The Tom Bearden

Help support the research


Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 00:39:54 -0600
A "New" and Incredibly Powerful Terrorist Weapon of Mass Destruction
 Below is an article on a possible indicator of a most serious strategic potentiality, since it involves a  new kind of "weapons of mass destruction" (WMD) strategic  threat  to the United States (and to the entire Western world) as potent as an all-out nuclear strike from Russia  with the Russians firing everything they've got. The actual weapon to be used is an old weapon developed and deployed in the early 1960s, but with a novel application.
 From the article, it seems something odd may be going on vis a vis quake reporting  also. If this report is true, then the U.S.  may have deliberately refrained from reporting a fairly large quake near the super caldera associated with Yellowstone.
This follows the same  quake reporting USGS folks removing from their website a previously reported quake activity in the Bering straits.  
If that Yellowstone quake was indeed a manmade event, then someone (most probably the Yakuza /Aum Shinrikyo teams in Russia , using their scalar interferometers leased from the Russians  at the end of 1989) could be tuning up a U.S. catastrophe of  truly gigantic  proportions. If a  sudden eruption of that giant Yellowstone caldera were deliberately stimulated, there would be hell to pay across the  entire United States  and much of the world , with horrible results that could destroy North America and even threaten the extinction of human life on earth.  The situation is further exacerbated by the fact that, in the view of many geophysicists, the Yellowstone caldera is in a geological period when just such a natural eruption could occur anyway. This means there is lots of natural geological stress already on the caldera, rendering it much easier to stimulate a very powerful eruption with catastrophic consequences.
Note also the proximity to the coming giant strategic Russian exercise. This may be the communist-dominated faction  of the FSS/KGB (which controls the energetics superweapons) allowing their lessee Yakuza  client to participate in the planning and preparation for  that  strategic exercise.
In 1997 the U.S. government actually confirmed the use of "electromagnetic weapons" to stimulate volcanoes into eruption, control the weather, and induce earthquakes.  One can easily observe and photograph the ongoing weather engineering all over the U.S., and particularly here in Huntsville , and we have published such results for decades . Here's  a statement by  Secretary Cohen (then U.S.  Secretary of Defense) 1997 on the subject, in a direct quotation:

"Others are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves… So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations…It's real, and that's the reason why we have to intensify our efforts, and that's why this is so important." 

[Secretary of Defense William Cohen at an April 1997 counterterrorism conference sponsored by former Senator Sam Nunn.  Quoted from DoD News Briefing, Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, Q&A at the Conference on Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and U.S. Strategy, University of Georgia, Athens, Apr. 28, 1997].

In addition to continuing to  operate and use their leased Russian interferometry weapons on site in Russia, the Yakuza/Aum Shinrikyo also took the technology back to Japan with them, and set up their own  weapons production facilities there. They apparently used them to kill certain Japanese politicians opposing the Yakuza  . This  was  not an activity of the Japanese government!  
Scalar interferometry  weapons  theory  originates from the two Whittaker papers of 1903 and 1904, and the science is rigorous, although it is not ordinary electrical engineering.  The former Soviet Union deployed the first strategic scalar interferometer weapons in 1963, using one to kill the U.S.S. Thresher nuclear submarine off the U.S. coast.  To build scalar interferometry weapons, one has to first develop longitudinal EM wave technology. To see a  rigorous theoretical explanation of this kind of effect in higher group symmetry electrodynamics, by a master theorist, see M. W. Evans et al., "On Whittaker's Representation of the Electromagnetic Entity in Vacuo, Part V: The Production of Transverse Fields and Energy by Scalar Interferometry," Journal of New Energy, 4(3), Special Issue, Winter 1999, p. 76-78. 
The Yakuza definitely should be accounted as a major though very clandestine  world terrorist organization, absolutely dedicated to the  total destruction of the United States. Because they have scalar interferometry weapons,  the Yakuza are potentially much more deadly  strategically than the Al Qaeda. Those Yakuza  scalar interferometry weapons still operated on site in Russia are under the direct  operational control of the KGB/FSS. We may be watching one more preparation by the Yakuza, tuning up and doing an artillery registration  with these interferometry weapons to be able to initiate one or more caldera events in the U.S.  The potential super caldera involved could be stimulated into an event so catastrophic that  it could destroy America and even pose a threat to the extinction of all humanity were such desired.  For the FSS/KGB to allow the Yakuza crews to set up that capability would certainly pacify  the Yakuza clamor to  directly participate in any eventual destruction of the U.S. The Yakuza used these same interferometers to shoot down the TWA-800, e.g.   and are using them right now to strongly engineer the weather over North America and elsewhere. 
There are at least two other such calderas in the United States (see enclosed article s ), which also could be targeted by  Yakuza  hostile scalar interferometry.
If this quake  in Yellowstone  is a deliberate  warm-up test it should be closely followed by  world intelligence analysts as a possible "hostile registration" of superweapons for what could then be  a highly unorthodox but terrible  strategic strike  on the U.S. that  could destroy the  entire  nation in a single blow. Please read the enclosed articles, which are just a small sampling of what such stimulation of one or more caldera eruptions could do.
Again, the U.S. Secretary of Defense publicly confirmed the hostile use of these weapons to initiate quakes and stimulate volcanic eruptions.  So the weapons are known to be already being used in just such fashion. The Yellowstone caldera is also known to be one of the largest on earth, and capable of doing the damage to totally destroy the U.S. and even much of the Earth. This is not foolishness, but deadly serious information.
Tom Bearden 
ADAS, Feb. 8, 2004 

See response from USGS below - Webmaster

Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 3:00 PM

Large Yellowstone Area Quake Goes Unreported...02/07/04
by Mitch Battros (ECTV)

Earth Changes TV exclusive!

A 'large-moderate' 5.3 magnitude earthquake occurred in the Yellowstone Super-Volcano area yesterday, February 6th. It is posted on the European-Mediteranian Seismological Center (EMSC) site:

When I posted this startling report in yesterday's article: I was soon flooded with emails telling me this earthquake has not been reported by the United States Geological Survey (USGS)
USGS site:

Did I stumble onto a cover-up? Is our government willfully omitting information which is known in all geological and seismological disciplines as a top rated priority? Was it simply an 'oversight'? This is a formal call to all governmental bodies. I am requesting your participation, and response to this potentially hazardous event. I promise equal and measured air time, and will provide a transcript for your records, and our audience.

Please pass this delicate information to your news groups and friends. I am determined a possible cover-up shall not prevail.

Here is my evidence:

    DATE       TIME      LAT    LON   DEP     MAG   AM  NET    REGION NAME

2004/02/06 19:03:33.3  43.5N 105.1W 264   mb5.3   A  NEIA       WYOMING

DAT: 200402061923 GMT

          The following is an UNCHECKED, FULLY AUTOMATIC LOCATION from the
                     USGS/NEIC National Seismic Network System:

     WYOMING                                                               ENAU

     dat =  6 FEB 2004  ( 37)                                prelim
     ot  = 19:03:33.33   +/-   1.79             Ellipsoid (az,pl,90% CI)
     lat =      43.532   +/-   18.4              262.6  73.6  102.3 km
     lon =    -105.112   +/-   25.7               66.0  15.8   28.7 km
     dep =       264.1   +/-   63.8              157.3   4.5   28.0 km

     nph =   22 of  33    se = 3.49             gap =  93.9   avh =  21.7  poor

     80 km (50 miles) WSW of Newcastle, Wyoming (pop 3,000)
     90 km (55 miles) NNE of Douglas, Wyoming (pop 5,000)
     90 km (55 miles) SSE of Gillette, Wyoming (pop 17,000)
     270 km (165 miles) N of CHEYENNE, Wyoming

     FE=460    PKP

 mb = 5.3 (  2)  ML = 0.0 (  0)  mblg = 0.0 (  0)  md = 0.0 (  0)  MS = 0.0r(  0)

 sta  phase     arrival     res   dist azm    amp  per mag     amp  per mag  sta
 BW06 P?      19:04:24.43  -6.3    3.3 258 d:2.6+2     4.1X L:1.1-1 .68 3.4X BW06
                                           g:6.3-2 .68 3.2X
 ISCO P?      19:04:34.35  -0.9    3.7 186 d:2.1+2     4.0X L:7.5-2 .83 3.4X ISCO
                                           g:5.2-2 .83 3.1X
 LKWY P?      19:04:36.55  -1.0    3.9 287 d:1.4+2     3.7X L:3.2-2 .43 3.1X LKWY
                                           g:2.7-2 .85 2.8X
 YMR  P?      19:04:41.27  -1.2    4.4 287 d:1.6+2     3.9X                  YMR
 BOZ  P?      19:04:47.12  -4.3    5.1 297 d:2.2+2     4.5X L:3.2-2 ..83 3.4X BOZ
                                           g:2.5-2 .93 2.9X b:2.2+0 .30 3.5X
 HWUT P?      19:04:49.22  -2.5    5.1 250 d:2.4+2     4.6X L:6.2-2 .85 3.7X HWUT
                                           g:5.2-2 .98 3.2X b:6.5+0 .40 3.9X
 TCUT e?      19:04:52.92  -0.2    5.3 245                                   TCUT
 AHID P?      19:04:53.17   9.7X   4.4 262 d:2.3+1     2.0X L:4.7-2 ..73 3.4X AHID
                                           g:2.9-2 .73 3.0X
 QLMT P?      19:04:53.88   7.1    4.7 288 d:3.5+1     2.5X                  QLMT
 JLU  P?      19:04:56.10  -0.7    5.6 240 d:1.6+2     4.3X                  JLU
 DAU  P?      19:04:56.77   0.2    5.5 238 d:2.2+2     4.6X                  DAU
 LCCM e?      19:04:59.11   4.8    5.3 298 d:4.9+1     3.1X                  LCCM
 HVU  P?      19:05:00.54  -0.7    5.9 255 d:1.6+2     4.4X                  HVU
 SPUT P?      19:05:00.72   0.1    5.9 250 d:1.6+2     4.4X                  SPUT
 SDCO P?      19:05:04.01   4.3    5.8 183 d:2.1+2     4.7X L:1.6-2 ..93 3.2X SDCO
                                           g:1.3-2 .93 2.7X b:1.8+0 .38 3.4X
 HRY  P?      19:05:04.38   5.5    5.7 306 d:1.3+2     4.2X                  HRY
 PV10 P?      19:05:04.55   2.9    5.9 211 d:2.1+2     4.7X                  PV10
 PV01 P?      19:05:04.69   2.4    6.0 207 d:2.3+2     4.8X                  PV01
 RW3  e?      19:05:05.67   8.0X   5.6 201 d:6.0+1     3.4X                  RW3
 NLU  P?      19:05:06.85   0.6    6.3 238 d:1.8+2     4.7X                  NLU
 CHMT P?      19:05:08.47  -2.1    6.7 303 d:2.0+2     4.9X                  CHMT
 DUG  P?      19:05:10.27  -0.1    6.6 243 d:2.2+2     5.0X L:1.7-2 ..78 3.4X DUG
                                           g:1.1-2 .78 2.8X b:4.8+0 .38 3.9X
 MPU  P?      19:05:22.25  19.8X   6.0 236 d:2.2+1     2.5X                  MPU
 CBKS P?      19:05:33.23  28.2X   6.2 137 d:1.6+1     2.2X L:5.4-2 ..70 3.8X CBKS
                                           g:4.6-2 .93 3.3X
 ULM  P?      19:05:43.27   0.5    9.2  40 d:7.4+1     4.7X L:8.6-3 .65 3.5X ULM
                                           g:8.1-3 .93 2.8X b:4.5+0 .65 3.7X
 MSU  P?      19:05:44.13  25.3X   7.3 229 d:1.8+1     2.7X                  MSU
 MVU  P?      19:05:44.80  25.7X   7.3 229 d:2.1+1     2.9X L:9.9-3 ...78 3.3X MVU
                                           g:7.2-3 .83 2.7X
 WUAZ P?      19:05:59.33  14.9X   9.3 213 d:3.1+1     3.9X L:1.4-2 .83 3.8X WUAZ
                                           g:1.0-2 .85 3.0X
 ACSO e?      19:07:11.53  -3.0   16.8  94 b:9.4+0 .25 4.8                   ACSO
 SDMD P?      19:07:56.96  -5.2X  21.5  91                                   SDMD
 CBN  P?      19:07:56.99  -5.7X  21.6  95 b:1.3+2 .30 5.9                   CBN
 TWB  P?      19:08:33.20  25.2X  22.1 110                                   TWB
 ESLA P?      19:14:48.86  25.5X  70.9  53                                   ESLA

 Hypocenter records:
 P N  Src     Time        Lat     Long     Dep   SD Gap   Avh   Pu   Pa PuGS PaGS
 c 1 GS    19:03:33.34?  43.532 -105.112 264.1! 3.5  93  21.7   22   33   22   33

 Pub Flags:
Not written

Generated 2004 FEB  6 at 19:18 UTC

Reception date: 2004/02/06-19:23

Subscribe To ECTV For Full Access:

Receive Your "Free" ECTV Newsletter:

About Mitch:

Survival Tips:

Mitch Battros
Producer - Earth Changes TV





resurgent calderas in US.htm

Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 07:56:48 -0700
From: Stuart Sipkin <>


Your website, and the page at , were brought to my attention by a fan of yours.

Unfortunately Mitch Battros cannot read a map, and you have uncritically passed along his erroneous information without doing any fact checking.  The coordinatesof the event listed on his, and your website, 43.5N 105.1W, are nowhere near Yellowstone. This location is in eastern Wyoming, approximately 270 miles from Yellowstone.

  For what it is worth, the NEIC does not, and never has suppressed earthquake information. There are, however, cases where earthquake listings have been removed. The reason for this is that, while fairly reliable, and getting better all the time, the system that locates and computes the magnitudes of earthquakes automatically sometimes gives bad results, especially for events that are not well recorded. Upon analyst review, these erroneous entries are deleted. An excellent example of this the event referenced by you that turned out to be a mine blast near Gillette, WY on February 6, 2004. The automatic system, based upon what, for us, is a minimal amount of data, computed an epicenter in eastern Wyoming. The EMSC solution listed below is actually the NEIC automatic solution that the EMSC reproduced on their website (note the "NEIA" source). Because of the sparseness of the data, however, the depth was computed to be 264 km. This was a "red flag" that the location was not well constrained by the data. In addition, the amplitudes from some stations that are known to be not very well calibrated yielded an automatic magnitude of 5.3. Upon review by an analyst, this event turned out to be a mine blast at one of the mines near Gillette, WY. Since we try to keep explosions and earthquakes separate, this event does not appear in our earthquake listings. It does, however, appear in our Routine Mining Seismicity Bulletin at .  A person unfamiliar with our procedures, who had seen the automatic location and magnitude, might erroneously presume that this event had been "covered up". It is precisely because of these inaccurate automatic solutions that we prefer to widely distribute only the reviewed solutions.

  Stuart Sipkin USGS/NEIC