|Subject: RE: Antoine Prioré's
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 00:27:31 -0500
think that, eventually, once we redevelop the Priore-type approach, we
are going to find various wide bandwidths of frequencies exist, not
just in EM waves but audio waves, electrostatic waves, etc., that can
be used in similar fashion.
may eventually find a correlation between "injection sites"
(probably the acupuncture points found by trial and error) and the
frequency used in the irradiation, as well. Or at least the difference
frequencies used in the irradiation, and the phase relationships.
to be safe, I would try to start off by using frequencies in the
ranges used by Priore. Some
are discussed in his patents. I
do think quite a few harmonic intervals are a necessity, at least at
the early stages of research.
I think the Priore work is just the tip of the iceberg.
It isn't so much the "exact frequencies", because the
differences between the frequencies are at least as important as, if
not much more important, than the actual frequencies.
We have taken the theory far beyond the "a given frequency
does this or that" effect in the body.
Those type effects are very gross, and do not yield vacuum
engines (spacetime curvature engines) for a specific illnesses.
is after all the longitudinal EM waves made in the body itself, by its
own nonlinear responses, that we are driving after.
Any longitudinal EM wave is accompanied by a companion
time-polarized EM wave. It
is this combination that does the "magic" work.
And it is that combination that is used by the cellular
regeneration system in the body itself.
Antoine Prioré's work