|Subject: RE: recent quakes &
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 10:27:34 -0600
No indications directly as yet. So far, just the fact that it seems to be the most powerful quake ever to hit the U.S. Also, it damaged the pipeline in Alaska (800 miles long pipeline) that carries 20% of all domestic U.S. oil. The pipeline is shut down now, and I haven't a picture yet as to whether the damage is just minor or substantial. Note we previously discussed (several times) just how vulnerable that pipeline is.
We also know (100% certainty) that the Yakuza and Aum Shinrikyo have indeed been engineering our weather, etc. since 1990, having leased the scalar interferometers from the Russians (from the KGB, who control and use all such Russian weapons), on site in Russia at the end of 1989.
We also know that in 1997 SecDef Cohen publicly confirmed that electromagnetic weapons were being used by hostiles to (1) engineer the weather, (2) initiate earthquakes, and (3) initiate volcanoes. The confirmation is in the official transcript of his speech and interactions at a conference in Georgia. Here is the quotation:
"Others are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves… So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations…It's real, and that's the reason why we have to intensify our efforts, and that's why this is so important."
So if it is the Yakuza and Aum Shinrikyo, one can possibly add a couple of recent volcano eruptions as possible candidates to their list.
So a shadowy picture of possible Yakuza activities and involvement does emerge, but not yet with enough certainty to state it as such.
In intel jargon, there are not yet enough indicators to be reasonably decisive. But we're watching it! The game of intelligence includes noticing and keeping and fitting all the seemingly disparate indicators that eventually fit together to give the real picture. At five indicators in agreement, you have a good candidate. At seven in agreement, you have quite a high probability that it is indeed a legitimate picture. Beyond seven, it gets to be nearly a certainty.