|Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003
Two rigorous papers dealing with the MEG are published in Foundations of Physics Letters. They are:
M. W. Evans, P. K. Anastasovski, T. E. Bearden et al., "Explanation of the Motionless Electromagnetic Generator by Sachs's Theory of Electrodynamics," Foundations of Physics Letters, 14(4), 2001, p. 387-393.
For the second paper, the refereeing was particularly vigorous. A senior member of the board of directors of the company owning the Foundations of Physics journals objected to the paper on the grounds that it was forbidden perpetual motion. A rigorous defense was furnished in rebuttal, entitled "On Permissible COP>1.0 Maxwellian Systems". Among other things, we cited hard physics experiments that are replicable and that produce more EM energy out than one oneself inputs (e.g., negative resonance absorption of the medium). The referees were very knowledgeable physicists, and fully understood the rebuttal and its cited references. So the rebuttal was upheld, and the journal published the article.
Another explanation of the MEG, not quite so highly mathematical, is given in: T. E. Bearden, "Energy from the Active Vacuum: The Motionless Electromagnetic Generator," in M. W. Evans (Ed.), Modern Nonlinear Optics, Second Edition, 3-vols., Wiley, 2001; Vol. 2, p. 699-776. The 3 vols. comprising a Special Topic issue as Vol. 119, I. Prigogine and S. A. Rice (series eds.), Advances in Chemical Physics, Wiley, ongoing. Another explanation is given in T. E. Bearden, Energy from the Vacuum: Concepts and Principles, Cheniere Press, 2002, Chapter 7: Aharonov-Bohm Effect, Geometric Phase, and the Motionless Electromagnetic Generator.
In addition, the AIAS has published some 20 or more papers in leading physics journals, dealing with extracting EM energy from the vacuum.
Every charge and dipole in the universe already extracts EM energy from the vacuum, transduces it to real, observable EM energy, and pours it out in all directions at light speed, forming the associated EM fields, potentials, and energy.
The standard classical Maxwell-Heaviside equations implicitly assume that every EM field, EM potential, and joule of EM energy in the universe is freely created by the associated source charge, right out of nothing at all, in total violation of the conservation of energy law. Either one must totally abandon the conservation of energy law, or else one must explain what is the input of energy to the source charge.
The solution to that long vexing problem is given in T. E. Bearden, T. E. Bearden, "Giant Negentropy from the Common Dipole," Proceedings of Congress 2000, St. Petersburg, Russia, Vol. 1, July 2000 , p. 86-98. Also published in Journal of New Energy, 5(1), Summer 2000, p. 11-23. Also carried on DoE restricted website http://www.ott.doe.gov/electromagnetic/ and on www.cheniere.org. It is also given in my new book, Energy from the Vacuum: concepts and Principles, Cheniere Press, 2002, Chapter 3: Giant Negentropy, Dark Energy, Spiral Galaxies and Acceleration of the Expanding Universe. It is also given in M. W. Evans, T. E. Bearden, and A. Labounsky, "The Most General Form of the Vector Potential in Electrodynamics," Foundations of Physics Letters, 15(3), June 2002, p. 245-261.
Very best wishes,