The Tom Bearden




Sent:     Saturday, December 02, 2000 2:25 PM
To:       Hal  Fox;
Cc:       James L. Kenny
Subject:          RE: Reply to Query from Jed Rothwell


Dear Jed,

The researcher who replicated the MEG was Jean-Louis Naudin in France.  He
obtained COP = 7.3 in his later (third) build-up after an initial success of
COP = 1.3.  We have obtained COP = 17 to 20, higher in some experimental
build-ups, and we deliberately pushed one unit to destruction of the output
coil, with the unit reaching COP>100 just before the arc-over and
destruction of the coils.

At the request of our patent attorneys and the university, we are keeping
close the name of the university until their report is completed.  But yes,
arrangements have been made for the university's scientific team to not only
test it, but to physically and independently replicate it from scratch,
under U.S. Department of Defense auspices (the university team works on a
DoD program in power supplies).  The university scientists will build-up the
replication to our specifications, but they will order the parts, wind the
coils, make the assembly,  and produce everything completely independently
from Magnetics Energy Limited, to which the intellectual property rights are

We are also arranging for independent testing by a government-certified
private testing laboratory with an international reputation and with
impeccable credentials (many of the large aerospace industries use this
laboratory for certification testing on a great variety of U.S. government
contracts).  After observing the fierce dogmatic hassle that the orthodox
establishment poured on cold fusion and on the institutes and scientists
involved, you can understand why we are not releasing which university,
which DoD agency, and which independent test laboratory.  We are striving to
do straightforward scientific work for review by openminded scientists, not
by dogmatists.

There are five persons who in combined effort invented the motionless
electromagnetic generator (MEG).  Beside myself they are Dr. Jim Hayes, Dr.
Lee Kenny, engineer Ken Moore, and engineer Steve Patrick.  These latter
four researchers have worked very long and hard on this project, which
succeeded only after nearly a decade of effort.

As soon as we have these independent tests completed and the independent
university replication completed and tested, we will have presented the
scientific community with a validated, replicated experimental unit forever
proving that electrical power systems with COP>1.0 are not only possible but
feasible and practical.  In short, if the present conventional theory
disagrees with the MEG experiment once the experiment is independently
validated and replicated, then it is the present conventional theory which
must be changed, if one follows prescribed scientific method.

To understand how straightforward it is to extract EM energy from the
vacuum, I suggest that my several papers on Department of Energy website
read, particularly the paper "Giant Negentropy from the Common Dipole"-which
has also just been published in Journal of New Energy.  One should also read
my paper on the DoE website on "The Unnecessary Energy Crisis" in order to
understand that all the hydrocarbons ever burned, dams ever built to power
hydroturbines to turn the shafts of the generators, and nuclear fuel rods
ever expended, have not added and will never add a single watt to the power
line.  All that ferocious destruction of the biosphere has done nothing but
force the internal charges of the generators apart, to make the source
dipoles.  It is the source dipole that powers every electrical circuit and
every power system, not the shaft horsepower input to the generator shaft.
Isn't it strange that we have all been taught to design and build only
closed current loop circuits-which a priori destroy their source dipoles
(and thus the inflow of free electrical energy from the vacuum) faster than
they can catch some of the free energy from the vacuum and use it to power
their loads!  Until it is understood that all EM energy comes from the
vacuum anyway, and specifically from the time domain as reactive power
(electrical engineering term), then the operation of systems such as the MEG
will make no sense to one at all, and in fact the mechanism actually
powering every EM circuit and electrical power system will not be

I have promised Hal Fox to prepare an article for Journal of New Energy,
describing the MEG and its general mechanism for operation, as soon as the
independent testing and independent university's full replication are

Also, Dr. Myron Evans, a theoretician of much note, has completed an AIAS
scientific paper which provides a succinct and rigorous technical exposition
in O(3) electrodynamics of the MEG's "energy from the vacuum" operational
mechanism.  Evans demonstrates that the explanation does not appear at all
in the standard U(1) electrodynamics, but does easily appear rather
straightforwardly in the higher symmetry O(3) electrodynamics, which is a
non-Abelian EM theory.  That AIAS paper has been submitted to a leading
physics journal and is presently in formal referee review.

We briefed technical representatives of two U.S. Senate committees on the
MEG and on overunity electrical power systems in general as part of our
briefing (along with excellent briefings by Dr. Eugene Mallove, Dr. Tom
Valone, Dr. Ted Loder, and others) and will brief again-more widely in the
Senate and on Capital Hill-sometime next spring or early summer.  At the
next briefing, we will probably include a live demonstration of the MEG.

Both here and abroad, we are actively seeking capitalization by licensing
the non-exclusive manufacturing of scaled up MEG power units, while
retaining control of our fundamental invention.  In the not too distant
future, we will scale up the MEG and see it manufactured by various
licensees worldwide, with units going directly to the market place  as real
power systems powering real loads.

The Managing Partner and Director of Magnetic Energy Limited is Dr. Lee
Kenny, E-mail  Lee should be contacted for all matters
regarding the MEG program, program status, plans, investments, company
information, etc. and for any further questions.

Very best wishes,

Tom Bearden