically by metastasis.
Growths
are further characterized by the type of tissue in which they occur, and their
actions. Of particular interest are neoplasm,
tumor, carcinoma, and sarcoma. Malignant disorders
tend to produce deterioration, infiltrate, metastasize, and terminate
fatally. A neoplasm is simply any new growth of tissue that serves no useful
function. A tumor is an abnormal mass of tissue that (1) is not inflammatory,
(2) arises from preexisting cells, and (3) serves no useful purpose. A carcinoma is a malignant tumor of epithelial (covering membraneous tissue
of a free surface) origin. A sarcoma is a malignant neoplasm that
arises in mesodermal tissue
(connective tissue, bone, cartilage, or striated muscle) and that spreads by
(1) extension into neighboring tissue or (2) by way of the bloodstream, or (3)
both.
New
definition of cancer: A
centrally-commanded, final, desperate, "first-step dedifferentiation"
adaptive attempt by stressed, affected cells experiencing sustained oxygen
shortage (hypoxia) to reverse their cellular evolution and return to the
anaerobic stage of their primeval cellular ancestry. Thus a cancer cell is a severely stressed hypoxic cell that has
been "ordered" by the master cellular control system (MCCS) to
dedifferentiate back to a more primeval form in which it needed little
or no oxygen. It is the last desperate
attempt by the body to insure the affected cells' survival when all other means
available to the MCCS to provide the necessary oxygen have been exhausted and
have failed. The "order"
differs from normal signal theory in that it consists of a
Stoney/Whittaker/Ziolkowski template inside the personal quantum potential
of the organism. Thus the
"order" actually consists of a vacuum engine, so that the
spacetime in which the affected cell exists is acted upon by structured,
energetic hidden variable fingers to directly alter it. The "signal order" is in fact a
set of hidden vector forces in spacetime itself, created directly in and on the
affected cell(s), in every part, in every atom. The cure for the cancerous cell, once formed, is simply to cause
the MCCS to generate the "counter-order" reversing the original
dedifferentiating action. This can be
readily accomplished by establishing hidden multifrequency pump waves in the
quantum potential on the cancerous cell, on all its parts, so that they act as
pumped phase conjugate mirrors. Since
they already exist in the altered "cancer" spacetime template/signal,
the pumping causes a phase conjugate replica of the precise cancer state
to be created in and on the cell and its parts. [In fact this is a general therapeutic mechanism, and it can be
applied to reverse almost any conceivable cellular damage or disorder.] This counter-order is a new and amplified
vacuum engine that acts upon the cell to redifferentiate it back to a normal
cell. If an abnormal number of cells
results, the body's normal processes then recognize the excess cells and
destroys them.
CANCER HOTSPOT
An area or locality or location where cancer recurs repeatedly, more than the normal deviation expected statistically. In such case, one is dealing with a hidden cause or carcinogen.
Human
systems exposed to such a hotspot experience cellular changes (hypoxia) which
eventually result in the master cellular control system (MCCS) issuing a
dedifferentiation order to the affected cells to regress back to a primeval
anaerobic form. The first step is
dissociation from central (MCCS) control of cellular growth, resulting in a
cell that now grows and divides unrestrained by the normal body. The real question in the hotspot is,
"What is the unknown agent inducing the hypoxia condition, and what is the
mechanism by means of which it induces it?" Epidemology will point out a hotspot, but is usually incapable of
resolving the primary causative agent or its active mechanism since it can only
show correlation.
CAPACITOR AS A TRANSMISSION LINE
A
capacitor can be theoretically treated as a special type of transmission line,
a fact which is apparently known to transmission line theorists but not to many
engineers and physicists not specializing in transmission lines.
CARCINOGEN
A
substance or agent (such as a chemical or a spacetime curvature engine) capable
of inducing a cancer.
In
the new theory, the primary carcinogen is an actual order (a vacuum engine)
issued by the master cellular control system (MCCS), reverting
(dedifferentiating) the affected cell to a primal anaerobic form. Usually what are normally regarded as
carcinogens are also causes of cellular conditions wherein the cell becomes
very hypoxic, so much so that the MCCS exhausts all other alternative
corrective means and as a last desperate measure orders the cell to change to a
form that requires little or no oxygen.
The "exhausting of other measures" may be very rapid, as when
the cell has been affected and damaged by powerful carcinogens, or it may
require decades to occur, as when the cell is subjected to long-term mild
hypoxia, such as from electromagnetic smog.
CARRIER WAVE
A
fundamental wave which is modulated by another wave or other waves, and hence
"carries" the other waveform(s).
By stripping off the carrier in a demodulator, the carried waveform(s)
emerges.
Hence
it is a continuous frequency wave which can be modulated by an
information-bearing signal.
CASIMIR EFFECT
The attraction of two conducting
parallel plates in space, placed very close together, due to their influence on
the active vacuum and on the vacuum's interaction with the plates.
CASIMIR, HENDRIK BRUGT GERHARD (1909-2000)
Noted scientist who in 1948
predicted that two parallel conducting plates, placed very near each other in a
vacuum, would experience an attractive force due to their influence on the
electromagnetic vacuum.
See H. B. G.
Casimir, “On the attraction between two perfectly conducting plates,” presented
at a meeting of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences on 29 May,
1948. Published in the same year in Proceeding. Koninklijke Nederlandse
Akademie van Wetenschappen, Amsterdam, vol. 51(7), 1948, p.
793-796. For a beautiful modern
experiment confirming the force, see S.K. Lamoreaux, “Demonstration of the
Casimir Force in the 0.6 to 6mm range,” Physical
Review Letters, 78(1), Jan. 6, 1997, p. 5-8.
The force was experimentally
detected some 10 years later.
CAUSAL
SYSTEM ROBOTS (CSRs)
Massless 4-space
"engine" systems (therefore in the causal domain only, hence the
name) formed of longitudinal EM waves and their dynamics, which are therefore
sets of spacetime curvatures and their deterministic dynamics (engines) which
function as individual robots.
This is a totally new kind of
system leading to a totally new kind of warfare, developed over some decades
and deployed by the KGB in 1999.
Matter is composed mostly of empty
space filled with EM waves, fields, and potentials. Those "fillers" themselves are just bundles of
longitudinal EM waves and their impressed dynamics. Hence all matter, the vacuum, and all conventional EM potentials,
fields, and waves—being filled with vast sets of longitudinal EM waves—are vast
superhighways for longitudinal EM waves to travel on or in. The CSRs, being totally LW and LW dynamics
in nature, thus are free to travel right through EM radiations from power
lines, phone lines, TV stations, radio stations, etc. They easily penetrate any matter, including right through a
mountain. Any function of a normal EM
system can be performed—at least in theory—by such robots. This includes longitudinal EM wave
interferometry, which forms external EM fields and waves, of whatever pattern
or form desired. Further, these CSRs
are actual functioning systems, and if communications functions are designed
in, one can communicate with them at a distance, using longitudinal EM wave
communication, right through the intervening earth and ocean, etc.
For some time, extensive
underground facilities—hundreds—have been building in the former Soviet Union,
and this massive buildup continued unabated after the Russian economy collapsed
and the Berlin Wall came down. This
tremendous expenditure, when the Russian economy was crippled, shows the
strategic significance of these facilities.
Further, apparently our satellites have not seen any missiles, normal
weapons or munitions, etc. associated with that vast complex. In short, it is suspected that we don't have
the foggiest notion of what it is.
Indeed, those facilities will already have sent some CSRs into those
very satellites, to insure that we do not find out what is going on, and
perhaps to "spy on the spy satellites".
We think these terribly important
facilities are the KGB-controlled facilities for developing and producing the
CSRs, and contain a vast longitudinal EM wave command and control set of
facilities as well. In short, this is
the strategic arsenal, development, and control for building sets of various
type CSRs in huge numbers—a vast new army of robots with unprecedented
capabilities, under the command and control of a human "strategic
force" operations command of very large size.
Developing and debugging one CSR
would be a formidable and lengthy task.
Once a single one is developed, making a million copies is simple. Just take a normal CD-ROM, e.g., and record
something on it. Send in a working CSR
robot to "reside inside" the infolded EM interior of the recorded
informational electromagnetic pattern on the CD-ROM. Then simply copy that CE-ROM magnetically, as many times as is
desired. Each copy contains a copy of
the original signal that was recorded, including the exact infolded
electromagnetic structuring inside that signal. Voila! One has as many
new duplicate CSRs of that exact type, as one wishes, for a few pennies each.
One can see the implications. In all those underground facilities, there
are many development laboratories, production laboratories, and command and
control facilities and "storage facilities" for the robots. Those hundreds of facilities are in fact a
great new strategic weapon system and all its development labs and production
facilities, as well as its tactical control and command and control systems,
its "troops", its "equipment", and its commanders and
operators.
Well, then one can deploy and
"utilize" such a strategic armada just as one would use any other
great strategic army. One
"deploys" one's forces against the enemy. In this case, one just sends the armada (individually
controlled!) right through the "LW superhighways" of matter itself,
right into the strategic territory and very heart of the targeted nation. One deploys the robots everywhere—e.g.,
inside the electronics in nuclear warheads, inside the control systems for the
nuclear submarines and nuclear bombers, inside the satellites, inside the
fighter aircraft electronics, inside the fighting ships, inside the main battle
tanks and major weapons carriers, inside the signals on the hard drives of
computers, etc. One sends them right
through the "inside" of the targeted nation's power grid electrical
energy signals, through the TV stations' emitted signals, etc. The Pentagon and Cheyenne Mountain are duck
soup, as is the stock exchange and other civilian systems vital to continued
functioning of the infrastructure. So
is everywhere else, even the deepest vault and "special security"
facility.
In short, the vast electronic
command and control activities of an otherwise "modern" superpower
provide great, convenient, easy superhighways for full strategic deployment to
be completed by millions of weapons systems (CSRs) into everything of value in
the targeted nation or nations. This
completely solves the usual weapons delivery problem; delivery is made in
advance of D-Day.
Such a vast CSR armada was
deployed throughout the Western world, and particularly in the United States,
just before the end of 1999. Yes, this
was to be the KGB's great millennium gift to America—a really enormous Y2K problem
that would stun and disable the entire nation, its armed forces, its electronic
systems in its major weapons, and its command and control centers in one great
TOT (time on target) assault. The major
electrical power systems of the nation would have been disabled, as would have
been the major communications systems.
Using LW interferometry, the robots would have wreaked havoc on the
nation. They would have disabled the
electronics of every major C4I computer of importance, every major fighter aircraft,
every major fighting ship, every nuclear submarine, every ICBM, every nuclear
powerplant, etc. The attacking force
was in its deployment and employment sites in the targets themselves. Everything was in place and cocked and ready
to fire. To test whether we knew what
was going on, the KGB even had one or more robots temporarily produce
hacker-type operations and signals "emerging" in some U.S. command
and control center computers, and deliberately let our fellows discover this
"hacker attack" was coming from the Russian Academy of Science. Then the CSR simply stopped its LW
interferometry, which caused the "normal hacker electronic" signals
to just vanish and never reappear.
Little wonder that our counter-type fellows were totally unable to find
any trace of it, or where it was residing.
They have no technology for such.
Well, happily those early-model
CSRs are easy to root out and destroy, if one has quite advanced LW
technology. Visualize these beasts as
existing in a special sort of "internal sky" or "infolded
atmosphere" inside matter.
Strategic range LW "radars" can just sweep through this
"internal atmosphere" inside matter, etc., detecting and tracking
those CSR beasts analogous to how normal radar detects and tracks
aircraft. The difference is that the
strategic LW can also use a bit of LWI pulse to instantly snap those CSRs like
popping bugs, completely jamming their operations or even "erasing"
them once their characteristics are observed.
That very new kind of vast
strategic warfare occurred right at the end of 1999, all through the United
States—the Pentagon, our strategic weapon systems, the works. The friendly little nation rooted out and
destroyed all those "on site" CSRs just prior to the attack being
launched.
A full-up strategic war, of
previously unknown kind, was fought all over the U.S. and our own system guys
apparently didn't know it. It didn't
even surface. Didn't make a whimper.
That hostile CSR armada consisted
of first generation systems. These systems did not have defensive
countermeasures. The systems were
depending on total surprise, but were found out (that is another story that
would make a great movie if one could live to film it) and then were destroyed
in short order.
CSR development has ushered in a
totally new kind of strategic, operational, and tactical warfare. The delivery of all the weapon systems
"into the target" is accomplished long before the advent of
hostilities. The second generation
CSRs, once built, will be even more sophisticated. These will almost certainly be on line soon. They will likely also possess
countermeasures.
An eerie new chapter in the annals
of warfare has been initiated, and the world will never be the same again. Once the CSRs have sufficient defensive
countermeasures such as stealth means and coordination with countering, rapid
response LWIs to target and destroy the hostile "LW radars" seeking
them, etc., the next world-wide strategic CSR war will be neither so simple nor
so bloodless.
NOTE: Contrast this CSR discussion
to the discussion of nanotechnology
and nanobots. Just as nanobots are
natural developments which teams skilled in nanotechnology would produce, so
CSRs are natural developments which teams skilled in longitudinal EM wave
technology—and in the "infolded" electrodynamics inside all EM
fields, potentials, and waves—would produce.
For decades (since the 1950s) the KGB has been developing and using
longitudinal EM wave interferometers (LWIs) which beam right through the "inner
highways" inside the fields and waves inside matter, thus allowing very
large LWIs which beam right through the intervening earth and ocean, and can
"focus" under the ocean or within the earth as well as out of
it. With such background, the CSRs were
just as natural a development for them as the nanobots are for conventional
Western nanotechnology scientists.
CAUSALITY
The
relationship between "cause" and "effect". The basic notion in a causal system is that
the system's response to an input signal is not dependent upon future input
values.
Thus
the notion of causality involves a precise time ordering of ordinary inert
interactions, where the cause was never input from a future time. Macroscopic (observable) causality may be
and is violated by the interaction of hidden subquantal (virtual state)
variables.
CEREBRAL HEMISPHERE
Each
half of the cerebrum, i.e., each half of the enlarged anterior or upper part of
the vertebrate brain.
The
two cerebral hemispheres may function as a longitudinal EM wave interferometer
or a time-polarized (scalar) EM interferometer to sense distant scenes (even
distant in time), or produce EM energy and signals at a distance, since the
body, brain, and nervous system does produce longitudinal EM waves and scalar
EM waves. For proof of scalar EM wave
interferometry in O(3) electrodynamics, see M.W. Evans, P.K. Anastasovski, T.E.
Bearden et al., "On Whittaker's Representation of the Electromagnetic
Entity in Vacuo, Part V: The Production of Transverse Fields and Energy by
Scalar Interferometry," Journal of
New Energy, 4(3), Special Issue, Winter 1999, p. 76-78.
CHANGING THE PAST
Every
intentional inception upon ordinary inert causality prior to collapse of the
wave function represents a slight alteration or change in direction, departing
minutely from pure causality. From a
causal viewpoint, each human inception minutely changes the causal past, as
well as the future.
Experimental
proof that the causal past can be changed is provided by the delayed choice
two-slit experiment. E.g., see C.W.
Rietdijk, "Another proof that the future can influence the
present." Foundations of Physics, 11(9/10), 1981, p. 783-790. Particularly see Wheeler, John Archibald
Wheeler, "The 'past' and the 'delayed-choice' double-slit
experiment," in A.R. Marlow [Ed], Mathematical
Foundations of Quantum Theory, Loyola University, New Orleans, Louisiana,
June 2-4, 1977; Academic Press, New York, 1978, p. 9-48.
CHAOS
In dissipative dynamical systems,
the dynamical evolution that is aperiodic and highly dependent upon initial
conditions of the system.
The trajectories of the system move
on a strange attractor, which is a fractal subspace of the phase space.
The term suggests the ordinary
meaning of random and unpredictable disorder, but there exists intrinsic
determinism and at least partial embedded ordering. The mathematical equations describing chaotic behavior are very
nonlinear and so complex that at the present time they cannot be computed or
predicted. Even simple systems,
including simple electromagnetic systems, can exhibit unpredictable chaotic
behavior. The science of chaotic
dynamics is still in its infancy, having begun moving once the modern computers
became economical and pervasive.
CHARGE, ELECTRICAL (Q)
Electrical charge q is defined as
q º mqfq, to first order.
As can be seen, the actual
"charge" action associated with the mass is due totally to fq, and to the broken symmetry of fq in the vacuum flux exchange with mq. The charge q can be further broken down into
a set of composite dipoles if the gathering of a virtual charge screen in the
vacuum, surrounding the mass of the "bare charge" inside the
gathering, is included. At first order, fq can be expressed
(particle view) as a change in the local vacuum virtual photon flux (VPF), due
to the VPF exchange between vacuum and mq. The fq component is actually the "electrical charge"
and massless of itself.
However, see my paper, "Giant
Negentropy of the Common Dipole," Journal
of New Energy, 5(1) Summer 2000, p. 11-23.
We include the isolated charge by treating it as a system of multiple
composite dipoles. We also explain the
previously unrecognized 4-symmetry EM energy flow ongoing, where incoming
longitudinal EM waves are being received, transduced into real longitudinal EM
waves in 3-space, with the latter being emitted in all directions in 3-space.
A charged particle of mass is thus a
little energy flow generator. It is a broken 3-symmetry in the local VPF, and
therefore has an "observable" energy flow output, extracted and gated
from the asymmetry in the VPF. This "observable" energy flow outputs
the well-known energy flow S in
classical EM, though CEM does not recognize or include this vacuum interaction,
the broken 3-symmetry of the dipole, and the steady input of EM energy to the
dipole in the form of EM energy from the time domain (complex plane).
Instead, classical EM just assumes
that the "charge" q is the source of a potential. When originally
formed as a concept, q was just a "quantity of electric fluid," like
a "cubic centimeter of fluid," etc. The atom and the electron had not
yet been discovered.
CHARGE CARRIERS
Anything—usually fundamental
particles, ions, etc.—which consists of or contains charges and can move.
It can be an electron, a collection
of electrons fixed in a moving dielectric, ions, atoms, molecules, etc.
The moving charge (i.e., the current
dq/dt) with an energy flow streaming onto it and on beyond, carries its
interaction with that energy-flow right along with it in the current
i = dq/dt. This is what the charge's "excess collected energy"
consists of, and this is how the collected/collecting
energy in the circuit is transported to the collected-energy dissipation sites (loads and losses).
CHARGE, GRAVITATIONAL
To be added
CHARGE, MAGNETIC
Essentially, the magnetic scalar
potential, or monopole.
In an uncurved spacetime, the magnetic
charge must always occur in dipolar pairs, where each is equal and opposite the
other. In a curved spacetime, a free net monopolar magnetic charge may and
does exist. In classical
electrodynamics, the assumption of a locally flat spacetime is ubiquitous
though not prominently emphasized.
Hence most electrical engineers are unaware that monopoles can indeed be
made, but only if one uses a process to curve local spacetime.
CHARGE-PARITY-TIME (CPT) THEOREM
The theorem states that all known quantum field theories
obey CPT symmetry.
C is charge conjugation, which changes the quantum number of
every particle into its antiparticle. P
is the reflection operation known as parity
which turn an object into its mirror image and rotates it 180 degrees
about an axis perpendicular to the mirror, T is time reversal. Any violation of time-reversal symmetry is
always accompanied by a violation of CP symmetry and vice versa.
Electrodynamics and the strong interaction preserve CP
symmetry to great accuracy. Weak
interactions do not conserve CP symmetry.
T symmetry violation has been shown at CERN, the European particle
physics laboratory in Geneva, Switzerland.
CHARGE TRAPPING (Also
"Pinning")
Holding charges
"pinned" or "trapped" by a barrier or force, so that they
do not flow as
i = dq/dt.
CHARGE-BARRIER
A process or component or
function—particularly in a semiconductor such as the Fogal semiconductor—which
blocks the movement of charges q as current dq/dt.
CHARGE-BLOCKING ASYMMETRIC QUANTUM
WELLS
A quantum well which has more
charge-blocking action in one direction than the other, and is thus
"asymmetric" in its function.
It may also be dynamic, so that it
changes in its degree (and/or its direction) of action as a function of time.
CLASSICAL AND QUANTAL ELECTRODYNAMICS
Classical EM (CEM) theory is
simply classical electrodynamics (CED).
Classical EM does not break the
fields into "quanta" (a quantum is a standard-sized piece of action
(angular momentum)]. Instead, CEM considers the fields as continuously varying
in magnitude from zero to infinite magnitude (at least in theory).
Quantal Electrodynamics is known as
quantum electrodynamics (QED). These are standard terms for standard
disciplines. QED considers the fields
to be composed of quanta called "photons". Hence there is an underlying region called the "virtual
state" whose denizens are "smaller in magnitude" than the
quantum. Heisenberg uncertainty
applies, since the quantum of action is not quantized energy, but quantized
(energy x time). In short, it is a
function of both the magnitude of the energy and its duration of
persistence. Hence a field or photon of
any amount of energy may form temporarily, so long as it does not endure
sufficiently long in observer time to reach quantum size and breach the quantum
threshold.
In this view, then, "empty
space" is not empty at all, but is a seething cauldron of these
"energetic bubbles" continually appearing and disappearing, with the
entire spectrum of frequencies and energies.
This is in fact the "new ether". If we consider only the field portion of the bubbling virtual
photons appearing and disappearing, this leads to a vacuum that consists of EM
field fluctuations, again of essentially the entire frequency spectrum and
energy spectrum.
However, how we attempt to tie
either of these "energetic vacuum" EM views to general relativity
(GR) is then a problem. The cause of
the problem, however, is largely ignored in physics. In CED, e.g., one models EM energy moving through a flat space. This is a non sequitur, since the presence of
any change of the energy density of space a priori is a curvature of
spacetime. Hence rigorously EM energy
can only propagate through a curved spacetime.
Indeed, when this correction is made, the EM wave becomes an oscillating
curvature of spacetime. This is the
approach worked out by Mendel Sachs, extending Einstein's work. The higher symmetry O(3) electrodynamics
spearheaded by Evans turns out to be an important subset of Sach's umbrella
unified field theory. Hence EM has
become GR, and for the first time in history, O(3) electrodynamics provides the
approach that will allow direct engineering of general relativity on the lab
bench, in working devices, etc.
CLASSICAL ELECTROMAGNETICS (CEM)
"Ordinary" electromagnetics,
of the kind used in ordinary EM circuits, which fundamentally consists of the
modified Maxwell's equations.
Classical EM consists of Maxwell's
equations and the various changes and additions that have since been made. CEM does not break the fields into
"quanta" (a quantum is a standard-sized piece of action (angular
momentum)]. Instead, CEM considers the fields as continuously varying in
magnitude from zero to infinite magnitude (at least in theory).
Primarily refers to Maxwellian
electrodynamics as reinterpreted by Heaviside, Gibbs, Hertz, and a few
others. Unfortunately these
reinterpretations of Maxwell's theory also greatly reduced its topology, and
therefore reduced the area of natural electrodynamic phenomena that the
resulting equations describe.
Significantly more advanced
"classical" electrodynamics emerges when one goes back to the
quaternion algebra electrodynamics of Maxwell, or to the more advanced Clifford
algebra electrodynamics. The higher
symmetry electrodynamics models such as O(3) symmetry EM developed by Evans and
others, are capable of modeling a great deal more physical phenomena than the
very limited standard U(1) electrodynamics largely in vogue in science.
CLASSICAL EM THEORY
Classical electrodynamics theory,
begun by Maxwell, with his seminal paper orally presented in 1864 and published
in 1865.
Essentially Maxwell's
electrodynamics at root basis, with the background supporting classical
theory. Today many variations have been
made, particularly with the basic symmetry of the theoretical equations. See discussion above under classical electromagnetics.
CLIFFORD ALGEBRA
A special higher topology algebra
founded by Clifford, which includes as subsets many other algebras of lower
topology.
CLOSED SYSTEM
A system that does not
communicate with its environment, and does not exchange energy or matter
between system and environment.
An ideal model where dynamically and
energetically the system is considered to be "isolated" as if nothing
else existed. In short, consider the
system as if it were in some "magic box" and nothing outside the box
can ever enter the box or affect the system inside the box, and nothing in the
system can ever leave the box or affect anything outside the box.
One performs a non sequitur whenever
proclaiming treatment of a system as a "closed system", and of course
good scientists are aware of this. This is particularly true in electrical
power systems. Here one is indeed
allowed to input energy into the system to excite or potentialize it. That of course assumes that the system was
"opened" long enough to take on excess energy! Then as the system operates, losses and
dissipations occur, in which case energy is considered to "escape"
from the system permanently. In other
words, the system was also continually "opened" so that energy could
escape.
There is really no such thing as a
truely closed system in the universe,
since every system is embedded in the active vacuum and is an open system in an
energy exchange with the vacuum. If
that exchange is symmetrical, then the system is in equilibrium with respect to
the vacuum exchange. In that case, the
system may be treated as if it were a closed system for a limited number of
purposes. In classical electrodynamics
(CED), the Lorentz regauging of the Maxwell-Heaviside equations further reduced
them to describe only Maxwellian systems in such equilibrium with the active
environment. Consequently, the
interaction between the external vacuum and the system is not included in the
CED model. Obviously a broken equilibrium in that actual
physical interaction is also not included in the CED model.
An electrical power system is
already permitted to violate the Lorentz condition when it
(1) receives additional EM energy to "energize" or
"potentialize" or "excite" or "regauge" it, and
(2) whenever energy escapes from the system in the loads and losses (which
escapes of energy are "de-energizing", "depotentializing",
"dissipating", or "regauging" actions.
Hence the Lorentz condition greatly
simplifies the Maxwell-Heaviside equations and makes them much easier to
solve. However, when enforced by the system itself with regard to the system's
excitation and de-excitation (dissipation) functions—i.e., when those functions are "symmetrical" (equal and
opposite)—it also arbitrarily discards all those Maxwellian systems capable
of the five "magical" functions of an open disequilibrium
system: (1) self-ordering, (2)
self-oscillation or self-rotation, (3) output of more energy than the operator
inputs (the excess energy is input by the active environment, (4) powering
itself and its load (all the energy is input by the active environment, and (5)
exhibiting negentropy.
It follows, however, that physical
electrical power systems must therefore have some feature which self-imposes
the Lorentz condition, at least during the phase when the system's excitation
energy is discharged in the loads and losses.
The standard closed current loop system, where every electron
progressing through the external circuit's loads and losses must be forcibly
rammed back up through the source dipole in the power source, is indeed what
enforces the Lorentz condition with respect to excitation and dissipation, and arbitrarily prevents the system from
achieving COP>1.0.
In a battery-powered system, the
otherwise closed current loop is broken into two quite different circuits: (1)
the electron current circuit between the outer surface of the plates and the
external loads and losses, and (2) the ion current in the electrolyte between
the inner surface of the plates. Since
the ions (e.g., in a lead-acid battery) in the "inner" ion current
may have a m/q ratio very much greater than that of the electrons in the
"outer" electron current, clever timing of pulsed signals to the
plates may be used to form a phase difference—including even a phase angle of
180°—between the two currents.
It can be shown that this forms a high potential on the plates which
acts as a negative resistor, extracting EM energy from the vacuum and
recharging the battery while simultaneously powering the external circuit. This is the Bedini process, and with
Bedini's permission an explanation of that process has been published by
Bearden ["Bedini's
Method For Forming Negative Resistors In Batteries," Journal of New Energy, 5(1), Summer 2000, p. 24-38.] Note that Bedini's process in fact
repeatedly removes the Lorentz regauging condition, and therefore the system is
rigorously permitted to achieve not only COP>1.0 but also self-powering of
itself and its loads and losses.
COLD EXPLOSION
The
sudden extraction of EM heat energy from a distant intersection zone (IZ) of
the crossing beams of a scalar potential interferometer, which transmits in the
sharply pulsed mode, while the electrical grounding of the transmitters are
negatively biased with respect to the potential in the distant IZ.
COLD FUSION
An ad hoc term applied to the
transmutations at low energy achieved in electrolyte experiments, particularly
when using specially prepared palladium electrodes, and particularly when deuterium
is present in the electrolyte.
COMPOSITE DIPOLE
Dipole formed as one part of an
isolated, observable "charged particle", consisting of a differential
element of that observable charge on one end and a momentary clustering virtual
charge of opposite sign.
In quantum electrodynamics, it is
well-known that virtual charges of opposite signs cluster in the immediate
vacuum around any "isolated" observable charge. By applying the composite dipole concept,
this author was able to treat the isolated charge as a set of composite
dipoles. By then applying Whittaker's
decomposition of the scalar potential between the ends of each of these
composite dipoles, the "source charge" was a set of broken
3-symmetries in the vacuum flux, and thus a set of 4-symmetries in that flux
exchange. This meant that the EM energy
continuously output in all directions by the source charge was actually
continuously received by the source charge (as a set of composite dipoles) from
the time-domain, and 4-conservation of EM energy flow rigorously was upheld.
This allowed a solution to what has
been called the most formidable problem in both classical and quantum
electrodynamics: the problem of the association of the source charge and its
associated fields and potentials along with the energy contained by them and
continuously pouring from the charge without any 3-space energy input.
CONCOMITANT
Occurring or existing together.
CONGLOMERATE HIERARCHY OF THE PHOTONS
Every photon remains perfectly
ordered! A conglomerate (group) of photons, however, may be arranged in almost
an infinite variety of orderings, groupings, directions, etc.—which we refer to
as templates and as hierarchies (group orderings) of photons.
In a pure energy flow (energy
transport), the "herd" of photons is organized along the flow
direction. Regardless of how one scatters or "disorders" this
patterning of the "herd" or "hierarchical ordering" of
photons, not one single bit of the underlying energy and individual photon
ordering is lost. So when one "uses" energy (e.g., scatters the
hierarchical ordering of a photon herd from a resistor as heat), one does not
lose any energy at all, but simply has "scrambled" the hierarchical
ordering of the photons into a new herd configuration (which may be varying
every which way!). The point here is the real meaning of the fundamental
conservation of energy law: Energy can
neither be created nor destroyed!
When we "use" one joule of
energy to perform one joule of work (say, in a single-pass, scattering), we
still have exactly that one joule of energy left, but just in different form
(different direction, type, collection or not collected, etc.) It can still do another single pass joule of
work, then another, then another, and so on. If we plan things right, we can
use a single joule of work to perform many joules of work, contrary to what we
were so strongly taught in the "single-pass,
single collection, single dissipation" examples given to us in
university as the "law" of God and electrodynamics.
Note that the conventional
work-energy theorem assumes single pass, single collection, and single
dissipation of a joule of energy to perform a single joule of work. The point
is, that is not a limitation of nature,
but a limitation of a single process! Nature regularly uses a joule of energy
to do multiple joules of work, because after one dissipates or scatters the
energy the first time, it's still there and later will be intercepted to do
some more work.
Anti-Stokes emission, the Patterson
Power Cell, Lawandy's lasing without population inversion, and some gas-filled
tubes with anti-Stokes emission are examples of known, validated overunity
processes (processes with coefficient of performance greater than unity). These
all use multipass, multicollection, multi-dissipation in iterated manner, to
increase dipole asymmetry and therefore produce excess extraction of energy
from the vacuum. Patterson's unit, e.g., has been independently measured by
universities at efficiencies of some 1200 or so. This absolutely does not
violate the laws of physics nor the nonequilibrium thermodynamics of open
systems far from thermodynamic equilibrium.
CONSCIOUS MIND
The serial processing mind which
we normally associate erroneously as ourself. Other to be added.
Mind is time-like, not
space-like.
CONSCIOUS MIND (PSYCHOENERGETICS VIEW)
The serial-processing mind which
one normally associates erroneously as oneself.
Mind is time-like, not space-like. Hence it is not directly observable, a
priori, since all observation is 3-spatial.
However, if we consider that changes in 3-space produce spacetime
curvatures and thereby also produce slight changes in the time domain, then
iterative coherent spatial changes eventually will produce a change in the
time-domain. Consequently, the
time-like mind will have a continuing stream of such small but processable
time-energy changes from coherent 3-spatial phenomena in its body and the
macroscopic (coherent) universe. To
sense the 3-space body as "self" while simultaneously sensing other
3-space physical changes as "non-self", the conscious mind must
compare the various received time-like projection signals against its
"time-like orders" issued.
That set of received time-signals that matches or closely matches the
conscious mind's issued order signals, thus yields the sense of the body
behavioral changes as (1) self, and (2) body responses to its orders. The time delay between issuance of the
mind's orders and the receipt of the correlated time-like responses from its
body, provides the sense of self-persistence or independent being.
The mind couples to the body via a
similar spacetime curvature mechanism.
When the mind issues "orders", they are in the time-like realm
but are changes, hence small spacetime curvatures. They therefore involve very small 3-spatial changes (projections)
into the 3-space body. Since the mind
orders are coherent, this small iterative set of 3-space changes will integrate
coherently, yielding real quantum changes in the body and nervous system (e.g.,
the brain).
This coupling mechanism is profound. The steady stream of integrated time-like
projections arising in the mind due to the physical world outside one's body,
does not compare or match the mind's memory of its orders. Hence that allows the sensing of the
"external world" as "nonself". The sense of that external world as "existing" or
"being" is provided by the time delay in the comparison process, from
"mind signals issued" to "physical signals received". The metric yardstick standard for this
comparison time, so to speak, is provided by the time in the identified
"self-loop" with the physical body.
In other words, the mind uses that length of time to differentiate those
time signals which coherently integrate but do not match its issued order
signals, from those time-signals which coherently integrate in the same time
loop interval and do match its issued ordered signals.
In this manner, we resolve all the
great previously unresolved philosophical questions of the nature of
consciousness, nation of being, nature of self, nature of nonself, perception
of the physical world, perception of body as self, perception of other bodies
as non-self, etc. At least we resolve
these issues from a testable physics approach, so that we can see that now a
unified physics (and a technology) of mind and matter is at last in view. Since O(3) electrodynamics has been shown to
be an important subset of Sachs' unified field theory, then O(3)
electrodynamics—or SU(2)´SU(2), which is homomorphic with O(3)—can be used to
develop the direct engineering of mind, the mind-matter interaction, and mind
functions of the living biological system.
It is my considered opinion (with
much evidence) that the Russian branch of energetics,
known as psychoenergetics,
uses a unified field theory and a higher symmetry electrodynamics to achieve
that type of direct engineering already, but for weapons use rather than
beneficial use for humanity.
As examples, we strongly suggest
that the deaths of U.S. Captains Button, Svoboda, and Hess all involved KGB
testing of long-range strategic psychoenergetics weapons over the United
States, on those targeted personnel.
This should not be surprising at all; the KGB has tested longitudinal EM
wave interferometer weapons over the U.S. since 1967, and continues to do so
today. They tested bioenergetics EM
weapons against U.S. Embassy personnel in Moscow for several decades. Kills of U.S. aircraft and missiles have
been performed at various times, including kill of the Arrow DC-8 at Gander,
Newfoundland in Dec. 1985, kill of a Titan ICBM fired from Vandenberg AFB in
the spring of 1986, kill of the U.S. space shuttle Challenger in the spring of
1986, continuing weather engineering over the U.S. and elsewhere, etc.
That novel electromagnetic weapons
have indeed been developed and are being tested world-wide, was confirmed by
Defense Secretary Cohen in 1997 as follows:
"Others [terrorists] are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves… So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations…It's real, and that's the reason why we have to intensify our [counterterrorism] efforts." [Secretary of Defense William Cohen at an April 1997 counterterrorism conference sponsored by former Senator Sam Nunn. Quoted from DoD News Briefing, Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, Q&A at the Conference on Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and U.S. Strategy, University of Georgia, Athens, Apr. 28, 1997.].
We
specifically call attention to the fact that the Secretary did not speak the
words enclosed in square brackets. This
is not limited just to terrorists or
counterterrorism.
There appears to be no
insurmountable difficulties in developing psychoenergetic technology using the
approach outlined above. Certainly it
is not as formidable a task as has been hot fusion.
The incident involving Captain
Button, e.g., was to demonstrate control of an individual performing complex technical
tasks for a period of at least one hour.
The test against Captain Svoboda was to demonstrate how simply human
kill can be achieved in combat troops, merely by introducing selected changes
in the mental functioning of the targeted individuals. As Svoboda was climbing her A-10 out of a
successful low-level ordnance drop at night on a ground target, her sense of up
and down was instantly reversed.
Instantly perceiving she was diving instead of climbing—although actually climbing out perfectly—she
"corrected" immediately and dove headlong into the ground, perishing
in the resulting explosion of her aircraft.
In the case of Capt. Hess, the test
demonstrated that rather complete mental control can be almost instantly
asserted, and even the responses of the autonomic nervous system can be
overridden. So Captain Hess, out for a
morning jog, simply went aside, sat down, and stabbed himself repeatedly,
including multiple times right through the heart. Had one seen the incident, he would have simply continued
stabbing himself very calmly, without emotion or reflex action from his
autonomic nervous system, until physical failure of his body.
As can be seen, it is of the utmost
importance that this nation understand psychoenergetics weapons of such nature,
and develop effective defenses against them.
The next great strategic battlefield may be as much a "virtual
reality" battle as it is a "real physical world" combat. The war can be quickly lost in either arena.
We also point out that the
psychoenergetics weaponry readily is adapted to use in more advanced
longitudinal EM wave interferometers, which readily penetrate the Earth and the
ocean. Hence deeply buried strategic
command and control centers are vulnerable to psychoenergetics warfare, as are
the crewmen of our nuclear submarines, ICBMs, aircraft carriers, division and
army command centers, national command centers, strategic bomber pilots, etc.
Indeed, one of the major incentives
for developing such psychoenergetics weapons as was demonstrated in controlling
Captain Button, was to seize and control the entire on-site manning crews of
the defensive quantum potential weapons preventing launch of full strategic
warfare. By having the QP systems
"stood down for maintenance" by their own crews, the major strategic
retaliation and "dead man fuzing" would have been removed and
countered. Then powerfully striking the
QP sites with LWIs would have destroyed them, and left the sites themselves
radioactively emitting longitudinal EM waves, thus preventing reoccupation in
case the QP weaponry survived. The
counter to that scheme was to place the friendly QP weapon sites on
"insane" command and control.
In that mode, instead of human decision being made to launch, every so
often (say, every two hours) the computer automatically initiates the launch
sequence. During that sequence, if the
crew is still alive and functional, codes can be punched in and the computer
cancels the launch initiation. It then
repeats the sequence two hours later.
If no coded cancellation order is punched in, for whatever reason, the
launch sequence completes and the QP weapons fire. In that case, much of Russia disappears from the face of the
earth.
Eerily, just about the time that
Secretary Cohen was making his quoted statement in April 1997, the KGB was
being notified by the friendly little nation of the change to insane command
and control. This forced the abortion
of a great strategic attack upon the West, scheduled to occur on May 1, 1997.
We are strongly stressing that
psychoenergetics is not parapsychology and it is not just an idle theory of
academics. Instead, it is already
potently used in some very powerful and deployed weapon systems that could well
decide the course of the next world war, almost at a moment's notice.
See also discussion under energy.
CONSCIOUSNESS
Refers
to a living being's awareness of its sensations, feelings, thoughts, and the
world around it.
The new approach uses a coupling
mechanism between the time-like mind and the body of a living creature. The nature of this coupling mechanism then
generates the mechanism by which self-awareness is produced, awareness of
non-self is produced, and the sense of existing in the external world but
differing from it is produced.
CONTINUOUS MODE
For
a longitudinal EM wave interferometer, a continuous mode of operation where
power is fed continually to the transmitters, and the two longitudinal EM wave
patterns or beams are continuously transmitted.
CONVENTIONAL SCALAR POTENTIAL
A scalar potential formed without
use of artificially added substructuring of its internal biwaves and their
products.
In other words, one in which it is
assumed that its virtual particle flux has no ordering, but is just a
randomized flux. This assumption (e.g., of quantum mechanics indirectly) is incompatible
by the Whittaker demonstration that (i) a scalar potential is a harmonic set of
"bidirectional" EM phase conjugate wave pairs, and thus not a scalar
entity at all, and (ii) perfect ordering of its wave components exists inside
the scalar potential.
One must carefully distinguish what
each of these internal "phase conjugate EM longitudinal wavepairs"
actually represents. Prior to
interaction with detecting charges, the potential is a 4-potential existing in
spacetime (4-space). The time domain,
of course, is represented by ict, and in that expression only "t" is
a variable. Hence the
"incoming" phase conjugate longitudinal EM waves in the imaginary
plane are actually longitudinal EM waves in the time dimension. These waves converge upon the dipolarity
represented by the "scalar potential" or any "piece" of
it. The dipolarity represents the
interaction of charges; specifically, a dipole. This reaction—by the spin of the charges—transduces the incoming
EM energy from the time-dimension into 3-space, and emits it from the charges
as real EM longitudinal EM energy radiating out from the dipolarity in all
directions in 3-space.
The phase conjugate half-set of the
Whittaker waves, prior to their
interaction with charge, are not waves in 3-space, but are waves of LW
EM energy coming in from the imaginary plane and thus from the time
domain. The charges of the dipolarity
spin 720°, being 360º in the complex plane and then 360º in real
3-space. So the charges absorb the EM
LW energy impinging on them from the time domain, during their 360º rotation in
the complex plane. When they enter real
3-space for the rest of their spin, the already-excited charges dissipate their
excitation energy in all directions as they spin their 3609º in 3-space. That is what the Whittaker decomposition
actually shows, but it has been ignored for almost a century.
In short, the broken 3-symmetry of
the dipolarity—well-known in particle physics for nearly a half-century, but
never incorporated into CED—allows nature to jump to a higher, more fundamental
4-symmetry in the energy flow. Energy
is being conserved in 4-space, but not in 3-space. Further, there is a special new energy flow symmetry involved:
one-way in the time domain and the other way in the 3-space domain. Note that energy is not conserved in
3-space! There is no law of nature requiring the extra requirement that, in
addition to conservation in 4-space, the energy must also be conserved in
3-space! So when the dipole breaks
that extra requirement, only the basic 4-conservation applies. In that case, nature very happily gives you
what might be called a white hole in astrophysics terms: energy will pour in to
the dipolarity unceasingly from the time-dimension, and will pour out in
3-space unceasingly, so long as that dipolarity persists.
By considering the virtual charges
of opposite sign that cluster in the vacuum around any "isolated
observable charge", one may represent a single charge (as an electron or
proton) as a set of composite dipoles, where each dipole consists of a virtual
charge (while it exists) and a differential element of the observable
charge. So the charge becomes a set of
composite dipoles, each with Whittaker decomposition of the scalar potential
between its ends.
Hence we have solved the long-vexing
problem that Semiz called "the greatest unsolved problem in
electrodynamics": the problem of the source charge (or source dipole) and
its associated fields and potentials and the enormous EM energy continually
pouring out of any charge or dipole in all directions in 3-space.
When the arbitrarily discarded giant
Heaviside nondiverged energy flow component is also accounted, this leads to
the giant negentropy of the dipole, as shown in my paper, "Giant
Negentropy from the Common Dipole".
We have also proposed this "dark Heaviside energy" as the
unaccounted source of the excess gravity known to be present in spiral galaxies
and holding together their arms. The
dark energy yields at least 90% of the total gravity involved, and the
additional 10% or so can be accounted for my known gravitational sources.
It appears that these new
discoveries can also be utilized to show that "quintessence" is also
caused by COP>1.0 processes in the universe, and the excess production of
negative "giant dark energy flows".
If so, then this also would account for the recently discovered fact
that the universe has an excess of negative gravitation, so that it is not only
expanding but is accelerating in that expansion. At this time, the present author is still attempting to tie up
the loose ends involved in showing that quintessence also is created as a
result of functions of the giant negentropy process.
In the Whittaker biwave pairs, If
one then insists that these hidden EM waves are comprised of hidden photons,
then it follows that the photons exist as continually coupling and uncoupling
photon/antiphoton pairs, or continually forming and unforming gravitons as the wave and antiwave
continually pass through each other.
It is a little more complicated than
that, since Maxwell actually omitted half the EM energy in the EM wave in
space, and also in the circuit—as do electrodynamicists to this day. For gravitons, one really must come to grips
with this error and correct it. This
will be added later in this glossary.
(To be Added).
COOPER PAIR
A dynamic pairing of electrons in
superconductivity theory.
In this pair, if the energy state
with wave number s and spin ½ is occupied by an electron, then so is the
state with wave number - s and spin - ½.
COP (COEFFICIENT OF PERFORMANCE)
Ratio of energy out, divided by
that portion of the total energy input that is input by the operator or
experimenter.
The COP is thus a measure of
"efficiency of using the operator or experimenter's input energy" to
produce—or direct the production of—useful work. Note that he can direct the
use of his own input energy, as almost all our present systems do. Better yet,
he can also direct (gate or "switch") the use of some external free
flow of energy from the environment into the system, so that he gets lots more
work out of the system than he has to put in himself. Only a few of our
systems—such as solar cells, sails on sailboats, waterwheels to power mills,
and windmills—are such Maxwell's demons (open systems) where the output exceeds
the operator's input of energy.
We sharply contrast the term
"COP" to the term "efficiency". The efficiency (overall) of a system is how much useful energy
output (usually as work, or can be converted to work at will) the system
produces for the total amount of energy that is input (both by the operator and
by the external environment). Even a
highly inefficient system may nonetheless have a COP>1.0, if the operator
inputs less energy than the system outputs.
We urge the reader to thoroughly
understand the difference between energy-use "efficiency" of a system
and coefficient of performance of the system.
Many scientists, engineers, and especially free-energy researchers are
confused on the precise difference in these terms.
CORPUS CALLOSUM
The
thick nerve cable that links together the two cerebral hemispheres (which are
separate brains) in each vertebrate (including human) brain.
In
each of the two cerebral hemispheres, there is a separate mind and personality
(given that the other is separated).
However, a brain has a unique characteristic: Anything that arises
directly inside it is automatically assumed to be self-originated, since the
brain-tuner can differentiate no separation or "separate source" for
the signal/thought arising directly upon its "internal screen". This allows integration of the two
brains/minds/personalities into one. That is, when one brain half prepares and
sends a message, that message is also routed across the corpus callosum into
the other brain half, arising internally upon the second brain's
"display." The second brain half therefore thinks that it itself
originated the signal or message.
COSMOLOGICAL FEEDBACK PRINCIPLE
Puthoff's self-regenerating cosmological feedback cycle for the source of the vacuum EM ZPE.
One may assume the existence of EM zero-point energy (ZPE) by fiat as part of the boundary conditions of the universe, or conceive of its generation by the quantum-fluctuation motion of charged particles that constitute matter. Puthoff calculated the latter possibility, assuming that the ZPE spectrum (field distribution) drives particle motion, and that the particle motion in turn generates the ZPE spectrum. This provides a self-regenerating cosmological feedback cycle, which in fact is consistent with the general relativity assumption that curvature of spacetime affects mass energy, and mass energy changes affect the curvature of spacetime.
The result of Puthoff's calculation is the appropriate frequency-cubed spectral distribution of the correct order of magnitude. His result is thus consistent with, and indicates, a dynamic-generation process for the ZPE fields.
In
general this is also consistent with the Sachs' unified field theory approach,
and with the Evans O(3) important subset of it.
COURRIER, ROBERT
Noted French scientist who
collaborated with Antoine Prioré in his revolutionary healing experiments on
laboratory animals using longitudinal EM waves from plasma tubes.
Courrier was the head of the Biology
Section of the French Academy and also the perpetual secretary at the
time. He personally presented the
astounding results of the Prioré work, showing cures of terminal tumors, to the
assembled French Academy, creating a furor.
CROSSTALK
In
ordinary science, the transfer of energy or signal from one channel to another,
by cross modulation or cross coupling between the channels.
In
the new approach, the term "crosstalk" can be used in an additional
sense where it refers to virtual energy exchange between orthogonal universes
or frames—that is, between different 3- or 4-dimensional slices of an
infinite-dimensional universe.
CURL CONCEPTS OF FIELDS
Refers to concepts of fields as
the curl of some vector potential;
E.g., the magnitude of the B-field is equal to the curl of the A-potential, given by B = Ñ´A. More exactly, the B-field is identically a curled A-potential, by B º Ñ´A, but only that
portion of Ñ´A that is diverged around
or collected by an intercepting unit point static charge.
Note that we are accenting that no
equation is a definition. So texts
stating that the first equation with an equals sign "defines" the
magnetic vector potential A, are in
error. If we state that B º Ñ´A, then we are defining the B-field as a curled form of the magnetic vector potential, which it
is.
The reader must be aware that the
field concept itself in CEM is flawed, being "defined" as the effect
existing after an interaction by a 4-space entity with a 3-space mass, and
hence
3-spatial and an "effect", and yet then used as if it were the
4-space "cause" entity that propagates in 4-space to interact. In short, the field concept is thoroughly
confused in the texts and papers in the literature (and has been confused for
more than a century) as not only the cause but the result of the interaction of
the cause with some recipient. This problem
has been highlighted by many physicists, including Feynman, Wheeler, etc.
This "confusion of the cause
with the effect" is widespread in physics, and is the single greatest
foundations error which hampers the progress of physics. Another example is the false notion that a
"separate force" acts upon a "separate mass", when in fact
mass is a component of force by the definition F º d/dt(mv). That such simple and obvious errors have
been propagated by so many hundreds of thousands of scientists for so many
decades is perplexing. Indeed, the
errors simply continue to be used. Note
that Nobelist Feynman and the great John Wheeler pointed out that the
"field" as defined in CEM does not and cannot exist in
spacetime! Instead, Feynman pointed out
that only the potential for the field exists in spacetime, in case some charged
mass is brought in to interact with it and thereby
produce the field as an effect.
Indeed, no observable persists, for
it "exists" only as a momentary 3-space frozen snapshot or slice of a
4-space dynamic interaction. Here
again, most physicists do not realize that observables such as mass m do not
and cannot persist other that at the instantaneous frozen moment of the
snapshot.
CURL-FREE MAGNETIC VECTOR POTENTIAL
A field-free magnetic vector
potential without curl, hence with no B-field.
Toroids and long solenoids have the
characteristic of separating the B-field
(curled potential) and holding it inside.
However, drawing energy from any potential whose "source charge or
source dipole" is not destroyed, simply results in the full value of the
potential being replenished from the vacuum, via the 4-symmetry energy flow
mechanism in the presence of the broken 3-symmetry of the dipole. Hence one may easily "double" the
potential energy density at will, and this is a special form of gauge freedom,
where the potential energy of any electromagnetic system can be altered freely
and at will. We strongly accent that,
contrary to what is in the EM textbook, gauge freedom rigorously allows the direct
and free amplification of potential energy of the EM system at will. That this principle, incorporated in gauge
field theory, has been known so long and still not used in the design,
production, and use of COP>1.0 electrical power systems is quite inexplicable.
In the motionless electromagnetic
generator, we used a special core material to extract the curled potential (B-field) from a permanent magnet's
vector potential A, so that A is replenished in uncurled form
directly from the vacuum via the giant negentropy process.
To achieve COP>1.0, we then
simultaneously interacted both the uncurled A-potential energy external to the output coil, and the internal
curled A-potential energy (B-field energy) internal to the core
through the coil, with the coil. By
pulsing, the Lenz law effect is also invoked as yet another momentary regauging
and potential energy increase, so that an additional energy gain is achieved.
The well-known Aharonov-Bohm effect
proves that the uncurled A-potential
can indeed be separated from the B-field
in like manner, and the A-potential
does interact with electrons since dA/dt
= - E.
Thus the MEG achieves COP>1.0
permissibly, because it is an open system freely receiving excess energy from
the active vacuum environment, via the vacuum's replenishment of the magnetic
vector potential of the permanent magnet dipole as fast as energy is drawn from
it. The MEG also violates the usual
closed current loop's self-imposition of Lorentz symmetrical regauging when
discharging its excitation energy (its free excess regauging potential energy),
because the "source dipole" (the permanent magnetic dipole) is not
destroyed.
CURVED SPACETIME (externally,
internally)
A four-dimensional geometry used
in general relativity, where the curvature is determined by the distribution of
mass-energy.
In the new, more extended approach,
any change in the spatial energy density of spacetime or any change in the
time-energy density of it, or a combination of changes in both. The difference is that in the new approach
time is also treated as a special form of energy. Specifically, time may be regarded as spatial EM energy
compressed by a factor of c2.
CYBORG (An acronym for cybernetic organism).
(Noun):
A single integrated system consisting of a living system energetically or
functionally linked to mechanical or electromagnetic devices and/or systems
performing some vital functions.
(Verb):
Link, in the sense of forming such a system.
In
the new approach, a living biological system may thus be considered a cyborg of
its time-like mindworld (mindframe) to its 3-spatial body (laboratory
tuner). The "cyborging" is
provided by the personal quantum potential and by the mind-body coupling
mechanism. Due to the giant negentropy
mechanism of any dipolarity, any scalar potential as a dipolarity is a cyborg
between observable reality and virtual state (time-like) reality, i.e., between
3-space and the time-domain.
CYTOMEGALOVIRUS
Any of several members of the herpesvirus
family that cause infected cells to enlarge and/or to form cytoplasmic (the
protoplasm of a cell, external to the nuclear membrane) inclusions in
leukocytes (white blood cells), particularly in their nuclei.
Cytomegalovirus makes a protein that
appears to disable the p53 protein. As
a result, smooth muscle cells in blood vessels can proliferate until they
impede blood flow.
CYTOPATHOGEN
Literally, a pathogen (disease
causing organism—or extended, mechanism—) that affects cells and generates
damage in them.
CYTOPATHOGENIC
Damaging, harmful, or destructive
for cells.
CYTOPATHOGENIC EFFECT
The generation of damage,
disease, death, or other symptoms at the cellular level in cells that are
exposed to or subjected to a pathogen.
CYTOPATHOGENIC MIRROR EFFECT
Distant EM pathogenic effect
noted by Kaznacheyev in thousands of military experiments, where cellular
death, disease, and damage forms are shown to be transmitted from one cell
culture in the dark (absence of visible light) where the changes are induced,
to another similar targeted cell culture in the dark that is environmentally
shielded from the first except for light transmission in the infrared and in
the ultraviolet. After exposure begins,
after a time delay (say, 2 hours or more), the cells in the targeted cell culture
will begin to exhibit the same symptoms as the culture having the induced
damage. Eventually, in most cases the
targeted cells will develop the same damage, disease condition, or death. The effects vary with the time of day etc.
The necessity for photon connection
from IR to UV is shown by contrasting a thin quartz window allowing the light
transmission with a thin window glass window.
The quartz is open from the IR to the UV, and will pass that entire
spectrum. With the visible light
absent, the IR and UV biophotons emitted by the damaged cell culture will pass
through the quartz window into the targeted cell culture. After the time delay, the targeted cell
culture starts developing the condition.
Use of a thin window glass window,
however, prevents the effect. Normal
window glass is opaque in the IR and in the UV, and so it blocks the
transmission of the IR and UV biophotons.
The UV is a harmonic of the IR,
arranged properly. An unusual effect
exists when two sine waves one the first harmonic of the other, are
simultaneously transmitted into an isotropic nonlinear medium, such as
water. On each sine wave, the peak
travels faster in the water than off-peak parts of the wave does. Hence the wave peaks overshoot its middle,
the wave collapses, breaks up, etc.
Both the waves of the transmitted harmonic set do that. However, if one pretends that one
transmitted the difference frequency between them, and not the waves
themselves, a strange phenomenon results.
Regardless of the breakup of the primary harmonic set, the difference
frequency travels through the water as if it were a real frequency in a linear
medium. This effect has been proven and
is used in underwater sonar equipment.
For example, see Owen Flynn, "Parametric arrays: A new concept for sonar," Electronic Warfare Magazine, June 1977, p. 107-112. Any two sine-wave frequencies as simultaneous drivers combine to produce a sine-wave difference frequency propagating in water, essentially without sidebands or reverberations. Its pattern has a main lobe approximately equal to that of the high frequency drive, but devoid of sidelobes. The level of the propagating difference frequency is proportional to both the product of the two fundamental drive levels and to the square of the desired value of difference frequency.
Living cells contain a great
percentage of water. Hence the effect
should apply to those targeted cells, under the conditions stated.
From general relativity, we know
that any pattern and dynamics of mass-energy, such as in a cell and all its
parts and dynamics, directly interacts with local spacetime to curve it, and
any set of curvatures of spacetime interact with any conglomerate of
mass-energy and its parts and dynamics.
The set of precise curvatures and their dynamics we call an engine. In a mass embedded in a local region of
spacetime containing an engine, the engine will interact with the mass-energy
to change it if the mass-energy and its dynamics do not "fit" the
engine and its dynamics.
In a diseased, damaged, or dead
cell, the mass-energy of that cell and its "template" (form and
dynamics) differs from its template while the cell was living and normal. Let us now see what happens when that dead
cell emits a biophoton.
A photon emitted from a dielectric
such as a damaged cell, is not emitted just from one spot. Every part of the dielectric participates in
the emission of that photon. (See
"porthole concept", to be added).
Further, each emitted photon contains in its scalar potential and its
magnetic vector potential, the exact longitudinal EM waveset that constitutes
the vacuum engine of the damaged cell that emitted it. When a cell absorbs a photon, it absorbs
that vacuum engine carried by the photon also.
If it absorbs a stream of photons of harmonic interval, the difference
frequency constitutes in terms of a wave, traveling through the cell water as
if in a linear medium, and transporting that vacuum engine to every part of the
absorbing cell dielectric.
So the biophotons emitted from
Kaznacheyev's damaged, diseased, or dying cells sent biophotons containing the
exact spacetime curvature engines and dynamics of their precise condition
(template). Further, a harmonic interval of such radiation is transmitted into
the targeted cells, and absorbed. The
mixing of the two absorptions eventually is sufficient to establish the
harmonic interval, thus with a clear EM signal difference that travels through
the cell's water and to every tiniest part of it. This "difference frequency clear signal" also contains
the pure vacuum engines of the template of the changes in the diseased, dying,
or damaged emitting cells.
The result is the
"kindling" (coherent integration) of the template in the absorbing
cell's local spacetime in which it is embedded. As that spacetime engine grows, it differs from the resident
engine of the absorbing cell. That
difference is itself an engine, and it operates steadily upon that absorbing
cell to alter its engine and then its physical condition and state.
As the new engine continues to
interact, the physical cell is gradually changed into an equilibrium condition
in its mutual interaction with its local spacetime engine. That occurs after the absorbing cell has
developed the same disease, damage, or dying condition as the transmitting
cells.
This is the secret of the
Kaznacheyev experiments. The
Kaznacheyev work was allowed to be released in the open literature to stimulate
the U.S. scientific and intelligence communities and see whether or not the
scientists and analysts had applied a unified field theory and higher symmetry
electrodynamics to the EM bioeffects problem.
The totally casual reception of the Kaznacheyev experiments in the West,
with no interest or interaction from the stimulated communities, assured the
KGB conclusively that the West was still in kindergarten in its knowledge of EM
bioeffects, and particularly had little or no knowledge in the field of EM
biological warfare.
Kaznacheyev referred to the effect
as the "cytopathogenic mirror" effect, for the pathogenic effects
from the emitting damaged cells being "mirrored' in the targeted cells.
See Vlail Kaznacheyev and L. P. Mikhailova, Ultraweak Radiation in Intercellular Interactions, [in Russian], Novosibirsk, 1981. An English exposition of much of the Kaznacheyev work is given in Vlail Kaznacheyev, "Electromagnetic Bioinformation in Intercellular Interactions," Psi Research, 1(1), Mar. 1982, p. 47-76. See also Vlail Kaznacheyev, "Apparent information transfer between two groups of cells," Psychoenergetic Systems, 1(1), Dec. 1974; Vlail Kaznacheyev et al., "Distant intercellular interactions in a system of two tissue cultures," Psychoenergetic Systems, 1(3), Mar. 1976, p. 141-142. In the same issue, see "A Comment" by William A. McGarey, p. 143; "A Comment" by Arthur C. Hastings, p. 143-144.
Seven or eight nations now have
longitudinal EM wave interferometer weapons, capable of beaming right through
the earth and ocean to the other side of the planet. At least two of these nations—Russia and China—are capable of
adding engine structures to these interferometers, and sweeping a targeted
population area to generate that specific disease condition in that
target. A sophisticated use would be to
have agents (such as terrorist teams already in the United States and with
biological agents in hand) release a small quantity of smallpox in the area
previously targeted. The LWIs have
swept the entire area continuously for a period, slowly kindling (especially at
night) the exact form of the disease within the bodies of the populace. A curious thing happens if the level of
kindling of the smallpox state has been kept just beneath the observable state,
within what is sometimes called the "shadow state" (just barely
virtual). A smallpox pandemic will
explode in that populace with a ferocity never seen in modern times, and at an
unparalleled rate. This is further
exacerbated by "spreading the immune system" prior to the attack
(term and discussion to be added), which seriously weakens the immune system's
ability to resist any single pathogenic attack.
There are hardly any supplies of
smallpox vaccine left that are viable.
Even where there are, the Russian laboratories developed strains of
smallpox resistant to the normal vaccine, and after the collapse of the Russian
economy and the former Soviet state, these strains were sold on the black
market to the highest bidder. Further,
most of the Soviet scientists employed in those secret biowar facilities wound
up employed in several other nations, most hostile to the United States.
The point is this: Such a strike
could in fact kill up to 2 billion people worldwide. Further, the entire affair would appear to be just a chance
breakout of smallpox, and its spread through a nonresistant world populace.
When modern biological warfare is
actually analyzed in detail, the "bang for the buck" is greater than
it is for nuclear weapons. Further, a
rogue or hostile nation can take its time in advance and develop quantities of
smallpox vaccine (for the very strain it will use), then initiate such a
clandestine campaign after it has vaccinated its own populace, armed forces,
and agents. Guess who survives after
such an attack.
CYTOTOXIC
Toxic (acts as a poison or toxin) to
cells.
A toxin
is a colloidal proteinaceous poisonous substance that is a specific product of
the metabolic activities of a living organism.
The toxin is usually very unstable, and is notably toxic when introduced
into the tissues.
DARK ENERGY
The Heaviside nondiverged energy
flow component, surrounding every field/charge and potential/charge reaction
but unaccounted in present electromagnetic theory after being arbitrarily
discarded by Lorentz.
DATUM
Consideration, or data
considered, or information considered, or action considered, or result
considered.
DEATH
The
disintegration of the personal quantum potential's connection to the physical
body's atomic nuclei by loss of the mind-body connection mechanism.
Simply
put, separation of the quantum potential containing the time-like mind-frame
from the body. Loss of the preferential
tuning of a physical body to its mindworld.
This causes loss of the preferential consciousness loop or life channel,
resulting in "death" (reversion to inert matter) of the body. Actually the quantum potential and the
mind-frame remains, so the being is
unchanging and indestructible, hence consists of all changes and destructions
simultaneously, with none separated individually. Life and death thus are two sides of the same coin, and the coin
is immutable, regardless of which side is exposed.
DE BROGLIE WAVE
A matter wave, conceived by Louis
de Broglie.
The quantum mechanics wave
associated with a particle of matter, which can give rise to interference
effects. An orbital electron in an atom is associated with a standing de
Broglie wave on a Bohr orbit. De Broglie waves always move faster than the
speed of light, the speed being given by c2/v, where c is the
velocity of light in vacuum and v is the velocity of the particle of mass. De
Broglie wave velocities thus vary from the speed of light to infinite speed
(everywhere at once). In his speech accepting the Nobel Prize, de Broglie
emphasized that, since these waves produce real physical effects, they are real
and must not be regarded simply as mathematical conveniences.
DEBYE, PETER
Dutch-born American physical
chemist and Nobelist, 1884-1966, who performed important and fundamental
studies in bipole moments and diffractions of X-rays and electrons in gases.
DEDIFFERENTIATION, CELLULAR
The reversion of a cell or cellular
structure to a more primitive or generalized condition.
Dedifferentiation is often preliminary to
a major change in the cell or cellular structure. It can also be a reversion of the cell to a previous—even primeval—cell form. The important point is that
dedifferentiation returns the cell to a previous (past) cellular state. Reversion of a cancer cell, e.g., would
cause the cell to return to a normal cell, since that is the nature of its
"cellular past." It is
vitally important that Becker has demonstrated that cells can be differentiated
(moved forward to a future state) or dedifferentiated (moved backward to a
previous state) electrically, by very weak DC currents (picoamperes). He was nominated for a Nobel Prize for this
epochal work.
Actual electromagnetic redifferentiation
of terminal tumors in laboratory animals was repeatedly demonstrated by Prioré
et al in the late 60s and early 70s and reported in the peer-reviewed French
medical journals, as was reversion of depressed immune systems, cures of
infectious diseases, and curing of arteriosclerosis. It is inexplicable that this positively demonstrated cure of
cancer—which could also cure infectious diseases and probably can be developed
to cure AIDS—was suppressed in the mid-70s
and has not been vigorously pursued by present establishment medical science.
DEGENERATE SEMICONDUCTOR
A semiconductor whose
conductivity approaches that of a metal.
DELGADO, JOSE M. R.
Noted Spanish neurophysiologist
well-known for his research on brain behavioral mechanisms and their control by
electrical stimulation; who implanted electrodes in the brains of animals and
humans and demonstrated that their responses (both behavioral and emotional)
were specific and depended upon the specific localized part of the brain that
was stimulated.
A TV tape made by Delgado showed a
spectacular demonstration where he stopped a charging bull in mid-stride. With a small hand-held radio transmitter, he
transmitted a radio signal to a receiver implanted in the head of the
bull. This dramatic demonstration
caused a world-wide sensation.
The significance of his work is given
by Becker: "Delgado discovered the exact parts of the brain in which
electrical stimulation produced fear, anxiety, pleasure, euphoria, or rage in
human subjects. He found that certain
sites produced major personality alterations.
For example, stimulation of one such site could cause very proper,
reserved young ladies to become flirtatious and sexually aggressive. Other sites inhibited maternal or aggressive
behavior. In short, Delgado was able to
profoundly alter human behavior through electrical stimulation of discrete
areas of the brain." … electrodes
were implanted in the pleasure centers of rats' brains. The animals were provided with two levers to
press. One of these delivered food, and
the other produced electrical stimulation of the pleasure center. Invariably, the rats chose to press the
lever that stimulated the pleasure center, even to the extent that they died of starvation."
(Becker, Cross Currents, p.
221-222).
It is known based on a rare OMNI
interview that Delgado progressed to detailed study and experimentation for the
behavioral and emotional effects in monkeys of specific magnetic field
frequencies on monkeys. These
successful experiments involved electrical currents produced in the brain but
hundreds of times lower in intensity than those required for direct electrode
stimulation. Since then, some
information has been cautiously released from Western military studies showing
that microwave pulses can couple to the central nervous system and produce
stimulation and behavior alteration similar to Delgado's released experimental
results.
Comment: The ultimate and most refined techniques in the field of
electromagnetic control of human behavior, volition, emotion, etc. is provided
by Russian psychoenergetics, the military version of which is totally under KGB
control. This work has progressed far
beyond what Delgado and Becker were discussion so long ago. The use of the infolded longitudinal EM
waves and "engines"—once the technology is developed—allows direct
engineering of conscious and unconscious mind, memory including short term and
long term, perception, awareness, etc.
The additional advantage of using EM longitudinal waves is that mass is
largely a very thin dispersion of particles, with (relatively speaking) very
large distances between them, somewhat like the solar system but on different
scale. This "inner space" is
filled with EM waves, potentials, and fields—all of which decompose into sets
of longitudinal EM waves and their impressed dynamics. Thus the earth and ocean are readily
penetrated by longitudinal EM wave beams, and the Russians (KGB) has developed
such LW interferometers since the mid 1950s.
However, by LW interferometry where the patterns and dynamics of the
carried LWs are engineered, any desired mapping pattern of precise EM signals,
frequencies, phases, and magnitudes can be reproduced in distant interference
zones, reaching right through the ocean.
These interferometers could localize the distant interferometry into a
6-inch diameter volume as early as 1985, so from that time forward it gradually
became possible to perform all of Delgado's "inserted electrode" EM
stimulus in a single selected human brain from the opposite side of the
earth. So approximately 1985 is when I
would estimate the beginning of the "golden age" (ugh!) of distant
psychoenergetics was initiated.
By 1997, this development would be
into at least third generation weapons, just being deployed or just having been
deployed, considering an somewhat accelerated weapons development program where
6 years is one generation. By 1997,
very complex individual behavioral and perceptual control should have just
arrived in on-site deployed strategic weapons systems. See discussion under conscious mind.
Some selected useful references are:
J.M.R. Delgado et al., Journal of
Anatomy, vol. 134, 1982, p. 533 reports that developmental defects occur in
chick embryos exposed to various ELF frequencies. See also J.M.R. Delgado, Physical
Control of the Mind: Toward a Psychocivilized Society, Vol. 41, World
Perspectives, Harper & Row, New York, 1969.
DEMODULATION
From a carrier containing a
modulated signal, recovering the signal that was used to modulate it.
DENSE SIGNAL ENVIRONMENT
For our purposes, when the number
of weak EM signals crossing one square meter per second reaches 200,000.
At 500,000 important nonlinear
optical type effects of significance—particularly long term cumulative
effects—begin to occur in the exposed biological organism.
DEPARTING ORTHOROTATIONS
In space of dimensions greater
than four, the rotating of an object or entity away from its line of motion, in
the direction of a dimension at right angles to the line of travel in the
observer's three-space, by some number of additional 90° rotations.
The Lorentz transform in special
relativity, e.g., is just a formula for this kind of rotation. What we call "velocity" is
actually a measure of rotation. In
4-space, any object in 3-space can only rotate "out" of 3-space in
one direction: toward the time-axis. As
the object rotates toward that time-axis, we see the object as having a
velocity in 3-space, and its "length along the line of motion" as
having diminished. When the object
rotates the full 90°, its "length along the line of motion" has been
converted to "time" rather than length. Hence it has zero length along the line of motion and is moving
at c, the speed of light in ambient space.
It is also no longer material, but is a sort of flat plane surface
moving at speed c in a direction perpendicular to the plane.
In that 4-space model, it is
impossible for anything to move faster than light speed. So Einstein's postulate dealing with the
fact that it is impossible to translate mass, signals, etc. faster than light
speed has a built-in assumption that only one orthogonal departing rotation can
be made from 3-space. That postulate
need not apply at all if more than one departing orthorotation is
permitted—which of course requires a space of 5 dimensions or greater.
The notion is that, if we allow a
spacetime of greater than four dimensions, by continuing to rotate ever more
orthoturns in a departing direction away from the original line of travel, the
rotated object loses one observable dimension for every orthorotation. Hence
with three "departing" orthorotations it becomes a "nonobservable
point" to the normal observer, but one that would be moving at speed c3. A single orthorotation would make the
3-dimensional object a two-dimensional plane moving at speed c.
No matter how many rotations are
made in a departing manner, the object is still connected to the time dimension
common to all dimensions (assuming only a single time dimension for
simplicity). So it exists in an
orthorotated space, but in the same time.
To the physical observer in 3-space, it thus appears to be a
"time-like" or "mental" object only. Nonetheless, by affecting the density and
structuring of the time domain, it can have an effect on a 3-spatial
object. We discuss that mechanism under
the subjects of the mind-to-body coupling mechanism and the body-to-mind coupling
mechanism. Further, with the
Sachs-Evans unified field theory approach, the time-domain can be directly
engineered. This means that both
"inert" or physical reality and time-like or "mental"
reality can be directly engineered by novel electrodynamic means.
In short, a photon is just a
particle (such as an electron) that is orthorotated once (toward the time
axis). In photon emission, a little bit of the mass-energy turns into
orthorotated photon energy. In photon
absorption, the absorbed photon energy turns back into mass-energy.
The higher dimensional
orthorotational concept was originally formed to allow a physical modeling
grasp on a "mental" object as compared to a "physical"
object, and to have a connection mechanism between the two. Such an approach can be used to model both
mind and matter, their interaction, etc.
The present author has used it to solve the old philosophical problem of
"intent", of how the perception of self is attained, how the external
world is perceived separate from self, etc.
A model for both living and nonliving states does emerge.
This or a very similar approach has
been used by the Russian's highly classified weapon science called energetics. That third branch of energetics is called psychoenergetics and it is the physics
of directly engineering mind states, mind operations, memory, etc. by extended
electrodynamic means. We have
previously detailed much of this work privately, but with some detailed openly
in a few papers. E.g., see T. E.
Bearden, "Mind Control and EM Wave Polarization
Transductions, Part I", Explore,
9(2), 1999, p. 59; Part II, Explore,
9(3), 1999, p. 61; Part III, Explore,
9(4,5), 1999, p. 100-108.
DESTRUCTIVE INTERFERENCE
When two waves or wavesets from
two different sources superpose to produce a combined waveset that has a lower
intensity than the sum of the intensities of the two original waves.
DETERMINISTIC PATTERN OR TEMPLATE
The exact arrangement, by plan
and deterministic action, of a group of entities.
E.g., of the photons in a "herd"
or "group" of them. Or a set of spacetime curvatures, into a dynamic
structure called a "spacetime curvature engine"—or "engine"
for short. Or by the virtual photons in
the vacuum flux, or a deterministic set of changes to that vacuum flux (the
vacuum flux that is called the "vacuum potential." I have called this
function—of a deterministic patterning or templating of the virtual flux
(particle view) of the potential—dimensioning
the potential.
DIELECTRIC
Literally, "against electric
(current),"
...originally coined to mean
"opposes the flow or conduct of electric fluid."
In today's language, a dielectric is
a non-conducting material used to oppose or prevent the flow of electric
charges. Even empty vacuum exhibits some dielectric resistance. "Dielectric"
is also used to refer to a nonconducting material (often used between the metal
plates of a capacitor or elsewhere) which can (i) sustain a change in potential
across a distance (i.e., an E-field),
and (ii) serve as an insulator. Space itself is a dielectric, or at least it is
said to exhibit certain dielectric qualities.
DIFFERENTIATION, CELLULAR
(1) specialization of body parts or
organs in the evolutionary process.
(2) modification of different
parts of the body to perform particular functions. (3) modification of the cells forming these body parts or organs
so as to perform the necessary cellular functions required to support the
functioning of the body part or organ.
DIFFRACTION
The bending of light at the edge of an
opaque object.
Usually diffraction introduces undesired
distortion and is a problem. However,
it can be useful and desirable—for example, in a diffraction grating.
DIMENSION
A certain primary geometrical
physical attribute, such as length, used to describe the separational
relationships of physical phenomena.