all the planets and moons and the sun exchange scalar EM energy (or in
the time-domain, e.g.). As a result, even the speed of light in empty
space between the planets varies, and this has in fact been shown by
actual radar measurements. The
speed of light varies as all sorts of seasonal time factors, probably
due to de Broglie wave interferometry variations seasonally, so that
means that other effects -- such as what you mention -- are also
affected and altered by these seasonal variations due to the
"system" characteristics of the solar system.
De Broglie waves always travel faster than the speed of light, and
multiple interactions can be detectable (produce observable effects)
in mass systems and charged systems, even though a single de Broglie
wave interaction cannot. So
all members of the solar system have an enormous exchange each with
the other, due to the exchange of enormous numbers of superluminal de
Broglie waves. This
exchange certainly affects all bodies on the earth and in the oceans,
and it also affects the local vacuum on the Earth itself.
are some references on the measured variation of the speed of light in
space, and how the agencies and scientists just "averaged"
the radar measurements over something like a month, to hold to the
standard speed c doctrine, etc.
speed of light is a characteristic of its medium; so-called empty
space is indeed a medium and it has certain physical properties.
When the vacuum medium is change or altered, its
"medium-disturbances velocity" can also change, and does.
James M. (1982)
"Physical properties of de Broglie's phase
Journal of Physics, 50(4), Apr. 1982.
p. 357-362. Detection
of superluminal entities such as de Broglie waves is not possible
in a single interaction, but is quite possible in a dual
interaction. Thus the
two-slit box, for example, first interferes superluminal de
Broglie waves to form a subluminal group velocity, and then this
subluminal group velocity is detected (moves or affects an
electron) in a second interaction.
A Critical Look at the Theory of Relativity, Library
of Congress Catalogue No. 77-670044. Extensive
compilation of measurements of the speed of light, all known
measurements during the past 300 years or so.
Clearly shows the speed of light is not constant but
changes, sometimes even daily.
Bryan G. (1973)
"The Unified Quantum Electrodynamic Ether," Foundations
of Physics, 3(3), Sept. 1973, p. 381-388.
His discussion of the interplanetary radar measurements of
Venus, which did not fit relativity, are particularly interesting,
particularly with respect to his finding that the data were simply
"averaged" to eliminate the variations and hence the
diurnal, lunar, and synodic periodic components actually measured
in the variations of the speed of light.
Bryan G. (1985)
"The great speed of light in space cover-up." Scientific
Ethics, 1(1), Feb. 1985.
p. 2-3. A very
strong paper referencing extensive radar experiments that clearly
show that the speed of light in space is not constant, and
revealing the cover-up of this definitive experimental data.
For example, the paper refers to a presentation by the Jet
Propulsion Laboratory's E.M. Standish, Jr., at the Dec. 1974 AAS
Dynamical Astronomy Meeting, reporting that significant
unexplained systematic variations existed in all the
interplanetary data, and that JPL is forced to use empirical
Bryan G. (1969)
"Radar Testing of the Relative Velocity of Light in
Vol. 2, No. TBD, Month TBD, 1969. p. 361.
Analysis of inconsistencies in published interplanetary
radar data. The
measured inconsistencies are not random, but contain diurnal,
lunar, and synodic periodic components.
Laboratories now are routinely interpolating the data to
force it to fit the "constant speed of light in vacuum"
hypothesis of relativity. Note
that this is a modified version of Wallace's "An Analysis of
Inconsistencies in Published Interplanetary Radar Data,"
which was rejected by Physical Review Letters under
apparently suspicious circumstances.
Bryan G. (1983)
"Letters to Editor."
36(1), 1983. p.
11. Details author's
attempts to breach the bigot barrier at Physical Review
journals with analysis showing that experimental interplanetary
radar data reveals periodic variations in the speed of light in
vacuum, casting strong doubt on the validity of Einstein's
assumption of the constancy of c, the speed of light.
I had been pondering a question in my profession (dentistry) and in
reading much of your works, thought that perhaps I should run this by
you ... In doing oral surgery over the years, I have found that the
occurrence of the so-called "dry socket" is almost never
trauma during the procedure but due to the time of year. This happens,
generally, due to lack or loss of blood supply to the clotting area
subsequent loss of the primary intention of healing. The discomfort is the result of
the exposed periostium. Any "old timer" will say that has been
seen as a trend during anyone's time doing that kind of work. My question is: Is
it possible for the scalar interaction of the Earth, Moon and Sun to
influence the healing characteristics of the human body?? If so how
All the best and hope your recovery is going well ..... Carter *******