I suspect that the
material is factual.
Subject: more on chemtrail sunscreen
Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 11:35:12 +0100
"Everyone talks about the weather,
but nobody does anything about it."
The following is a letter (e-mail) written by a friend of a
correspondent. The writer appears to have an "inside track" on the
chemtrail spraying programme. There was an opportunity to ask specific
questions relating to the aerial spraying and the "insider" then
answered the questions.
I am aware of the insider's place of employment and the facts presented
conform with the type of activities that are carried out there.
The responses have the tone of someone with detailed inside knowledge
but for reasons of confidentiality it is unsigned. Where population is
mentioned also see the Holmestead
Population Explosion page.
It is a lengthy piece but when you reach the end please continue as
there is a second item following.
At 4 April 2003 some supplementary questions and answers have been
added. This makes the piece even longer and again the related item
follows. If you wish to skip the first section and go directly to the
new material click:
Points to Ponder:
The Shield Project.
Here we quote the communication from
Having read your email, I must say that you are full of questions. These
questions I would dismiss immediately as being the frustrated attempts
of fringe groups to bring a halt to the project, however these reports
of biological material being part of the spray should be addressed.
Therefore I will give as much attention to all of your questions as
1. What purpose do polymer threads imbedded with biological material
serve in this scenario?
Polymers are part of the mixture and they do form in threads and in
`tufts'. The idea is simple and comes to us from the spider. As you may
know spider webbing is very light, some newborn spiders spin a
`parachute' to catch the prevailing breeze to travel far from their
place of birth. Spiders have been able to attain high altitudes and
travel great distances for long periods of time. Most of the elements
used in the spray are heavier than air, even in their powdered form they
are heavier and will sink quickly. Mixing them with the polymers
suspends the particles in the atmosphere high above the surface for
longer periods of time, therefore in theory we do not need to spray as
often or as much material. Since the suspended particles eventually do
settle into the lowest part of the atmosphere and are inhaled by all
life forms on the surface there is an attempt to counter the growth of
mold by adding to the mixture mold growth suppressants - some of which
may be of biological material.
Mold comes in spores that travel on the winds; the polymers can attract
mold spores through static charges created by the friction of the
polymer threads and the atmosphere. Add a bit of warmth and moisture and
mold begins to grow. The polymer is stored in a liquid form as two
separate chemicals. When sprayed they combine behind the plane
`spinning' long polymer chains (threads). Much tinkering has been done
which the chemical matrix in past years. Many polymers (plastics) are
non-biodegradable thus add to the problem of pollution. Various formula
have been used, some which even use biological agents. It would be great
if we could reproduce the same web material that spiders make, it is
extremely strong, extremely lightweight and breaks down relatively fast
in the ecology.
2. If this spraying is to mitigate global warming, why does so much of
it take place at night?
Though it would appear that the dispersal rate of the spray is fast, it
is actually takes much longer to be an effective shield. There is a
desired concentration being sought. One that is thick enough to stem the
UV and the Infrared, while being thin enough to allow visible light
through. A perpetual cloud cover would have disastrous effects on plant
life; the food chain thus disrupted would soon collapse. The desired
effect wanted is a thin cover that would theoretically create a daytime
haze that allows plenty of sunlight while providing protection. From UV
radiation and also reflect enough infrared to maintain nominal
The optimal condition is to use the least amount of material to provide
the maximum amount of shielding. Ideally that would be a one-time
application which would stay suspended for years, however, as noted,
barium and aluminum and other trace elements are far heavier than air
and they sink rather rapidly. The different temperatures between day and
night causes massive volumes of air to rise during the night, the warm
air trapped at the surface rises above the cooling air above. By
strategically spraying in certain areas at night, we get the advantage
of the rising air, which not only pushes the material higher, but also
causes the material to disperse into a thin layer.
I would suggest studying on the subject of weather, namely highs and
lows and how air moves to fully understand the times of spraying. I
note, it is not just global warming we are combating here, we are also
combating UV Summer. Global warming could effectively be treated by
applications during the night, when the warm air rises. However the UV
needs to be treated during the day. This is why on some days one finds
that more spraying is done during the day. The UV indexes are monitored
constantly for local areas. If the problem were simply cooling the
earth, rockets would have been used to suspend particles in the high
atmosphere. However the delicate nature of the Ozone Layer precludes
this method of shielding. More on this in the answer to Question 6.
3. What other military programs are in place involving the spraying of
barium and what are their purposes? Do you know and understand the
chemical make up of the element?
A little knowledge will go a long way to understanding the need to use
barium: Barium is often used in barium-nickel alloys for spark-plug
electrodes and in vacuum tubes as a drying and oxygen-removing agent.
Barium oxidizes in air, and it reacts vigorously with water to form the
hydroxide, liberating hydrogen. In moist air it may spontaneously
ignite. It burns in air to form the peroxide, which produces hydrogen
peroxide when treated with water. Barium reacts with almost all of the
nonmetals; all of its water-soluble and acid-soluble compounds are
poisonous. Barium carbonate is used in glass, as a pottery glaze, and as
a rat poison. Chrome yellow (barium chromate) is used as a paint pigment
and in safety matches. The chlorate and nitrate are used in pyrotechnics
to provide a green color. Barium oxide strongly absorbs carbon dioxide
and water; it is used as a drying agent. Barium chloride is used in
medicinal preparations and as a water softener. Barium sulfide
phosphoresces after exposure to light; it is sometimes used as a paint
pigment. Barite, the sulfate ore, has many industrial uses. Because
barium sulfate is virtually insoluble in water and acids, it can be used
to coat the alimentary tract to increase the contrast for X-ray
photography without being absorbed by the body and poisoning the
Note what Barium Oxide can do, absorb carbon dioxide - one of the chief
gasses causing the green house effect. In my answer to Question 4 I will
discuss the need to carry a current in the shield. I would like to point
out that barium and aluminum work together to diffuse and strengthen an
electrical charge. Somewhat like the current produced when acid is
introduced between two dissimilar metals, such as iron and copper. There
are military applications for everything you can think of, can not a
butter knife be used as a weapon? The same concept holds true here.
4. What is the connection between ELF, EMF, VLF and Chemtrails spraying?
Or is there one?
To understand the use of radio waves in the shield, one first
understands how ozone is created. I cannot stress to you how dire the
situation really is. The shield in place is only a partial solution; we
must counter the depletion of the ozone- this means we must make ozone
in the stratosphere. Ozone at ground levels does no good; indeed, ozone
pollution at ground levels it what is used to determine the air quality.
Higher levels of ground level ozone mean that air quality is bad. Pure
ozone is an unstable, faintly bluish gas with a characteristic fresh,
penetrating odor. The gas has a density of 2.144 grams per liter at
standard temperature and pressure. Below its boiling point (-112?) ozone
is a dark blue liquid; below its melting point (-193?) it is a
blue-black crystalline solid. Ozone is triatomic oxygen, O3, and has a
molecular weight of 47.9982 atomic mass units (amu). It is the most
chemically active form of oxygen. It is formed in the ozone layer of the
stratosphere by the action of solar ultraviolet light on oxygen.
Although it is present in this layer only to an extent of about 10 parts
per million, ozone is important because its formation prevents most
ultraviolet and other high-energy radiation, which is harmful to life,
from penetrating to the earth's surface. Ultraviolet light is absorbed
when its strikes an ozone molecule; the molecule is split into atomic
and diatomic oxygen: 03+ ultraviolet light ->0+02. Later, in the
presence of a catalyst, the atomic and diatomic oxygen reunite to form
Ozone is also formed when an electric discharge passes through air; for
example, it is formed by lightning and by some electric motors and
generators. Ozone is produced commercially by passing dry air between
two concentric-tube or plate electrodes connected to an alternating high
voltage; this is called the silent electric discharge method. Since UV
radiation is the problem, we can not use UV to produce more
stratospheric ozone. Another method must be found. The shield acts like
one plate of the electrode, when tickled with certain radio waves; it
produces an opposite charge to stratospheric layers producing low
atmosphere to stratosphere lightening. Creating ozone where it is
5. If this is being done for the reasons you say, then why are other
chemicals being used, why are different sprays being used?
Correcting the ecological damage that mankind has done has NEVER BEEN
DONE BEFORE. We are relatively new to this notion of terraforming on a
real scale. That is what we are doing, Terraforming. We are trying to
recreate the ideal life-sustaining conditions on a dying planet. We have
never done this before, not intentionally. We are testing and trying
different methods. Granted, if we do nothing 89% of all species will go
extinct and humanity stands a high chance of not surviving through two
more generations (or less). However the idea of 2 billion casualties
death and permanent injury is not easy to swallow either.
Several attempts to improve the application of Shielding material and
getting the most out of each application are taking place all the time.
The combined resources of the nations of earth are not enough to allow
constant spraying. Though we have achieved a high level of technology,
there is a great surface area that needs to be covered nearly daily.
Large sections of ocean are all but ignored; the remaining land masses
are more than what can be covered effectively. The Shield would work
best if it was a single thin layer with out interruption, however due to
the movement of air, weather patterns and the sad fact that we do not
have the means to place ample amounts of material at the same level at
the same time we are getting a small fraction of the effectiveness from
6. Why is spraying found before storm fronts? Is it to cause drought?
Before a storm there is a front, the front clears the air before a
storm, pushing particulate matter ahead of it, leaving a space
relatively clear of particulate matter. UV radiation levels rise in
these areas, sometimes to dangerous levels. The shield must be
maintained. Since barium absorbs water as well as carbon dioxide,
precipitation has been affected. Other kinds of sprays are in
development and testing which may reduce the affects on precipitation.
As I stated above, this is a new technology we are working with, it is
still in its infancy and there are some problems with it.
7. Why are UFO's and disappearing spray planes reported?
I do not know.
8. What about the reports of sickness after spraying?
There are several causatives for this. Some people are more sensitive to
metals, whiles others are sensitive to the polymer chemicals. As stated
in a previous email, people will get sick, and some will die. It is
estimated that 2 billion worldwide will be affected to some degree by
the spraying. Without spraying we have a 90% + chance of becoming
extinct as a species with in the next 20 years.
9. What is the relationship between these spraying programs and One
Personally I am against the move for globalization, and yes, there is
potential to use the Shield to speed up the process of globalization,
there are several countries that are involved in this project: European
Union Nations, USA and Russia are the largest contributors to the
project, many of the allied nations and UN Members participate to one
extent or another. The material (chemical spray as you may call it)
comes from all of these nations.
To insure that the chemicals are not tampered with, they are mixed and
sprayed over random nations. This means that chemicals produced in the
USA has a good chance of being sprayed over Russia, England and the USA.
This random spray of material means that no nation would be certain that
their chemicals will be sprayed over a nation which they have issues
with. Russian planes may be seen in USA skies, but so too will USA
planes be seen in Russian skies. The canisters used are sealed in a
third nation that has no idea where its canister is going. Participating
nations have their observers at every station where canister loading is
done. All of this to insure that the shield is not used as a weapon. To
further insure that the shield is not used as a weapon, non participant
nations are sprayed by participants who must spray in order to get
enough material to maintain their nations shield. It is understood that
not spraying is as much a military offense as shooting at them.
Without the shield, UV poisoning would cause great death. The threat is
a common one, which has brought nations together in defense. The natural
outcome of having a common enemy is to strengthen international ties - a
step toward globalization.
10. Is the Spraying related to terrorism?
Yes and no. Recent terrorist activity can be traced to resistance groups
who feel that we should not interfere with the natural order of things.
As you know, there are many rumors out there as to what the Shield
Program is. Some believe that this is a population reduction scheme,
designed to kill off 'undesirable' peoples. While others hold that this
is a mind control program. There are many theories which have sinister
plots in them these are propagated by the resistance groups in an
attempt to stop the shield regardless of the consequences.
The same delivery method could be used for biological and chemical
warfare. It could also be used to inoculate large populations, the
effectiveness of these uses are low, there are better methods that can
be used. As a means to fight terrorism it is ineffectual, it is far
easier to inoculate a population individually and would insure full
inoculation against germ warfare.
11. Why all the secrecy?
Due to the severity of the situation it is mandatory to maintain public
calm for as long as possible. The Earth is dying. Humanity is on the
road to extinction - without the Shield mankind will die off with in 20
to 50 years. Most people alive today could live to see this extinction
take place. This means that an announcement of the situation we face
boils down to telling every man, woman and child on earth that they have
no future, they are going to be killed. People would panic. There would
be economic collapse, the production and movement of goods would
collapse. Millions would die in all cities on earth, riots and violence
would reduce civilian centers to rubble within days. Half of the
population in dense metropolitan areas would try to leave the cities
seeking 'safety' in the rural areas thinking that they would be safe.
Those left behind in the cities would be at war with their neighbors,
fighting for the remaining supplies. We would be telling the world that
the world is coming to an end, and even with the Shield the chances of
survival are small.
UV Summer and Global Warming are the immediate problems we face, there
are far greater problems that are raising their ugly heads and will
present new problems which in some cases have no viable solutions at
this time. Ecologies are collapsing. The extinction rate of species is
climbing. The amount of chemical pollutants in the water and soil are
fast approaching and in many places has surpassed the earth's ability to
heal itself. Crop failure is on the rise, even in the USA the returns on
crops are smaller than they were 10 years ago. Even with the advances in
genetically altered food crops, we are falling behind in our ability to
produce enough to go around. Throughout the 20th century chemical
fertilizers and pesticides were used to insure the best yields.
Unfortunately many of these have contaminated ground water, killed
beneficial insects along with the undesirable insects. These chemicals
have gotten into the food chain and are affected other species besides
mankind. It is only a matter of years before famine spreads like a
cancer throughout the world.
Clean fresh water is in short supply, in many places well water is
nonpotable, containing the run off of pesticides, herbicides and
fertilizers that have been used on crops and lawns. The water treatment
facilities we have are unable to scrub out all of the toxins we have
placed in the soil and water supply. Many of the toxins we find build up
over time in the body, a long slow poisoning which has been making its
presence felt in many areas of the world in the form of cancers,
leukemia, sterility, birth defects, learning disorders, immune
deficiency problems, etc. These are on the rise, any good researcher can
find the records. For decades there was public outcry for the end to
pollution. For every small step we made to clean up our production,
millions where born who added to the problem. Yes, pollution is down per
individual, however there are a couple more billion individuals
producing pollution, thus the real numbers have an increase in over all
pollution produced. Name a city that does not have problems with smog.
You would be hard pressed to find one. Though smog controls on
automobiles is higher than ever before, the number of autos on the road
has increased thus the amount of smog producing pollutants is higher
than ever before. All the clean air acts passed to curb individual
factory and auto emissions did not address the production of more
factories and more autos. Here an uneasy compromise was made between the
need to maintain the economy against the need to maintain the ecology.
The ecology lost since it was estimated to be a problem decades from
now. The economy was a problem that would have dire effects today.
All of these factors combined have produced a scenario that in shorts
boils down to the end of the world in 50 to 75 years. Even if we were to
stop all emissions of pollution today, the inertia of past decades is
enough to carry us over the brink in 100 years. However we cannot stop
the production of pollution, to do so would mean shutting down every
factory, every auto, every train, truck, ship and every household on the
planet. Electricity is used to heat many homes in the Western World. The
production of electricity produces fewer pollutants than heating all
homes with wood or coal. Cutting our power generation abilities down to
hydroelectric and fission reactors would leave a good chunk of the world
in the dark. It is an impossible situation, our civilization is geared
to the use of energy, take away our energy and civilization will
12. When will spraying stop?
There are several factors governing this:
A. Should the Ozone layer repair itself or our active attempts at repair
reduces the amount of ground level UV to acceptable levels, spraying
will stop. Present calculations place this between 2018 and 2024.
B. Should another method be found which is more effective, less costly
or presents us with long-term solutions the Shield project would be
C. When the other problems become too big to make the maintenance of the
shield worth the effort. The estimated date for this is 2025 to 2050.
13. Since Global Warming and UV summer are the problem, why is the
Government backing down on its pollution controls?
Because they are ineffectual and will cause more economic problems than
they would solve ecological problems. We surpassed the threshold of
Earth's ability to absorb pollutants in the 1970's. Since that time the
earth's population has nearly doubled. Emerging Industrial nations have
come into being, more pollutants are produced now than back then, even
with the stringent controls in place. The world is heading for economic
depression, more emission controls would add to the economic problems.
This translates into our being unable to do anything to start solving
Unfortunately our technologies require a strong economy to advance. We
need that advancement, we need the trillions of dollars spent on
research that a strong economy causes. Each corporation that produces a
product has a product development program in place. Many of the past
products invented came by accident through other unrelated products.
There is a corporate drive to find methods to clean up the ecology, to
reduce emissions, etc. These goals have been in place for decades, many
of the large corporations are in the know when it comes to the
ecological problems we face thus they are spending a great deal of money
and time on finding solutions to the problems we face. Take away the
economy and their research stops.
14. How are you related to the Chemtrails? How do you know that this is
what is happening?
I would prefer to not state who I am or how I am related to all of this.
To validate what I say, would require a bit of research on your behalf.
I would recommend the following subjects to look up and study:
A. Population numbers for industrial nations and the tons of pollutants
produced annually. Start with 1975 and work your way up.
B. Number of emerging Industrial Nations.
C. Number of cases of Skin cancers worldwide.
D. Crop Production vs. land area dedicated to crop production. Simple
math will show that more acreage is needed to produce food per
E. Automobile production from 1975 to present, estimated number of autos
on the road and the average emissions of later model cars produced as
compared the emissions of earlier model cars. A little math will show
that though individual autos produce less emissions, the amount of
emissions has risen due to the number of autos on the road. Remember
that many autos are the road that were built before present emission
control standards. 1980 is a cut off date - anything put on the road
before then produces more pollutants than autos produced today. I would
include research in the number of diesel autos produced, diesel has not
been under the emissions control acts.
F. Severity of storms and the number of severe storms. Also include heat
waves and droughts in that research, you will find that the numbers are
staggering when compared to data from 1950, 1960 and 1970.
G. Research how naturally occurring Ozone is produced in the
stratosphere. Compare to how it is produced industrially.
H. Research political reforms in the past 30 years, see which political
institutions have changed, which nations have joined with whom.
Concentrate more on these from 1982 onward. This would include the fall
of the Wall and Iron Curtain.
I. Research polymers and how they are made, look at recent research done
in biological polymers, medical polymers and filaments.
J. Check out spiders and spider web and the way spiders use their
different webs and threads.
K. Research clean fresh water estimates as compared to the 1970's to
today - world wide.
L. Research the following medical conditions per capita: Birth Defects
Cancers Leukemia Immune deficiency diseases (excluding virus borne ID
illnesses such as HIV) Occurrences of Learning disabilities, including
dyslexia, ADD, and over all IQ tests Sterility for both male and females
world wide Instances of glaucoma and cataracts.
M. Compare the history of UV indexes from 1970 to present. You may note
that it was on sharp rise until 1997-99.
N. I would strongly recommend researching the reactions of different
barium and aluminum compounds and how they are used. Research how long
it takes for these metals in pure form to oxidize, how they combine with
nitrates, carbon monoxide carbon dioxide and fluorocarbons and
hydrocarbons and water vapor.
O. Research how mold propagates, the conditions it needs to grow and
just how abundant it is in the atmosphere.
If you pursue these lines of inquiry, you will see the Shield Project as
it really is.
At the time of the US-lead invasion of Iraq I had the opportunity to ask
a few supplementary questions. There has been no attempt to integrate
these questions and answers into the previous section therefore some may
appear somewhat out of logical order.
A couple of the questions have a Canadian approach. By the way, I came
up with the name - have to call the source something!
Here we quote
the further communication from "Deep Shield":
15. Could you, "Deep Shield" - be described as a scientist or...?
Scientist is a good generic term. I do study and research in a
scientific manner. I carry papers and degrees. My official capacity is
in direct research of atmospheric issues in relation to pollutants. I
also create models of potential long-term effects of green house gasses
on the climate. Predict wind patterns, weather patterns, etc.
I have spent a good many years working on the project calculating the
amount of material needed and creating models for dispersion patterns. I
work other members who know the chemicals used and their interactions
with the atmosphere, pollution and water vapor. I am part of a team
which itself is part of a larger team, which is part of still a larger
team. Government work with many chiefs and levels above the workers.
16. Are you prepared to comment upon your personal motives for sharing
Not at this time, no.
17. Have you signed a non-disclosure or Secrets Act document that
specifically relates to this project?
18. To your knowledge what categories of individuals officially know of
the Project and are expected to remain silent? For example, my list of
suspects includes government down to the county level, military
especially air force, meteorologists, health specialists, mainstream
All those who know are expected to remain silent. All of those who
suspect are either faced with trying to prove the virtually unprovable
or are faced with good enough reasons to remain silent. I would assume
that this situation is worldwide and could be considered one of the
dangers of this project.
It was presented to me as a matter of national security. I can see the
reasons why there is a desire to repress the information not that
spraying is taking place but the hard little fact that we are facing a
period of human history which might be the end of civilization.
19. Is the mainstream controlled media specifically ordered to avoid any
mention of chemtrails? If so, have you anything further to add such as
how was this done?
I would assume that the Media is controlled by its own desire to make
money from what it reports. Since there is enough debunking out there,
which says that contrails are part of the normal use of jet engines in
the atmosphere, this would leave a reporter with very little to report
unless there was solid evidence or pictures or something that could not
be explained away.
You must know by now all the debunking methods that have been employed.
The 'official' announcements are the media's main dish. The rest they
regulate to the realm of the National Enquirer.
20. What government agency or agencies control this program? Is it under
It is an international program. Many nations contribute in different
ways. Measures have been taken to insure that what is sprayed over all
countries is the same through triple blind deliveries; which include not
knowing where a certain canister will end up, not knowing which aircraft
a certain canister will be flown, and not even knowing who (in military
craft) will be piloting a craft which has the purpose of spraying (Note:
in today's world there is usually a mixed crew of different
nationalities flying any one military aircraft on a Shield mission). I
believe the Media caught Canadians in Iraq recently when Canada's
official say on the matter was that Canada was not giving any support to
the military might.
The fact remains that there were Canadian military with the USA forces.
Some on aircraft carriers most being pilots. I think you can connect the
21. How is the project funded - who pays for it? Have you any idea of
the total direct operating cost? Also, does Canada make a funding
contribution for the activities in our skies?
Most governments tend to over charge themselves to cover for their black
operations (unofficial operations). That money comes out of the
collection of taxes. So in effect the taxpayers of the world are paying
for this project.
I would assume Canada does contribute funding to the Project. Canada is
one of the top nations contributing time, material and funding to this
project. Most of the Free World, the Western World, has taken on most of
the burden of the costs.
22. Is the Shield Project the only such aerial spraying program?
Is it the only project designed to avert ecological disaster? Then yes.
There are countless other projects that could be taking place which
include spraying of some sort or another. Pesticides are usually
sprayed. There has been great interest in weather control such as
bringing rain to arid regions and taking the punch out of hurricanes and
Weather control may be one of the final options left to us. Considering
the amount of global warming that has taken place. There is a strong
need to deflect a storm's fury, or to bring rain back to those regions
which have been suffering drought.
What Mother Nature has done for millions of years automatically may now
require mankind's hand to keep the schedule.
23. There are reports of four different chemtrail programs and other
"code" names. For example, see:
Holmestead: Chemtrails - what are they? Any comments?
It is possible that the Military does have a use for similar sprays. I
cannot speak for the Military. However, my own personal research has
come across these things as well. Are they possible? Yes. Are they
practical? Only in the small scale say over the battlefield, or in the
case of say the Iraq War, over Baghdad. Global application would be far
too expensive and would require an obvious flight pattern of grids,
circles and other heavy spray patterns.
24. Is all the spraying done using the "tank kits" described earlier or
are the KC-135R and KC-10 types filled to the brim? Such aircraft have a
load capacity of 200,000 pounds or more for refueling missions.
No. Several types of craft are used. Commercial jet airliners are used
and they are not diverted from their flight paths to do so. How the
canisters and the spraying is done on this kind of craft is unknown to
me exactly. I do have my suspicions. I know best that which is my field;
this is not to say that we do not talk around the water tank. So I know
more than just my area and am able to think the matter through to its
I do know that even all the commercial jetliners in use are not enough
to insure complete coverage all of the time. My computer models require
knowing how much material needs to be sprayed. Certain conditions cause
wide areas to suddenly (over hours) open up in the Shield. Then and only
then is mass spraying done - and would be done with the most logical
craft, a tanker.
Why not spray more from individual jetliners? That is one of the
problems. Jetliners do not carry much material (100 to 500 gallons)
because the material has to be spread out thinly.
Look at the kinds of material being used, aluminum, barium, titanium,
etc. Most are highly reflective; in some instances the material is an
absorber of gasses. In the case of reflection the desire is to reflect X
amount of heat and X amount of UV while still maintaining acceptable
(nominal) levels of UV and heat reaching the planet's surface.
Life requires a certain amount of both UV and Heat too much will kill -
so will too little. The apparent amount looks like a lot more than what
is actually being sprayed per volume of air it is covering. Most of the
whitening of the sky is not the material per se, but the collection of
water vapor, which forms into suspended ice crystals. The introduction
of the material causes the water vapor to collect like rain collects on
individual particles of dust.
Too much material would cause a "mud fall" of sorts where the naturally
occurring water vapor would precipitate carrying the material with it.
Spraying is done in such away as to "layer" the material through a
volume that will allow an acceptable level of UV and heat through along
with all the other wavelengths of light. Photosynthesis is the
foundation of life on our planet.
Only when all the material is removed in a local area does it require a
massive spray, this is usually in the front of a weather system, or
after a heavy period of precipitation. Then a tanker is flown, fully
25. Is there any truth in the story that some of the spraying is done by
jetliners with modifications in the "honey" or waste compartment? For
example, see mechanic story:
The technology used for spraying is rather simple. It requires at least
two tanks under pressure, each carries half of the mixture which is
sprayed at the same time forming a complete compound which is designed
to be lightweight (so as to be suspended for longer periods of time).
There have been attempts to incorporate the materials in jet fuel,
however the material binds with unburned jet fuel, water vapor, etc and
does not have the added buoyancy of the polymer threads. The end result
is a spray that is less than half as effective and is more dangerous
since it can lead to sulfates, acids and other mixtures, which are more
lethal than the spray.
It is very possible that the "honey" compartment is used. The amount of
material needed is small compared to the payload of any given commercial
However, there is a good deal of fuel tank that is not used. Airliners
only fuel their craft for the journey ahead of them; they rarely top off
the tank. This has become public knowledge in light of 9-11. It was this
small fact that caused the terrorists to pick pan-continental flights so
they would have a plane fully loaded.
The majority of flights are short range and do not require the full
capacity of an airliners fuel tanks. Any adaptations needed could easily
be done during routine maintenance, and could be easily explained away
as being a modification for safety and-or pollution controls.
This last is my own theory.
We can assume that any means possible to deliver the material is tried.
Independent nations may favor one way of doing so over another.
26. Where are the official sources that state that a certain number of
people (worldwide?) will sicken and possibly die as a result of the
spraying? In other words, what *internal* studies have been done on the
health issues and who carried them out?
WHO (World Health Organization) carried out most of the studies. Other
nations have carried their own research on the matter. Some have said
the ill effects will be minimal - along the lines of a million or so,
while others have found the numbers to be far higher - 3 to 4 billion.
Some of the organizations include the CDC and independent labs. We are
dealing with a situation where the amount of contamination is estimated
to be far higher than what would normally take place but is far lower
than historical instances of industrial contamination. This is important
to note, the only real history we have with barium/aluminum/titanium
etc. contamination is through factory workers, miners, etc, who receive
a far greater dosage of the material than what is to be experienced by
the populace under the Shield.
The amount of spray is very small compared to the volume of the space
that is covered. Most of the harmful chemicals that are used are being
dissipated over vast areas. Near coastal regions the fall out is not
reaching land at all, but is being carried out to the oceans. The
addition of polymers to make the material remain suspended in the air
longer means that less material is being used.
Today the material used and its application is nothing like in the early
days when it was sprayed in greater quantities and settling far faster
to be inhaled by all.
The accepted Estimated Casualties (from WHO) is 2 billion over the
course of 6 decades. The majority will be either the elderly, or those
who are prone to respiratory problems. These numbers are based on the
current estimates of the general health of the population, the average
age and the occurrence of respiratory problems as a health issue. All
are estimates since there are no solid numbers to work with.
27. Could you summarize the root causes of the initial destruction of
the atmosphere that requires this "repair" work? Did it perhaps result
in part from fluorides released/produced by the nuclear weapons
In a word - Industry. Most fail to understand that the products we use,
wear and live with are made in a manner that dumps CFC's and green
houses gasses into the atmosphere. There is no one single causative in
this issue. It goes way back to the Industrial Revolution and the use of
coal to power steam engines. Since that time we have consumed greater
and greater energy resources, dumping the waste where ever we wanted.
Up until very recently refrigeration was a big contributor, imagine all
those hundreds of millions of households that owned and operated freon
cooled refrigerators from 1940 to 1970. Not just one refrigerator per
household, but over the course of time often multiple freon units. This
doesn't include the various air conditioner systems or industrial
For a long period when the refrigerator or air conditioner unit was
replaced, the old one was taken to the dump and thrown into the heap -
the freon was free to escape and make its way up into the stratosphere
to eat away at the ozone layer.
You can add to that list. Think of all the cars that had air
conditioners, think of all those hair spray cans with their propellant
gasses - the amount of those alone were enough to do great damage.
Styrofoam is another industry and product that has contributed to the
problem. In the scheme of things atomic energy has contributed little
compared to the consumer goods that have been manufactured during the
Think of all the cars on the road today. In the late 1970's smog
controls started getting stronger. Think of all the pre-1978 cars on the
road - they are still producing a good many chemicals that leech into
every corner of the globe.
28. Have you any comment on the use of so-called "CloudBusters" based
upon the theories of Wilhelm Reich? For an example of this see:
I could go on for hours about the particular errors of this site. Let us
just cut to the chase: I seriously doubt that this machine does as it is
reported to do. I could be wrong, but then I do not work with
alternative energy sources such as Orgone energy.