Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003
13:59:36 0400
Subject: RE: Mathematical Background for Leyton's Symmetry
Dear Mr Bearden,
I am from Atlanta, Ga. I
will be transferring back to Ga, either to UGA, or Tech. (Probably UGA,
although I have friends who go to Tech) I am pursuing a Physics Bachelor,
and want to get a Masters in something closely related (I see that you
took the path of nuclear engineering). I will probably minor in
mathematics, What math courses would you recommend to understand
Whittaker's decomposition, and Leyton's hierarchy of symmetry to its full
implications? My next step in math classes will be partial differential
equations, and in physics and I starting Modern Physics and Quantum
Mechanics.
ANS: For Leyton's work,
it's pure group theory. He derived the new geometry and hierarchies of
symmetry using pure group theoretic methods. I don't know of any
university teaching courses in his geometry as yet, but that should
eventually change. Whittaker's decomposition can be understood to first
order with standard U(1) electrodynamics. However, since each
longitudinal EM wavepair is a phase conjugate pair, one needs to update
one's interpretation of Whittaker's decomposition. From quantum field
theory, we find that neither the scalar (timepolarized) photon nor the
longitudinal photon can be individually observed, but the combination of
the two is observed as the instantaneous scalar potential. So Whittaker's
phase conjugate LW wavepair is actually a timepolarized EM wave coupled
to a longitudinal EM wave. This of course also completely changes the
entire notion of propagation of EM energy in 3space, which is a non
sequitur anyway. Nothing changes or moves in 3space along, but only in
4space. No time, no change. The confusion is because observation is a
d/dt operator imposed upon an ongoing 4space process. It destroys the
timeaxis (as is wellknown, all observation is 3spatial) and produces an
instantaneous frozen 3space snapshot, much like a motion picture still
(frame) taken by a "motion picture" camera. The process accomplishing
that d/dt is photon emission. Photon absorption by a 3space (frozen)
entity adds the time domain (and increases the mass a little), thus
producing the unobserved 4space process again. This is the real secret
behind duality (the old waveparticle argument which was never solved,
just abandoned).
So you should plan on
courses in group theory, and in quantum field theory, as well as the
quantum mechanics courses you will be taking. Leyton, I believe, is
placing a new manuscript with his publisher, giving (I hope) some of the
applications to physics of his new geometry and hierarchies of symmetry.
Unless Rutgers teaches some courses in it, I don't know of any others
(but I'm pretty much out of the loop with the universities).
For the higher symmetry
electrodynamics, a few universities do offer courses in quaternion
mathematics, but usually for aerodynamicists. Quaternions are very useful
in aerodynamics. The literature, however, has lots of quaternion work
scattered in it. A very good higher group symmetry EM is O(3) EM, founded
by Evans and Wigner. Evans is working on a textbook right now (to be
published by World Scientific). Evans heads the Alpha Foundation's
Institute for Advanced Study (an unfunded group of fine theorists and
scientists). They have a website,
www.aias.com, which contains much material. You can contact Evans
there if you wish, and for members of AIAS there is also a restricted DoE
website in advanced electrodynamics, carrying over 100 papers.
Do many universities even
offer Clifford algebra, or Klein geometry, etc?
Also, why do you call the
bidirectional wave pairs "engines"? (is it because they can be
Engineered?)
See above for the
algebra and geometry. For the other: One of the really serious flaws and
limitations in electrodynamics is its assumption of a flat spacetime
(which is only a gross approximation; every time the energy density of
space changes, spacetime is curved. Interestingly, that bidirectional
longitudinal EM phase conjugate wavepair (whew! Let's just call it a
"Wpair") has a rhythmic oscillation of the time density in its phase
conjugate wave (reinterpreted to be in accord with quantum field theory)
accompanying or correlated with a rhythmic oscillation of the spatial
energy density in the spatial LW component. That's a direct variation of
the curvature of spacetime, and it is a powerful curvature since time has
the same energy density as mass. E = ct^2 gives the rough spatial energy
equivalence of some time. (Remember, the fundamental units one uses in
one's physics model are totally arbitrary. Simply consider a model where
the joule is the only fundamental unit. In that case, mass is totally a
function of energy (no problem, after Einstein and the nuclear age), but
so is time (a real problem, since few of our physicists have reached the
point of considering time as energy). Anyway, each of those Whittaker
pairs, considered from the QFT view, is a very powerful wave of the
oscillation of the curvature of spacetime. That type of "curvature wave"
will act upon mass to produce real forces. Now thinking backwards, this
means that you can put a deterministic "set" or "pattern" of such wpairs
inside a scalar potential. Call that deterministic set an "engine". An
engine can be designed and inserted inside a scalar potential, to interact
with mass at any level and in any fashion desired! In the GR view, all
forces are results of the interaction of curvature of spacetime with
mass. So one can design and insert a deliberate pattern of forces (and
their dynamics) inside the scalar potential. This is why the potentials
on the membranes and every part of a cell in the body, are so important.
All the real action by the body's cellular control system is going on in
the "engines" inside those potentials.
Now Whittaker's 1904
paper shows that any EM field or wave can also be decomposed into
differential functions of two scalar potentials. This paper initiated
what today is called "superpotential" theory. Sadly, no one included in
those two "base" scalar potentials the further Whittaker decomposition of
1903 (the wwaves). Hence they totally missed the ability to form such
engines inside any EM signal, radiate a targeted mass or masses with the
signal, gradually deposit (integrate) those engines inside the targeted
mass, and thus directly affect, change, and engineer that mass from a
distance  including even inside the nucleons, to engineer the gluons
and quarks. In short, they missed a vast new superphysics  which of
course the Russians did not miss, but developed (highly classified by the
Russians) and weaponized. We cover that sort of thing in other
publications.
So that is the meaning
of "engines". An engine is a deterministic set of such coupled
timepolarized EM wave and longitudinal EM wave pairs, deliberately
inserted inside a carrier EM potential or field or wave. It can be used
for great harm, of course, but it also can be used for great good. The
human cellular restorative system (which does all the actual healing,
after the immune system has killed the bad guys and littered the
battlefield) uses this "internal" and far more fundamental EM. The
Russian weapons scientists call this area "energetics" (they borrowed an
older term and pressed it into use). Some 10 nations now have weaponized
this area or parts of it, yet our orthodox scientists still have not
really read and studied the combination of Whittaker two papers (1903 and
1904) or reinterpreted them in the light of QFT.
I particularly advocate
the crash development of mass treatment units, portable and about the size
of a large suitcase, to be able to effectively treat and save the mass
casualties we shall eventually have in our cities and population centers,
once the terrorists assets already in country are unleashed. If
interested in that, see my Porthole briefing on my website, and also the
provisional patent application I freely gave to the public domain, to the
peoples of the earth.
If I want to meet upcoming
professionals interested in the same field, do you have any forums, or
interest groups online or in Huntsville? ( I have joined the JLN labs
yahoo group, and read a lot of their postings)
Nothing much like that
is going on in Huntsville, except for a tiny bit of antigravity work by Li
Ning, and a couple other outfits. However, the funding for any such "out
of the box" here is vanishingly small and nearly non existent. In the
higher group symmetry O(3) electrodynamics, the AIAS group is directed by
Dr. Myron Evans, and their discussions, papers prepared and reviewed, and
papers submitted for publication are conducted by Email, since the
scientists are scattered through many nations.
The ordinary Internet
does contain a great deal of information, and also a great deal of
disinformation. One must sort out the actual scientific work from the
flame artists, "instant" experts (often with a B.S. degree in EE only),
etc. Some of them of course are doing excellent work. Others have a mind
game going. You can particularly recognize the scurrilous ones by their
habit of making vicious ad hominem attacks on anyone really trying to
approach these areas scientifically. Look for the discussion of the
scientific part of the problem, such as the source charge problem, what
unified field theory is and where it has progressed to, lists of hard
science references in the refereed scientific literature, etc. But these
days a Google search, adroitly applied and filtered, can give you lots of
very valuable information, papers, etc. The trick is to keep it
scientific, and filter out the wheat from the chaff.
On a slightly different
subject, I have read that Hieronymous was able to conduct electricity
through an indigo ink circuit... would you speculate this was accomplished
via virtual fields and the intentions of the mind (being used as a scalar
interferometer)??
Such devices make use of
the fact that a human being also has a quantum potential connecting his
body. The quantum potential (in Bohm's interpretation of quantum
mechanics) is everywhere it's going to be, at once, with no "travel in
between". Remember we pointed out that the notion of "energy transmission
through 3space" (originated by Heaviside and Poynting in the 1880s, and
before that not appearing in physics) is an oxymoron, since all changes
occur in 4space, not 3space. What actually "propagates" is the iterative
appearance at 3spatial points (say, along a line of "travel" or
"perception of travel position") of a circulation of EM energy from the
time domain into the 3space at that point and return to the time domain.
That's for the negative charge; for the positive charge, there is a
circulation going the other way. It is that CIRCULATION process that
actually "spreads" in 4space, and we iteratively detect 3space energy
intersections of that ongoing 4circulation with our instruments at
iterative 3space points, in sequence.
All that said, the
quantum potential is rather like an ordinary scalar potential in the
Coulomb gauge (which is instantaneous also, but which is usually confined
to the 'near field'. The QP is not limited to the near field. But as a
scalar potential, it has an internal Whittaker structuring, and thus can
transport an "engine". The "operator" of the Hieronymus device uses his
own personal QP (with perhaps some assisted "tuning" from the device) to
form the necessary internal engine (an adaptation of his unconscious use
of his cellular control system, which uses this exact process in the
body). Also, any two objects that have interacted with each other by
photon interaction, thereafter have a very weak QP connection between
them. An object that has so interacted and developed a QP connection with
a person (or an object such as an agricultural field) is said to be a
"witness", meaning a little "tuner" which has such a standing QP
connection with the object of interest. A person has such a weak QP
connection with one of his fingernail cuttings, lock of his hair, etc.
Obvious a photograph contains such a connection. Some rather rigorous
scientific tests of insect control at a distance, by treating the
photograph of an agricultural field and its crops (placing insecticide on
the photograph) have been successfully conducted. A variation of double
blind testing has also been used in at least one very successful set of
tests.
Anyway, that is the
theory of the Hieronymus device. He did not induce "current through the
ink drawing" as such. Instead, he introduced the 4space engine for the
"spread of that 4circulation of EM energy" that is usually interpreted in
the old fashion.
In the present world
situation, five nations have very powerfully developed quantum potential
weapons, which are the most powerful weapons on earth. Some of the
testing and uses of those weapons are covered in my old book, recently
updated a bit, called FerdeLance.
The engine concept has
also been weaponized and further extended by the Russians, in a very
bizarre fashion. Imagine a functioning system, a robot having various EM
functions and mechanical functions, computer processing, signal and
communications processing, and EM weaponry. Now leave that system's
entire gestalt functioning, but just remove the mass. voila! You have a
functioning set of engines and their dynamics. call that an "engine
robot" system. Now insert that system into some charged mass, and allow
it to interact with the charged mass. You have real, physical "system
functions and actions" emerging in the mass!
Further, you have to
have a carrier or "container" for that set of engines (for the engine
system or engine robot). Fine, just embed it in an EM signal or EM
potential. E.g., record that "engineembedded" EM signal on a CDROM.
Now copy that CDROM. You copy not only the external "envelope" signal,
but its inner contents  the "engine system"  as well.
It appears to be
horribly difficult to make one good debugged engine robot system. Once
you have made one, perhaps costing a billion dollars, you can then grind
them out like sausages for less than $1 apiece.
With the communications
function, you can also communicate with each and every robot system, via
longitudinal EM waves. By having a number registry that can be set, you
can give each one a number or individual "name". Voila! You have created
an eerie kind of robot army, and these robots can travel through any EM
field, potential, or signal. E.g., mass (such as the earth and the ocean)
is largely empty space filled with fields and potentials. Hence it is a
vast superhighway through which the robots can easily travel. A signal
from a satellite in orbit can be received, and a robot can be sent back
through the signal beam right into the guts of the satellite. And so on.
This too has been
weaponized, and tested on a rather giant scale. It was also effective
countered by a friendly little nation.
Anyway, once we turn to
the Hdevice and to the use of "engine robot systems", you can begin to
see the possibilities (for both good and evil, unfortunately) for such
technology.
I Greatly Appreciate any inputyou might have on the subject!
Thank You!
Ryan
Best wishes to you,
Ryan, and I wish you well in your education program.
Tom Bearden
