The Tom Bearden
|Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001
I'm slowly recovering from a recent heart attack, and so will be very
slow for awhile in doing most anything.
It appears I can expect nearly full recovery, but it will
require two months or longer.
10 nations now have what I first called scalar EM weapons.
They are actually longitudinal EM wave interferometers.
You can draw your own conclusions about the U.S. knowledge of
them from Defense Secretary Cohen's statement in 1997:
[terrorists] are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby
they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely
through the use of electromagnetic waves… So there are plenty of
ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they
can wreak terror upon other nations…It's real, and that's the reason
why we have to intensify our [counterterrorism] efforts."
Secretary of Defense William Cohen at an April 1997
counterterrorism conference sponsored by former Senator Sam Nunn.
Quoted from DoD News Briefing, Secretary of Defense William S.
Cohen, Q&A at the Conference on Terrorism, Weapons of Mass
Destruction, and U.S. Strategy, University of Georgia, Athens, Apr.
the decisive type of weapon is Quantum Potential weapons; three
nations have them, being Russia (under control of the KGB, not in the
Russian armed forces), Brazil, and a small nation friendly to us that
has saved our bacon on four occasions since Jan. 1997.
A fourth nation, China, is very near having these QP weapons
also. I certainly hope
our fellows are working on them; I've tried very hard to get them to
do that, and at least some of them are finally beginning to believe
Chinese are serious about moving on Taiwan, presently having large
amphibious exercises on an island near Taiwan, and having already
massed missile artillery on Taiwan.
Unknown to U.S. intelligence, the Chinese also have produced a
completely different kind of EMP (electromagnetic pulse) weapon
unknown in the West, and has deployed it.
It is a most formidable weapon, of nearly incredible capability
against weapon systems, communications, living persons, etc.
If they move on Taiwan, they will almost certainly use this
weapon to counter U.S. naval task forces, missiles, aircraft, etc.
assigned to the theater which move to support Taiwan.
Even the rather staid "Foreign Affairs" for the
present issue has an article pointing out the seriousness of China's
threats on Taiwan. I
regard this weapon as one of the most powerful weapons of all time,
and have only recently been able to understand how it works and the
mechanism involved. Again,
I've tried to pass this information "in" to our fellows, but
have no idea of whether successfully or not.
do not comment on the inventions of others.
So the only comment I can make is that the MEG is for real.
It uses the well-known Aharonov-Bohm effect to extract
additional EM energy from that air.
The AB effect has been known from some time, but apparently has
never been thought of in the sense of using it in a power system.
It's usually thought to be an obscure part of physics, a very
novel effect, but something very tiny.
To the contrary, it can also be used in macroscopic power
systems in the real world.
inventor and I have also, after a long struggle, finally deciphered
nature's mechanism for decaying any overunity system's excitation
above unity. It is a most
unsuspected decay mechanism, and can only be see by an analysis of the
supersystem rather than the system.
The supersystem has three parts: (1) the physical system and
its dynamics, (2) the local vacuum exchange with the system and the
dynamics involved, and (3) the local curved spacetime and its
components of the supersystem all interact with each other, and no
analysis of any electromagnetic circuit is complete without taking all
three into account.
this supersystem approach, in 2000 I finally resolved the
long-standing problem of the source charge -- which has been called
the most difficult problem in electrodynamics.
The key was to properly re-interpret Whittaker's 1903
decomposition of the scalar potential.
Whittaker along with everyone since then interpreted the phase
conjugate wave only after it has reacted with a charge.
Prior to that interaction, the phase conjugate wave is NOT a
"real" EM wave in 3-space, but a wave in the complex domain.
In 4-space, the fourth axis is modeled as -- ict, and the only
variable is t. So the
phase conjugate half of each Whittaker decomposition wavepair suddenly
is seen to be an incoming longitudinal EM wave in the time domain,
interacting with the charge, with the charge absorbing the energy in
the time-domain, then with its spin emitting the excitation energy as
real EM energy in 3-dimensions. The
paper (on my website) dealing with that is "Giant Negentropy of
the Common Dipole".
publishing the paper, I also discovered very powerful support for the
re-interpretation, with the support provided in Mandl and Shaw,
Quantum Field Theory, Wiley, 1984, under the heading "Convariant
Quantization of the Photon Propagator" in Chapter 5.
Mandl and Shaw give a deeper coverage of the four photon
polarizations. Mandl and
Shaw argue that the longitudinal and scalar (i.e., time) polarizations
are not directly observable, but only in combination, where they
manifest as the "instantaneous" Coulomb (i.e.,
electrostatic) potential. Our
comment is that this argument, translated from particle terminology to
wave terminology, directly fits my re-interpretation of Whittaker's
1903 decomposition of the scalar potential, as pointed out in my paper
"Giant Negentropy from the Common Dipole," Journal of New
Energy, 5(1), Summer 2000, p. 11-23.
However, Mandl and Shaw fail to account for the assumed
interaction of the detecting/observing unit point charge, and thus
fail to account for the absorption of the incoming time-polarized wave
or photon, the transduction of that excitation energy of the charge
into longitudinal EM wave/photon energy, and the subsequent emission
of that excitation energy in 3-space. Thus Mandl and Shaw missed the
time-excitation charging of
the interacting charge via absorption of the "coupled"
time-polarized EM wave/photon, and the subsequent decay of the
charge's excitation energy in the time-domain by emission of 3-space
longitudinal EM wave/photon. This
interaction has been erroneously omitted in physics prior to our
recognition of it. So
Mandl and Shaw do not account for photon (or wave) polarization
transduction, where the "causal" time-polarized EM wave or
photon comes in and is absorbed by the detecting charge or dipole,
then re-emitted as the longitudinally polarized EM wave or photon in
3-space. Recognition of
these missing facts allowed at last a solution to the long-vexing
problem of the source charge, often called the greatest problem in
both quantum and classical electrodynamics.
leads to a very important new EM energy flow symmetry, preferred by
nature, between the time-domain and 3-space.
So the most fundamental EM energy flow symmetry is between the
time-domain and 3-space, where both time-energy flow symmetry and
3-space energy flow symmetry are individually broken.
This new "preferred" symmetry provides negentropy,
and would appear to have dramatic implications throughout much of
we will be recovering over the next few months, and until then I am
not running any footraces!
wish you well in your research.