electromagnetic systems involve not only positive energy (which you were
thinking exclusively in terms of) but also negative energy. They also
involve a rather precise balance in their two environmental components:
(1) the active vacuum, and (2) the active local curvatures of
spacetime. So the positive energy, negative energy, active vacuum, and
local spacetime curvature have to all be dealt with and "freeze framed"
and locked into a stable COP>1.0 operational state.
It's a horrendous
problem, else we would have done it long ago. One of our bench fellows
is a phase lock loop specialist, so simple clamped positive feedback is
a piece of cake for him. One can try it, and watch all his switching
transistors fail or even explode (they make nice little 1-foot diameter
fireballs, and the fragments stinging one's face do keep the bench
fellows on their toes). Bedini solved it first, without clearly knowing
the mechanism, so I was finally able to contribute the mechanism.
Bedini I have filed a patent application on the process, but he is the
major inventor and I only made very small contributions. There is
another easier way that we at Magnetic Energy Ltd. have discovered, but
it calls for an extremely complex and very expensive system buildup.
We are working on that method now, as we can, and have included it in a
second patent application already filed. Its mechanism is right out
there on the forefront of quantum electrical physics.
No textbook anywhere
discusses or gives the "supersystem" functioning --- all those
components (the system, the active vacuum, and the local curvatures of
spacetime --- which all interact with each other) that must be
absolutely synchronized and stabilized, which is what is necessary for
close-looping a COP>1.0 electrical system.
In the past a very few
inventors also stumbled onto variant methods accidentally, without
understanding the process at all, but just being able to do it by a way
that they found. I know of three of those, and their methods --- once
painfully deciphered --- are different yet again.
Hope this sheds a
little light on the subject.
Subject: Dear Dr. Bearden, about closed looping...
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 19:30:23 -0500
past several months I have been slowly absorbing into my mind more
information from your website. The whole concept you have resurrected
dealing with the scalar longitudinal waves is fascinated. I have now
realized that *all* of reality is completely engineerable. Time, space,
gravity, inertia, and every thing that makes up reality are just
different forms of these scalar waves that can be manipulated through
the use of scalar technology.
there is one concept that has boggled my mind. Perhaps you can explain
it to me.
stated that it is very difficult to "close-loop" the MEG or a free
energy device. That certainly sounds fair enough in one sense, because
we are dealing with an entirely new type of circuit. But in another
sense, it is down right bizarre.
what I understand the MEG is powered with electricity. Perhaps I am
incorrect, but it could be powered with the electricity coming from a
standard electrical outlet.
power the MEG to create the initial dipole this device then can achieve
a COP of at least 5 and up to 30 or more. But the point is of course the
amount of electrical power going out can be many times that going in.
have lets say one unit of electrical power going in, and another ten
going out for example.
ten units of power could be used to power a microwave, a lamp, a
television, and a computer for example.
question is as follows: why can you not simply and easily take "one" of
these units of electricity and feed it back into the MEG to close-loop
the device without any problem?
to me that if you generate electricity to power various other devices
with the MEG, then you should be able to re-route some of it back to the
example, what if the power company started using a MEG to power the
electrical grid. If you had a MEG at home could you power it from the
electricity, pumped into the grid, from another MEG?
say you rigged up a MEG to power just your house. Could you "plug in"
another MEG to an electrical outlet, inside of your home, and power it
as well? Would that be a closed-loop?
seems to me that some form of closed looping should not be too
difficult. If my thinking is flawed, please point it out to me, because
I am sincerely trying to understand this concept.
you very much for all of your efforts on the MEG.
PS: Is there a way to pre-order your book (Energy From the Vacuum:
Concepts and Principles)? I would like to order a copy right now! :-)