|Subject: RE: cop>1.0
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 11:20:25 -0500
For something to just straightforward build, though difficult:
magnetic motor process (built-in self-switching of the flux path, so
nonconservative net magnetic field is used) will essentially double
of a permanent magnet motor.
So if you start with a high
say 0.7 or 0.8, you can expect to get 1.4 or 1.6, as the Hitachi
in Japan measured for a Kawai process applied to two of their own
high-efficiency Hitachi motors. Note that the mechanical pattern
metal that does the flux path switching is a bit complicated.
device works right from the patent, if you use very efficient
(photon-coupled) switching. I'm not an electronics technician
(two of our
guys are and they do that kind of work for us), but that has to be
The Magnetic Wankel also can be made to work, or at least self-rotate,
care is used in precision cutting the magnets. But there are
iron magnets, so that is quite expensive.
I don't know of any really cheap, easily put together system; if there
one, then all the universities would have been onto this a long time
or at least the sharp young grad students would have been onto it.
The anti-Stokes emission effect is always overunity a priori, since
emitting matter receives excess energy from the dynamic motions of
molecules in the system. I don't believe anyone has looked at
replenishment of the energy to those atoms and molecules; standard
is to imply that they "run down" or "slow down",
which probably is not true
at all, since they all involve charge and charge dynamics, and charge
thing that can easily be proven to emit EM energy in 3-space without
input energy at all in 3-space. (The energy is received from the
domain; see my paper on Giant Negentropy from the Common
very strong supporting argument by Mandl and Shaw, Quantum Field
Chapter 5). So in theory if you collect and use the energy
from a monopolar charge or dipole, and do not use half of it (in a
current loop circuit containing the source dipole) to destroy the
you can permissibly do overunity, without violation of physics,
thermodynamics, or conservation of energy law. That's because
you are using
an open system far from thermodynamic equilibrium, and such a system
permitted to (1) self-order, (2) self-rotate or self-oscillate, (3)
more energy than you yourself have to input in 3-space (the excess
freely received from the external environmental exchange) (4) power
and its external load (all the energy is freely received from the
environmental energy exchange), and (5) exhibit negentropy.
The Bohren experiment also outputs some 18 times as much energy
one oneself inputs by the standard Poynting energy flow calculation.
is because there is a nondiverged, noncollected Heaviside component of
energy flow accompanying every Poynting energy flow (Poynting's
only the intercepted component of flow, hence the diverged component)
is abandoned in electrodynamics since Lorentz arbitrarily discarded it
1886. The Bohren experiment puts a collecting charged particle
particle resonance, so it "sweeps out" a larger reaction
area, thereby intercepting and catching (diverging) more energy flow.
Bedini's negative resistor process in batteries is absolutely genuine
my paper on it), but putting it together into a nice operating system
such a simple matter.
I guess the basic overunity problem (in electrical systems approaches
them) can be stated as follows: Take any dipole such as a
Energy radiates continuously from it in all directions, without
the speed of light. The problem is to catch some of the energy
external circuit containing a load, then discharge that energy into
load. And one must not "kill" the dipole, but leave it
alone. So it's
primarily a "intercepting the energy, discharging it in a load,
going back and dipping up some more energy, etc." Or in
shuttling the energy rather than transmitting its effects around a
path where the electrons are pushed in such a path. Tesla's
approach was to
shuttle back and forth along a single wire connecting two circuits,
Anyway, I wish you well in your research. We have found some
to do it, all needing further research to handle the phenomenology
emerges, but we ourselves are still looking for that "novel and
I did propose one simple way but was never able to obtain the material
try it. If one can have a metallurgical lab make some aluminum
with about 1% iron (has to be done in an inert atmosphere such as
then the electron relaxation time can be brought up to about a
That means that one can potentialize the conductors etc. in the
suddenly, in purely static manner (the electrons are still
"frozen" for a
substantial percentage of that millisecond), then switch away leaving
potential energy and closing the circuit (as with a diode) so that
can only occur in one direction around through the load, and watch the
energy then discharge through the load. Then one can
"shuttle" some more
energy onto the circuit, pull away, watch it discharge in the load,
Here one only has to "pay" for switching costs, not at all
for the energy
itself. This too is perfectly permissible; one is simply
well-known gauge freedom axiom of quantum field theory. From any
potential (phi), one can collect any amount of energy W, by the simple
formula W = (phi)q. So for a given phi, to collect a desired W,
needs to have collecting charges q. Energy is actually a flow
and a cause;
work is a dissipation or change to that flow and is an effect.
dipole --- once made -- produces a scalar potential forever, so long
dipole remains intact. So one can pay to make the dipolar source
potential, and then must figure out a way to collect and switch energy
that potential in a completely separate circuit (use
theory, not closed current loop circuit theory where the source dipole
part of the circuit!) to collect the energy in a receiving
antenna/collector. That external receiver/collector can of
course be a
closed current loop circuit, but SEPARATE circuit not connected at all
to the primary source dipole. Then by switching, one can convert
received DC to AC, e.g., and let it power something.
That is the kind of experiment that one can do, without destroying the
The beauty of working with permanent magnetic dipoles is that the
"fixed" in the material, and the magnetic charges are not
flux current is passed back through the dipole.
We have been able to do this with the MEG experiment, and have filed
appropriate additional patent application on the exact process we use
well as several variants.
Hope this helps, and good luck with your experiments. We too are
for the long haul; it required more than eight years of hard work to
with our first MEG. Lots of things we did and tried, just went
the tubes and did not work. When our understanding got more
gradually we became more aware of what we are doing. The basic
are applying for power is the Aharonov-Bohm
effect. Contrary to
opinion, the MEG is not a standard transformer functionally.
major operation is not that of a transformer at all, but a
transmitter-receiver-converter using the AB effect.
My name is ********* and I have
been reading your papers on
exraction from the vacuum, overunity principles etc with great
Together with my father, we work in a small garage laboratory, as we
for years, trying to break the COP>1 barrier - mainly to get our
electric bike to break the 30km/25km per hour barrier.
We have built innumerable versions of
Takahashi motors, Adams motors,
pulsed overunity generators and the like - all without any success,
through lack of trying, as Dad can clearly remember his Dad playing
magnets many years ago and muttering "there must be some way of
run with these things" and truly, we can conceive of nothing more
promising than some contraption sitting on our bench, powering it's
simultaneously running itself.
Tom, is there ****ANYTHING**** we can
do to help realise this dream -
for us, but for the Earth and it's creatures ? Although we have
of our equipment from garbage cleanups and have as our
"funding" the few
pennies we can obtain from the odd repair job, we have nevertheless
to do some feats which have left local university professors aghast in
amazement (why I will never know!) so we are not completely without
enthusiasm, but this overunity business totally eludes us.
Can you help ?
I understand if you cannot answer this email -
In any event, our hopes are with you -
Michael and Dad