The Tom Bearden
Website

Help support the research

 

Subject: RE: Possible lab funding for US lab
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 16:51:41 -0600

 

Dear Tim,

 

Will forward your E-mail to Dr. Lee Kenny, who controls all MEG negotiations and schedules and is CEO of our little company, Magnetic Energy Ltd.  I'm just one of the technical fellows.  We are engaged in some pressing negotiations with multiple groups at present, so don't know what Lee's schedule and availability, etc. is.  He will have to contact you with regards to that.  Will just have to see if he is interested in pursuing it etc.  Our greatest need at the immediate moment is about $50K worth of laboratory equipment, for the special phenomenology and development testing we are engaged in.  We frankly just don't have as yet the $30K scope and $10K power supply we need, etc.

 

We don't reveal the specific foreign nation involved with us on the MEG project; there are some very strange and powerful folks out there who really do not wish any such "energy from the vacuum" project done.  However, there are already English texts in higher symmetry electrodynamics. E.g., see M.W. Evans, "O(3) Electrodynamics," in Modern Nonlinear Optics, Second Edition, 3 Vols., edited by M.W. Evans, Wiley, New York, 2001, Part 2, p. 79-267.  In the 3 volume set there are several papers by Evans, and many other pertinent papers in higher symmetry electrodynamics.  Evans is seeking a personal grant (should be about $50K) to actually write an entire O(3) textbook for formal publication.  I attach a listing of  the papers in the 3-volume Modern Nonlinear Optics set.  The set can be purchased, e.g., from Amazon.

 

So far as I'm aware, an individual cannot protect himself from strikes by EM and large scalar EM weapons -- just as one cannot really protect oneself from an atomic bomb strike on his head.  The best "defense" is a capable offense by the nation, which several Western nations do have, and a couple other friendly nations have as well.  Were there not credible deterrents already deployed, we would long ago have been destroyed.

 

The U.S. is definitely not ignoring these weapons, as shown by the SecDef's public statement (quoted elsewhere on this website) in 1997.

 

The AIAS reference for demonstrating the theory of scalar interferometry is M.W. Evans et al., "On Whittaker's Representation of the Electromagnetic Entity in Vacuo, Part V: The Production of Transverse Fields and Energy by Scalar Interferometry," Journal of New Energy, 4(3), Winter 1999, p. 76-78.  Actually any superpotential theory can do the same, and so different models can be put together, depending upon what kind of potential one wishes to utilize in the weaponry.  The best weapons way is to use longitudinal EM wave interferometry, since good-quality LWs travel easily through the earth and the ocean, with little attenuation.  The U.S.S. Thresher was destroyed with such in April 1963, as was the Arrow DC-8 at Gander, Newfoundland on Dec. 12, 1985.  And several other hostile tests against aircraft, missiles, etc.

 

The greatest help with the Priore extension effort would  of course be funding to get on with it (and I can personally sympathize with that, because my own funds are quite limited). Since I can only work about half-schedule now because of medical reasons, one finds that one simply cannot get done what should be done.  Mr. Tony Craddock, who kindly prepares this website, is handling our Priore extension project and the search for funding.  There is a massive briefing of some 119 slides on the Cheniere.org website, regarding that methodology and its promise.  I would envision a multi-staged funding process: (1) first assemble a proper team of scientists with the necessary different disciplines, and prepare a thorough and rigorous exposition of the proposed work in all its aspects, the necessary theory, the medical research support, etc.  Some laboratory work would also be advisable, to build up at least a small and rough prototype to show how the process would be handled in terms of potential equipment embodiment.  (2) Based on this study (which would require about a year, I think), then a detailed project can be laid out quite thoroughly, with schedules, funding and staffing requirements, animal testing requirements, etc.  Major funding would be needed for launching and doing the research to actually accomplish the project.  Something like that is what is needed.  I've done the best I can, as one person, and have broken the fundamental mechanism and dramatically extended it.  Now my "limited overview" needs real depth and teeth to be added, by a highly qualified multidisciplinary team (no single scientist has all the required disciplines!).

 

And thanks for the kind words, they are much appreciated.

 

Best wishes,

 

Tom Bearden, Ph.D.


 
Subject: Possible lab funding for US lab
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 09:50:34 -0800

Please pass on to Dr. Bearden
I have also been fascinated and inspired by your work.  I pray the best for
you to continue your great work.

I want to be able to get your MEG to the world. I do have contacts that
could give funding for a lab to help. This is a non-profit trust with
substantial holdings. Would you put together a summary of the MEG that I
could use for promoting support? Perhaps they can add funding to the work
already being done by the lab in the friendly country you mention.  Would
this be of interest to you and the group?

Additional questions:
1. You mention that the friendly country has been teaching electromagnetic
differently than the US for 12 years.  Can we get translations of the texts?
How do we get this going in the US?

2. I personally want one of your books and a MEG as soon as they become
available. Is there a pre-release or first order list of these available? If
specs on the MEG look ok the trust I mention would be willing to buy a
substantial amount of them.

3. Is there anyway an individual can protect himself from the EM weapons and psychoenergetics weapons?

4. Are we sure the US is ignoring these weapons?

5. What is the AIAS reference for the weather manipulation technology paper?

6. How can we help with the Priore research?

Regards

Tim


Modern Nonlinear Optics, Second Edition

Edited by M. W. Evans

Wiley, New York, 2001 (3-volumes)

 

List of Papers

 

Part I (Volume 1)

 

Ryszard Tanas, "Quantum Noise in Nonlinear Optical Phenomena," p. 1-77.

 

Zgigniew Ficek, "Quantum Interference in Atomic and Molecular Systems," p. 79-154.

 

Adam Miranowicz, Wieslaw Leonski, and Nobuyuki Imoto, "Quantum-Optical States in Finite-Dimensional Hilbert Space.  I.  General Formalism," p. 155-193.

 

Wieslaw Leonski, and Adam Miranowicz,, "Quantum-Optical States in Finite-Dimensional Hilbert Space.  II.  State Generation," p. 195-213.

 

Zbigniew Ficek and Ryszard Tanas, "Correlated Superposition States in Two-Atom Systems," p. 215-266.

 

Tadeusz Bancewicz, Yves Le Duff, and Jean-Luc Godet, "Multipolar Polarizabilities from Interaction-Induced Raman Scattering," p. 267-307.

 

V. V. Dodonov, "Nonstationary Casimir Effect and Analytical Solutions for Quantum Fields in Cavities with Moving Boundaries," p. 309-394.

 

Alexander S. Shumovsky, "Quantum Multipole Radiation," p. 395-490.

 

Jiri Bajer, Miloslav Dusek, Jaromir Fiurasek, Zdenek Hradil, Antonin Luks, Vlasta Perinova, Jaroslav Rehacek, Jan Perina, Ondrej Haderka, Martin Hendrych, Jan Perina, Jr., Nobuyuki Imoto, Masato Koashi, and Adam Miranowicz, "Nonlinear Phenomena in Quantum Optics," p. 491-601.

 

David L. Andrews and Philip Allcock, "A Quantum Electrodynamical Foundation for Molecular Photonics," p. 603-675.

 

Mendel Sachs, "Symmetry in Electrodynamics: From Special to General Relativity, Macro to Quantum Domains," p. 677-706.

 

 

Part II (Volume 2)

 

B. Lehnert, "Optical Effects of an Extended Electromagnetic Theory," p. 1-77.

 

M. W. Evans, "O(3) Electrodynamics," p. 79-267.

 

R. Z. Zhdanov and V. I. Lahno, "Symmetry and Exact Solutions of the Maxwell and SU(2) Yang-Mills Equations," p. 269-351.

 

P. Szlachetka and K. Grygiel, "Chaos in Optical Systems," p. 353-427.

 

Boguslaw Broda, "Non-Abelian Stokes Theorem," p. 429-468.

 

M. W. Evans, "The Link Between the Sachs and O(3) Theories of Electrodynamics," p. 469-494.

 

M. W. Evans, "The Link Between the Topological Theory of Ranada and Trueba, The Sachs Theory, and O(3) Electrodynamics," p. 495- 499.

 

J. R. Croca, "Beyond Noncausal Quantum Physics," p. 501-556.

 

Patrick Cornille, "Electrodynamics and Topology," p. 557-611.

 

Carl E. Baum, "Quantum Electrodynamics: Potentials, Gauge Invariance, and Analogy to Classical Electrodynamics," p. 611-638.

 

Thomas E. Bearden, "Extracting and Using Electromagnetic Energy from the Active Vacuum," p. 639-698.

 

Thomas E. Bearden, "Energy from the Active Vacuum: The Motionless Electromagnetic Generator," p. 699-776.

 

 

Part III (Volume 3)

 

M. W. Evans and S. Jeffers, "The Present Status of the Quantum Theory of Light," p. 1-196.

 

Antonio F. Ranada and Jose L. Trueba, "Topological Electromagnetism with Hidden Nonlinearity," p. 197-253.

 

Nils Abramson, "Ellipsoids in Holography and Relativity," p. 255-295.

 

D. F. Roscoe, "Astrophysics in the Dark: Mach's Principle Lights the Way," p. 297-333.

 

Hector A. Munera, "A Semiclassical Model of the Photon Based on Objective Reality and Containing Longitudinal Field Components," p. 335-385.

 

Pal R. Molnar and Milan Meszaros, "Significance of the Sagnac Effect: Beyond the Contemporary Physics," p. 387-401.

 

Lawrence B. Crowell, "Non-Abelian Electrodynamics: Progress and Problems," p. 403-467.

 

A. Khovanov, D. G. Luchinsky, R. Manella, and P. V. E. McClintock, "Fluctuational Escape and Related Phenomena in Nonlinear Optical Systems," p. 469-524.

 

Donald Reed, "Beltrami Vector Fields in Electrodynamics a Reason for Reexamining the Structural Foundations of Classical Physics?," p. 525-569.

 

Sisir Roy, "Constancy of Velocity of Light and Stochastic Background," p. 571-621.

 

Harold L. Fox, "Energy for the Future: High-Density Charge Clusters," p. 623-653.

 

Petar K. Anastasovski and David B. Hamilton, "The Superluminal Theory and Effects," p. 655- 681.

 

Fabio Cardone and Roberto Mignani, "Superluminal Effects and Tachyon Theory," p. 683-698.

 

Terence W. Barrett, "Topological Approaches to Electromagnetism," p. 699-734.