|Subject: RE: Overunity device
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 12:15:28 -0600
Thanks for the kind words and the very kind offer. They are much appreciated.
I've thought long and hard about the problem, and have come up with what I think is the best way for you to get your systems onto the market in spite of the usual strong suppression efforts that arise, and in spite of any attempted opposition by the High Cabal.
It is perfectly obvious that, if one separates the voltage (potential) from the current (say, via two channels, one where the electrons are "pinned" and cannot move as current), and then separately amplifies the voltage channel alone, that amplified voltage is "for free" since that is simply asymmetrical regauging, and it is guaranteed work-free by the gauge freedom principle. Of course, in the real world, it may cost a little for switching etc., but the change of magnitude of the potential (and therefore collected potential energy) of a system is basically free. The trick, of course, is how to then couple the amplified voltage flow back onto the current flow in the main path, without also coupling it back across the main source dipole (external power source) and increasing the current back through the back emf of the external source. Such coupling is almost certainly possible, but of course the standard closed current loop circuit guarantees that it does not happen.
Any variation of that schema -- essentially separating voltage from current, amplifying the voltage separately, then recoupling it to the current without back coupling it to the external source -- accomplishes asymmetrical regauging to change only the potential energy of the system. Without the back coupling, then dissipation of the excess potential energy in the external load and not in the original source, is sufficient to yield genuine COP>1.0. Energy conservation is not violated, since the actual collected potential energy in the external circuit comes from the local altered vacuum potential via the source charges, not really from the external source. A "flow of potential" onto a receiving circuit, which "potentializes the receiving circuit", actually changes the energy density of the local vacuum potential in which the receiving circuit is embedded. Thus the source charges in the circuit (which we usually call the "potentializing charges") receive the additional potential energy from their ongoing altered vacuum exchange -- the latter interaction is not even modeled in conventional electrical engineering.
It will take such influence and backing by persons in high political position, to get the units onto the market safely and keep them there in spite of the Cabal. Their support will assure the "running blocking" of the interference in all its many guises.
Due to my own serious health problems (and taking care of my wife 24/7 after her stroke of several months ago), I am not in a sufficient physical situation to bring about the very strong support and high level interference-running you need.
As you know from my writings, I don't care who gets it done first; the world absolutely must develop and use "cheap clean energy from the vacuum", or else the environment and probably much of the human species are just going to go down the tube in the economical and military problems that ensue in the coming "energy wars" otherwise.
Very best wishes,