|The Tom Bearden
© T. E. Bearden 2008
The use of negative energy EMP is a threat of even more orders of magnitude. It represents rather instant death to most things living, both animals and plants.
But our guys in officialdom
never even speak of negative energy EMP. Physics itself was
deliberately altered in 1934 to root this negative energy out of the
Dirac theory. Nonetheless, Dirac held firm for at least quantum
electrodynamics, with the exception of substituting the positron for
One will still need to note that the Casimir "statistical jiggling" energy of an observable particle is not the actual vacuum energy at all, but is the integrated result of the ongoing but incoherent massive reactions of the seething virtual state vacuum particles with that observable particle. It is the statistical summations of all those vast interactions. The source charge, on the other hand, serially absorbs single virtual photon after single virtual photon, changing each to an excitation in the charge's positive mass-energy, which is additive and thus grows coherently to quantum size. When quantum size is reached, the mass-energy excitation abruptly decays by emission of an observable (quantized) photon of energy.
By "tickling" the vacuum with a
"froth" of tiny-energy EMP pulses (as in the RF region—see
Kanzius's proven watergas process verified by a world expert in
water chemistry and also his cancer cure process now being proven by
an established research institute) you can create a froth of
"pop-outs" of electrons from the Dirac Sea vacuum. That's the
ordinary energy response. However, the "pop-outs" leave behind
The thing that so frightened the mathematical physicists in the late 1920s, about negative energy, was its associated negative probabilities. All "observables" may be modeled as being continuously created and sustained by ongoing positive-energy interactions (with their associated positive probabilities) in the underlying frenzied interactivity of the underlying statistical interactions ongoing in the virtual state vacuum. So in this model every "observable" is continually "happening" and continually sustained due to that set of underlying positive energy interactions and positive probabilities, all the way up from the primeval virtual state vacuum.
But if we now take something (say, the water molecules in a fixed container) and tickle that local vacuum in the container so that the local vacuum now contains a "froth" of negative energy (Dirac Sea holes with their concomitant negative energy EM fields and potentials), that froth of "negative energy and associated negative probabilities" is now added into that set of sustaining underlying statistical interactions that continually make that water molecule.
That starts the "highest positive energy" formations that are continually "happening" to also start "unhappening" simultaneously. So the O-H bond (formed when H2 oxidized in O2) as the "last positive energy thing" forming the water molecule) will start "unhappening". In short, the OH bonds will just start flatly disappearing at a steady rate. This is due to the direct interaction of the altered local vacuum with the water in it.
In the test vessel of water where one evokes this "negative energy froth" vacuum interaction, one thus starts "unhappening" the O-H bonds in the water molecules in that vessel. This in turn forms bubbles of released H2 and O2. And the hydrogen and oxygen bubbles are much less explosive or combustible in that "froth" container region, because in that region with its modified vacuum it is now much more difficult to form the O-H bond (i.e., to combust hydrogen) to form the water molecule.
But if we pipe those H2 and O2 bubbles a few inches away from the "negative energy frothed" container, and into the combustion chamber of a combustion engine, the bubbles are now back in a normal "positive energy" vacuum without all the "unhappening" going on. In this case, the negative probabilities are now gone, and the mixture is highly combustible. So it will burn right there in the chamber, powering the combustion engine and only emitting water vapor from the exhaust.
This is the mechanism actually used by the Kanzius watergas process (which apparently he is still unaware of).
Kanzius actually developed it as a cancer cure. If one focuses (using, e.g., nanocrystalline receiver materials around the cancer in the flesh) the negative energy/negative probabilities onto that cancer, it was and is the "highest positive energy" thing existing in that "container". And now it will start "unhappening" and just "fading away", due to the direct interaction of the "negative energy froth" of the vacuum in that region occupied by the tumor.
In phase one animal trials just completed, the research institute found that this process easily and quickly cured 100% of the tumors in the lab animals. Hopefully human tests will be next.
Egad! back in the late 1920s the leading mathematical physicists got the shock of their lives, when they saw that this meant we could judiciously combine the use of "negative energy froth" of the local vacuum to directly "engineer" physical reality itself. Eventually as the new "technology" is developed, we will be able to easily cure any disease—including the effects of aging—by properly "tailoring" the negative energy/negative probabilities characteristics of the local vacuua of the diseased body.
Tesla originally discovered negative energy before the term was even born. He called it "radiant energy" to differentiate its very different electromagnetic characteristics. Bedini in his beautiful battery-charging processes has been using negative energy for over 20 years, to "unhappen" the bad chemical effects (such as sulfation) previously accumulated in the battery, thus dramatically extending the lifetime and performance of the battery.
At any rate, in the late 1920s and early 1930s the leading mathematical physicists such as Heisenberg and Pauli beat the daylights out of any physicist—including Dirac himself—supporting this "negative energy/negative probabilities" thing, because it meant the ability to directly engineer physical reality itself. So in 1934 they arbitrarily and rather brutally forced it out of physics. Hotson has done a good job of revealing that suppression. Quoting Hotson:
So when one unleashes a vast pulse of EM energy (as in the normal EMP weapon) on a targeted city, one can arrange the weapon's construction and materials aspects to produce a vast set of sharper and smaller pulses that comprise the overall huge "EMP explosion". That giant "froth" of negative energy/negative probabilities striking the city becomes a negative energy EMP weapon, possessed now by several nations. Just about all life—both plant and animal—in a large city region struck by such a negative energy EMP weapon will suffer devastating "unhappening" in their inmost and deepest life processes. It's instant and total death for everything. It makes the old idea of a "death ray" pale by comparison.
As the study folks have shown, a normal "positive energy" EMP weapon is certainly terrible enough. And as the study group found, planning of what to do after such a strike is woefully deficient.
But a modified EMP weapon used to make a negative energy EMP strike is vastly more devastating to life itself and to the living things in that struck area. That may even include all the plants as well; their internal living processes get "unhappened" also.
Essentially all the living things will instantly become dead things, with not a whimper, movement, gasp, or other observable reaction.
That is the upper level of the "EMP weapon" threat against our nation and our cities. And sadly there is no planning at all for such negative EMP attack or attacks.
Negative EMP attacks can also be
done by modified longitudinal EM wave interferometers, in their
interference zone, and at least a dozen nations now possess such
interferometry weapons. Our weather over
If the same interferometers
diverging and steering our jet streams, big storms, and major
weather are also used in the negative energy EMP mode, they could
very simply devastate city after city, with shot after shot,
destroying not only the
And of course there has been no planning at all for such dire situations. So far as I'm aware, there is no defense at all against the formation of a sudden giant "negative energy froth" vacuum in which a large area is immersed. One could speak of "recovery" (actually, complete restoration from scratch) of such a single struck area, but how one would approach "restoration from scratch" of most of our population, crops, etc. is presently unknown.